Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Influence of Traffic Noise on Vertebrate Road Crossing Through Underpasses

  • Report
  • Published:
AMBIO Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Noise produces multiple effects on ecosystems and it influences habitat use by vertebrates near roads. Thus, it may reduce the effectiveness of mitigation measures installed on roads to alleviate population fragmentation. This study analyses the effects of noise on the use by vertebrates of 19 underpasses at a motorway. It employs generalised linear models to test the effect of three noise indicators at the underpasses and in their vicinity on the crossing frequency of eight animal species. The results show that the road crossings are subjected to high and variable noise levels. Nevertheless, there is no consistent response to noise by vertebrates. This suggests that wildlife use of underpasses is determined more by habitat characteristics than by the levels of noise tolerated. The conclusion is that noise abatement measures on roads in areas of faunal sensitivity should focus on general noise reduction rather than on making individual crossing places quieter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, A.B., and C.N. Jenkins. 2006. Applying nature design. Corridors as a strategy for biodiversity conservation. New York, USA: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, J.R., K.R. Crooks, and K.M. Fristrup. 2010. The costs of chronic noise exposure for terrestrial organisms. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 25: 180–189. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.08.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barreto, G.P., S.P. Rushton, R. Strachan, and D.W. Macdonald. 1998. The role of habitat and mink predation in determining the status and distribution of water voles in England. Animal Conservation 1: 129–137. doi:10.1111/j.1469-1795.1998.tb00020.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blickley, J.L., and G.L. Patricelli. 2010. Impacts of anthropogenic noise on wildlife: Research priorities for the development of standards and mitigation. Journal of International Wildlife Law & Policy 13: 274–292. doi:10.1080/13880292.2010.524556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brüel & Kjaer. 2005. Predictor Type 7810 Version 5.0 Technical documentation and user manual. Naerum, Denmark: Brüel & Kjaer Sound and Vibration Measurement A/S.

  • Brumm, H., K. Voss, I. Köllmer, and D. Todt. 2007. Acoustic communication in noise: Regulation of call characteristics in a New World monkey. The Journal of Experimental Biology 207: 443–448. doi:10.1242/jeb.00768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, G.P., P.C.L. White, and S. Harris. 1998. Effects of roads on badger (Meles meles) populations in south-west England. Biological Conservation 86: 117–124. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(98)00018-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clevenger, A.P., and N. Waltho. 2000. Factors influencing the effectiveness of wildlife underpasses in Banff National Park, Alberta, Canada. Conservation Biology 14: 47–56. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.00099-085.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clevenger, A.P., and N. Waltho. 2005. Performance indices to identify attributes of highway crossing structures facilitating movement of large mammals. Biological Conservation 121: 453–464. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2004.04.025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clevenger, A.P., B. Chruszcz, and K. Gunson. 2001. Drainage culverts as habitat linkages and factors affecting passage by mammals. Journal of Applied Ecology 38: 1340–1349. doi:10.1046/j.0021-8901.2001.00678.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornillon, P.C., and M.A. Keane. 1977. Simple model for simulating traffic noise spectra. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 61: 739–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Díaz, J.A., and S. Cabezas-Díaz. 2004. Seasonal variation in the contribution of different behavioural mechanisms to lizard thermoregulation. Functional Ecology 18: 867–875. doi:10.1111/j.0269-8463.2004.00916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig, L., and T. Rytwinski. 2009. Effects of roads on animal abundance: An empirical review and synthesis. Ecology and Society 14(1): 21. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art21/. Accessed 18 January 2011.

  • Forman, R.T.T. 2000. Estimate of the area affected ecologically by the road system in the United States. Conservation Biology 14: 31–35. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99299.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman, R.T.T., and R.D. Deblinger. 2000. The ecological road-effect zone of a Massachusetts (USA) suburban highway. Conservation Biology 14: 36–46. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99088.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman, R.T.T., D. Sperling, J.A. Bissonette, A.P. Clevenger, C.D. Cutshall, V.H. Dale, L. Fahrig, R. France, et al. 2003. Road ecology. Science and solutions. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, C.D., C.P. Ortega, and A. Cruz. 2009. Noise pollution changes avian communities and species interactions. Current Biology 19: 1415–1419. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.06.052.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gagnon, J.W., T.C. Theimer, N.L. Dodd, S. Boe, and R.E. Schweinsburg. 2007. Traffic volume alters elk distribution and highway crossings in Arizona. Journal of Wildlife Management 71: 2318–2323. doi:10.2193/2006-224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glista, D.J., T.L. Devault, and J.A. Dewoody. 2009. A review of mitigation measures for reducing wildlife mortality on roadways. Landscape and Urban Planning 91: 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.11.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goerlitz, H.R., and B.M. Siemers. 2007. Sensory ecology of prey rustling sounds: Acoustical features and their classification by wild Grey Mouse Lemurs. Functional Ecology 21: 143–153. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2006.01212.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, A., H.J. Dickens, and R.J. Whelan. 1987. Movements of mammals through tunnels under railway lines. Australian Zoologist 24: 89–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iuell, B., G.J. Bekker, R. Cuperus, J. Dufek, G. Fry, C. Hicks, V. Hlaváč, V. Keller, et al. 2003. Wildlife and traffic: A European handbook for identifying conflicts and designing solutions. Brussels, Belgium: KNNV Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heffner, H.E. 1998. Auditory awareness. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 57: 259–268. doi:10.1016/S0168-1591(98)00101-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JCyL. 2007. Territorial information system of Castilla y León (GIS platform). Junta de Castilla y León. www.sitcyl.jcyl.es. Accessed 18 January 2011 (In Spanish).

  • Lodé, T. 2000. Effect of a motorway on mortality and isolation of wildlife populations. AMBIO 29: 163–166. doi:10.1579/0044-7447-29.3.163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, S.J., R.G. Harcourt, and A.P. Clevenger. 2002. Do wildlife passages act as prey-traps? Biological Conservation 107: 135–145. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00059-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, D.W., V.E. Sidorovich, E.I. Anisomova, N.V. Sidorovich, and P.J. Johnson. 2002. The impact of American mink Mustela vison and European mink Mustela lutreola on water voles Arvicola terrestris in Belarus. Ecography 25: 295–302. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0587.2002.250306.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mace, R.D., J.S. Waller, T.L. Manley, L.J. Lyon, and H. Zuuring. 1996. Relationships among grizzly bears, roads and habitat in the Swan Mountains, Montana. Journal of Applied Ecology 33: 1395–1404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mata, C., I. Hervás, J. Herranz, F. Suárez, and J.E. Malo. 2005. Complementary use by vertebrates of crossing structures along a fenced Spanish motorway. Biological Conservation 124: 397–405. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.01.044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mata, C., I. Hervás, J. Herranz, J.E. Malo, and F. Suárez. 2009a. Seasonal changes in wildlife use of motorway crossing structures and their implication for monitoring programmes. Transportation Research. Part D 14: 447–452. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2009.05.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mata, C., F. Suárez, and J.E. Malo. 2009b. Are wildlife crossing structures a good place to hunt? IX Jornadas de la SECEM. 4–7 diciembre 2009. Bilbao (in Spanish).

  • Minisiterio de Fomento. 2002. Traffic Maps 2002. CD-Rom Edition. Madrid: Ministerio de Fomento (in Spanish).

  • Minisiterio de Fomento. 2003. Traffic Maps 2003. CD-Rom Edition. Madrid: Ministerio de Fomento (in Spanish).

  • Ministerio de la Presidencia. 2007. Noise Spanish Ordinance.Real Decreto 1367/2007 por el que se desarrolla la Ley 37/2003, de 17 de noviembre, del Ruido, en lo referente a zonificación acústica, objetivos de calidad y emisiones acústicas. Boletín Oficial del Estado 254: 42952–42973 (in Spanish).

  • Ng, S.J., J.W. Dole, R.M. Sauvajot, S.P.D. Riley, and T.J. Valone. 2004. Use of highway undercrossings by wildlife in Southern California. Biological Conservation 115: 499–507. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00166-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palomo, L.J., J. Gisbert, and J.C. Blanco. 2007. Atlas and red list of the Spanish mammals. Madrid: Dirección General para la Biodiversidad-SECEM-SECEMU (in Spanish).

  • Parris, K.M., M. Velik-Lord, and J.M.A. North. 2009. Frogs call at a higher pitch in traffic noise. Ecology and Society 14: 25. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art25/. Accessed 18 Januray 2011.

  • Pater, L.L., T.G. Grubb, and D.K. Delaney. 2009. Recommendations for improved assessment of noise impacts on wildlife. Journal of Wildlife Management 73: 788–795. doi:10.2193/2006-235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peris, S., S. Mendes, and V. Colino. 2007. Wildboar (Sus scrofa) roadkills in Salamanca Province: Relationship between road type, landscape, noise and timing. Salamanca, Revista de Estudios 55: 365–379. (in Spanish).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, E.A. 1966. Hearing in the Lizard: Some comments on the auditory capacities of nonmammalian ear. Herpetologica 22: 161–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pungetti, G., and B. Romano. 2004. Planning the future landscape between nature and culture. In Ecological networks and greenways. Concept, design and implementation, ed. R. Jongman, and G. Pungetti, 107–127. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rabin, L.A., and C.M. Green. 2002. Changes to acoustic communication systems in human-altered environments. Journal of Comparative Psychology 116: 137–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabin, L.A., R.G. Cossb, and D.H. Owings. 2006. The effects of wind turbines on antipredator behavior in California ground squirrels (Spermophilus beecheyi). Biological Conservation 131: 410–420. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2006.02.016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reijnen, R., R. Foppen, C. Ter Brack, and J. Thissen. 1995. The effects of car traffic on breeding bird populations in woodland. III. Reduction of density in relation to the proximity of main roads. Journal of Applied Ecology 32: 187–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riitters, K.H., and J.D. Wickham. 2003. How far to the nearest road? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1: 125–129. doi:10.1890/1540-9295(2003)001[0125:HFTTNR]2.0.CO;2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roedenbeck, I.A., and P. Voser. 2008. Effects of roads on spatial distribution, abundance and mortality of brown hare (Lepus europaeus) in Switzerland. European Journal of Wildlife Research 54: 425–437. doi:10.1007/s10344-007-0166-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slabbekoorn, H., and M. Peet. 2003. Birds sing at a higher pitch in urban noise. Nature 424: 267. doi::10.1038/424267a.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slabbekoorn, H., and N. Bouton. 2008. Soundscape orientation: A new field in need of sound investigation. Animal Behaviour 76: e5–e8. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.06.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • StatSoft, Inc. 2002. STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 6. www.statsoft.com.

  • Thurber, J.M., R.O. Peterson, T.D. Drummer, and S.A. Thomasma. 1994. Gray wolf response to refuge boundaries and roads in Alaska. Wildlife Society Bulletin 22: 61–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torre, I., and M. Díaz. 2004. Small mammal abundance in Mediterranean post-fire habitats: A role for predators? Acta Oecologica 25: 137–143. doi:10.1016/j.actao.2003.10.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallet, M. 2001. Effects of noise on health. In Environmental urban noise, ed. A. García, 63–109. Billerica, Massachussetts, USA: WIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virgós, E. 2001. Role of isolation and habitat quality in shaping species abundance: a test with badgers (Meles meles L.) in a gradient of forest fragmentation. Journal of Biogeography 28: 381–389. doi/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2001.00552.x.

  • Zegel, W.C. 1997. Noise standards. In Environmental engineering’s handbook, ed. D.H.F. Liu, 201–204. Boca Raton, Florida, USA: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Traffic data were supplied by the Servicio de Informática y Kilometraje (Dirección General de Carreteras, Ministerio de Fomento). Data on underpass use were collected as part of a research agreement funded by the Centro de Estudios y Técnicas Aplicadas (CEDEX, Ministerio de Fomento). The researchers of the TEG-UAM benefit from the financial support of the REMEDINAL-2 network (Fondo Social Europeo-Comunidad de Madrid S-2009/AMB/1783).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan E. Malo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Iglesias, C., Mata, C. & Malo, J.E. The Influence of Traffic Noise on Vertebrate Road Crossing Through Underpasses. AMBIO 41, 193–201 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-011-0145-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-011-0145-5

Keywords

Navigation