Abstract
Uterine niche is one of the emerging complications of caesarean section. With rising caesarean rates, the caesarean-related iatrogenic complications are also on the rise. These include placenta accreta, scar ectopic pregnancy and uterine niche which is a newer entity being described in the recent literature. Uterine niche, also described as uterine isthmocele, caesarean scar defect and diverticulum, is an iatrogenic defect in the myometrium at the site of previous caesarean scar due to defective tissue healing. Patients may have varied symptoms including abnormal uterine bleeding, post-menstrual spotting and infertility, though many women may be asymptomatic and diagnosed incidentally. Diagnosis is made radiologically by transvaginal sonography, saline instillation sonohysterography or magnetic resonance imaging. Occurrence of niche may be prevented by using correct surgical technique during caesarean. Patients may be managed medically; however, subfertility and persistent symptoms may require surgical correction either by hysteroscopic resection or transabdominal or transvaginal repair. This mini-review comprehensively covers the potential risk factors, clinical presentation, diagnosis and management of this increasingly encountered condition due to rising caesarean rates.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bij de Vaate AJ, Brolmann HA, van der Voet LF, et al. Ultrasound evaluation of the cesarean scar: relation between a niche and postmenstrual spotting. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;37:93–9.
Naji O, Abdallah Y, Bij De Vaate AJ, et al. Standardized approach for imaging and measuring Cesarean section scars using ultrasonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;39:252–9.
van der Voet LF, Bij de Vaate AM, Veersema S, et al. Long-term complications of caesarean section. The niche in the scar: a prospective cohort study on niche prevalence and its relation to abnormal uterine bleeding. BJOG. 2014;121(2):236–44.
Kremer TG, Ghiorzi IB, Dibi RP. Isthmocele: an overview of diagnosis and treatment. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2019;65(5):714–21.
Iannone P, Nencini G, Bonaccorsi G, et al. Isthmocele: from risk factors to management. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2019;41(1):44–52.
Vikhareva Osser O, Jokubkiene L, Valentin L. Cesarean section scar defects: agreement between transvaginal sonographic findings with and without saline contrast enhancement. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;35:75–83.
Setubal A, Alves J, Osório F, et al. Treatment for uterine isthmocele, a pouchlike defect at the site of a cesarean section scar. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25(1):38–46.
Antila-Långsjö RM, Mäenpää JU, Huhtala HS, et al. Cesarean scar defect: a prospective study on risk factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;219(5):458.e1–.e8.
Bij de Vaate AJ, van der Voet LF, Naji O, et al. Prevalence, potential risk factors for development and symptoms related to the presence of uterine niches following Cesarean section: systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;43(4):372–82.
Vervoort AJ, Uittenbogaard LB, Hehenkamp WJ, et al. Why do niches develop in Caesarean uterine scars? Hypotheses on the aetiology of niche development. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(12):2695–702.
Vervoort AJ, Van der Voet LF, Witmer M, et al. The HysNiche trial: hysteroscopic resection of uterine caesarean scar defect (niche) in patients with abnormal bleeding, a randomised controlled trial. BMC Womens Health. 2015;15:103. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-015-0260-8.
Vervoort A, Vissers J, Hehenkamp W, et al. The effect of laparoscopic resection of large niches in the uterine caesarean scar on symptoms, ultrasound findings and quality of life: a prospective cohort study. BJOG. 2018;125(3):317–25.
Antila RM, Mäenpää JU, Huhtala HS, et al. Association of cesarean scar defect with abnormal uterine bleeding: the results of a prospective study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;244:134–40.
van der Voet LF, Vervoort AJ, Veersema S, et al. Minimally invasive therapy for gynaecological symptoms related to a niche in the caesarean scar: a systematic review. BJOG. 2014;121(2):145–56.
Antila-Långsjö R, Mäenpää JU, Huhtala H, et al. Comparison of transvaginal ultrasound and saline contrast sonohysterography in evaluation of cesarean scar defect: a prospective cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018;97(9):1130–6.
Zhang X, Yang M, Wang Q, et al. Prospective evaluation of five methods used to treat cesarean scar defects. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016;134(3):336–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2016.04.011.
Abacjew-Chmylko A, Wydra DG, Olszewska H. Hysteroscopy in the treatment of uterine cesarean section scar diverticulum: a systematic review. Adv Med Sci. 2017;62(2):230–9.
Donnez O, Donnez J, Orellana R, Dolmans MM. Gynecological and obstetrical outcomes after laparoscopic repair of a cesarean scar defect in a series of 38 women. Fertil Steril. 2017;107(1):289–96.
Vervoort A, van der Voet LF, Hehenkamp W, et al. Hysteroscopic resection of a uterine caesarean scar defect (niche) in women with postmenstrual spotting: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2018;125(3):326–34.
Vegas Carrillo de Albornoz A, López Carrasco I, Montero Pastor N, et al. Outcomes after hysteroscopic treatment of symptomatic isthmoceles in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding and pelvic pain: a prospective case series. Int J Fertil Steril. 2019;13(2):108–12.
Nirgianakis K, Oehler R, Mueller M. The Rendez-vous technique for treatment of caesarean scar defects: a novel combined endoscopic approach. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(2):770–1.
Api M, Boza A, Gorgen H, et al. Should Cesarean scar defect be treated laparoscopically? A case report and review of the literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015;22(7):1145–52.
Calzolari S, Sisti G, Pavone D, et al. Prevalence of infertility among patients with isthmocele and fertility outcome after isthmocele surgical treatment: a retrospective study. Ochsner J. 2019;19(3):204–9.
Enderle I, Dion L, Bauville E, et al. Surgical management of isthmocele symptom relief and fertility. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;247:232–7.
Kalem Z, Kaya AE, Bakırarar B, et al. An optimal uterine closure technique for better scar healing and avoiding isthmocele in cesarean section: a randomized controlled study. J Investig Surg. 2019;9:1–9.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge contribution of Dr Vatsla Dadhwal, Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, for providing figures for the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None of the authors have any potential conflict of interest.
Ethical Statement
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Vidushi Kulshrestha is a Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India; Nutan Agarwal is a Consultant Gynaecologist, Head- Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Artemis Hospital, Gurugram, Haryana, India; Ex-Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, AIIMS, New Delhi, India; Garima Kachhawa is a Additional Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kulshrestha, V., Agarwal, N. & Kachhawa, G. Post-caesarean Niche (Isthmocele) in Uterine Scar: An Update. J Obstet Gynecol India 70, 440–446 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-020-01370-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-020-01370-0