Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Prognostic significance of USP10 as a tumor-associated marker in gastric carcinoma

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Tumor Biology

Abstract

Ubiquitin-specific protease 10 (USP10), a novel deubiquitinating enzyme, had been associated with growth of tumor cell. However, the role of USP10 in gastric cancer carcinogenesis had not been elucidated yet. The aim of this study was to investigate the expression level of USP10 in gastric carcinoma (GC) tissues and cell lines, then to evaluate the clinical significance of USP10 in GC patients. USP10, E-cadherin, Ki67 and p53 expressions were detected in 365 GC and 40 non-cancerous mucosa tissues by immunohistochemistry. Western blot for USP10 was performed on additional fresh GC tissues and GC cell lines. The expression level of USP10 in GC tissues was proved lower than that in non-cancerous mucosa tissues (p < 0.05). It was also lower in GC cell lines (AGS, BGC-823 and MKN45 cells) than that in gastric epithelial immortalized cell line (GES-1). Clinicopathological analysis showed that USP10 expression was negatively correlated with gastric wall invasion (p = 0.009), nodal metastasis (p = 0.002), and TNM stage (p = 0.000). In contrast, a positively correlation between the expression of USP10 and E-cadherin was found (p < 0.05), but there was no relationship proved between Ki67, p53 and USP10 (p > 0.05). On the Kaplan–Meier survival curves, we found poor prognosis in GC patients was associated with negative USP10 expression (p < 0.05). Moreover, USP10 expression was an independent prognostic factor for the overall survival in multivariate analysis. Our findings suggested that USP10 was an independent predictor of prognosis of GC patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AR:

Androgen receptor

DUBs:

Deubiquitinases

G3BP:

Ras-GAP SH3 domain binding protein

GC:

Gastric carcinoma

IHC:

Immunohistochemistry

PHLPP:

PH domain leucine-rich-repeats protein phosphatase

SDS-PAGE:

Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

USPs:

Ubiquitin-specific proteases

USP10:

Ubiquitin-specific protease 10

USP18:

Ubiquitin-specific protease 18

USP2a:

Ubiquitin-specific protease 2a

USP22:

Ubiquitin-specific protease 22

USP46:

Ubiquitin-specific protease 46

Reference

  1. Nijman SM, Luna-Vargas MP, Velds A, Brummelkamp TR, Dirac AM, Sixma TK, et al. A genomic and functional inventory of deubiquitinating enzymes. Cell. 2005;123(5):773–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Daviet L, Colland F. Targeting ubiquitin specific proteases for drug discovery. Biochimie. 2008;90(2):270–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Santin I, Moore F, Grieco FA, Marchetti P, Brancolini C, Eizirik DL. USP18 is a key regulator of the interferon-driven gene network modulating pancreatic beta cell inflammation and apoptosis. Cell Death Dis. 2012;3:e419.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tong X, Buelow K, Guha A, Rausch R, Yin L. USP2a protein deubiquitinates and stabilizes the circadian protein CRY1 in response to inflammatory signals. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(30):25280–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Li X, Stevens PD, Yang H, Gulhati P, Wang W, Evers BM, et al. The deubiquitination enzyme USP46 functions as a tumor suppressor by controlling PHLPP-dependent attenuation of Akt signaling in colon cancer. Oncogene. 2013;32(4):471–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Piao S, Liu Y, Hu J, Guo F, Ma J, Sun Y, et al. USP22 is useful as a novel molecular marker for predicting disease progression and patient prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42540.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang H, Li YP, Chen JH, Yuan SF, Wang L, Zhang JL, et al. Prognostic significance of USP22 as an oncogene in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Tumour Biol. 2013;34(3):1635–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Soncini C, Berdo I, Draetta G. Ras-GAP SH3 domain binding protein (G3BP) is a modulator of USP10, a novel human ubiquitin specific protease. Oncogene. 2001;20(29):3869–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Faus H, Meyer HA, Huber M, Bahr I, Haendler B. The ubiquitin-specific protease USP10 modulates androgen receptor function. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2005;245(1–2):138–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bomberger JM, Barnaby RL, Stanton BA. The deubiquitinating enzyme USP10 regulates the endocytic recycling of CFTR in airway epithelial cells. Channels (Austin). 2010;4(3):150–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bomberger JM, Barnaby RL, Stanton BA. The deubiquitinating enzyme USP10 regulates the post-endocytic sorting of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator in airway epithelial cells. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(28):18778–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yuan J, Luo K, Zhang L, Cheville JC, Lou Z. USP10 regulates p53 localization and stability by deubiquitinating p53. Cell. 2010;140(3):384–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Deng S, Zhou H, Xiong R, Lu Y, Yan D, Xing T, et al. Over-expression of genes and proteins of ubiquitin specific peptidases (USPs) and proteasome subunits (PSs) in breast cancer tissue observed by the methods of RFDD-PCR and proteomics. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007;104(1):21–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Grunda JM, Nabors LB, Palmer CA, Chhieng DC, Steg A, Mikkelsen T, et al. Increased expression of thymidylate synthetase (TS), ubiquitin specific protease 10 (USP10) and survivin is associated with poor survival in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). J Neurooncol. 2006;80(3):261–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61(2):69–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Song LJ, Liu RJ, Zeng Z, Alper SL, Cui HJ, Lu Y, et al. Gastrin inhibits a novel, pathological colon cancer signaling pathway involving EGR1, AE2, and P-ERK. J Mol Med (Berl). 2012;90(6):707–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zheng Y, Wang L, Zhang JP, Yang JY, Zhao ZM, Zhang XY. Expression of p53, c-erbB-2 and Ki67 in intestinal metaplasia and gastric carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16(3):339–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ohno T, Aihara R, Kamiyama Y, Mochiki E, Asao T, Kuwano H. Prognostic significance of combined expression of MUC1 and adhesion molecules in advanced gastric cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42(2):256–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shen WW, Zeng Z, Zhu WX, Fu GH. MiR-142-3p functions as a tumor suppressor by targeting CD133, ABCG2, and Lgr5 in colon cancer cells. J Mol Med (Berl). 2013. doi:10.1007/s00109-013-1037-x.

  20. Sun GY, Wu JX, Wu JS, Pan YT, Jin R. Caveolin-1, E-cadherin and beta-catenin in gastric carcinoma, precancerous tissues and chronic non-atrophic gastritis. Chin J Cancer Res. 2012;24(1):23–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fenoglio-Preiser CM, Wang J, Stemmermann GN, Noffsinger A. TP53 and gastric carcinoma: a review. Hum Mutat. 2003;21(3):258–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cheng LL, Itahana Y, Lei ZD, Chia NY, Wu Y, Yu Y, et al. TP53 genomic status regulates sensitivity of gastric cancer cells to the histone methylation inhibitor 3-deazaneplanocin A (DZNep). Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(15):4201–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported in part by grants from Hubei Provincial Health Department Fund (Grant no. JX5B17). The authors are grateful to Mrs. Ying Chen and Mrs. Hong Hu for the excellent support in laboratory work.

Conflicts of interests

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Pathology Center, Shanghai First People`s Hospital / Faculty of Basic Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Number 280, South Chong-Qing Road, Shanghai, 200025, China

    Zhi Zeng & Guo-Hui Fu

  2. Department of Pathology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430060, Hubei, China

    Zhi Zeng, Na Zhan, Ya-Bing Huang & Ze-Sheng Wang

  3. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430060, Hubei, China

    Hong-Xue Wu

  4. Department of Pathology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, Hubei, China

    Gui-Fang Yang

  5. Department of Pathology, Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200011, China

    Ping Wang

Authors
  1. Zhi Zeng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hong-Xue Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Na Zhan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ya-Bing Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ze-Sheng Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Gui-Fang Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ping Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Guo-Hui Fu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhi Zeng or Guo-Hui Fu.

Additional information

Z. Zeng and H.-X. Wu contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zeng, Z., Wu, HX., Zhan, N. et al. Prognostic significance of USP10 as a tumor-associated marker in gastric carcinoma. Tumor Biol. 35, 3845–3853 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-013-1509-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-013-1509-1

Key words

Search

Navigation