Abstract
No ideal serum markers for gastric cancer (GC) screening have been identified. The aim of this study was to determine the usefulness of endothelial cell-specific molecule-1 (ESM-1) as a serum marker for GC. The ESM-1 levels in serum specimens from 114 patients with GC and 55 health subjects were measured using a sandwich ELISA kit. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was calculated to assess the diagnostic value of ESM-1. Survival curves by the Kaplan-Meier method were plotted to display overall survival distributions. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to assess independent prognostic factors for overall survival in GC. We showed that the ESM-1 levels in the serum of patients with GC (83.7 ± 16.2 pg/mL) were significantly elevated compared to health subjects (44.7 ± 16.4 pg/mL). The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of ESM-1 for GC were 0.946, 98, and 80 %, respectively, by ROC curve analysis. The positive and negative predictive values were 91 and 93.6 %, respectively. The likelihood ratios of a positive or negative test result were 20.9 and 0.14, respectively. When analyzed with a Cox regression model, a higher serum ESM-1 level (≥84.2 pg/mL) was correlated with poor prognosis. This study suggests that serum ESM-1 level is increased in patients with GC and that ESM-1 can be used as a potential serum marker for early detection and prognosis evaluation of GC.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90.
Yeh JM, Goldie SJ, Kuntz KM, Ezzati M. Effects of Helicobacter pylori infection and smoking on gastric cancer incidence in China: a population-level analysis of trends and projections. Cancer Causes Control. 2009;20:2021–9.
Shimada H, Noie T, Ohashi M, Oba K, Takahashi Y. Clinical significance of serum tumor markers for gastric cancer: a systematic review of literature by the Task Force of the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Gastric Cancer. 2014;17:26–33.
Wanebo HJ, Kennedy BJ, Chmiel J, Steele Jr G, Winchester D, Osteen R. Cancer of the stomach. A patient care study by the American College of Surgeons. Ann Surg. 1993;218:583–92.
Lassalle P, Molet S, Janin A, Heyden JV, Tavernier J, Fiers W, et al. ESM-1 is a novel human endothelial cell-specific molecule expressed in lung and regulated by cytokines. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:20458–64.
Bechard D, Meignin V, Scherpereel A, Oudin S, Kervoaze G, Bertheau P, et al. Characterization of the secreted form of endothelial-cell-specific molecule 1 by specific monoclonal antibodies. J Vasc Res. 2000;37:417–25.
Sarrazin S, Adam E, Lyon M, Depontieu F, Motte V, Landolfi C, et al. Endocan or endothelial cell specific molecule-1 (ESM-1): a potential novel endothelial cell marker and a new target for cancer therapy. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006;1765:25–37.
Grigoriu BD, Depontieu F, Scherpereel A, Gourcerol D, Devos P, Ouatas T, et al. Endocan expression and relationship with survival in human non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:4575–82.
Leroy X, Aubert S, Zini L, Franquet H, Kervoaze G, Villers A, et al. Vascular endocan (ESM-1) is markedly overexpressed in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Histopathology. 2010;56:180–7.
Ji NY, Kim YH, Jang YJ, Kang YH, Lee CI, Kim JW, et al. Identification of endothelial cell-specific molecule-1 as a potential serum marker for colorectal cancer. Cancer Sci. 2010;101:2248–53.
Liu N, Zhang LH, Du H, Hu Y, Zhang GG, Wang XH, et al. Overexpression of endothelial cell specific molecule-1 (ESM-1) in gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:2628–39.
Tanigawa N, Amaya H, Matsumura M, Lu C, Iki M. Association between tumor angiogenesis and Borrmann type 4 carcinomas of the stomach. Oncology. 1998;55:461–7.
Akobeng AK. Understanding diagnostic tests 3: receiver operating characteristic curves. Acta Paediatr. 2007;96:644–7.
Akobeng AK. Understanding diagnostic tests 1: sensitivity, specificity and predictive values. Acta Paediatr. 2007;96:338–41.
Akobeng AK. Understanding diagnostic tests 2: likelihood ratios, pre- and post-test probabilities and their use in clinical practice. Acta Paediatr. 2007;96:487–91.
Scherpereel A, Gentina T, Grigoriu B, Sénéchal S, Janin A, Tsicopoulos A, et al. Overexpression of endocan induces tumor formation. Cancer Res. 2003;63:6084–9.
Huang GW, Tao YM, Ding X. Endocan expression correlated with poor survival in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Dig Dis Sci. 2009;54:389–94.
Kunisaki C, Akiyama H, Nomura M, Matsuda G, Otsuka Y, Ono HA, et al. Clinicopathological properties of poorly-differentiated adenocarcinoma of the stomach: comparison of solid- and non-solid-types. Anticancer Res. 2006;26:639–46.
Zuo L, Zhang SM, Hu RL, Zhu HQ, Zhou Q, Gui SY, et al. Correlation between expression and differentiation of endocan in colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:4562–8.
Wobbes T, Thomas CM, Segers MF, Nagengast FM. Evaluation of seven tumor markers (CA 50, CA 19–9, CA 19–9 TruQuant, CA 72–4, CA 195, carcinoembryonic antigen, and tissue polypeptide antigen) in the pretreatment sera of patients with gastric carcinoma. Cancer. 1992;69:2036–41.
Acknowledgments
No funding was received for the present study. We would like to thank Yifei Zhang for helping collecting the clinical data.
Conflicts of interest
None
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Fig. S1
Serum concentration and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). (a) Serum CEA levels in normal subjects (N) and in patients with GC. (b) Serum CEA levels in normal individuals (N), patients with early stage GC (stage I/II), and patients with late stage GC (stage III/IV). (c) The ROC curve for CEA in serum collected from patients with GC and health subjects. (GIF 59 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lv, Z., Fan, Y., Chen, H. et al. Endothelial cell-specific molecule-1: a potential serum marker for gastric cancer. Tumor Biol. 35, 10497–10502 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-014-2319-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-014-2319-9