Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prognostic analysis in node-negative gastric cancer patients in China

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Tumor Biology

Abstract

Gastric cancer patients with negative nodes were considered to have better outcomes, however, some of them still suffered from disease recurrences or distant metastases after radical resection. A total of 1,020 gastric carcinoma patients receiving treatment in our center between 2003 and 2008 were selected for the analysis. All patients received gastrectomy and D2 lymphadenectomy. Survival analysis was performed with Cox regression model. The final study includes 222 patients. The overall 5-year disease-specific survival rate was 73.0%. Factors bearing significant association with lower survival on univariate analysis included the age of 58 years old or more (P = 0.021), tumor size longer than 4 cm (P < 0.001), presence of angiolymphatic invasion (P = 0.006), proximal site (P = 0.030), serosal invasion (T3+T4, P = 0.003), and higher TNM stage (P < 0.001). Only three factors including serosal invasion, tumor size at least 4.0 cm, and presence of angiolymphatic invasion remained independent negative predictors of survival in multivariable analysis. These parameters can be employed to select node-negative gastric cancer patients for an adjuvant setting and close follow-up scheduling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kamangar F, Dores GM, Anderson WF. Patterns of cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence across five continents: defining priorities to reduce cancer disparities in different geographic regions of the world. J Clin Oncol. 2006;10:2137–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Moore MA, Eser S, Igisinov N, Igisinov S, Mohagheghi MA, Mousavi-Jarrahi A, et al. Cancer epidemiology and control in North-Western and Central Asia—past, present and future. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2010;11:17–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Siewert JR, Bottcher K, Stein HJ, Roder JD. Relevant prognostic factors in gastric cancer: ten-year results of the German Gastric Cancer Study. Ann Surg. 1998;228:449–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Shiu MH, Perrotti M, Brennan MF. Adenocarcinoma of the stomach: a multivariate analysis of clinical, pathologic and treatment factors. Hepatogastroenterology. 1989;36:7–12.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bozzetti F, Bonfanti G, Morabito A, Bufalino R, Menotti V, Andreola S, et al. A multifactorial approach for the prognosis of patients with carcinoma of the stomach after curative resection. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1986;162:229–34.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim JP, Kim YW, Yang HK, Noh DY. Significant prognostic factors by multivariate analysis of 3926 gastric cancer patients. World J Surg. 1994;18:872–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bruno L, Nesi G, Montinaro F, Carassale G, Boddi V, Bechi P, et al. Clinicopathologic characteristics and outcome indicators in node-negative gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2000;74:30–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, et al. American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) cancer staging manual. 6th ed. New York: Springer, Inc; 2002. p. 179–88.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Byrd DR, SB Edge, Compton CC, et al. American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) cancer staging manual. 7th ed. Chicago: Springer, Inc.; 2010. p. 117–26.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Baba H, Maehara Y, Takeuchi H, Inutsuka S, Okuyama T, Adachi Y, et al. Effect of lymph node dissection on the prognosis in patients with node-negative early gastric cancer. Surgery. 1995;117:165–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Adachi Y, Mori M, Maehara Y, Kitano S, Sugimachi K. Prognostic factors of node-negative gastric carcinoma: univariate and multivariate analyses. J Am Coll Surg. 1997;184:373–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Maehara Y, Tomoda M, Tomisaki S, Ohmori M, Baba H, Akazawa K, et al. Surgical treatment and outcome for node-negative gastric cancer. Surgery. 1997;121:633–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hyung WJ, Lee JH, Choi SH, Min JS, Noh SH. Prognostic impact of lymphatic and/or blood vessel invasion in patients with node-negative advanced gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9:562–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kooby DA, Suriawinata A, Klimstra DS, Brennan MF, Karpeh MS. Biologic predictors of survival in node-negative gastric cancer. Ann Surg. 2003;237:828–35. discussion 835–837.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Baiocchi GL, Tiberio GA, Minicozzi AM, Morgagni P, Marrelli D, Bruno L, et al. A multicentric Western analysis of prognostic factors in advanced, node-negative gastric cancer patients. Ann Surg. 2010;252:70–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Setälä LP, Kosma VM, Marin S, Lipponen PK, Eskelinen MJ, Syrjänen KJ, et al. Prognostic factors in gastric cancer: the value of vascular invasion, mitotic rate and lymphoplasmacytic infiltration. Br J Cancer. 1996;74:766–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China grant 30672408, Guangzhou Bureau of Science and Technology grant 2006Z3-E0041 and Sun Yat-Sen University 985 Program Initiation Fund (China). We gratefully thank the staff members in the Department of Medical Oncology and Gastric and Pancreatic Surgery Oncology at Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center for their suggestion and assistance.

Conflicts of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rui-hua Xu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Qiu, Mz., Wang, Zq., Luo, Hy. et al. Prognostic analysis in node-negative gastric cancer patients in China. Tumor Biol. 32, 489–492 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-010-0142-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-010-0142-5

Keywords

Navigation