Skip to main content
Log in

Estimation of Serum Uric Acid as an Indicator of Severity of Preeclampsia and Perinatal Outcome

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Uric acid is a marker of oxidative stress tissue injury and renal dysfunction, hence a correlation hypothesized.

Objectives

(1) To evaluate severity of preeclampsia with raised serum uric acid. (2) To evaluate perinatal outcome in preeclampsia with raised serum uric ccid.

Materials and Methods

50 pregnant women with severe preeclampsia and 50 normotensive women were included in the study and maternal serum uric acid was estimated in both the groups.

Results

In the study group comprising of 50 cases of preeclampsia, there is a positive correlation (r = 0.695 & +0.359) between the variables in study group, and as the SBP or DBP increases, the MSUA concentration also increases. In control group, there is a negative correlation (r = −0.083 & −0.095). Perinatal complication was more in study group, 54 % were preterm compared to 4 % in control group also as MSUA value increased average gestational age decreased. Mean birth weight in study group was 1.8 kg study group of which 13 (26 %) babies were VLBW, 28 (56 %) were LBW, and 9 (18 %) babies had normal birth weight, in control group mean birth weight was 2.99 kg. There were 6 cases of ELBW babies in study group which were included in VLBW group for statistical calculation. The difference was found to be statistically significant (p < 0.05). In the study group, the MSUA concentration is found higher in LBW and VLBW babies compared to normal birth weight babies.

Conclusion

There is a positive correlation between SUA & severity of preeclampsia, and a significant adverse fetal outcome is observed with raised MSUA in preeclamptic patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Evans AT, Niswander KR. Manual of Obstetrics. 6th ed. Lippincott: Williams & Wilkins Publishers; 2000. p. 287–98.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Powers RW, Bodner LM, Ness RB, Coper KM, et al. Uric acid concentration in early pregnancy among pre eclamptic women with gestational hyperuricemia at delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194:160–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Daftary SN, Chakravathi S. Holland and Brews Manual of Obstetrics, 4th edn. Elsevier; 1991. p. 91–98.

  4. Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Hauth JC, Gilstrap LC III, Wenstrom KD. Williams obstetrics. 22nd ed. New York: McGraw Hill; 2005. p. 762–78.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brutis CA, Ashwood ER. Teitz Fundamentals of clinical chemistry. 5th ed. St. Louis: Saunders Publications; 1996. p. 422–6.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Prince CP, James DR. Analytical reviews in clinical biochemistry: the measurement of urat. Ann Clin Biochem. 1988;25:484–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tietz NW, editor. Clinical guide to laboratory tests. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  8. James DK, Steer PJ, Weiner CP, Gonik B. High risk pregnancy management options. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2001. p. 639–62.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Clark BA, Halvorson L, Sachs B, Epstein FH. Plasma endothelin levels in preeclampsia: elevation and correlation with uric acid level and renal impairment. Am J Obster Gynacol. 1992;166:962–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mustaphi R, Gopalan S, Dhaliwal L, Sarkar AK. Hyperuricemia and pregnancy induced hypertension-reappraisal. Indian J Med Sciences. 1992;10:68–71.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Many A, Hubel CA, Roberts JM. Hyperuricemia and Xanthine oxidase in preeclampsia, revisited. Am J Obster Gynacol. 1996;174:288–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gabbe SG, Niebyl JR, Simpson JL. Obstetrics normal and problem pregnancies. 3rd ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1996. p. 935–96.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chamberlain G, Steer P. Turnbulls’ Obstetrics. 3rd ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 2001. p. 338–44.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kleigman RM, Behraman RE, Jenson HB, Staton BF. Nelson’s text book of pediatrics, vol. 1. 18th ed. Philadelphia: Saunder’s Elseveir Publications; 2007. p. 701–4.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yassaee F. Hyperuricemia and perinatal outcomes in patients with severe preeclampsia. Iran J Med Sci. 2003;28:198–9.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Williams KP, Galerneau F. The role of serum uric acid as a prognostic indicator of the severity of maternal and fetal complications in hypertensive pregnancies. J Obster Gynaecol Can. 2002;24:628–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Magann EF, Chauhan SP, Naef RW, Blake PG, Morrison JC, Martin J. Standard parameters of preeclampsia: can the clinician depend upon them reliably identify the patient with HELP syndrome? Aust N Z/Obset Gynaecology. 1993;33:122–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Witlin AG, Saade GR, Mattan F, Sibai BM. Risk factors for abruption placentae and eclampsia: analysis of 445 consecutively managed women with severe preeclampsia and eclampsia. Am J Obster Gynacol. 1999;180(6):1322–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Roberts JM, Bodnar LM, Lain KY, Hubel CA, Markovic N, Ness RB, Powers RW. Uric acid is as important as proteinuria in identifying fetal risk in women with gestational hypertension. Hypertension. 2005;46:1263–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. August P, Helseth G, Cook EF, Sison C. A prediction model for superimposed preeclampsia in women with chronic hypertension during pregnancy. Am J Obster Gynacol. 2004;191:1666–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Compliance with Ethical Statement

Conflict of Interest

Dr. Aparna Nair and Dr. Savitha C declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed Consent

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008 (5). Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aparna Nair M.S..

Additional information

Aparna Nair is Asst. Professor in Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences & Research Institute. C. Savitha is Professor in Bangalore Medical College & Research Institute.

Appendices

Appendix 1

figure b
figure c

Appendix 2

figure d
figure e

Appendix 3: Key to Master Chart

IP No

Inpatient number

GA

Gestational age in weeks

Obs index

Obstetric index

BP

Blood Pressure

MAP

bMean arterial pressure

NA

Not applicable

Primi

Primigravida

FTND

Full-term normal delivery

IUGR

Intrauterine growth restriction

IUD

Intra uterine death

NICU

Neonatal intensive care unit

NR NST

Non-reactive non-stress test

PIH

Pregnancy-induced hypertension

SUA

Serum uric acid

SBP

Systolic blood pressure

DBP

Diastolic blood pressure

MGA

Mean gestational age

HTN

Hypertension

PNM

Perinatal mortality

HELLP

Hemolysis elevated liver enzymes low platelet

RDS

Respiratory distress syndrome

LBW

Low birth weight

MSUA

Maternal serum uric acid

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nair, A., Savitha, C. Estimation of Serum Uric Acid as an Indicator of Severity of Preeclampsia and Perinatal Outcome. J Obstet Gynecol India 67, 109–118 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-016-0933-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-016-0933-8

Keywords

Navigation