Skip to main content
Log in

Iron Deficiency Anemia in Pregnancy: Intravenous Versus Oral Route

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of intravenous iron with oral iron in the treatment of iron deficiency anemia of pregnancy.

Methods

A randomized experimental study was conducted at K. J. Somaiya Hospital involving 200 pregnant women with iron deficiency anemia. In the intravenous group iron dose was calculated from: Total iron dose required (mg) = 2.4 × weight kg × target hemoglobin − actual hemoglobin) g/dl + 500.   Target hemoglobin was set at 12 g/dl. In the oral group patients received 200 mg oral ferrous ascorbate daily. Hemoglobin and serum ferritin were reviewed at 2, 4, and 6 weeks. Paired and independent t test was applied.

Results

The change in hemoglobin and ferritin levels from baseline was significantly higher in the intravenous group than the oral group at each measurement (P = 0.000).

Conclusion

Intravenous iron elevates hemoglobin and restores iron stores faster than oral iron, with no severe adverse reactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Graph 1
Graph 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Candio F, Hofmeyr GJ. Treatments for iron deficiency anemia in pregnancy. RHL commentary. The WHO Reproductive Health Library. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2007.

  2. UNICEF/UNO/WHO. Iron deficiency anemia: assessment, prevention and control. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2001.

  3. Kalaivani K. Prevalence and consequences of anemia in pregnancy. Indian J Med Res. 2009;130:627–33.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), India; 2005–2006.

  5. Danielson BG, Salmonson T, Derendorf H, et al. Pharmacokinetics of iron(III) hydroxide sucrose complex after a single intravenous dose in healthy volunteers. Arzneimittelforschung. 1996;46:615–21.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Beshara S, Lundqvist H, Sundin J, et al. Pharmacokinetics and red cell utilization of iron(III) hydroxide–sucrose complex in anaemic patients: a study using positron emission tomography. Br J Haematol. 1999;104:296–302.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Yee J, Besarab A. Iron sucrose: the oldest iron therapy becomes new. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002;40:1111–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Teucher B, Olivares M, Cori H. Enhancers of iron absorption: ascorbic acid and other organic acids. Int J Vitam Nutr Res. 2004;74:403–19.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. al-Momen AK, al-Meshari A, al-Nuaim L, et al. Intravenous iron sucrose complex in the treatment of iron deficiency anemia during pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1996;69:121–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bayoumeu F, Subiran-Buisset C, Baka NE, et al. Iron therapy in iron deficiency anemia in pregnancy: intravenous route versus oral route. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186:518–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Al RA, Unlubilgin E, Kandemir O, et al. Intravenous versus oral iron for treatment of anemia in pregnancy: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106:1335–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bencaiova G, von Mandach U, Zimmermann R. Iron prophylaxis in pregnancy: intravenous route versus oral route. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;144:135–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deeba Shafi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shafi, D., Purandare, S.V. & Sathe, A.V. Iron Deficiency Anemia in Pregnancy: Intravenous Versus Oral Route. J Obstet Gynecol India 62, 317–321 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-012-0222-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-012-0222-0

Keywords

Navigation