Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Authentication of newly established human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cell line (YM-1) using short tandem repeat (STR) profiling method

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Tumor Biology

Abstract

Cross-contamination during or early after establishment of a new cell line could result in the worldwide spread of a misidentified cell line. Therefore, newly established cell lines need to be authenticated by a reference standard method. This study was conducted to investigate the authenticity of a newly established epithelial cell line of human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) called YM-1 using short tandem repeat (STR) DNA profiling method. Primary human ESCC epithelial cells were cultured from the fresh tumor tissue of an adult female patient. Growth characteristics and epithelial originality of YM-1 cells were studied. Genomic DNA was isolated from YM-1 cells harvested at passage 22 and ESCC donor tumor sample on two different days to prevent probable DNA contamination. STR profiling was performed using AmpFℓSTR® Identifiler® Plus PCR Amplification Kit. To address whether YM-1 cells undergo genetic alteration as the passage number increases, STR profiling was performed again on harvested cells at passage 51. YM-1 cells grew as a monolayer with a population doubling time of 40.66 h. Epithelial originality of YM-1 cells was confirmed using ICC/IF staining of cytokeratins AE1/AE3. The STR profile of the ESCC donor tumor sample was the same with YM-1 cells at passage 22. However, STR profile of the donor tumor sample showed an off-ladder (OL) allele in their D7S820 locus. Also, re-profiling of YM-1 cells at passage 51 showed a loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at D18S51 locus. This suggests that long-term culture of cell lines may alter their DNA profile. Comparison of the DNA fingerprinting results in DSMZ, and ATCC STR profiling databases confirmed unique identity of YM-1 cell line. This study provides an easy, fast, and reliable procedure for authentication of newly established cell lines, which helps in preventing the spread of misidentified cells and improving the reproducibility and validity of experiments, consequently.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boonstra JJ, van der Velden AW, Beerens EC, van Marion R, Morita-Fujimura Y, Matsui Y, et al. Mistaken identity of widely used esophageal adenocarcinoma cell line TE-7. Cancer Res. 2007;67:7996–8001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dirks WG, Faehnrich S, Estella IA, Drexler HG. Short tandem repeat DNA typing provides an international reference standard for authentication of human cell lines. ALTEX. 2005;22:103–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hughes P, Marshall D, Reid Y, Parkes H, Gelber C: The costs of using unauthenticated, over-passaged cell lines: how much more data do we need? Biotechniques 2007, 43:575, 577–578, 581–572 passim.

  4. van Staveren WC, Solis DY, Hebrant A, Detours V, Dumont JE, Maenhaut C. Human cancer cell lines: experimental models for cancer cells in situ? For cancer stem cells? Biochim Biophys Acta. 1795;2009:92–103.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Geraghty RJ, Capes-Davis A, Davis JM, Downward J, Freshney RI, Knezevic I, et al. Guidelines for the use of cell lines in biomedical research. Br J Cancer. 2014;111:1021–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Masters JR, Thomson JA, Daly-Burns B, Reid YA, Dirks WG, Packer P, et al. Short tandem repeat profiling provides an international reference standard for human cell lines. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:8012–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Chatterjee R. Cell biology. Cases of mistaken identity. Science. 2007;315:928–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Parson W, Kirchebner R, Muhlmann R, Renner K, Kofler A, Schmidt S, et al. Cancer cell line identification by short tandem repeat profiling: power and limitations. FASEB J. 2005;19:434–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nims RW, Sykes G, Cottrill K, Ikonomi P, Elmore E. Short tandem repeat profiling: part of an overall strategy for reducing the frequency of cell misidentification. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2010;46:811–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Cell line misidentification: the beginning of the end. Nat Rev Cancer 2010, 10:441–448.

  11. Capes-Davis A, Theodosopoulos G, Atkin I, Drexler HG, Kohara A, MacLeod RA, et al. Check your cultures! A list of cross-contaminated or misidentified cell lines. Int J Cancer. 2010;127:1–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gartler SM. Genetic markers as tracers in cell culture. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1967;26:167–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Masters JR, Bedford P, Kearney A, Povey S, Franks LM. Bladder cancer cell line cross-contamination: identification using a locus-specific minisatellite probe. Br J Cancer. 1988;57:284–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Thacker J, Webb MB, Debenham PG. Fingerprinting cell lines: use of human hypervariable DNA probes to characterize mammalian cell cultures. Somat Cell Mol Genet. 1988;14:519–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. King BL, Lichtenstein A, Berenson J, Kacinski BM. A polymerase chain reaction-based microsatellite typing assay used for tumor cell line identification. Am J Pathol. 1994;144:486–91.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Reid Y, Storts D, Riss T, Minor L: Authentication of human cell lines by STR DNA profiling analysis. 2004.

  17. Boonstra JJ, van Marion R, Beer DG, Lin L, Chaves P, Ribeiro C, et al. Verification and unmasking of widely used human esophageal adenocarcinoma cell lines. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102:271–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Langdon SP: Cancer cell culture. Methods and protocols. Humana Press Inc, Totowa, NJ 2004, 88:83–85.

  19. Langdon SP. Basic principles of cancer cell culture. Methods and protocols. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press Inc; 2004. 88:pp 114.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hu Y, Lam KY, Wan TS, Fang W, Ma ES, Chan LC, et al. Establishment and characterization of HKESC-1, a new cancer cell line from human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2000;118:112–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shimada Y, Imamura M, Wagata T, Yamaguchi N, Tobe T. Characterization of 21 newly established esophageal cancer cell lines. Cancer. 1992;69:277–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cheung LC, Tang JC, Lee PY, Hu L, Guan XY, Tang WK, et al. Establishment and characterization of a new xenograft-derived human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cell line HKESC-4 of Chinese origin. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2007;178:17–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hu YC, Lam KY, Law SY, Wan TS, Ma ES, Kwong YL, et al. Establishment, characterization, karyotyping, and comparative genomic hybridization analysis of HKESC-2 and HKESC-3: two newly established human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cell lines. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2002;135:120–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Drexler HG, Dirks WG, Matsuo Y, MacLeod RA. False leukemia-lymphoma cell lines: an update on over 500 cell lines. Leukemia. 2003;17:416–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Schweppe RE, Klopper JP, Korch C, Pugazhenthi U, Benezra M, Knauf JA, et al. Deoxyribonucleic acid profiling analysis of 40 human thyroid cancer cell lines reveals cross-contamination resulting in cell line redundancy and misidentification. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93:4331–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. van Helden PD, Wiid IJ, Albrecht CF, Theron E, Thornley AL, Hoal-van Helden EG. Cross-contamination of human esophageal squamous carcinoma cell lines detected by DNA fingerprint analysis. Cancer Res. 1988;48:5660–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Budowle B, Moretti TR, Niezgoda SJ, Brown BL: CODIS and PCR-based short tandem repeat loci: law enforcement tools. Second European Symposium on Human Identification 1998:73–88.

  28. Vauhkonen H, Hedman M, Vauhkonen M, Kataja M, Sipponen P, Sajantila A. Evaluation of gastrointestinal cancer tissues as a source of genetic information for forensic investigations by using STRs. Forensic Sci Int. 2004;139:159–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. American National Standards Institute. Authentication of human cell lines: standardization of STR profiling. ANSI/ATCC ASN-0002-2011. http://webstore.ansi.org. 2011.

  30. Lorenzi PL, Reinhold WC, Varma S, Hutchinson AA, Pommier Y, Chanock SJ, et al. DNA fingerprinting of the NCI-60 cell line panel. Mol Cancer Ther. 2009;8:713–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Sirus Zeinali and colleagues for their assistance in STR profiling, Dr. Ali Arian-Nia for esophageal tumor samples, Mrs. Marie Saghaeian Jazi for technical assistance, and Mr. Saeed Mohammadi and Mr. Kamaleddin Mir-Karimi for editing the manuscript. Special thanks to the woman with esophageal cancer who participated in this study. This work was supported by the Golestan University of Medical Sciences (research grant no 920723102).

Compliance with ethical standards

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Golestan University of Medical Sciences and written informed consent was obtained from the patient.

Conflicts of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Asadi Jahanbakhsh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ayyoob, K., Masoud, K., Vahideh, K. et al. Authentication of newly established human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cell line (YM-1) using short tandem repeat (STR) profiling method. Tumor Biol. 37, 3197–3204 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-015-4133-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-015-4133-4

Keywords

Navigation