Skip to main content
Log in

Multi-ego-centered communities in practice

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Social Network Analysis and Mining Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We propose here a framework to unfold the ego-centered community structure of a given node in a network. The framework is not based on the optimization of a quality function, but on the study of the irregularity of the decrease of a proximity measure. It is a practical use of the notion of multi-ego-centered community and we validate the pertinence of the approach on benchmarks and a real-world network of wikipedia pages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The idea that there are groups of nodes which are very connected to one-another, but loosely connected to the outside.

  2. For all experiments we used the proximity introduced in (Danisch et al. 2013a) called carryover opinion, however the framework is independent of the chosen proximity.

  3. This quantity measures to what extent a node is near from node1 AND node2. Doing the maximum of the proximities is not relevant for our problem, since this would unfold nodes that are part of a community of node1 OR node2, but doing the product of the scores could work too.

  4. For two sets \(A\) and \(B,\) the Jaccard similarity is given by \(Jac(A,B)=\frac{|A\cap B|}{|A\cup B|}.\)

  5. ChessBoxing is a sport mixing Chess and Boxing in alternated rounds.

  6. if A and B have the same size then, \(jac(A,B)>0.7\) iff A and B overlap at more than \(82.3\%.\) If \(A \subset B\) then, \(jac(A,B)>0.7\) iff \(|A|>0.7|B|.\)

References

  • Blondel VD, Guillaume J-L, Lambiotte R, Lefebvre E (2008) Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J Stat Mech: theory and experiment 2008(10):P10008

  • Chen J, Zaiane OR, Goebel R (2009) Local community identification in social networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advances in Social Network Analysis and Mining, 2009. ASONAM’09, pp 237–242

  • Clauset A (2005) Finding local community structure in networks. Phys Rev E 72:026132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danisch M, Guillaume J-L, Le Grand B (2013a) Towards multi-ego-centred communities: a node similarity approach. IJWBC 9(3):299–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Danisch M, Guillaume J-L, Le Grand B (2013b) Unfolding ego-centered community structures with a similarity approach. Complex networks IV, Springer, Berlin, pp 145–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans TS, Lambiotte R (2009) Line graphs, link partitions and overlapping communities. Phys Rev E 80:016105. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.80.016105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friggeri A, Chelius G, Fleury E (2011) Triangles to capture social cohesion, IEEE

  • Fortunato S (2010) Community detection in graphs. Phys Rep 486:75–174

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Girvan M, Newman MEJ (2002) Community structure in social and biological networks. PNAS 99(12):7821–7826

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Koren Y, North SC, Volinsky C (2007) Measuring and extracting proximity graphs in networks. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data (TKDD), 1, 3, 12 ACM.

  • Lancichinetti A, Fortunato S (2009) Benchmarks for testing community detection algorithms on directed and weighted graphs with overlapping communities. Phys Rev E 80(1):016118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo F, Wang JZ, Promislow E (2008) Exploring local community structures in large networks. Web Intell Agent Syst 6(4):387–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman MEJ (2006) Finding community structure in networks using the eigenvectors of matrices. Phys Rev E 74(3):036104

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngonmang B, Tchuente M, Viennet E (2012) Local community identification in social networks. Parallel Process Lett 22(1):1240004

    Google Scholar 

  • Palla G, Derenyi I, Farkas I, Vicsek T (2005) Uncovering the overlapping community structure of complex networks in nature and society. Nature 435(7043):814–818

    Google Scholar 

  • Palla G, Farkasl IJ, Pollner P, Derenyi I, Vicsek T (2008) Fundamental statistical features and self-similar properties of tagged networks. New J Phys 10(12):123026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sozio M, Gionis A (2010) The community-search problem and how to plan a successful cocktail party. In: Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, 939–948, 2010, ACM

  • Tong H, Faloutsos C (2006) Center-piece subgraphs: problem definition and fast solutions. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, 404–413, ACM

  • Tatti N, Gionis A (2013) Discovering nested communities. Machine learning and knowledge discovery in Databases. Springer, Berlin, 32–47

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported in part by the French National Research Agency contract CODDDE ANR-13-CORD-0017-01.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maximilien Danisch.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Social Systems as Complex Networks.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Danisch, M., Guillaume, JL. & Le Grand, B. Multi-ego-centered communities in practice. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 4, 180 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-014-0180-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-014-0180-x

Keywords

Navigation