Introduction

Synthetic dyes are widely used by several industries such as paper production, textile, leather and food technology. Disposing them to the natural waters can cause serious environmental problems such as decreasing the water transparency and decreasing photosynthesis (Forgiarini and de Souza 2007). On the basis of dye chemical structure, they are classified into various groups such as basic, acidic, azo, diazo and anthraquinone dyes. Currently, 10,000 registered different types of dyes are used in industrials (Ghaly et al. 2014). It is estimated that, this industries spend a lot of water (approximately 0.08–0.15 m3) to produce 1 kg of fabrics and create up to 1000–2000 m3⁄d wastewater (Arslan-Alaton et al. 2009;Ghaly et al. 2014). Malachite Green (MG) dye has molecular formula C23H25N2Cl, and it contains three groups of aryls (molecular weight = 364.92, solubility in water 66.67 g/L as the chloride salt, λmax = 617 nm) (Fig. 1). The MG, a cationic triphenylmethane and also called basic green 4, is extensively used for dyeing cotton, silk, paper, leather and plastics, in acrylic industries and also as biocide in the aquacultural industry due to its high effectiveness as a strong antifungal, antibacterial and antiparasitic agent (Srivastava et al. 2004). Malachite Green is classified as Class II health hazard because it was found to be environmentally persistent and acutely detrimental effects on immune and reproductive system, liver, gill, kidney, intestine, gonads and pituitary gonadotrophic cells (Srivastava et al. 2004; Stolker et al. 2007). Although, Malachite Green has been banned in many countries for aquacultural use, it is still being used due to its low cost, ready availability and efficacy (Li et al. 2012b). Therefore, the removal of MG from aqueous solution is environmentally important.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Structural formula of Malachite Green dye

In recent years, advanced oxidation process (AOP) has been successfully employed as an efficient procedure for degrading organic compounds in aqueous solutions (Hoffmann et al. 1995). In AOPs, the hydroxyl radicals (·OH) are very promising because of their high oxidation efficiency, rapid mineralization and their non-selective reactivity (Hoffmann et al. 1995). Recently, electrochemical AOPs (EAOPs) have received great attention because they are environmentally clean and can produce a large amount of hydroxyl radicals under control of applied current (Peralta-Hernández et al. 2006). Anodic oxidation (AO), so-called direct electrochemical oxidation, and electro-Fenton process (EFP) are the most common EAOPs that are able to produce hydroxyl radical (·OH) for destroying organic pollutants. They are characterized by high standard redox potential (E = 2.80 V/SHE) (Sirés et al. 2014). Direct electro-oxidation is theoretically possible at low potentials but has slow reaction rate and low ·OH concentration at the anode. Moreover, due to the formation of a polymer layer on the anode surface, there is a decrease in the catalytic activity, commonly called the poisoning effect (Canizares et al. 2004; Rodrigo et al. 2001). In the electro-Fenton process (EFP), by using the coupling of electrochemistry and Fenton’s reaction, one of the EAOPs is employed to react with the pollutants. Ting et al. (2008) classified the EF process into four categories. Type 1: sacrificial iron anode is used as a ferrous ion source, while hydrogen peroxide is externally added. Type 2: ferrous ion is externally applied, and hydrogen peroxide is generated by an oxygen-sparging cathode. Type 3: hydrogen peroxide and ferrous ion are electro-generated using an oxygen-sparging cathode and a sacrificial anode. Type 4: Fenton’s reagent (Fe2+, H2O2) is added to produce hydroxyl radicals in the electrolytic cell, and ferrous ion is regenerated via the reduction of ferric ion on the cathode (Ting et al. 2008). Electro-coagulation process (ECP) includes the generation of coagulants in situ by dissolving electrically iron ions in iron electrodes. The basic reactions that occur in an EC cell are described in the following reactions (Dia et al. 2017):

$$ {\text{Anodic}}\;{\text{reactions}}:{\text{M}}_{\text{s}} \to {\text{M}}_{{\left( {\text{aq}} \right)}}^{{{\text{n}} + }} + {\text{ne}}^{ - } $$
(1)
$$ {\text{Cathodic}}\;{\text{reaction}}:\; 2{\text{H}}_{2} {\text{O}} + 2{\text{e}}^{ - } \to 2{\text{OH}}^{ - } + {\text{H}}_{2} $$
(2)
$$ {\text{In}}\;{\text{the}}\;{\text{solution}}:{\text{M}}_{{\left( {\text{aq}} \right)}}^{{{\text{n}} + }} + {\text{nOH}}^{ - } \to {\text{M}}\left( {\text{OH}} \right)_{{{\text{n}}\left( {\text{s}} \right)}} $$
(3)

Most of the researchers used the electro-Fenton technology for the treatment of effluents from the dyeing industry with low concentration. Fe2+ was in situ generated at the iron anodes, and hydrogen peroxide was added externally. In this paper, we evaluate the effect of different key variables involved in the EFP, including pH value, current density, H2O2 doses, kinetic of the reaction and the presence of different scavengers.

Materials and methods

Chemicals analytical procedures

Malachite Green was purchased from Sigma–Aldrich which was in the crystalline form with purity of 65%. Other chemicals including NaCl, H2SO4 and NaOH were analytical grade from Merck. The pH of the solution was adjusted to the desired value at the initial reaction, by adding dilute 0.1 M HCl or 0.1 M NaOH, and was measured by pH meter (Philips PW 9422). The pH of the solution was not controlled during the reaction. Malachite Green was used without further purification in distilled water, using 0.008 M NaCl as supporting electrolyte. This adjustment has shown negligible effect on the initial pH of the solution. At the end of EFP, the residual H2O2 in the filtrate was quenched immediately with 5 mM sodium thiosulfate (Na2S2O3.5H2O). Before analysis, the withdrawn sample was filtered through 0.45 μm acetate cellulose filter, and then, residual dye concentration was analyzed. The removal of color was followed by measuring the drop in absorbance at the maximum wavelength of the dye (λmax = 617 nm), using a spectrophotometer (Hach, Germany). The removal efficiency was calculated as follows:

$$ R\left( \% \right) = \frac{{C_{0} - C_{\text{e}} }}{{C_{0} }} \times 100 $$
(4)

where \( C_{0} \) and \( C_{\text{e}} \) are dye concentrations at the initiation and the end of reaction, respectively. The degree of dye mineralization was measured before and after the processes by determining the total organic carbon (TOC) of the solution using a TOC analyzer (Shimadzu). The mineralization efficiency was calculated as follows:

$$ {\text{Mineralization}}\;{\text{efficiency}}\left( \% \right) = \frac{{{\text{TOC}}_{0} - {\text{TOC}}_{\text{t}} }}{{{\text{TOC}}_{0} }} \times 100 $$
(5)

where TOC0 and TOCt denote the TOC concentrations before and after oxidation, respectively. Residual H2O2 concentration was determined spectrophotometrically (410 nm) using titanium(IV) oxysulfate in accordance with the DIN 38402H15 method (Giannakis et al. 2017).

The concentrations of residual Fe2+ and Fe3+ ions at the end of electrolysis were determined using the phenanthroline colorimetric method recommended by the American Public Health Association (APHA 1998). The mineralization current efficiency (MCE) of each tested solution was calculated as follows (Guinea et al. 2010):

$$ {\text{MCE}} \left( \% \right) = \frac{{{\text{nFV}}_{\text{s}} \Delta ({\text{TOC}})_{ \exp } }}{{4.32 \times 10^{7} \,{\text{mIt}}}} $$
(6)

where F is the Faraday constant (96,487 C/mol), Vs is the solution volume (dm3), ∆ (TOC)exp is the experimental TOC decay (mg/dm3), 4.32 × 107 is the conversion factor of units (3600 s/h × 12,000 mg of C/mol), m is the number of carbon atoms of MG, I is the applied current (A), t is the electrolysis time (h) and n is the number of electrons consumed in the mineralization process of each MG molecule. The n-value was taken as 126, considering that each MG is completely mineralized to CO2 by the reaction (Hashemian 2013):

$$ {\text{C}}_{23} {\text{H}}_{25} {\text{ClN}}_{2} + 52{\text{H}}_{2} {\text{O}} \to 23 {\text{CO}}_{2} + 129 {\text{H}}^{ + } + 2{\text{NO}}_{3}^{ - } + {\text{Cl}}^{ - } + 126{\text{e}}^{ - } $$
(7)

Experimental setup

A schematic diagram of the experimental setup is shown in Fig. 2. Experimental studies were carried out in an undivided electrochemical cell with a volume of 250 mL by constant agitation with a magnetic stirrer at a rate of 300 rpm. Cylindrical glass vessel made from Pyrex having 5 cm internal diameter and a 25 cm height operated in the batch mode. Electrochemical cell was equipped with a cathode and an anode, both made of iron and installed in parallel. Initial experiments were conducted at room temperature of 25 °C. In order to do electrolyses, the electrodes were connected to a digital DC power supply (GW Instek, GPS 3030 DD, 0–30.0 V, 0.0–5.0 A). Simultaneously, a certain amount of H2O2 was added into the solution, current density was adjusted to the desired value and the electrolysis was started. The area of both electrodes plunged into the beaker containing dye solution had a length × width × thickness dimension of 4 cm × 2.5 cm × 0.2 cm. Two sheets of iron spaced 1 cm apart were installed in the cell’s electrodes

Fig. 2
figure 2

The experimental setup

All the chemical analyses were carried out according to the detailed procedure in standard methods for examination of water and wastewater (APHA 1998). In this study, EFP trials were conducted for different pH values (2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11), current densities (0, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, 15, 20 mA/cm2), H2O2 doses (0, 25, 50, 75, 100, 150, 200 mg/L) and MG concentrations (200, 600, 1000, 1500, 2000, 3000 mg/L) at different reaction time (2.5–30 min) (kinetic of reactions). The EFP of MG was repeated by adding 3 mM of \( \left( {{\text{SO}}_{4}^{ - 2} , {\text{PO}}_{4}^{ - 3} } \right) \) as an anion, 3 mM of EDTA as a hole (h+) scavenger and chelating agent, 3 mM of benzoquinone (BQ) as a superoxide radical scavenger (\( {\text{O}}_{2}^{ \cdot - } \)) and 10 mM of tert-butyl alcohol (TBA) as a hydroxyl radical scavenger (·OH) (Xin et al. 2016). Also, in the optimum condition of the experiment the intermediates produced during the degradation were determined by GC–MS. The operation phases and experimental conditions are given in Table 1. Experimental studies independently were repeated twice, and data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). In addition, the efficacy of the ECP in the removal of MG was also evaluated. In ECP, the addition of H2O2 was stopped to the reactor while the power supply was kept switched on. In addition, characteristic of the waste sludge produced from the method was also observed. Sludge production was determined by TSS (total suspended solids) and SVI (sludge volume index) according to Standard Methods (APHA 1998).

Table 1 The operation phases and experimental conditions

Analysis of metabolites formed after decolorization

Extraction of degradation metabolites

A 50.0 mL of sample solution was transferred into a volumetric flask, and then 1 mL of n-hexan was added and vigorously stirred for 10 min. After separation of organic phase from water sample, the organic phase was transferred to an Eppendorf microtube containing 100 mg anhydrous Na2SO4 and mixed well for 5 min. The mixture was centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 3 min. A 500 µL portion of organic phase was transferred into a 1.0 mL vial, and 1 µL was injected into the GC–MS (Cui et al. 2016; Wanyonyi et al. 2017).

GC–MS Analysis

Malachite Green degradation metabolites analysis was performed on an Agilent 7890 gas chromatograph equipped with an Agilent 5975C mass spectrometer detector, equipped with HP-5MS capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm i.d., 0.25 μm film thicknesses) and ChemStation software. Helium was used as carrier gas with the flow rates of 1 mL/min. The initial temperature of column was maintained at 50 °C for 1 min and then raised at 5 °C/min to 180 °C and held for 2 min and then raised at 10 °C/min to 260 °C and held for 15 min. Injection of samples was carried out in splitless mode. The injector, detector, line transfer and ion resource temperatures were set at 250 °C, 260 °C, 280 °C and 230 °C, respectively (Cui et al. 2016; Wanyonyi et al. 2017). Mass spectra were scanned in the range of 40–500 amu. Identification of individual compounds was made by comparison of their mass spectra with those of the internal reference Wiley 7NL mass spectra library.

Results and discussion

Effect of pH and the mechanism MG degradation

The effect of pH at different pH values (2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11) on the degradation of MG in the ECP and EFP was investigated under the conditions specified in Table 1. The degradation of MG as a function of pH is shown in Fig. 3. As observed in Fig. 3, the highest electro-Fenton activity was attained under pH 3, where the MG removal reached near 89%. These findings confirm that EFP and ECP efficiency is a function of pH. Based on the results plotted in Fig. 3, the removal of MG in EFP increased from 82% at pH 2 to 89.2% when pH was increased to 3. A further increase in pH to 11 led to a considerable decline of MG removal to 40.3% under the selected conditions. This result is entirely consistent with the findings of other authors which indicated that the optimal pH of Fenton process is around 3 (Guenfoud et al. 2014; Hameed and Lee 2009; Hashemian 2013; Panizza and Cerisola 2009b; Wang et al. 2010). For instance, Hameed and Lee (2009) investigated the degradation of Malachite Green by Fenton process and observed the maximum degradation of MG in a [dye] = 20 mg/L, [H2O2] = 20 mM and [Fe2+] = 0.05 mM at pH level 3. Similarly, Panizza and Cerisola (2009b) reported that electro-Fenton process reached its maximum degradation of Alizarin Red at pH 3.0 with a maximum COD removal of 93% at 4 h. At low pH values below 3, hydrogen peroxide would stay steady according to the formation of oxonium ion as shown in Eq. 8. Furthermore, iron species form stable complexes (e.g., \( {\text{Fe(H}}_{2} {\text{O)}}_{6}^{2 + } \)) with H2O2 at lower pH values, leading to deactivation of catalysts (Zhou et al. 2007):

Fig. 3
figure 3

Effect of solution pH on MG degradation in EFP and ECP (initial MG concentration = 200 mg/L; current density = 7.5 mA/cm2; H2O2 dosage = 50 mg/L; reaction time = 10 min)

$$ {\text{H}}_{2} {\text{O}}_{2} + {\text{H}}^{ + } \to {\text{H}}_{3} {\text{O}}_{2}^{ + } $$
(8)

On the other hand, iron species began to precipitate as ferric hydroxides (Fe(OH)n) at higher pH values and thus the ratio of Fe2+/Fe3+ decreased (Jiang and Zhang 2007). In this way, when the solution pH further increased oxidation together with simultaneous coagulation and formation of hydroxyl complexes, these ferric hydroxide complexes led to the deactivation of a ferrous catalyst (Szpyrkowicz et al. 2001). Thus, due to the EFP result of co-action of hydrogen peroxide and ferrous ion, the conversion of Fe2+ and Fe3+ to Fe(OH)n-type structures led to the degradation tendency of MG at different pH values (Zhou et al. 2007). Moreover, H2O2 rapidly decomposed to oxygen and water at basic solution with rate constant of 2.3 × 10−2 and 7.4 × 10−2 min−1 at pH 7.0 and 10.5, respectively (Shemer and Linden 2006). The maximum percentage removal of EFP in removal of MG attained at pH = 3 can be stated considering the continuous release of Fe2+ through anodic scarification/oxidation [Eq. (9)] and the classic Fenton reaction [Eq. (10)] (Eiroa et al. 2005):

$$ {\text{Anode}}\;{\text{scarification}}/{\text{oxidation}}:{\text{Fe}}_{s} \to {\text{Fe}}_{aq}^{2 + } + 2e^{ - } \quad E^{0} = 0.711 V $$
(9)
$$ {\text{Fenton - reaction}}\;{\text{Fe}}^{2 + } + {\text{H}}_{2} {\text{O}}_{2} \to {\text{OH}}^{ \cdot } + {\text{Fe}}^{3 + } + {\text{OH}}^{ - } $$
(10)

Therefore, according to Fig. 3 maximum difference of EFP and ECP efficiency in removal of MG was observed at an acidic pH. It was concluded that acidic pH was required to increase the efficiency of the EFP. This narrow pH range for the EF process limits the perfect application of this technology in wastewater treatment. Hopefully, inherent pH of MG is 3 and there is no need to adjust pH. Ray et al. (2006) reported that pH of wastewater outputs from acrylic fiber industry (its wastewater contains MG) at low pollution load is 4. Li et al. (2012a) reported that Fenton process reached its maximum degradation of acrylic fiber manufacturing wastewater at pH 3.

However, the Fe3+ formed during Eq. (10) cause one of the parasitic reactions in EFP. According to Eq. (11), Fe3+ by consumption of H2O2 and thus competing with the main Fenton reaction can cause limiting generation of ·OH (Eiroa et al. 2005):

$$ {\text{Fe}}^{3 + } + {\text{H}}_{2} {\text{O}}_{2} \to {\text{HO}}_{2}^{ \cdot } + {\text{Fe}}^{2 + } + {\text{H}}^{ + } $$
(11)

The MG was degraded through the generated reactive radicals (hydroxyl and hydroperoxyl) (Eq. 12 and Eq. 13):

$$ {\text{MG}} + {\text{OH}}^{ \cdot } \to {\text{Product}} $$
(12)
$$ {\text{MG}} + {\text{HO}}_{2}^{ \cdot } \to {\text{Product}} $$
(13)

As the oxidation potential of ·OH (2.8 eV) is much higher than that of HO·2 (E◦ = 1.65 V), in the presence of HO·2, the contribution of reaction (12) in degradation of MG was more decreased than that of reaction (13). Therefore, the occurrence of a parasitic reaction [Eq. (11)] led to limiting the rate of MG degradation (Eiroa et al. 2005).

Based on the results plotted in Fig. 3, the removal of MG in ECP (reaction without H2O2) increased from 5.8% at pH 2 to 31% when pH was increased to 11. According to the speciation curve of Fe(II) in water [Eq. (14)], Fe(OH)+ is the dominant species of iron in the solution with a strong alkaline pH (over 9). The increase in pH during ECP process leads to coagulation of MG and is removed by electrostatic attraction (Santana-Casiano et al. 2006):

$$ {\text{Fe}}^{2 + } + {\text{H}}_{2} {\text{O}} \to {\text{Fe}}\left( {\text{OH}} \right)^{ + } + {\text{H}}^{ + } $$
(14)

In aqueous solution, MG exists in two ionic forms: cationic form and colorless carbinol form (Mitrowska et al. 2008). The carbinol base is colorless and relatively insoluble in water. MG has two amino groups with pKa of 6.9 that are complete protonated and ionized at pH 4 or lower. At pH 10, most molecules are deprotonated, exist solely as the carbinol and so colorless (Mitrowska et al. 2008).

Effect of current density

To choose the suitable applied current density for optimal MG removal in the EFP and ECP, several experiments at an applied current density ranged from 0 to 20 mA/cm2 were investigated (under the conditions given in Table 1). Figure 4 shows the results of MG removal as a function of current density. Figure 5 shows the H2O2 consumption percentage versus the current density at a constant H2O2 concentration of 50 mg/L.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Effect of current density on MG degradation in EFP and ECP (initial MG concentration = 200 mg/L; solution pH = inherent (3); H2O2 dosage = 50 mg/L; reaction time = 10 min)

Fig. 5
figure 5

H2O2 consumption percentage versus the current density (initial MG concentration = 200 mg/L; solution pH = inherent (3); H2O2 dosage = 50 mg/L; reaction time = 10 min)

As shown in Fig. 4, when no current was applied between the electrodes, 9% of MG was removed. This can be attributed to Fenton reaction in the cell between the Fe electrodes and the H2O2 added to the reactor. Consumption of added H2O2 (4%) and the reduction in weight of both electrodes (0.0025 g weight reduction for each electrode) prove this reasoning. As illustrated in Fig. 4, at the low current density of 2.5 mA/cm2, 76% of the MG could be removed. The increase in current density to 10 mA/cm2 caused an increase in removal of MG to 94%. However, a further increase in current density to 15 mA/cm2 had insignificant influence on MG removal. Since the consumption of electric energy increased with the applied current, accordingly the best applied current density of 10 mA/cm2 was selected for the electrodes in the next experiments. According to Faraday’s formula (Eq. (15)), it is clear that Fe2+ dose released from anode depends on the current (Daneshvar et al. 2006):

$$ {\text{C}}_{\text{Fe}} = \frac{{{\text{M}}_{\text{w}} {\text{It}}}}{\text{ZFV}} $$
(15)

where CFe, Z, F, V, Mw and t are the theoretical concentration of Fe2+ (g/m3), the chemical equivalence (ZFe = 2), Faraday constant (96,487 C equiv−1), volume of reactor (m3), molecular weight of iron (= 56 g/mol) and electrolysis time (s), respectively.

Applying an electrical current until density of 15 mA/cm2 resulted in an increase in MG removal to 95.2%. It appeared that higher current densities, according to Faraday’s law, accelerate anodic scarification and the generation of Fe2+ ions, which is a main element required to run the Fenton reaction (Moussavi et al. 2011, 2012). Determination of the ratio of mass of H2O2 added to the reaction cell to the mass of Fe released to the solution (H2O2/Fe(II)) verifies this deduction. As shown in Fig. 4, with increasing intensity of current, the ratio of H2O2/Fe declines. The increase in weight loss of anode electrode, which according to Eq. (9) means an increase in Fe(II) released to the solution, resulted in the decline of H2O2/Fe(II) ratio with increased intensity of current since the total amount of H2O2 added to the reactor at all current densities was constant at 50 mg/L. In the presence of greater Fe(II) available in the solution, reaction of EFP [Eq. (10)] accelerated. Therefore, a greater amount of H2O2 consumption (Fig. 5) and hence a higher amount of ·OH were generated which resulted in an increase in MG removal. A significant amount of flocs were generated, when the current density increased which in turn trapped the dye molecules and enhanced the EFP efficiency (Fig. 4) (Khataee et al. 2009). As shown in Fig. 4, a further increase in current density to 20 mA/cm2 decreased MG removal to 90%. At current densities of over 15 mA/cm2, the decline in MG removal in EFP can be related to higher anode scarification and generation of the excess concentration of Fe2+. According to Eq. (16), the excess Fe2+ scavenged the ·OH and so decreased the ·OH available to react with MG (Pérez et al. 2002):

$$ \cdot {\text{OH}} + {\text{Fe}}^{2 + } \to {\text{Fe}}^{3 + } + {\text{OH}}^{ - } \;k_{{20\,^{ \circ } {\text{C}}}} = 3 \times 10^{ - 8} \,{\text{M}}^{ - 1} {\text{s}}^{ - 1} $$
(16)

Moreover, at higher current density, competitive electrode reaction and parasitic reaction will increase (Nidheesh and Gandhimathi 2012). These reactions include equations of (17), (18) (19) and (20) (Nidheesh and Gandhimathi 2012). The reaction rate constant (k) of Eqs. (19) and (20) is more than 500,000 times greater than k reaction of Eq. (10) (Moussavi and Aghanejad 2014; Nidheesh and Gandhimathi 2012). These reactions inhibit main reactions such as reactions (10) which cause a decrease in efficiency of EFP:

$$ \cdot {\text{OH }}\mathop \to \limits^{ } {\text{O}}_{2} + 2{\text{H}}^{ + } + 2{\text{e}}^{ - } $$
(17)
$$ 2 \cdot {\text{OH}}\mathop \to \limits^{ } {\text{H}}_{2} {\text{O}}_{2} $$
(18)
$$ {\text{H}}_{2} {\text{O}}_{2} + {}_{ }^{ \cdot } \cdot {\text{OH }}\mathop \to \limits^{ } {\text{HO}}_{2}^{ \cdot } + {\text{H}}_{2} {\text{O }}\;k = 2.7 \times 10^{7} \,{\text{M}}^{ - } {\text{S}}^{ - } $$
(19)
$$ {\text{Fe}}^{2 + } + {}_{ }^{ \cdot } \cdot {\text{OH }}\mathop \to \limits^{ } {\text{Fe}}^{3 + } + {\text{OH}}^{ - } \;k = 3.2 \times 10^{8} \,{\text{M}}^{ - } {\text{S}}^{ - } $$
(20)

As shown in Fig. 4, MG removal in the ECP at the current density of 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, 15 and 20 mA/cm2 was 10%, 12.3%, 15%, 30%, 43% and 50.6%, respectively. On the other hand, in the presence of NaCl, oxidant species can be generated by the indirect electrochemical oxidation (Garcia-Segura et al. 2018). In order to determine the role of indirect electrochemical oxidation, the effect of current density for ECP without NaCl was done. Results showed that MG degradation in the ECP without NaCl at the current density of 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, 15 and 20 mA/cm2 was 9%, 11.5%, 14.3%, 29%, 43% and 50%, respectively. It can be seen in the absence of NaCl removal efficiency of MG at ECP negligible decreased. Therefore, role of indirect electrochemical oxidation at degradation of MG is insignificant. This finding agrees with reported in the literature (Ghoneim et al. 2011) which determined that in the presence of Cl ions the efficiency of electrochemical oxidations is lowered, whereas in the presence of other supporting electrolyte.

Effect of H2O2 dosage

The initial concentration of H2O2 plays an important role in the EFP (Ting et al. 2009). The effect of H2O2 dosage on degradation of 200 mg/L MG was investigated at current density of 10 mA/cm2, pH of inherent and time reaction of 10 min. The ratio of mass of H2O2 to that of Fe2+ was calculated from the H2O2 added to the reactor cell and the Fe2+ released by Fe anode scarification. Therefore, the H2O2 concentrations as a function of the percentages of MG removal and the molar ratio of H2O2 to Fe2+ are shown in Fig. 6. As shown in Fig. 6, in the absence of H2O2, the rate of MG removal was only 30% (electro-coagulation). Doses of 25, 50, 75, 100 and 150 mg/L H2O2 resulted in an increase in MG removal to 90, 94, 94.5 94.7 and 95%, respectively. The increase in removal of MG with an increased dose of H2O2 was due to the increase in hydroxyl radical concentration as a result of the addition of H2O2 [Eq. (10)]. In this way, the optimum ratio of H2O2 to Fe2+ was determined to be approximately 0.11 (mg H2O2 to mg Fe2+).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Effect of H2O2 dosage (0–200 mg/L) on MG degradation in EFP (initial MG concentration = 200 mg/L; solution pH = inherent (3); current density = 10 mA/cm2; reaction time = 10 min)

The further increase in H2O2 concentration to 200 mg/L caused MG removal efficiency to decrease down to 91%. At a high dosage of H2O2, the decrease in removal efficiency was due to competing parasitic reactions that cause scavenging effect of H2O2 (Eqs. (21) and (22)) and the recombination of the hydroxyl radical (Eq. (18)) (Babuponnusami and Muthukumar 2012; Muruganandham and Swaminathan 2004):

$$ {\text{OH}}^{ \cdot } + {\text{H}}_{2} {\text{O}}_{2} \to {\text{HO}}_{2}^{ \cdot } + {\text{H}}_{2} {\text{O}} $$
(21)
$$ {\text{HO}}_{2}^{ \cdot } + {\text{OH}}^{ \cdot } \to {\text{H}}_{2} {\text{O}} + {\text{O}}_{2} $$
(22)

Oxidation potentials of hydroperoxyl radicals are less than H2O2. Oxidation potentials of H2O2 and hydroperoxyl radicals are 1.31 and 1.25, respectively, as compared to chlorine: 1.0 (Rodríguez 2003)

Kinetic study of EFP

The effect of MG concentration on its decay kinetic during EFP at 10 mA/cm2 and 50 mg/L H2O2 is shown in Fig. 7. As anticipated, a longer time of electrolysis was required to remove MG as its initial concentration increases due to the superior amount of organics in medium(Panizza and Oturan 2011). The results given in Fig. 7 indicated that removal efficiencies of MG dye were decreased with increasing initial concentrations. For instance, at first 15 min, the removal efficiency observed at initial MG concentrations of 200, 600, 1000, 1500, 2000 and 3000 mg/L was 100, 88.7, 74.3, 68.3, 63 and 53%, respectively. Under the constant conditions of the electrolysis system such as the constant current density, a specified amount of hydroxyl free radicals are produced. When the concentration of the pollutant is increased, the amount of hydroxyl free radicals is not enough to degrade the high concentrations of the pollutant, and thus, removal efficiency decreases (Daneshvar et al. 2008). Furthermore, the result showed that EFP at optimum condition could remove 100% of MG at an inlet concentration up to 1000 mg/L and 92.3, 80.1 and 65% at initial MG concentration of 1500, 2000 and 3000 mg/L in short time reaction as low as 30 min. Considering the fact that the concentration of most fish industry MG-laden effluents is below 100 ppm, it can be concluded that the EFP is an efficient and promising technique for treating fish industry wastewaters containing dyes compounds (Culp and Beland 1996). On the other hand, in most published literature, the concentration of MG removed was less than 50 mg/L (Gokulakrishnan et al. 2012; Guenfoud et al. 2014).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Effect of MG concentration on its degradation (CD = 10 mA/cm2, solution pH = inherent (3), CH2O2 = 50 mg/L−1)

Pseudo-first- and pseudo-second-order reaction kinetics were used to study color removal kinetics for EFP. The individual expressions were presented as follows [Eqs. (23), (24)]:Pseudo-first-order reaction kinetics:

$$ {\text{LnC}}_{t} = {\text{LnC}}_{0} - K_{1} t $$
(23)

Pseudo-second-order reaction kinetics:

$$ \frac{1}{{C_{t} }} = K_{2} t + \frac{1}{{C_{0} }} $$
(24)

where C0 and Ct show the MG concentration at the beginning and after time (t) of the reaction, respectively. K1 and K2 show the pseudo-first- and pseudo-second-order reaction constants, respectively. Values of K1 and K2 can be determined analytically from the slope of the plots Ln Ct against t and 1/Ct against t, respectively (Moussavi et al. 2011).Table 2 shows the obtained values of Kapp and liner correlation (R2) from pseudo-first- and pseudo-second-order kinetics. According to the correlation coefficients (R2) given in Table 2, the experimental data fitted better to the pseudo-first-order reaction (higher values of R2). Furthermore, according to Table 2, the pseudo-first-order rate constants slightly decreased with increasing the concentration of MG dye which was due to the progressive acceleration of competitive reactions between hydroxyl free radicals and the lately formed oxidant by-products of MG dye during the process (El-Desoky et al. 2010; Hafaiedh and Bellakhal 2013).

Table 2 Kinetic parameters for degradation of MG at different initial concentrations by EFP (CD = 10 mA/cm2, pH = 3, CH2O2 = 50 mg/L − 1)

To better determine the rate reaction in EFP and ECP, the kinetics of MG removal with pseudo-first-order reaction is shown in Fig. 8. As shown in Fig. 8, reaction rate constants for EFP and ECP were 0.092 and 0.02 min−1, respectively. Thus, predicting a model for the removal of MG in the EFP and ECP can be proposed as follows:

$$ {\text{EFP}}:r_{\text{MG}} = 0.092(C_{t} )^{2} $$
(25)
$$ {\text{ECP}}:r_{\text{MG}} = 0.02(C_{t} )^{2} $$
(26)

Accordingly, the treatment time required in EFP is 4.6 times lower than ECP.

Fig. 8
figure 8

The plots of pseudo-first-order reaction models fitted in EFP and ECP (CMG = 1000 mg L−1, CD = 10 mA/cm2, pH = 3, CH2O2 = 50 mg L−1)

Characteristic of the waste sludge

One of the most important advantages of EFP in comparison with Fenton process is waste sludge having low amount and high settling properties. To prove this point, TSS and SVI of the waste sludge produced from the EFP and Fenton process in optimum conditions (pH = 3, applied current density 10 mA/cm2, H2O2 concentration 50 mg/L for EFP and 0.3 g/L iron powder depending on the weight loss of the anode electrode in EFP and H2O2 concentration 50 mg/L for Fenton process) were determined. The result showed that TSS is 1540 and 2570 mg/L in EFP and Fenton process, respectively. The SVI value for EFP was determined 7 ml/g, while sludge in Fenton process was not deposited. SVI value lower than 100 is considered as the sludge having good sedimentation characteristics (Tchobanoglous et al. 2003). According to Panizza and Oturan (2011), reaction (10) is reproduced through the continuous regeneration of ferrous iron at the cathode (reaction (27)) Accordingly, accumulation of Fe3+ and thereby production of iron sludge are eliminated:

$$ {\text{Fe}}^{3 + } + {\text{e}}^{ - } \to {\text{Fe}}^{2 + } $$
(27)

Therefore, low amount and high settling properties of EFP in comparison with Fenton process may considerably reduce disposal costs of waste sludge produced for large-scale treatment systems. The standard for effluent discharge regulations for iron is 2 mg/L (EPA. 2002). Results showed at optimum conditions, the residual concentration of iron (Fe2++Fe3+) in treated effluent (supernatant) is 5.8 mg/L. So, using the conventional treatments or the electro-Fenton, excess of the metal would to be removed.

MG mineralization, UV–Vis spectra and identification of intermediates

To conduct investigation of intermediates, the mineralization of MG was studied by measuring the TOC. The TOC decay with electrolysis time of 200 mg/L MG solution under best conditions, previously found, (pH of inherent, applied current density 10 mA/cm2 and H2O2 concentration 50 mg/L) is presented in Fig. 9. The results in Fig. 9 show that TOC is reduced by 62.3% for 5 min and by 95.3% for 30 min. This finding means that almost all the organic compounds are completely mineralized to CO2 and water. Figure 9 depicts the time of MCE values calculated from Eq. (6). As expected, the efficiency was 19.4% at the beginning of the electrolysis and then it gradually decreased during the treatment. This tendency can be related to the gradual formation of more recalcitrant by-products that are more difficult to destroy with electro-Fenton oxidation (Panizza and Cerisola 2009a; Panizza and Oturan 2011). Panizza et al. also reported similar observation (Panizza and Oturan 2011). They investigated the degradation of Alizarin Red by electro-Fenton process using a graphite-felt cathode and observed that TOC removal efficiency and MCE at reaction time of 40 min and 210 min are 25%, 95% and 55%, 30%, respectively.

Fig. 9
figure 9

TOC removal and mineralization current efficiency (MCE) of MG by EFP (initial MG concentration = 200 mg/L; solution pH = inherent (3); current density = 10 mA/cm2; H2O2 dosage = 50 mg/L)

In order to appear the changes in the molecule of MG and to unfold the mechanism of electro-Fenton degradation, time-dependent UV–Vis spectra of MG solution during EFP were drawn. Figure 10 shows typical time-dependent UV–Vis spectra of MG solution during EFP at current density of 10 mA/cm2, initial concentration of 200 mg/L and pH of inherent. As shown in Fig. 10, it could be observed that before treatment, the MG was characterized by a strong band at the characteristic λmax = 617 nm, along with two other weaker bands centered at 425 and 361 nm. Different structural groups in the dye molecules have unique absorbance peak, and these bands correspond to the chromophore group, the benzenic rings and the acidic functionality, respectively (Guenfoud et al. 2014). As it is clear from Fig. 10, the intensity of absorption peaks underwent a gradual decrease with EFP time up to their disappearance and became almost zero at ~ 15 min without any significant variation in the corresponding maximum wavelengths or new absorption bands. This indicates that the MG had been rapidly degraded (Zhou et al. 2007). The sooner decrease in MG concentration, measured by UV–Vis compared to solution TOC removal efficiency, indicates that some intermediates are produced during the oxidation (Panizza and Oturan 2011).

Fig. 10
figure 10

The absorption spectra of MG degradation at typical time (initial MG concentration = 200 mg/L; solution pH = inherent (3); current density = 10 mA/cm2; H2O2 dosage = 50 mg/L)

The intermediates formed during the degradation were determined by GC–MS as shown in Table 3. As can be seen, the most important intermediates included aromatic compounds (1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, Benzene, 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid) and benzoic acid (with 54.3% peak area). Therefore, the first stage of decomposition of the dye MG molecule occurs from cleavage of the bond between the central carbon, by attack of ·OH, leading to the production of aromatic compounds (Oturan et al. 2008; Xie et al. 2001). Benzoic acid and methyl ester generated after splitting of the bond between the central carbon of MG and phenylic groups. Eventually, this ultimate intermediate can be finally converted to CO2. Oturan et al. (2008) reported that the degradation of Malachite Green by Fe3+-catalyzed electro-Fenton process yielded aromatics including phenols, benzophenones and benzoic acid derivatives, which were converted into hydroquinone and p-benzoquinone. The cleavage of these products led to aliphatic carboxylic acids.

Table 3 Metabolites of Malachite Green degradation analyzed by GC–MS

Effect of scavengers

In order to confirm the mechanism of oxidation of organic compounds in the EFP occurred through hydroxyl radicals and electro-Fenton reaction, several experiments were run with EFP in the presence of various well-known radical inhibitors/scavengers including \( \left( {SO_{4}^{ - 2} , PO_{4}^{ - 3} } \right) \) as an anion, EDTA as a hole (h+) scavenger and chelating agent, benzoquinone (BQ) as a superoxide radical scavenger (\( O_{2}^{ \cdot - } \)) and tert-butyl alcohol (TBA) as a hydroxyl radical scavenger (·OH) at the optimum current density of 10 mA/cm2, pH of inherent (= 3) and a constant reaction time of 15 min. The result showed that the efficacy of EFP in the absence of radical scavengers was 100% under the selected conditions. When EDTA, phosphate, TBA, sulfate and BQ were added to the dye solution, the degradation of MG dropped dramatically to 60%, 70%, 81%, 85% and 94%, respectively. The most reduction effect was obtained by EDTA (40% reduction effect). Since EDTA is a strong chelating agent with a high reaction rate constant with Fe2+, subsequently it causes a reduction in ·OH production and thus a decrease in MG degradation. The presence of EDTA, as deduced above, confirms the generation of ·OH in the EFP (Ma and Graham 2000). Ambiguous results have been reported on the effect of EDTA on hydroxyl radical-generating systems (Li et al. 2007). Li et al. (2007) investigated the effect of EDTA on ·OH production during Fenton reaction, and the result showed that EDTA did not affect ·OH generation monitored by HPLC assay, but from the electron spin resonance (ESR) spin-trapping measurement, it was showed that EDTA suppresses hydroxyl radical formation. Kishimoto et al. reported that iron-chelating agents, such as EDTA, strongly inhibited (70%) the Fenton reaction at pH 2.5 or higher by complex formation with Fe(II) ion and masking of iron (Kishimoto et al. 2013). Similar inconsistent results were observed by Wang et al. (2011), who observed correlated well with the accelerated ·OH formation from the H2O2 decomposition at the BiFeO3 surface. Moreover, in the presence of phosphate, removal efficiency is reduced by 70%. Since phosphate and TBA are well-known ·OH scavengers, the reduction of MG degradation in the presence of phosphate clearly confirms the generation of ·OH in the EFP (Jafari et al. 2016). As deduced above, in the comparison with BQ, TBA had more inhibition impact on MG degradation. The degradation of MG was inhibited slightly with BQ, compared with the addition of TBA. Therefore, the effect of hydroxyl radical (·OH) on MG degradation is greater than that of superoxide radical scavenger (\( O_{2}^{ \cdot - } \)).

Conclusion

The performance of electro-Fenton process (EFP) was examined in the removal of MG from a concentrated aqueous solution. Several operational variables were studied for their effects on process efficacy. Narrow optimum pH (3) for the EFP limits the perfect application of this technology in wastewater treatment. The optimum ratio of H2O2 to Fe2+ was determined to be approximately 0.11 (mg H2O2 to mg Fe2+). It can be concluded that the EFP could completely degrade around 1000 mg/L MG at a short reaction time of 30 min under optimum condition. Reaction rate constants for EFP and ECP were acquired 0.092 and 0.02 min−1, respectively. The results showed that TOC was reduced by 62.3% for 5 min and 95.3% for 30 min. It was found that the most important intermediates included aromatic compounds and benzoic acid. Results showed, in the comparison with BQ, TBA had more inhibition impact on MG degradation. Therefore, the oxidation by hydroxyl radicals is dominant mechanism of MG degradation. It can be concluded that the EFP can be an efficient process for the removal of MG wastewater containing such contaminants.