Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Elevated growth differentiation factor 15 expression predicts poor prognosis in epithelial ovarian cancer patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Tumor Biology

An Erratum to this article was published on 12 March 2016

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the expression of growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) and explore its clinical significance in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients. The expression of GDF15 in EOC tissues and serum samples was evaluated using immunohistochemistry and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), respectively. The association of GDF15 expression with clinicopathologic parameters was analyzed. Survival time was assessed using the Kaplan–Meier technique and Cox regression model. Both in EOC tissues and serum, high GDF15 levels were obviously related with advanced International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, lymph node metastasis, ascites, and chemoresistance. Kaplan–Meier analysis indicated that EOC patients with high GDF15 expression showed poorer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that GDF15 expression was an independent predictor of PFS in EOC patients. Our study shows that elevated GDF15 expression was associated with poor prognosis in EOC patients. We suggest that GDF15 is a novel biomarker for the early detection of EOC, prediction of the response to chemotherapy, and screening for recurrence in EOC patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, et al. Cancer statistics, 2014. CACancer J Clin. 2014;64(1):9–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61(2):69–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gloss BS, Samimi G. Epigenetic biomarkers in epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer Lett. 2014;342(2):257–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Felder M, Kapur A, Gonzalez-Bosquet J, et al. MUC16 (CA125): tumor biomarker to cancer therapy, a work in progress. Mol Cancer. 2014;13:129.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Menczer J, Ben-Shem E, Golan A, et al. The significance of normal pretreatment levels of CA125 (<35 U/mL) in epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Rambam Maimonides Med J. 2015;6(1):e0005.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Cohen JG, White M, Cruz A, et al. In 2014, can we do better than CA125 in the early detection of ovarian cancer? World J Biol Chem. 2014;5(3):286–300.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Karam AK, Karlan BY. Ovarian cancer: the duplicity of CA125 measurement. Nature reviews. Clin Oncol. 2010;7(6):335–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Duffy MJ, Bonfrer JM, Kulpa J, et al. CA125 in ovarian cancer: European Group on Tumor Markers guidelines for clinical use. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2005;15(5):679–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ago T, Sadoshima J. GDF15, a cardioprotective TGF-beta superfamily protein. Circ Res. 2006;98(3):294–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Eling TE, Baek SJ, Shim M, et al. NSAID activated gene (NAG-1), a modulator of tumorigenesis. J Biochem Mol Biol. 2006;39(6):649–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Breit SN, Johnen H, Cook AD, et al. The TGF-beta superfamily cytokine, MIC-1/GDF15: a pleotrophic cytokine with roles in inflammation, cancer and metabolism. Growth Factors. 2011;29(5):187–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Brown DA, Ward RL, Buckhaults P, et al. MIC-1 serum level and genotype: associations with progress and prognosis of colorectal carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9(7):2642–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang G, Tan Q, Xie Y, et al. Variations in NAG-1 expression of human gastric carcinoma and normal gastric tissues. Exp Ther Med. 2014;7(1):241–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaur S, Chakraborty S, Baine MJ, et al. Potentials of plasma NGAL and MIC-1 as biomarker(s) in the diagnosis of lethal pancreatic cancer. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e55171.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Mehta RS, Song M, Bezawada N, et al. A prospective study of macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1 (MIC-1/GDF15) and risk of colorectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106(4):dju016.

  16. Marjono AB, Brown DA, Horton KE, et al. Macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1 in gestational tissues and maternal serum in normal and pre-eclamptic pregnancy. Placenta. 2003;24(1):100–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Koopmann J, Buckhaults P, Brown DA, et al. Serum macrophage inhibitory cytokine 1 as a marker of pancreatic and other periampullary cancers. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10(7):2386–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mutch DG, Prat J. 2014 FIGO staging for ovarian, fallopian tube and peritoneal cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;133(3):401–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kaku T, Watanabe S, Ohishi Y. [Pathology of ovarian cancer]. Nihon rinsho. Jap J Clin Med. 2012;70(l 4):512–516.

  20. Simon R, Mirlacher M, Sauter G. Immunohistochemical analysis of tissue microarrays. Methods Mol Biol. 2010;664:113–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Vaughan S, Coward JI, Bast Jr RC, et al. Rethinking ovarian cancer: recommendations for improving outcomes. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11(10):719–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Hogdall EV, Christensen L, Kjaer SK, et al. CA125 expression pattern, prognosis and correlation with serum CA125 in ovarian tumor patients. From The Danish "MALOVA" Ovarian Cancer Study. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;104(3):508–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nossov V, Amneus M, Su F, et al. The early detection of ovarian cancer: from traditional methods to proteomics. Can we really do better than serum CA-125? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(3):215–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Van Nagell Jr JR, Pavlik EJ. Ovarian cancer screening. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2012;55(1):43–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dorigo O, Berek JS. Personalizing CA125 levels for ovarian cancer screening. Cancer Prev Res. 2011;4(9):1356–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kang WD, Choi HS, Kim SM. Value of serum CA125 levels in patients with high-risk, early stage epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2010;116(1):57–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang X, Baek SJ, Eling TE. The diverse roles of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug activated gene (NAG-1/GDF15) in cancer. Biochem Pharmacol. 2013;85(5):597–606.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Xu J, Kimball TR, Lorenz JN, et al. GDF15/MIC-1 functions as a protective and antihypertrophic factor released from the myocardium in association with SMAD protein activation. Circ Res. 2006;98(3):342–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Buckhaults P, Rago C, Croix BS, et al. Secreted and cell surface genes expressed in benign and malignant colorectal tumors. Cancer Res. 2001;61(19):6996–7001.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Park JY, Park KH, Bang S, et al. Expression of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-activated gene-1 (NAG-1) inversely correlates with tumor progression in gastric adenomas and carcinomas. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2008;134(9):1029–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Blanco-Calvo M, Tarrio N, Reboredo M, et al. Circulating levels of GDF15, MMP7 and miR-200c as a poor prognostic signature in gastric cancer. Future Oncol. 2014;10(7):1187–202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Schiegnitz E, Kammerer PW, Koch FP, et al. GDF 15 as an anti-apoptotic, diagnostic and prognostic marker in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2012;48(7):608–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Yang CZ, Ma J, Zhu DW, et al. GDF15 is a potential predictive biomarker for TPF induction chemotherapy and promotes tumorigenesis and progression in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(6):1215–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wallin U, Glimelius B, Jirstrom K, et al. Growth differentiation factor 15: a prognostic marker for recurrence in colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2011;104(10):1619–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Shnaper S, Desbaillets I, Brown DA, et al. Elevated levels of MIC-1/GDF15 in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients are associated with glioblastoma and worse outcome. Int J Cancer. 2009;125(11):2624–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Staff AC, Bock AJ, Becker C, et al. Growth differentiation factor-15 as a prognostic biomarker in ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2010;118(3):237–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Bock AJ, Stavnes HT, Kempf T, et al. Expression and clinical role of growth differentiation factor-15 in ovarian carcinoma effusions. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010;20(9):1448–55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Meier JC, Haendler B, Seidel H, et al. Knockdown of platinum-induced growth differentiation factor 15 abrogates p27-mediated tumor growth delay in the chemoresistant ovarian cancer model A2780cis. Cancer Med. 2015;4(2):253–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ying-qi Zhang or Jian Wang.

Additional information

Ying Zhang and Wei Hua contributed equally to this work.

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13277-016-5008-z.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Hua, W., Niu, Lc. et al. Elevated growth differentiation factor 15 expression predicts poor prognosis in epithelial ovarian cancer patients. Tumor Biol. 37, 9423–9431 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-015-4699-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-015-4699-x

Keywords

Navigation