Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mekong at the Crossroads: Next Steps for Impact Assessment of Large Dams

  • Synopsis
  • Published:
AMBIO Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

  • Adamson, P.T. 2001. Hydrological perspectives on the Lower Mekong Basin—the potential impacts of hydropower developments in Yunnan on the downstream flow regime. International Water Power and Dam Construction 53: 16–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • ADB. 2004. Cumulative impact analysis and Nam Theun 2 contributions: Final report. Asian Development Bank (ADB). Vientiane: Lao PDR.

    Google Scholar 

  • ADB. 2008. Preparing the cumulative impact assessment for the Nam Ngum 3 Hydropower Project, prepared by Vattenfall Power Consultant AB in Association with Ramboll Natura AB and Earth Systems Lao. Asian Development Bank (ADB).

  • Arthur, R.I., and R.M. Friend. 2011. Inland capture fisheries in the Mekong and their place and potential within food-led regional development. Global Environmental Change 21: 219–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bäckstrand, K. 2003. Civic science for sustainability: Reframing the role of experts, policy-makers and citizens in environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics 3: 24–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R., I. Kubiszewski, P. Paquet, J. King, S. Halimi, H. Sanguanngoi, N.L. Bach, and R. Frankel et al. 2011. Planning approaches for water resources development in the Lower Mekong Basin. Portland State University and Mae Fah Luang University.

  • Dugan, P.J., C. Barlow, A.A. Agostinho, E. Baran, G.F. Cada, D. Chen, I.G. Cowx, J.W. Ferguson, et al. 2010. Fish migration, dams, and loss of ecosystem services in the Mekong Basin. AMBIO 39: 344–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grumbine, R.E., and J. Xu. 2011. Mekong hydropower development. Science 332: 178–179.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ICEM. 2010. MRC strategic environmental assessment of hydropower on the Mekong Mainstream. Hanoi: International Centre for Environmental Management (ICEM).

    Google Scholar 

  • IHA. 2010. Hydropower sustainability assessment protocol. London: International Hydropower Association (IHA).

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC. 2007. Climate change 2007—the physical science basis. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • IUCN. 2005. Thai Baan research on the ecology and local history of the seasonally-flooded forest in the Lower Songkhram River Basin. Bangkok: Mekong Wetlands Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Use Programme, International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, S. 1990. The fifth branch: Science advisors as policymakers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R., and M. Kummu. 2012. Water resource models in the Mekong Basin: A review. Water Resources Management 26: 429–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Käkönen, M., and P. Hirsch. 2009. The anti-politics of Mekong knowledge production. In Contested waterscapes in the Mekong Region—hydropower, livelihoods and governance, ed. F. Molle, T. Foran, and M. Käkönen. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keskinen, M. 2008. Water resources development and impact assessment in the Mekong Basin: Which way to go? AMBIO 37: 193–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keskinen, M., and M. Kummu. 2010. Impact assessment in the Mekong—review of Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) & Cumulative Impact Assessment (CIA). Espoo: Aalto University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keskinen, M., M. Kummu, M. Käkönen, and O. Varis. 2012. Mekong at the crossroads: Alternative paths of water development and impact assessment. In Politics and development in a trans-boundary watershed—the case of the Lower Mekong Basin, ed. J. Öjendal, S. Hansson, and S. Hellberg. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kummu, M., and J. Sarkkula. 2008. Impact of the Mekong River flow alteration on the Tonle Sap flood pulse. AMBIO 37: 185–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kummu, M., M. Keskinen, and O. Varis (eds.). 2008. Mekong at the crossroads. AMBIO 37: 146–149.

  • Lamberts, D. 2008. Little impact, much damage; the consequences of Mekong River flow alterations for the Tonle Sap ecosystem. In Modern myths of the Mekong—a critical review of water and development concepts, principles and policies, ed. M. Kummu, M. Keskinen, and O. Varis. Espoo: Aalto University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamberts, D., and J. Koponen. 2008. Flood pulse alterations and productivity of the Tonle Sap ecosystem: A model for impact assessment. AMBIO 37: 178–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, K., N. Badenoch, N. Dao, and B.P. Resurreccion (eds.). 2011. Water rights and social justice in the Mekong Region. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • MEA. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA). Washington: Island Press.

  • Molle, F., T. Foran, and M. Käkönen (eds.). 2009. Contested waterscapes in the Mekong Region—hydropower, livelihoods and governance. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • MONRE. 2012. Study of the impacts of mainstream hydropower on the Mekong Delta, request for expression of interest. Hanoi: Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment of Vietnam (MONRE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, D., J. Dore, and D. Gyawali. 2010. The World Commission on dams + 10: Revisiting the large dam controversy. Water Alternatives 3: 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • MRC. 2006. Integrated basin flow management: Report no. 8—flow-regime assessment. Mekong River Commission (MRC). Vientiane: Lao PDR.

  • MRC. 2008. Catch & culture, 14: 3. Mekong River Commission (MRC). Vientiane: Lao PDR.

  • MRC. 2010. Assessment of basin-wide development scenarios—main report. Mekong River Commission (MRC). Vientiane: Lao PDR.

  • MRC. 2011a. Lower Mekong countries take prior consultation on Xayaburi Project to ministerial level. MRC Media Release. Mekong River Commission (MRC). Vientiane: Lao PDR.

  • MRC. 2011b. Further study on impact of mekong mainstream development to be conducted, say Lower Mekong Countries. MRC Media Release. Mekong River Commission (MRC). Vientiane: Lao PDR.

  • MRCS/WUP-FIN. 2007. Final report—part 2: Research findings and recommendations. WUP-FIN Phase 2, MRC Secretariat (MRCS) and Finnish Environment Institute Consultancy Consortium. Vientiane: Lao PDR.

  • Sarkkula, J., M. Keskinen, J. Koponen, M. Kummu, J. Nikula, O. Varis, and M. Virtanen. 2007. Mathematical modeling in integrated management of water resources: Magical tool, mathematical toy or something in between? In Democratizing water governance in the Mekong Region, ed. L. Lebel, J. Dore, R. Daniel, and Y.S. Koma. Chiang Mai: Mekong Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, R. 2011. Mayhem on the Mekong. News focus. Science 333: 814–818.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • WCD. 2000. Dams and development—a new framework for decision-making. World Commission on Dams (WCD). London: Earthscan.

  • World Bank. 2004. Modelled observations on development scenarios in the Lower Mekong Basin. World Bank. Vientiane: Lao PDR.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank their numerous colleagues working on the Mekong for inspiring discussions. Juha Sarkkula and Jorma Koponen are specially thanked for their collaboration with the impact assessment work, and John Dore for useful comments. The authors also thank their wonderful colleagues at Aalto University’s Water & Development Research Group. The work was funded by Academy of Finland Project 133748.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Water & Development Research Group, Aalto University, PO Box 15200, 00076, Aalto, Finland

    Marko Keskinen, Matti Kummu & Olli Varis

  2. Finland Futures Research Center, University of Turku, Korkeavuorenkatu 25 A 2, 00130, Helsinki, Finland

    Mira Käkönen

Authors
  1. Marko Keskinen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Matti Kummu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mira Käkönen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Olli Varis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marko Keskinen.

Additional information

This synopsis was not peer reviewed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keskinen, M., Kummu, M., Käkönen, M. et al. Mekong at the Crossroads: Next Steps for Impact Assessment of Large Dams. AMBIO 41, 319–324 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-012-0261-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-012-0261-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation