Skip to main content
Log in

Are Women’s and Obstetricians, Views on Mode of Delivery Following a Previous Cesarean Section Really OCEANS Apart?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Most women with one previous cesarean section (CS) are suitable for either a vaginal birth after CS (VBAC) or an elective repeat CS. Previously, nurse-led prenatal education and support groups have failed to have an impact on the mode of delivery, which women opted for after one CS. A novel one-stop obstetrician-led cesarean education and antenatal sessions (OCEANS) has been developed to inform and empower women in their decision-making following one previous CS. The objective of our study was to evaluate how OCEANS influences the mode of delivery for women who have previously had one CS.

Study Design

Two-hundred and sixty-six women who had a single previous lower segment CS were invited to attend OCEANS, which is a 1-h discussion group of women between 5 and 15 in number, facilitated by an experienced obstetrician. Data were collected prospectively on women who were invited to attend OCEANS over a 12-month period commencing on the 1st January 2012.

Results

188 (71 %) attended the group, while 20 (8 %) canceled their appointment and 58 (22 %) did not keep their appointment. Those who attended OCEANS were 38 % more likely to opt for a VBAC than those who did not attend. There was no difference in the rates of successful vaginal delivery between women who attended OCEANS and those who did not (56 vs. 61 %, p = 0.55).

Conclusions

While nurse-led prenatal education and support groups have no impact on mode of delivery after one CS, a dedicated obstetrician-led clinic increases the rate of those opting for VBAC by 38 %. Such clinics may be a useful tool helping in empowering women in their decision-making and reduce the rate of CSs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Paterok EM, Roenthal H, Sabel M. Nipple discharge and abnormal galactogram. Results of a long-term study (1964–1999). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1993;50:227–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Guise JM, Eden K, Emeis C, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. Evid Rep Technol Assess. 2010;191:1–397.

    Google Scholar 

  3. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. cesarean Section. NICE clinical guideline 132; 2011.

  4. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Birth after previous cesarean birth. RCOG Guideline No. 45. London: RCOG Press; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, et al. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(6):1226–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wu S, Kocherginsky M, Hibbard JU. Abnormal placentation: twenty-year analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(5):1458–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Thomas J, Paranjothy S. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit. The National Sentinel Supplementary Material (scanned copies of 1st pages of references) cesarean Section Audit Report. London: RCOG Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Landon MB. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Clin Perinatol. 2008;35(3):491–504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Emmett CL, Shaw AR, Montgomery AA, et al. Women’s experience of decision making about mode of delivery after a previous cesarean section: the role of health professionals and information about health risks. BJOG. 2006;113(12):1438–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fraser W, Maunsell E, Hodnett E, et al. Randomized controlled trial of a prenatal vaginal birth after cesarean section education and support program. Childbirth Alternatives Post-Cesarean Study Group. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;176(2):419–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Silver B, Zaman IF, Ashraf K, et al. A randomized trial of decision-making in asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Neurology. 2012;78(5):315–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Montgomery AA, Emmett CL, Fahey T, et al. Two decision aids for mode of delivery among women with previous cesarean section: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2007;334(7607):1305.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Ethical Standards

The manuscript does not contain clinical studies or patient data.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vasanth Andrews.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wong, K.W., Thomas, J.M. & Andrews, V. Are Women’s and Obstetricians, Views on Mode of Delivery Following a Previous Cesarean Section Really OCEANS Apart?. J Obstet Gynecol India 64, 400–402 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-014-0553-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-014-0553-0

Keywords

Navigation