Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Association between vitamin D receptor gene Cdx2 polymorphism and breast cancer susceptibility

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Tumor Biology

Abstract

Vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene polymorphisms have been reported to influence susceptibility to breast cancer. However, published findings on the association between VDR Cdx2 polymorphism and breast cancer susceptibility are conflicting. To get a precise estimation of the association between VDR Cdx2 polymorphism and breast cancer susceptibility, we conducted a meta-analysis of four case–control studies with a total of 8,880 subjects (3,841 cases and 5,039 controls). The results showed that VDR Cdx2 polymorphism was not associated with risk of breast cancer (A versus G: OR = 0.96, 95 % CI 0.84–1.09; AA versus GG: OR = 0.97, 95 % CI 0.64–1.45; AA/GA versus GG: OR = 0.94, 95 % CI 0.80–1.10; AA versus GG/GA: OR = 0.99, 95 % CI 0.65–1.51). Subgroup analysis in Caucasians also showed that VDR Cdx2 polymorphism was not associated with risk of breast cancer in Caucasians. However, there was a significant association in Africans (A versus G: OR = 0.75, 95 % CI 0.60–0.94; AA versus GG: OR = 0.53, 95 % CI 0.29–0.99; AA/GA versus GG: OR = 0.75, 95 % CI 0.57–0.97). Therefore, the association between VDR Cdx2 polymorphism and breast cancer susceptibility is only found in Africans. More studies are needed to further assess the association in Asians or Africans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Warner E. Clinical practice. Breast-cancer screening N Engl J Med. 2011;365:1025–32.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Amir E, Freedman OC, Seruga B, Evans DG. Assessing women at high risk of breast cancer: a review of risk assessment models. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102:680–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Boyd NF, Martin LJ, Bronskill M, Yaffe MJ, Duric N, Minkin S. Breast tissue composition and susceptibility to breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102:1224–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Harris TJ, McCormick F. The molecular pathology of cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2010;7:251–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dong LM, Potter JD, White E, Ulrich CM, Cardon LR, Peters U. Genetic susceptibility to cancer: the role of polymorphisms in candidate genes. JAMA. 2008;299:2423–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Deeb KK, Trump DL, Johnson CS. Vitamin D signalling pathways in cancer: potential for anticancer therapeutics. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7:684–700.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Plum LA, DeLuca HF. Vitamin D, disease and therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010;9:941–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bertone-Johnson ER. Vitamin D and breast cancer. Ann Epidemiol. 2009;19:462–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kostner K, Denzer N, Muller CS, Klein R, Tilgen W, Reichrath J. The relevance of vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene polymorphisms for cancer: a review of the literature. Anticancer Res. 2009;29:3511–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tang C, Chen N, Wu M, Yuan H, Du Y. Fok1 polymorphism of vitamin D receptor gene contributes to breast cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;117:391–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Abbas S, Nieters A, Linseisen J, Slanger T, Kropp S, Mutschelknauss EJ, et al. Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and haplotypes and postmenopausal breast cancer risk. Breast Cancer Res. 2008;10:R31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Anderson LN, Cotterchio M, Cole DE, Knight JA. Vitamin D-related genetic variants, interactions with vitamin D exposure, and breast cancer risk among caucasian women in ontario. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20:1708–17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Yao S, Zirpoli G, Bovbjerg DH, Jandorf L, Hong CC, Zhao H, et al. Variants in the vitamin D pathway, serum levels of vitamin D, and estrogen receptor negative breast cancer among African–American women: a case–control study. Breast Cancer Res. 2012;14:R58.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1959;22:719–48.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7:177–88.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Egger M. Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C: Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315:629–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Chung M, Lee J, Terasawa T, Lau J, Trikalinos TA. Vitamin D with or without calcium supplementation for prevention of cancer and fractures: an updated meta-analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:827–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mondul AM, Weinstein SJ, Horst RL, Purdue M, Albanes D. Serum vitamin D and risk of bladder cancer in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012;21:1222–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen L. Davey Smith G, Evans DM, Cox A, Lawlor DA, Donovan J, Yuan W, Day IN, Martin RM, Lane A, Rodriguez S, Davis M, Zuccolo L, Collin SM, Hamdy F, Neal D, Lewis SJ: Genetic variants in the vitamin D receptor are associated with advanced prostate cancer at diagnosis: findings from the prostate testing for cancer and treatment study and a systematic review. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18:2874–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Touvier M, Chan DS, Lau R, Aune D, Vieira R, Greenwood DC, et al. Meta-analyses of vitamin D intake, 25-hydroxyvitamin D status, vitamin D receptor polymorphisms, and colorectal cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20:1003–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Levin GP, Robinson-Cohen C, de Boer IH, Houston DK, Lohman K, Liu Y, et al. Genetic variants and associations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations with major clinical outcomes. JAMA. 2012;308:1898–905.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Orlow I, Roy P, Reiner AS, Yoo S, Patel H, Paine S, et al. Vitamin D receptor polymorphisms in patients with cutaneous melanoma. Int J Cancer. 2012;130:405–18.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Jiao Z, Li D. Lack of association between MHTFR Glu429Ala polymorphism and breast cancer susceptibility: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 29 research studies. Tumour Biol. 2013;34:1225–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Dai G, Guo Z, Yang X, Yu B, Li L. Association of 8q24 rs13281615A > G polymorphism with breast cancer risk: evidence from 40,762 cases and 50,380 controls. Mol Biol Rep. 2013;40:4065–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu JJ, Liu JL, Zhang X, Xie L, Zeng J. A meta-analysis of the association of glutathione S-transferase P1 gene polymorphism with the susceptibility of breast cancer. Mol Biol Rep. 2013;40:3203–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Yao F, Fang Y, Chen B, Jin F, Wang S. Association between the NBS1 Glu185Gln polymorphism and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Tumour Biol. 2013;34:1255–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian-Hua Wu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhou, ZC., Wang, J., Cai, ZH. et al. Association between vitamin D receptor gene Cdx2 polymorphism and breast cancer susceptibility. Tumor Biol. 34, 3437–3441 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-013-0919-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-013-0919-4

Keywords

Navigation