Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic and predictive efficacy of the human epididymis secretory protein 4 (HE4) and serum amyloid-A (S-AA) together with the other tumor markers (CA 125, CA 15–3, CEA, and CA 19–9) in endometrial cancer patients. The study group consisted of 64 patients with defined stage and grade of endometrial cancer and 60 women with benign uterine diseases. Thirty-four healthy women were defined as the control group. Fasting blood samples were collected prior to surgery and tumor marker levels were determined in blood samples by E170 autoanalyzer. S-AA concentrations were measured by particle-enhanced immunonephelometry. Preoperative serum HE4 and S-AA levels were significantly higher in endometrial cancer patients than in controls, whereas the other measured parameters were not significantly different. Serum levels of HE4 were related to both the stage and grade of tumor. The best cutoff point for HE4 was determined to be 59.7 pmol/L; with 75 % sensitivity and 65.5 % specificity. For S-AA, the cutoff point was 8.8 U/mL, with 68.7 % sensitivity and 58.6 % specificity. The combination of HE4, CA 125, CEA, and S-AA raised the sensitivity to 84 %. Preoperative measurement of serum HE4 and S-AA may be of help in early detection of endometrial cancer. Preoperative screening with these markers may provide important information about the patient’s outcome and prognosis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- HE4:
-
Human epididymis secretory protein 4
- S-AA:
-
Serum amyloid A
- CEA:
-
Carcinoembryonic antigen
- FIGO:
-
International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics
- ROC:
-
Receiver operating characteristic
- PPV:
-
Positive predictive value
- NPV:
-
Negative predictive value
References
Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward, et al. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58:71–96.
Sohaib SA, Houghton SL, Meroni R, et al. Recurrent endometrial cancer: patterns of recurrent disease and assessment of prognosis. Clin Radiol. 2007;62:28–34.
Rose SL, Bradley SL, Lutgendorf SK, Sorosky J, Anderson B. The impact of adjuvant radiation therapy on long-term quality of life in patients with stage I endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;92:479–80.
Southcott BM. Carcinoma of the endometrium. Drugs. 2001;61:1395–405.
Taioli E, Kinney P, Zhitkovich A, et al. Application of reliability models to studies of biomarker validation. Environ Health Perspect. 1994;102:306–9.
Arslan AA, Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A, Lukanova A, et al. Reliability of follicle-stimulating hormone measurements in serum. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2003;1:49.
Touitou Y, Bogdan A. Tumor markers in non-malignant diseases. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1988;24:1083–91.
Gadducci A, Ferfeghini M, Prontera C, et al. A comparison of pretreatment serum levels of four tumor markers in patients with endometrial and cervical cancer. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 1990;1:283–8.
Hsieh CH, ChangChien CC, Lin H, et al. Can a preoperative CA 125 level be a criterion for full pelvic lymphadenectomy in surgical staging of endometrial cancer? Gynecol Oncol. 2002;86:28–33.
Powell JL, Hill KA, Shiro BC, Diehl SJ, Gajewski WH. Preoperative CA 125 levels in treating endometrial cancer. J Reprod Med. 2005;50:585–90.
Yurkovetsky Z, Ta’asan S, Skates S, et al. Development of multi-marker panel for early detection of endometrial cancer: High diagnostic power of prolactin. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;107:58–65.
Moore RG, Brown A, Miller M, Skaters S, Allard W, Verch T, et al. The use of multiple novel biomarkers for the detection of ovarian carcinoma in patients with pelvic mass. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;108:402–8.
Bingle L, Cross SS, High AS, Wallace WA, Rassl D, Yuan G, et al. WFDC2 (HE4): a potential role in the innate immunity of the oral cavity and respiratory tract and the development of adenocarcinomas of the lung. Respir Res. 2006;7:61.
Drapkin R, von Horsten HH, Lin Y, Mok SC, Crum CP, Welch WR, et al. Human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) is a secreted glycoprotein that is over expressed by serous and endometrioid ovarian carcinomas. Cancer Res. 2005;65:2162–9.
Huhtinen K, Suvitie P, Hiissa J, Huvila J, Kujari H, Stala M, et al. Serum HE4 concentration differentiates malignant ovarian tumours from ovarian endometriotic cysts. Br J Cancer. 2009;100:1315–9.
Galgano M, Hampton G, Frierson HJ. Comprehensive analysis of HE4 expression in normal and malignant human tissues. Mod Pathol. 2006;19:847–553.
Bignotti E, Ragnoli M, Zanotti L, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic impact of serum HE4 detection in endometrial carcinoma patients. Br J Cancer. 2011;104:1418–25.
Zanotti L, Bignotti E, Calza S, et al. Human epididymis protein 4 as a serum marker for diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma and prediction of clinical outcome. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2012;50:2189–98.
Mutz-Dehbalaie I, Egle D, Fessler S, et al. HE4 is an independent prognostic marker in endometrial cancer patients. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;126:186–91.
Mutch DG. The New FIGO staging system for cancers of the vulva, cervix, endometrium, and sarcomas. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;115:325–8.
Ueda Y, Enomoto T, Kimura T, Miyatake T, Yoshino K, Fujita M, et al. Serum biomarkers for early detection of gynecologic cancers. Cancer. 2010;2:1312–7.
Hellstrom I, Raycraft J, Hayden-Ledbetter JA, Schummer M, McIntosh M, et al. The HE4 (WFDC2) protein is a biomarker for ovarian carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2003;63:3695–700.
Sood AK, Buller RE, Burger RA, et al. Value of preoperative CA 125 level in the management of uterine cancer and prediction of outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;90:441–7.
Koper NP, Massuger LF, Thomas CM, Kiemeney LA, Verbeek AL. Serum CA 125 measurements to identify patients with endometrial cancer who require lymphadenectomy. Anticancer Res. 1998;18:1897–902.
Chung HH, Kim JW, Park NH, Song YS, et al. Use of preoperative serum CA-125 levels for prediction of lymph node metastasis and prognosis in endometrial cancer. Acta Obstet Gynecol. 2006;85:1501–5.
Rustin GJ, Bast RC, Kelloff GJ, et al. Use of CA-125 in clinical trial evaluation of new therapeutic drugs for ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:3919–26.
Li J, Dowdy S, Tipton T, Podratz K, Lu W-G, Xie X, et al. HE4 as a biomarker for ovarian and endometrial cancer management. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2009;9:555–66.
Iwahori K, Suzuki H, Kishi Y, Fujii Y, Uehara R, Okamoto N, et al. Serum HE4 as a diagnostic and prognostic marker for lung cancer. Tumour Biol. 2012;33:1141–9.
Yoo S-C, Yoon J-H, Kim WY, Chang S-J, Joo H-J, Ryu G-S. Premenopausal early-stage endometrial carcinoma patients with low CA-125 levels and low tumor grade may undergo ovary-saving surgery. J Gynecol Oncol. 2009;20:181–6.
Alagoz T, Buller RE, Berman M, et al. What is normal CA 125 level? Gynecol Oncol. 1994;53:93–7.
Sebastianelli A, Renaud MC, Gregorie J, Roy M, Plante M. Preoperative CA 125 tumour marker in endometrial cancer: correlation with advanced stage disease. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2010;32:856–60.
Moore RG, Jabre-Raughley M, Brown AK, Robison KM, Miller C, Allard WJ, et al. Comparison of a novel multiple marker assay vs the risk of malignancy index for the prediction of epithelial ovarian cancer in patients with pelvic mass. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203:228e1–6.
Cocco E, Bellone S, El-Sahwi K, et al. Serum amyloid A: a novel biomarker for endometrial cancer. Cancer. 2010;116:843–51.
Khan N, Cromer CJ, Campa M, Patz Jr EF. Clinical utility of serum amyloid A and macrophage migration inhibitory factor as serum biomarkers for detection of nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. Cancer. 2004;101:379–84.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the Research Fund of Istanbul University, project no. 3647.
Conflicts of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
All procedures were carried on according to the Helsinki Declaration 2000 and the study protocol was approved by the Local Ethical Committee of Istanbul University.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Omer, B., Genc, S., Takmaz, O. et al. The diagnostic role of human epididymis protein 4 and serum amyloid-A in early-stage endometrial cancer patients. Tumor Biol. 34, 2645–2650 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-013-0814-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-013-0814-z