Skip to main content
Log in

Processing and characterization of chitosan films with incorporation of ethanolic extract from “pequi” peels

  • Article
  • Published:
Macromolecular Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chitosan is a polysaccharide with excellent film forming ability widely evaluated as active packaging and edible coatings. Chitosan has good antimicrobial activity in gel form; however, in a solid state (film format), a reduction in this activity can occur due to spatial arrangement of the chains in the polymer matrix. Small amounts of natural compounds could then be added to the film formulations to improve both antifungal and antibacterial properties. One possible additive is the “pequi” (Caryocar brasiliense Comb.) peel ethanolic extract (PPE), which forms homogenous blend with chitosan and has proved antimicrobial activity. In this study the preparation of chitosan-PPE was evaluated concerning the effect promoted in the film structure due PPE incorporation. Films processed by casting were analyzed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), microscopy, X-ray diffraction, mechanical and thermal properties, water vapor permeability (WVP) and surface wettability. FTIR analysis indicates interactions between the phenolic compounds in the extract and the hydroxyl and amine groups present in the chitosan structure, by establishing a possible ester bonding between constituents. The presence of PPE resulted in a decrease of WVP and an increasing in hydrophobicity. The extract addition also reduced the film’s crystallinity along with a slight decrease of plasticity and lowering of the initial polymeric degradation temperature. However, the blend was characterized by a homogeneous matrix with smooth topography. The results suggest that PPE has good compatibility with chitosan, introducing small changes that do not alter the potential for medical or foodstuff applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. Park and Y. Zhao, J. Agr. Food Chem., 52, 1933 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. S. P. Noel, H. Courtney, J. D. Bumgardner, and W. O. Haggard, Clin. Orthop. Relat. R., 466, 1377 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Rojas-Graü, R. Soliva-Fortuny, and O. Martín-Belloso, Trends Food Sci. Technol., 20, 438 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. T. Kean and M. Thanou, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 62, 3 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. US Code for Federal Regulation. FDA GRAS Claim notification for chitosan No. GRN 000073. US Food and Drug Administration, Washington, D.C. (2001).

  6. F. Devlieghere, A. Vermeulen, and J. Debevere, Food Microbiol., 21, 703 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. M. Z. Elsabee and E. S. Abdou, Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 33, 1819 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. R. C. Goy and O. B. G. Assis, Braz. J. Chem. Eng., 31, 643 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Kong, X. G. Chen, K, Xing, and H. J. Park, Int. J. Food Microbiol., 144, 51 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Y. Peng, Y. Wu, and Y. Li, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 59, 282 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. N. K. K. Win, P. Jitareerat, S. Kanlayanarat, and S. Sangchote, Postharvest. Biol. Tec., 45, 333 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. S. R. Kanatt, M. S. Rao, S. P. Chawla, and A. Sharma, Food Hydrocolloid., 29, 290 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. L. Wang, Y. Dong, H. Men, J. Tong, and J. Zhou, Food Hydrocolloid., 32, 35 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. B. Badhani, N. Sharma, and R. Kakkar, RSC Adv., 5, 27540 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. L. B. Rocha, A. M. Melo, S. L. A. Paula, S. A. M. Nobre, and I. N. Abreu, Rev. Brasil. Plantas. Med., 17, 592 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. C. H. Azevedo-Meleiro and D. B. Rodriguez-Amaya, J. Food Comp. Anal., 17, 385 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. J. C. Siqueira. J. Brasil. Ciên., 2, 41 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  18. C. A. Breda, A. M. Gasperini, V. L. Garcia, K. M. Monteiro, G. A. Bataglion, M. N. Eberlin, and M. C. T. Duarte, Nat. Prod. Bioprospect., 6, 195 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. C. A. Breda, D. L. Morgado, O. B. G. Assis, and M. C. T. Duarte, J. Food Process. Pres., DOI: 10.1111/jfpp.13268 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  20. H. Struszczyk, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 33, 177 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. T. H. McHugh, R. Avena-Bustillos, and J. M. Krochta, J. Food Sci., 58, 899 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. S. F. Hosseini, M. Rezaei, M. Zandi, and F. F. Ghavi, Food Chem., 136, 1490 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. N. Benbettaieb, M. Kurek, S. Bornaz, and F. Debeaufort, J. Sci. Food Agr., 94, 2409 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. C. S. Martins, D. L. Morgado, and O. B. G. Assis, Macrom. Res., 24, 691 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. T. Sugama and S. Milian-Jimenez, J. Mater. Sci., 34, 2003 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. P. Ragavendran, D. Sophia, C. A. Raj, and V. K. Gopalakrishnan, Pharmacologyonline, 364, 358 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Y. W. Mak, L. O. Chuah, R. Ahmad, and R. Bhat, J. King. Saud. Univ. Sci., 25, 275 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. D. C. Lingegowda, J. K. Kumar, A. G. D. Prasad, M. Zarei, and S. Gopal, Rom. J. Biophys., 22, 137 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. P. Mayachiew, S. Devahastin, B. M. Mackey, and K. Niranjan, Food Res. Int., 43, 125 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Y.-Y. Qin, Z.-H. Zhang, L. Li, M.-L. Yuan, J. Fan, and T.-R. Zhao, J. Food Sci. Technol., 52, 1471 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. M. Gniewosz, A. Synowiec, K. Kraśniewska, J. L. Przybył, K. Baczek, and Z. Weglarz, Food Control., 37, 351 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. M. S. Hoque, S. Benjakul, and T. Prodpran, Food Hydrocolloid., 25, 1085 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. M. Ioelovich, J. Chem., 3, 7 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  34. F. A. A. Sagheer, M. A. Al-Sughayer, S. Mulim, and M. Z. Elsabee, Carbohydr. Polym., 77, 410 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. B. W. S. Souza, M. A. Cerqueira, J. T. Martins, A. Casariego, J. Á. Teixeira, and A. A. Vicente, Food Hydrocolloid., 24, 330 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. W. Thakhiew, S. Devahastin, and S. Soponronnarit, J. Food Eng., 119, 140 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. M. J. Zohuriaan and F, Shokrolahi, Polym. Test., 23, 575 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. C. Flaque and S. Montserrat, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 74, 201 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. L. S. Guinesi and E. T. G. Cavalheiro, Thermochim. Acta, 444, 128 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. J.-W. Rhim, C. L. Weller, and K.-S. Ham, Food Sci. Biotechnol., 7, 263 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  41. A. Bégin and M. R. V. Calsteren, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 26, 63 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. P. C. Srinivasa, M. N. Ramesh, K. R. Kumar, and R. N. Tharanathan, J. Food Eng., 63, 79 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. N. E. Suyatma, L. Tighzert, A. Copinet, and V. Coma, J. Agr. Food Chem., 53, 3950 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. S. Gaudin, D. Lourdin, P. M. Forssell, and P. Colonna, Carbohydr. Polym., 43, 33 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. O. B. G. Assis and J. H. Hotchkiss, Packag. Technol. Sci., 20, 293 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. D. Lin and Y. Zhao, Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Safety, 6, 60 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. B. L. Butler, P. J. Vergano, R. F. Testin, J. M. Bunn, and J. L. Wiles, J. Food Sci., 61, 953 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. J. Bonilla, L. Atarés, M. Vargas, and A. Chiralt, Food Hydrocolloid., 26, 9 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. J. L. Chen and Y. Zhao, J. Food Sci., 77, E127 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. X. Sun, Z. Wang, H. Kadouh, and K, Zhou, LWT-Food Sci. Technol., 57, 83 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank to FAPESP (grant 2011/19057-7), SisNano/MCTI and Rede AgroNano (Embrapa) for financial support and to Embrapa Instrumentação for providing access to its laboratory facilities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Odílio Benedito Garrido Assis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Breda, C.A., Morgado, D.L., Assis, O.B.G. et al. Processing and characterization of chitosan films with incorporation of ethanolic extract from “pequi” peels. Macromol. Res. 25, 1049–1056 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13233-017-5143-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13233-017-5143-4

Keywords

Navigation