Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Involvement of K-RAS mutations and amino acid substitutions in the survival of metastatic colorectal cancer patients

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Tumor Biology

Abstract

The efficacy of epidermal growth factor-targeting therapies has been found to be limited in tumors with the wild-type K-RAS gene, suggesting a predictive value of K-RAS gene analysis in tumoral response. However, the prognostic value of K-RAS is controversial. This study included patients diagnosed with metastatic colorectal cancer. The presence of K-RAS mutations was analyzed, and the tumors positive for a K-RAS mutation were further analyzed to identify the mutation type. Similarly, the following clinical and pathological variables were also collected. The study was composed of 53.3 % of patients with wild-type K-RAS and 46.7 % of patients with mutated K-RAS (mutated codon 12 was the most frequent). With a mean follow-up of 15 months (range, 1–45), the median survival of patients with wild-type K-RAS was 31.6 months. The median survival was 24.8 months for patients with K-RAS mutated in codon 12 and 17.8 months for patients with mutated codon 13 (p = 0.37). In a univariate analysis, K-RAS was associated with stage IV at diagnosis (p < 0.005). When K-RAS was mutated, a lower overall survival was observed in cases of G→A transition compared with G→T transversion (19.5 vs. 24.2 months, respectively; p = 0.47). When the amino acid change resulted in an acidic substitution, survival was lower, but it increased when the substitution resulted in a polar or nonpolar amino acid (19.5 vs. 23.2 vs. 24.4 months, p = 0.79). The type of K-RAS mutation or amino acid changes may have prognostic implications in metastatic colon cancer patients. Further research is needed in patients treated in prospective controlled trials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vogelstein B, Fearon E, et al. Genetic alteration during colorectal tumor development. N Engl J Med. 1998;319:525–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bos JL, Fearon EL, Hamilton SR, et al. Prevalence of ras gene mutations in human colorectal cancers. Nature Res. 1990;50:7717–22.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Neumann J, Zeindl-Eberhart E, Kirchner T, et al. Frequency and type of KRAS mutations in routine diagnostic analysis of metastatic colorectal cancer. Pathol Res. 2009;205:858–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Heinemann V, Stintzing S, Kirchner T, et al. Clinical relevance of EGFR—and KRAS—status in colorectal cancer patients treated with monoclonal antibodies directed against the EGFR. Cancer Treat Rev. 2009;35:262–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bokemeyer C, Igor B, Anatoly M, et al. Fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin with and without cetuximab in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:663–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Douillard JY, Siena S, Cassidy J, et al. Randomized, phase III trial of panitumumab with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) versus FOLFOX4 alone as first-line treatment in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: the PRIME Study. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:4697–705.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cunningham D, Humblet Y, Siena S, et al. Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:337–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Van Cutsem E, Köhne CH, Hitre E, et al. Cetuximab and chemotherapy as initial treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1408–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Karapetis CS, Khambata-Ford S, Jonker DJ, et al. K-RAS mutations and benefit from cetuximab in advanced colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1757–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Qiu LX, Mao C, Zhang J, et al. Predictive and prognostic value of KRAS mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with cetuximab: a meta-analysis of 22 studies. EJC. 2010;46:2781–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. De Roock W, Jonker DJ, Nicolantonio F, et al. Association of KRAS p.G13D mutation with outcome in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab. JAMA. 2010;304:1812–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Span M, Moerkerk P, Goeij A, et al. A detailed analysis of K-RAS point mutations in relation to tumor progression and survival in colorectal cancer patients. Int J Cancer. 1996;69:241–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A (eds.) AJCC cancer staging handbook. 6th Printing; 2010, XIV, 730 p. 130 illu.

  14. Linardou H, Briasoulis E, Dahabreh IJ, et al. All about KRAS for clinical oncology practice: gene profile, clinical implications and laboratory recommendations for somatic mutational testing in colorectal cancer. Cancer Treat Rev. 2011;37:221–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Esteller M, et al. K-ras and p16 aberrations confer poor prognosis in human colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:299–304.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Andreyev HJ, Norman R, Cunningham D, et al. Kirsten ras mutations in patients with colorectal cancer: the “RASCAL” study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998;90:675–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Van Cutsem E, Köhne CH, Láng I, et al. Cetuximab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: updated analysis of overall survival according to tumor KRAS and BRAF mutation status. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:1–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dix BR, et al. The common molecular genetic alterations in Dukes' B and C colorectal carcinomas are not short-term prognostic indicators of survival. Int J Cancer. 1994;59:747–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Roth A, Tejpar S, Delorenzi M, et al. Prognostic role of KRAS and BRAF in stage II and III resected colon cancer: results of the translational study on the PETACC-3, EORTC 40993, SAKK 60-00 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:466–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Deschoolmeester V, Boeckx C, Baay M, et al. KRAS mutation detection and prognostic potential in sporadic colorectal cancer using high-resolution melting analysis. Br J Cancer. 2010;103:1627–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Poehlmann A, Kuester D, Meyer F, et al. KRAS mutation detection in colorectal cancer using the pyrosequencing technique. Pathol Res Pract. 2007;203:489–97.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Finkelstein SD, Sayegh R, Christensen S, et al. Genotypic classification of colorectal adenocarcinoma—biologic behavior correlates with KRAS mutation type. Cancer. 1993;71:3827–38.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hemmingsson E, Udde J, Goodpaster BH, et al. KRAS genotypes and outcome in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastasic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab. JAMA. 2011;305:564–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Geido E, Sciutto A, Rubagotti A, et al. Combined DNA flow cytometry and sorting with KRAS2 mutation spectrum analysis and the prognosis of human sporadic colorectal cancer. Clin Cytometry. 2002;50:216–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kirk R. In colorectal cancer, not all KRAS mutations are created equal. Nature Nature. 2011;8:1–1.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Guerrero S, Casanova I, Farré L, et al. K-RAS codon 12 mutation induces higher level of resistance to apoptosis and predisposition to anchorage-independent growth than codon 13 mutation or proto-oncogene overexpression. Cancer Res. 2000;60:6750–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu X, Jakubowski M, Hunt J. KRAS gene mutation in colorectal cancer is correlated with increased proliferation and spontaneous apoptosis. Am J Clin Pathol. 2011;135:245–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elisabeth Pérez-Ruiz.

Additional information

Dr. E. Pérez-Ruiz and Dr. A. Rueda belong to REDISSEC.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pérez-Ruiz, E., Rueda, A., Pereda, T. et al. Involvement of K-RAS mutations and amino acid substitutions in the survival of metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Tumor Biol. 33, 1829–1835 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-012-0442-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-012-0442-z

Keywords

Navigation