Skip to main content
Log in

Environmental Pollution Liability Insurance in China: In Need of Strong Government Backing

  • Review
  • Published:
AMBIO Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Environmental pollution liability insurance was officially introduced in China only in 2006, as part of new market-based approaches for managing environmental risks. By 2012, trial applications of pollution insurance had been launched in 14 provinces and cities. More than ten insurance companies have entered the pollution insurance market with their own products and contracts. Companies in environmentally sensitive sectors and high-risk industries bought pollution insurance, and a few successful compensation cases have been reported. Still, pollution insurance faces a number of challenges in China. The absence of a national law weakens the legal basis of pollution insurance, and poor technical support stagnates further implementation. Moreover, current pollution insurance products have limited risk coverage, high premium rates, and low loss ratios, which make them fairly unattractive to polluters. Meanwhile, low awareness of environmental and social liabilities leads to limited demand for pollution insurance products by industrial companies. Hence, the pollution insurance market is not yet flourishing in China. To improve this situation, this economic instrument needs stronger backing by the Chinese state.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Loss ratio: in insurance, the loss ratio is the ratio of total losses incurred (paid and reserved) in claims, plus adjustment expenses, divided by the total earned premiums.

References

  • Abraham, K.S. 1986. Distributing risk: Insurance, legal theory, and public policy. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bie, T. 2008. Environmental pollution liability insurance in foreign countries. Qiu Shi. Retrieved March 3, 2008, from http://www.bizjournals.com/philadelphia/stories/2001/11/05/focus4.html (in Chinese).

  • Bie, T., and X. Fan. 2007. Comparative study on the international environmental pollution liability insurance systems. Insurance Studies 89–92 (in Chinese).

  • Chen, P. 2006. A study on the types of liability of the insurer for oil pollution and that of the party liable. In Prevention and compensation of marine pollution damage, recent developments in Europe, China and the US, ed. M.G. Faure, and J. Hu, 241–262. Alphen: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericson, R.V., A. Doyle, and D. Barry. 2003. Insurance as governance. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

  • Freeman, P.K., and H. Kunreuther. 1997. Managing environmental risk through insurance. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, P.K., and H. Kunreuther. 2003. Managing environmental risk through insurance. In Yearbook of environmental and resource economics, ed. T.T. Henk Folmer, 159–189. Glos: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao, J. 2010. Environmental pollution liability insurance have made positive progress in China. China Environment News. Retrieved September 20, 2010, from http://www.cenews.com.cn/xwzx/zhxw/ybyw/201009/t20100919_664056.html (in Chinese).

  • Goldman, P. 2006. Public interest environmental litigation in China: Lessons learned from the U.S. Experience. Vermont Journal of Environmental Law 8: 251–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, G., L. Zhang, Y. Lu, and A.P.J. Mol. 2011. Managing major chemical accidents in China: Towards effective risk information. Journal of Hazardous Materials 187: 171–181.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • He, G., Y. Lu, A.P.J. Mol, and T. Beckers. 2012. Changes and challenges of China’s environmental management. Environmental Development 3: 25–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hollaender, K., and M.A. Kaminsky. 2000. The past, present, and future of environmental insurance including a case study of MTBE litigation. Environmental Forensics 12: 205–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostka, G., and A.P.J. Mol. 2013. Implementation and participation in China’s local environmental politics: Challenges and innovations. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 15: 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levmore, S., and K.D. Logue. 2003. Insuring against terrorism—and crime. Michigan Law and Economics Research Paper No. 03-005; U of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper No. 47; U Chicago Law & Econ, Olin Working Paper No. 189. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=414144 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.414144.

  • Lin, Q. 2010. The role of government in environmental pollution liability insurance. Popular Business 320 (in Chinese).

  • Liu, Y. 1996. The states and prospect of pollution liability insurance in China. China Environment Management 16–18 (in Chinese).

  • Liu, C., and A.R.B. Chik. 2012. Reasons for insufficient demand of environmental liability insurance in China: A case study of Baoding, Hebei Province. Asian Social Science 8: 201–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Y., S. Xue, P. Bai, X. Huo, and X. Bian. 2012. Investment analysis report on insurance industry in China (2012–2016). China Investment Consultant Company (in Chinese).

  • MEP. 2011. Circular on enhancing pollution prevention in lead-acid storage batteries and lead recovery industries. MEP.

  • MEP and IRC. 2007. The guidelines on environmental pollution liability insurance. MEP.

  • Minoli, D.M., and J.N.B. Bell. 2002. Insurance as an alternative environmental regulator: findings from a retrospective pollution claims survey. Business Strategy and the Environment 12: 107–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mol, A.P.J., and N.T. Carter. 2006. China’s environmental governance in transition. Environmental Politics 15: 149–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PRCEE. 2011. The development report of environmental pollution liability insurance in China. PRCEE.

  • Priest, G.L. 1987. The current insurance crisis and modern Tort law. The Yale Law Journal 96: 1521–1590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sankar, U. 1998. Laws and institutions relating to environmental protection in India. In The role of law and legal institutions in Asian economic development. Rotterdam: Erasmus University.

  • SCPC, L. 2008. Regulations on pollution prevention and control of hazardous waste. SCPC.

  • Shavell, S. 1979. On moral hazard and insurance. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 93: 541–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, A. 2001. Pollution insurance growing in popularity. Philadelphia Business Journal. Retrieved Nov 5, 2001, from http://www.bizjournals.com/philadelphia/stories/2001/11/05/focus4.html.

  • Van Rooij, B., A.L. Wainwright, Y. Wu, and Y.A. Zhang. 2012. The compensation trap: The limits of community-based pollution regulation in China. Pace Environmental Law Review 29: 701–745.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Netherlands Royal Academy of Arts and Sciences and the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Project No. 10CDP030).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yonglong Lu.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 236 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Feng, Y., Mol, A.P.J., Lu, Y. et al. Environmental Pollution Liability Insurance in China: In Need of Strong Government Backing. AMBIO 43, 687–702 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-013-0436-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-013-0436-0

Keywords

Navigation