Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of Period of Gestation and Position of Fetal Neck on Nuchal Translucency Measurement

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to determine the effects of period of gestation and position of fetal neck on nuchal translucency measurement.

Materials and Methods

Nuchal translucency was measured in the mid-sagittal plane, with the fetal neck in the flexed, neutral, and extended positions in 100 pregnant women between 11 and 13+6 weeks. Mean nuchal translucency measurements at different periods of gestation were compared. Differences between the extended and neutral positions (Δ extended nuchal translucency) and those between the flexed and neutral positions (Δ flexed nuchal translucency) were calculated. The repeatability coefficients for the measurements in all the three positions were computed. Statistical analysis was also done.

Results

Nuchal translucency values were 1.050 ± 0.282 mm in the 11th week, 1.243 ± 0.348 mm in the 12th week, and 1.823 ± 0.357 mm in the 13th week (r = 0.747, p < 0.0001). The mean Δ flexed value was 0.233 ± 0.133 mm lesser than the neutral value (p < 0.0001). The mean Δ extended nuchal translucency was 0.305 ± 0.155 mm greater than the neutral value (p < 0.0001). The repeatability coefficient was the lowest in the neutral position (0.17 mm in the neutral position, 0.28 in the flexed position and 0.41 mm in the extended position).

Conclusion

We concluded that the period of gestation and fetal neck position can make a significant difference to nuchal translucency measurement. Repeatability of measurement is more accurate with the fetal neck in the neutral position. These findings have important implications for clinicians using nuchal translucency to screen the obstetric population for Down’s syndrome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pandya PP, Kondylios A, Hilbert L, et al. Chromosomal defects and outcome in1015 fetuses with increased nuchal translucency. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995;5:15–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wheeler DM, Sinosich MJ. Prenatal screening in first trimester of pregnancy. Prenat Diagn. 1998;18:537–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. de Graaf IM, Pajkrt E, Bilardo CM, et al. Early pregnancy screening for fetal aneuploidies with serum markers and nuchal translucency. Prenat Diagn. 1999;19:458–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical assessment. Lancet. 1986;i:307–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Braithwaite JM, Morris RW, Economides DJ. Nuchal translucency measurement: frequency distribution and changes with gestation in a general population. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;103:1201–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Whitlow BJ, Chatzipapas IK, Economides DL. The effect of fetal neck position on nuchal translucency measurement. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;105:872–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Braithwaite JM, Morris R, Economides DL. The measurement of nuchal translucency with transabdominal and transvaginal sonography: success rate, repeatability, and level of agreement. Br J Radiol. 1995;68:720–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Braithwaite JM, Kadir RA, Pepera T, et al. Nuchal translucency measurement: training of potential examiners. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1996;8:192–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. We LK, Chai HY, Supriyanto E. Computerized nuchal translucency three dimensional reconstruction, visualization and measurement for trisomy 21 prenatal early assessment. Int J Phys Sci. 2011;6(19):4640–8.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wee LK, Chai HY, Supriyanto E. Surface rendering of three dimensional ultrasound images using VTK. J Sci Ind Res. 2011;70(6):421–6.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kagan KO, Wright D, Etchegaray A, et al. Effect of deviation of nuchal translucency measurements on the performance of screening for trisomy 21. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33(6):657–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Del Carmen SM, DeVigan C, Vodovar V, et al. Measurement of nuchal translucency and the prenatal diagnosis of down syndrome. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(4):829–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Obstetrics & Gynecology, L.T.M. Medical College, Sion, Mumbai, 400022, India

    Shailesh Kore (Associate Professor), Aparna Hegde (Lecturer), Divya Kanavia (Registrar), Pradnya Supe (Registrar), Mansi Parikh (Registrar) & Y. S. Nandanwar (Professor & Head)

Authors
  1. Shailesh Kore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Aparna Hegde
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Divya Kanavia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Pradnya Supe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mansi Parikh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Y. S. Nandanwar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shailesh Kore.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 171 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kore, S., Hegde, A., Kanavia, D. et al. Effects of Period of Gestation and Position of Fetal Neck on Nuchal Translucency Measurement. J Obstet Gynecol India 63, 244–248 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-012-0341-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-012-0341-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation