Introduction

Bottom water reservoir suffered from water conning/cresting owing to formation heterogeneity, resulting in the dramatic rise of water cut, even the abandoning of well. There are plenty of chemical methods to block the uprising channel of bottom water, such as polymer, nitrogen foam and nitrogen (Pang et al. 2008, 2010; Chan 1988; Zaitoun and Pichery 2001) of which the nitrogen foam could play an important role in anti-water coning/cresting technology (AWCT) on account of its unique properties (Li et al. 2010; Schramm 1994; Simjoo and Zitha 2013; Sun et al. 2015).

Foam, considered as an impressive water profile control agent, does not directly change the water relative permeability curve or water viscosity (Bernard and Jacobs 1965; Lawson and Reisberg 1980; de Vries and Wit 1990). Foam can affect k rw indirectly through higher trapped gas saturation and reduced water saturation (Aarra et al. 2014). Foam can greatly reduce gas mobility in porous media in two ways: reduce gas relative permeability and increase apparent gas viscosity (Falls et al. 1988). The gas relative permeability reduction effect is caused by a large effective trapped gas saturation created by foam. The dragging of flowing lamellae along pore walls leads additional resistance to the flowing of foaming bubbles compared with foam-free gas (Hirasaki and Lawson 1985).

Zang found that foam resistance factor depends on parameters such as gas-to-liquid ratio, connate water saturation and surfactant concentration (Zang et al. 2015); however, the stability of foam was not investigated after some days’ aging. Furthermore, previous research has investigated the flowing characteristic of carbon dioxide foam in some low permeable cores under over 110 °C (Mclendon et al. 2014; Steinsbø et al. 2015); however, the properties of other sorts of foam were not been covered under such experimental condition. Besides, the former investigation has barely focused on the stability of foam mobility control ability; at most the foaming solution would be tested for its foaming ability such as foaming volume and drainage half time after some days’ aging under a set experimental condition.

The objective of this paper is to promote the range of nitrogen foam application under high temperature and high salinity by testing the mobility control ability. Moreover, the stability of foam mobility control ability would be observed through a kind of novel method, gaining a new sight into this characteristic of foam. This chapter proceeds with a description of experimental part, presentation and discussion of the results, and then, the main conclusions are drawn.

Apparatus and procedure

Materials

Oil sample was collected from the Northwest oil field, China. Its viscosity is 2.5 cP at 113 °C, the salinity of the formation brine is 212,813 mg/L, in which the concentration of calcium and magnesium ion is over 1.28 × 104 mg/L, and the reservoir temperature is 113 °C, and the formation pressure is 420 bar. Unless otherwise specified, all tests were performed at 113 °C, and water used was synthesized as the analysis data of the real formation water as Table 1 shows. The foam agent, which was synthesized and optimized in laboratory, was named as NS in this paper. During the whole process, the weight concentration of NS was 0.2%. Nitrogen was used as the gas phase in all foam tests.

Table 1 Ion content of brine

The artificial sandstone cores, which were pressed by quartz powder under suitable temperature and pressure, were applied to perform the experiments with a diameter of 2.5 ± 0.1 cm and a length of 30.1 ± 0.1 cm. ISCO pump, produced by Teledyne Co., USA, was designed to push fluid into cores. The stainless core holder, which was fitted precisely with the cores, was conducted the whole process that consists of water injection, foam injection, the extended water injection in a heat oven (was provided by Jiangsu Haian Petroleum Apparatus Co. Ltd., China). The nitrogen flow was regulated by a gas mass flow controller supplied by Bronkhorst High-Tech Co., Netherland.

Experimental procedures

On top of that, the permeability of the core in the presence of formation brine was measured; then, brine water was injected into cores to receive the basic differential pressure.

Secondly, different sorts of nitrogen foam, formed according to different experimental request, were injected into core until the differential pressure between the inlet and outlet of the core was stable. Thirdly, the two valves of the core holder were shut off, remained in the heated oven until reached the asked duration followed by the extended brine injected till the differential pressure fluctuated in a accepted scope.

Foaming solution and nitrogen were co-injected into cores, which were conducted horizontally and performed at 113 °C. Both of brine water and foam were injected at a rate of 0.5 mL/min. The whole schematic of the experimental apparatus is shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic of experimental apparatus for nitrogen foam injection, 1 nitrogen tank, 2 gas mass controller, 3 foam generator, 4 core holder, 5 back pressure valve, 6 hand booster pump, 7 atmospheric valve, 8 produced fluid metering system, 9 ISCO pump, 10 simulated water, 11 foaming solution, 12 oil, 13 heating oven

Results and discussion

Mobility control ability investigation

To quantify the mobility control ability of nitrogen foam, the resistance factor F R, which was defined as the differential pressure ratio of foam and brine injection, was often applied. Eleven series of nitrogen foam injection experiments were performed, which results are summarized in Table 2. Within these tests, the effects of gas-to-liquid ratio, injection rate and permeability on mobility control ability of nitrogen foam were investigated under experimental condition.

Table 2 Summary of mobility control ability of nitrogen foam tests

Effect of gas-to-liquid ratio on foam mobility control ability

Aiming at evaluating the gas-to-liquid ratio (GLR) on foam mobility control ability, three tests (Run 1–3) were carried out by injecting foam with different GLR. For all three runs, keeping the chemical formula constant (0.2 wt% NS), a series of experiments were performed by increasing the GLR incrementally from 1:1–3:1. The curves of F R versus different GLR for three foam injection tests are plotted in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Resistance factor curves of three gas-to-liquid ratio tests (run 1–run 3)

By checking the profile of the three curves, they differ from each other: The curve of GLR 2:1 climbs faster than the other two curves; additionally, it receives the most significant rise and in the end fluctuates around 95 which exceeds much more than that in the curves of GLR 1:1 and GLR 3:1, simultaneously, during the stabilize stage, the curve of GLR 3:1 slumps sometimes.

The reason for this outcome can be explained as follows: On condition that adding the nitrogen volume moderate on the basis of stabilizing the quantity of foaming agent (from 1:1 to 2:1), the volume and quantity of foam would increase, triggering the improvement in foam stability and mobility control ability. Nevertheless, if more nitrogen was added (from 2:1 to 3:1), the foam would expand, causing the thinning of foam film and weakening of foam stability; what’s worse, nitrogen may breakthrough and form the funnels on the F R curve.

Effect of injection rate on foam mobility control ability

With the purpose of studying the effect of injection rate on foam mobility control ability, three series tests (runs 4–6) were designed in which injection rate ranged from 0.5, 1, 2 mL/min. Figure 3 shows the discrepancy during the injection process.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Resistance factor curves of three injection rate tests (run 4–run 6)

Former research achievements found that the lower the injection rate was, the higher the F R would be. However, under experimental condition, the results represented differently: In the beginning, the curve of 0.5 mL/min levels off for almost 0.2 PV, while the other two curves rise; then, during the stable stage, the curve of 0.5 mL/min remains steady around 15; meanwhile, the F R of the 1 and 2 mL/min was 95 and 50, respectively.

The experimental condition may account for this phenomenon: Although the high concentration can increase the boiling temperature of foam solution, the experimental temperature is too high to keep the dynamic balance on the foam film; instead, the foam solution evaporation on the film would be forced, especially under the low injection rate situation. With the increase in injection rate, the latter injected foam solution would be sheared more abundantly to produce more moderate size foam, promoting the foam stability. By assuming that continue boosting injection rate, the shear force would be enhanced further, the decrease function of the apparent viscosity of foam would surpass the process of forming more foam, and therefore, the foam cannot build enough resistance, causing the descend of mobility control ability.

Effect of permeability on foam mobility control ability

In order to investigate the effect of core permeability on foam mobility control ability, five tests were conducted, and the core permeability was 43, 120, 348, 504, 840 mD, respectively. Figure 4 shows the resistance factor curves of five permeabilities.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Resistance factor curves of five permeability tests (run 7–run 11)

What is shown in the graph is that: In the whole process of foam injection, five curves of resistance factor are rise, and the climbing slope and velocity of the curves are differed from each other yet. The higher permeability core obtains more resistance factor, and it also augments faster. The specific results are shown in Table 3.

Table 3 Summary of stability of mobility control ability of nitrogen foam tests

The wider pore throat can shed light on the diversity: The higher the permeability is, the wider the average size of pore throat would be; in this throat, foam would be shear more gently than that in the narrower throat, triggering higher apparent viscosity of foam, which is crucial to build more flowing resistance; consequently, nitrogen foam can acquire the most remarkable mobility control ability in the 840 mD core.

Stability of mobility control ability

The residual resistance factor F RR, which was defined as the pressure drop ratio of the two brine injection stages after and before foam injection, was utilized to measure the stability of foam mobility control ability. Two series tests were carried out to study the effect of oil on stability of foam mobility control ability by comparing the F RR alteration of aging 5 days and unaged foam. The properties of the cores and results of every stage are summarized in Table 3. An extensive de-emulsification process was required when the produced effluent was oil-in-water emulsion. Figure 5 demonstrates the F RR changes of nitrogen foam between unaged and aging 5 days in the 113 °C oven.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Resistance factor and residual resistance factor curves of two aging duration tests (run 12–run 13)

Figure 5 compares the difference of the two processes: The stability of foam would be affected dramatically at the presence of oil, and the stable F R numerical value of the two curves was much smaller than that under non-oil condition. Simultaneously, after 5 days’ aging, the F RR collapsed apparently in contrast to the unaged foam.

One reason might can be cited to justify this: On account of the defoaming function of oil, the foam would be prone to break in the oil bank; beyond that, once foam had been contacted with oil, the re-foaming ability, which was one of its properties, would descend, resulting in the decline of the quantity of reproducing foam; taking all the above into consideration, on the profile of curve, the F R of foam in the presence of oil was much smaller. Additionally, after 5 days’ aging under 113 °C condition, although the curve fluctuated, which indicated that foam was produced in the cores, the foaming solution and nitrogen cannot produce enough foam to build ample resistance by virtue of the activity loss of foaming solution molecule, causing the F RR slump of the aged foam.

To illuminate this nature in particular, foam was in accordance with the demand of anti-water coning/cresting, which required the flowing resistance to reduce in the oil bank channel; instead, the flowing resistance in the channel with low oil saturation would much higher than that in oil bank channel, which would be convenient for the sweep area promotion in the oil bank channel by bottom water.

Conclusion

The mobility control ability of nitrogen foam which was generated by 0.2wt % NS was studied under different gas-to-liquid ratio by measuring the resistance factor F R, foam injection rate and permeability, the stability of mobility control ability through some days’ aging as well. The whole experimental process was proceeded at a back pressure of 420 bar and the ambient temperature was 113 °C, and the formation brine salinity was 21.2 × 104 mg/L. The main conclusions from this study are as follows:

  1. 1.

    By increasing gas-to-liquid ratio from 1:1 to 2:1, F R was promoted dramatically; but on proceeding up to 3:1, the F R curve descended and fluctuated, indicating that the most suitable gas-to-liquid ratio was 2:1 under this experimental condition.

  2. 2.

    Compared with former investigation accomplishments, what is different was that too slow injection rate (0.5 mL/min) would boost the evaporation speed, resulting in the weaker mobility control ability under experimental condition. The moderate injection rate (1 mL/min) would receive more outstanding F R than that under the rate of 2 mL/min.

  3. 3.

    The higher the permeability of cores was (from 43 mD to 840 mD), the higher the F R was, which was in accordance with the former study on the effect of diameter of pore on the mobility control ability of foam.

  4. 4.

    With a novel insight into the stability of mobility control ability of foam, after 5 days’ aging, the nitrogen foam still got some ability to control the water channeling, which was suitable for demand of anti-water coning for bottom water reservoir.