Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Maternal and Perinatal Death Inquiry and Response Project Implementation Review in India

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Profile of maternal deaths in selected districts of four Indian states was studied to examine the regional differences in non-biological causal factors (socioeconomic and sociocultural) in maternal mortality and to examine the method and completeness of implementation of Maternal and Perinatal Death Inquiry and Response (MAPEDIR) process.

Methods

An integrated qualitative and quantitative method was used to study the MAPEDIR process in selected districts of four states in India, through the use of standardized questionnaire for key informant interviews, participant observation checklist, analysis of verbal autopsy questionnaire, and maternal death reports.

Results

A comparison of Profile’s maternal deaths investigated showed that women died between 25 and 27 years of age. Half of the women died at home because of inability to afford transport (Delay II) and treatment costs. One third of the deaths had occurred in a health facility (Delay III) because of lack of specialists, equipments or blood. Two thirds of the delays (Delay I) were in seeking medical care. Review of the implementation process of MAPEDIR highlighted that the social audit review model is a unique field based collaborative initiative comprising of stakeholders from various sector in order to improve maternal health programming by reducing maternal mortality.

Conclusions

MAPEDIR has been able to identify socio-cultural, economic and health care systems related determinants of maternal deaths. Standardization the mechanism for information data sharing at district, sub-district and village level can maximize the use of available evidence for advocacy and policy shifts by developing policies and interventions suited to local needs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. At the institutional level, the MAPEDIR process has spawned new strategic partnerships between government agencies, NGOs, academic institutions, and the UN system. A collaborative initiative, it has elicited the involvement of several key institutions and groups including the Government of India, State Governments, District Administrations, Panchayati Raj (village-level institutions), women’s self-help groups, local non-governmental organisations (NGOs), medical faculties of Indian universities, the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health (USA), WHO, UNFPA, and UNICEF.

References

  1. Trends in maternal mortality 1990–2008. Estimates developed by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA and the World Bank. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241500265_eng.pdf. Accessed 27 April 2011.

  2. Special bulletin on maternal mortality in India 2004–2006. Sample Registration System. Registrar General of India. New Delhi. http://www.mp.gov.in/health/MMR-Bulletin-April-2009.pdf. Accessed 27 April 2011.

  3. Kim SY, Rochat R, Rahartnam A, et al. Evaluating completeness of maternal mortality reporting in a rural health and social affairs unit in Vellore, India, 2004. J Biosoc Sci. 2009;41(2):195–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kumar R. Prevention of maternal mortality: why success eludes us? Indian J Public Health. 2002;46(1):3–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. International Institute of Population Sciences (IIPS) and ORC Macro. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), 2005–2006. Mumbai: IIPS; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Maternal and perinatal death enquiry and response. Empowering community to take actions. UNICEF. http://www.unicef.org/india/MAPEDIR-Maternal_and_Perinatal_Death_Inquiry_and_Response-India.pdf. Accessed 27 April 2011.

  7. Rural health care in system in India structure and current scenario. http://mohfw.nic.in/Rural%20Health%20Care%20System%20in%20India.pdf. Accessed 20 April 2011.

  8. National rural health mission. Framework for implementation 2005–2012. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. New Delhi. http://www.mohfw.nic.in/NRHM/Documents/NRHM_Framework_Latest.pdf Accessed 20 April 2011.

  9. Panchayati Raj I Ministry of Panchayati Raj. Government of India. http://panchayat.gov.in/index.do?siteid=101&sitename=Government%20of%20India%20%3Cbr%3E%20Ministry%20of%20Panchayati%20Raj. Accessed 20 April 2011.

  10. Supratikto G, Wirth ME, Achadi E, et al.. A district-based audit of the causes and circumstances of maternal deaths in South Kalimantan. Indonesia. Bull World Health Organ. 2002;80(3):228–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fikree FF, Gray RH, Berendes HW, et al.. A community based nested case control study of maternal mortality. Int J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;47:247–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jafarey SN, Rizvi T, Koblinsky M, et al. Verbal autopsy of maternal deaths in two districts of Pakistan: filling information gaps. J Health Popul Nutr. 2009;27(2):170–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chowdhury ME, Ahmed A, Kalim N, et al. Causes of maternal mortality decline in Matlab. Bangladesh. J Health Popul Nutr. 2009;27(2):108–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Iyengar K, Iyengar SD, Suhalka V, et al. Pregnancy-related deaths in rural Rajasthan, India: exploring causes, context, and care-seeking through verbal autopsy. J Health Popul Nutr. 2009;27(2):293–302.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jafarey SN, Korejo R. Mothers brought dead: an enquiry into cases of delay. Soc Sci Med. 1993;36:371–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to Dr. Jeyashree Kathiresan, Junior Resident, and Ms Nadia Diamond-Smith, visiting fellow in School of Public Health, PGIMER, Chandigarh for their contribution in conducting data analysis. Funding from UNICEF, New Delhi, India is gratefully acknowledged.

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interests.

Ethical standard

Not applicable, as this study did not involve conducting intervention among human or animal subjects and medical records were not evaluated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Madhu Gupta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dikid, T., Gupta, M., Kaur, M. et al. Maternal and Perinatal Death Inquiry and Response Project Implementation Review in India. J Obstet Gynecol India 63, 101–107 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-012-0264-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-012-0264-3

Keywords

Navigation