Skip to main content
Log in

Welfare Implications of Leadership in a Resource Market under Bilateral Monopoly

  • Published:
Dynamic Games and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Formulating a dynamic game model of a world exhaustible resource market, in this paper, we study welfare implications of Stackelberg leaderships for an individual country and the world. We overcome the problem of time-inconsistency by imposing a “credibility condition” on the Markovian strategy of the Stackelberg leader. Under this condition, we show that the presence of a global Stackelberg leader leaves the follower worse off relative to the Nash equilibrium. Moreover, the world welfare is highest in the Nash equilibrium as compared with the two Stackelberg equilibria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Basar T, Olsder GJ (1982) Dynamic noncooperative game theory. Academic Press, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Benchekroun H, Long NV (1998) Efficiency inducing taxation for polluting oligopolists. J Public Econ 70:325–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Benchekroun H, Long NV, Tian H (1999) Learning-by-doing and strategic trade policy. Rev Int Econ 7:493–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bergstrom TC (1982) On capturing oil rents with a national excise tax. Am Econ Rev 72:194–201

    Google Scholar 

  5. Blanchard OJ, Gali J (2010) The macroeconomic effects of oil price shocks: why are the 2000s so different from the 1970s. In: Gali J, Gertler M (eds) International dimensions of monetary policy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 373–428

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brander J, Djajic S (1983) Rent extracting tariffs and the management of exhaustible resources. Can J Econ 16:288–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chou S, Long NV (2009) Optimal tariffs on exhaustible resources in the presence of cartel behavior. Asia-Pac J Account Econ 16:239–254

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dockner E, Jorgensen S, Long NV, Sorger G (2000) Differential games in economics and management Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Karp L (1984) Optimality and consistency in a differential game with non-renewable resources. J Econ Dyn Control 8:73–97

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Karp L, Newbery DM (1991) OPEC and the US oil import tariff. Econ J 101:303–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Karp L, Newbery DM (1991) Optimal tariffs on exhaustible resources. J Int Econ 30:285–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Karp L, Newbery DM (1992) Dynamically consistent oil import tariffs. Can J Econ 25:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kemp MC, Long NV (1979) The interaction between resource-poor and resource-rich economies. Aust Econ Pap 18:258–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kemp MC, Long NV (1980) Optimal tariffs on exhaustible resources. In: Kemp MC, Long NV (eds) Exhaustible resources, optimality, and trade. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 183–186

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kemp MC, Long NV, Shimomura K (1993) Cyclical and noncyclical redistributive taxation. Int Econ Rev 34:415–429

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Kohl WL (2002) OPEC behavior, 1998–2001. Q Rev Econ Finance 42:209–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liski M, Tahvonen O (2004) Can carbon tax eat OPEC’s rents? J Environ Econ Manag 47:1–12

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Long NV (2010) A survey of dynamic games in economics. World Scientific, Singapore

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Long NV, Shimomura K (2002) Redistributive taxation in closed and open economies. In: Woodland A (ed) Economic theory and international trade: essays in honour of Murray C. Kemp. Springer, Berlin, pp 104–123

    Google Scholar 

  20. Long NV, Sorger G (2010) A dynamic principal-agent problem as a feedback Stackelberg differential game. Cent Eur J Oper Res 18:491–509

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Maskin E, Newbery D (1990) Disadvantageous oil tariffs and dynamic consistency. Am Econ Rev 80:143–156

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mehlmann A (1988) Applied differential games. Kluwer Academic, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Reinganum JF, Stokey NL (1985) Oligopoly extraction of a common property natural resource: the importance of the period of commitment in dynamic games. Int Econ Rev 26:161–173

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Rubio S (2005) Tariff agreements and non-renewable resource international monopolies: prices versus quantity. Working Paper WP-AD-2005-10, University of Valencia

  25. Rubio S, Escriche L (2001) Strategic Pigouvian taxation, stock externalities and polluting non-renewable resources. J Public Econ 79:297–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Salo S, Tahvonen O (2001) Oligopoly equilibria in non-renewable resource markets. J Econ Dyn Control 25:671–702

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Smith JL (2009) World oil: market or mayhem? J Econ Perspect 23:145–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tahvonen O (1996) Trade with polluting non-renewable resources. J Environ Econ Manag 30:1–17

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Wirl F (1995) The exploitation of fossil fuels under the threat of global warming and carbon taxes: a dynamic game approach. Environ Resour Econ 5:333–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wirl F, Dockner E (1995) Leviathan governments and carbon taxes: costs and potential benefits. Eur Econ Rev 39:1215–1236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. World Trade Organization (2010) World Trade Report 2010

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenji Fujiwara.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fujiwara, K., Long, N.V. Welfare Implications of Leadership in a Resource Market under Bilateral Monopoly. Dyn Games Appl 1, 479–497 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13235-011-0036-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13235-011-0036-1

Keywords

Navigation