Abstract
The present work was carried out to assess a water quality index (WQI) of the Loktak Lake, an important wetland which has been under pressure due to the increasing anthropogenic activities. Physicochemical parameters like temperature (Tem), potential hydrogen (pH), electrical conductivity (EC), turbidity (T), dissolved oxygen (DO), total hardness (TH), calcium (Ca), chloride (Cl), fluoride (F), sulphate (\({\text{SO}}_{4}^{2-}\)), magnesium (Mg), phosphate (\({\text{PO}}_{4}^{3-}\)), sodium (Na), potassium (K), nitrite (NO2), nitrate (NO3), total dissolved solids (TDS), total carbon (TC), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), and chemical oxygen demand (COD) were analyzed using standard procedures. The values obtained were compared with the guidelines for drinking purpose suggested by the World Health Organization and Bureau of Indian Standard. The result shows the higher concentration of nitrite in all the location which is beyond the permissible limit. Eleven parameters were selected to derive the WQI for the estimation of water potential for five sampling sites. A relative weight was assigned to each parameter range from 1.46 to 4.09 based on its importance. The WQI values range from 64 to 77 indicating that the Loktak Lake water is not fit for drinking, including both human and animals, even though the people living inside the Lake are using it for drinking purposes. The implementation of WQI is necessary for proper management of the Loktak Lake and it will be a very helpful tool for the public and decision makers to evaluate the water quality of the Loktak Lake for sustainable management.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Find the latest articles, discoveries, and news in related topics.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Water quality is an important contributor touching on all aspects of ecosystems and human well-being and a significant tool in determining the human poverty, wealth, and education levels (UN Water 2010). The ecosystem services of water from rivers and lakes are directly or indirectly contribute to both human welfare and aquatic ecosystem (Costanza et al. 1997; Kar 2007, 2013). The increase in pollution of water sources like lakes and rivers is a major concern for the global scenario as most of the water bodies around the world are the source for water supply including human consumption and domestic purposes (Kazi et al. 2009; Dey and Kar 1987). The health of the aquatic ecosystem is determined by the water quality parameter which includes the physical, chemical, and biological characteristics (Kar 1990; Sargaonkar and Deshpande 2003; Venkatesharaju et al. 2010). Therefore, a particular problem with water quality monitoring is a complex issue associated with analyzing a large number of associate measures of variables (Boyacioglu 2007) and the high variability among the variables is due to increase in anthropogenic activities including natural influences (Simeonov et al. 2002). The anthropogenic discharges constitute a constant polluting source, thereby reducing the water quality. Human activities are the major factor determining the quality of water (Niemi et al. 1990; Kar 2010). Environmental pollution of water resources has become a major global issue, including developing countries which have been suffering from the impact of pollution due to poor socio economic growth associated with the exploitation of natural resources. As a result of it, water is considered as the highest risk to the world for future due to increase in demand as well as increase in pollution (Kar 2013; Global Risks 2015).
Many methods have been proposed and adopted for analysis of water quality. One of the most effective approaches for studying water quality is using of suitable indices (APHA 2005; Dwivedi and Pathak 2007). Indices are measure of changes in a representative group of individual data points of various physicochemical and biological parameters in a given sample. The advantage of indices is that it has the potential to inform the general public and decision makers about the status of the ecosystem (Nasirian 2007; Simoes et al. 2008). The benefit of this approach is the provision to evaluate the success and failure of any management plan for improving the water quality (Rickwood and Carr 2009).
A number of studies have reported the importance of water quality indices (WQI) which serve as an indicator for assessment of water quality as proposed for the first time by Horton (1965). Later, numerous researchers have carried out studies on water quality assessment using WQIs around the world in various water bodies (Pesce and Wunderlin 2000; Bordalo et al. 2001; Abdul et al. 2010; Akbal et al. 2011; Altansukh and Davaa 2011; Hector et al. 2012; Abdulwahid 2013; Mohamed et al. 2014; Chrysoula et al. 2014; Mehmet and Huseyin 2014; Will et al. 2015; Gerald et al. 2015; Hefni and Romanto 2015; Lobato et al. 2015; Mehrnoosh et al. 2015). Similarly, a number of studies have been carried out in India (Dwivedi and Pathak 2007; Joshi et al. 2009; Samantray et al. 2009; Chauhan and Singh 2010; Alam and Pathak 2010; Parmar and Parma 2010; Chaturvedi and Bassin 2010; Kalavathy et al. 2011; Kankal et al. 2012; Srinivas et al. 2013; Prerna et al. 2014; Salim and Ashok 2014; Jindal et al. 2014; Mrunmayee et al. 2015; Krishna et al. 2014, 2015; Kosha and Geeta 2015). However, there was no literature which reveals scientific study carried out with respect to WQI in North–East India, a mega biodiversity region. Nevertheless, a substantive amount of works has been done on the water quality parameters of lentic bodies of North–East (NE) India (Dey and Kar 1989a, b, 2012; Puinyabati et al. 2013; Kar et al. 2013; Kar 2014; Dutta and Kar 2014; Puinyabati et al. 2014; Das et al. 2015a, b; Das and Kar 2015; Singh et al. 2015; Das et al. 2015a, b) The rationale of the present study was to identify the water quality status of the Loktak Lake using the physicochemical parameters as the people living inside the lake used it for drinking. This study will also help in assessment and periodic monitoring of water quality for proper management strategies to minimize the water pollution level (Shuchun et al. 2010) in spite of increasing anthropogenic activity and urbanization within the sensitive area.
Methodology
Study area
Loktak Lake is a unique natural ecosystem with numerous national and international significances designated under the Ramsar Convention (Fig. 1). It is the largest fresh water lake in North–East India covering an area of 246.72 km2 (National Wetland Atlas 2009) and located between 93°46′E–93°55°E and 24°25′N–24°42′N. About 12 towns and 52 settlements are located in and around the Loktak Lake with a population of 2,20,017 persons, i.e., 9% of the total population of the state of Manipur (Census Report 2011). The lake is famous for its floating island locally knows as Phumdis (floating heterogeneous masses of vegetation, soil, and organic matters in various stages of decomposition and has been thickened into a solid form). Loktak is one of the 48 wetland sites in the world under the Montreux Record, a record of Ramsar sites where changes in ecological character have occurred is occurring or is likely to occur (Ramsar). The Lake is an oval shape and depth varies from 0.5 to 4.6 m with an average depth of 2.7 m. The lake is divided into three zones: the northern zones, the central zone, and southern zone. The main open water area is the central zone, which was relatively free from floating island, and the southern part is Keibul Lamjao National Park (KLNP), the world’s only floating national park, and last natural habitat of Manipur brow antlered deer Rucervus eldii eldii (Gray et al. 2015) locally known by Sangai has its habitat. The lake has a rich biodiversity, including 233 macrophytes, 425 species of animals, including 249 vertebrates and 176 invertebrates (Trishal and Manihar 2004).
Sample collection and analysis
In this study, all sampling sites were selected to cover a wide range of variables and key sites which represent the water quality of the lake. Water samples from five sites located in the open water area of central and southern areas were collected at a depth of 0.5 m seasonally (monsoon, post-monsoon, winter, and pre-monsoon) during July 2013–May 2014 from Loktak Lake. The sample collection sites are shown in Table 1. Water samples in triplicates were collected at each site by random sampling. The water samples were preserved in prerinsed 2-l polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles at 4 °C in darkness. Each container was clearly marked with the name and date of sampling. All analysis was done following the standard method of APHA (2005) and guide manual: water and wastewater analysis (CPCB). Various physicochemical parameters such as pH, EC, T, TH, and TDS were measured in situ using water analyzer kit. The methodologies adopted for determination of water quality parameters of the collected samples (Table 2).
Water quality index (WQI)
The WQI was prepared using the measured values of the physicochemical parameters. Eleven parameters were selected based on their importance in water quality. They were pH, DO, T, EC, TH, Na, BOD, NO2, NO3, TDS, and COD. The values used for each parameter are the mean value of the sites under investigation. The standard for drinking water used in this study was the recommended by the Guidelines for drinking water World Health Organization (2011) and BIS (Indian Standard Specification for Drinking Water 2012).
The following steps were involved in the calculation of the WQI:
-
1.
Initially, each of the 11 parameters has been assigned a weight (AW) ranging from 1.46 to 4.09 depending on the collective expert opinions taken from the previous studies (Table 3). The mean weight values of the selelcted parameter along with the reference are listed (Table 4). A relative weight of 4.09 was considered the most significant and 1.46 was less significant.
Table 3 Relative weight of the physiochemical parameters Table 4 Relative weight of the each parameter
The relative weight (RW) was calculated using the following equation:
where RW = relative weight, AW = assigned weight of each parameter, and n = number of parameters.
-
2.
A quality rating scale (Q i ) for each parameter is computed by dividing its concentration in each water sample by its respective standard according to the guidelines of World Health Organization guidelines. If WHO standard is not available, then the Indian Standard BIS (2012) is used and the result is multiplied by 100 using Eq. 2.
$$Q_{i} = \left( {\frac{{C_{i} }}{{S_{i} }}} \right) \times 100,$$(2)while the quality rating for pH and DO was calculated on the basis of
$$Q_{{{\text{ipH}},{\text{ DO}}}} = \left[ {\frac{{C_{i} - V_{i} }}{{S _{i} - V _{i} }}} \right] \times 100,$$(3)where, Q i = the quality rating, a C i = value of the water quality parameters obtained from the analysis, S i = value of the water quality parameter obtained from WHO and BIS parameters, V i = ideal value for pH = 7.0, and DO = 14.6.
-
3.
Next, the sub-indices (SI) have been calculated to compute the WQI:
$${\text{SI}}_{i} = \, W_{\text{r}} \times Q_{i}$$(4)$${\text{WQI = }}\sum {{\text{SI}}_{i} } .$$(5)
The computed WQI values were classified according to the proposed categorization of Yadav et al. (2010); Ramakrishnaiah et al. (2009), and Mohanty (2004). The Pearson’s correlation coefficient was computed to study the possible cause of pollution in the Loktak Lake and was computed with WQI and water quality parameters (Hameed et al. 2010).
Results and discussion
The analysis of result of physical and chemical parameters of lake water provides a considerable insight of water quality of the Loktak Lake. This study identifies the parameters which are responsible for decreasing the water quality. The obtained physicochemical parameters’ average values were compared with the World Health Organization standards and Bureau of Indian Standard for each sampling site in Loktak Lake (Table 5; Figs. 2, 3, 4). The highest temperature values were recorded during pre-monsoon with 28.2 °C in Sendra and a minimum of 16.4 °C recorded in the Keibul Lamjao National Park during winter. There is a seasonal variation of the temperature recorded with minimum temperature in Keibul Lamjao is all the seasons.
The pH of the Loktak Lake ranges from 6.15 to 7.66, indicating that water of Loktak is almost neutral to sub-alkaline. The highest values were observed in Sendra 7.66 in pre-monsoon and minimum 6.15 in Keibul Lamjao in winter. The low pH indicates acidity nature, which is due to the deposition of acid forming substance and Phumdis acts as a sink for nutrients and plays an important role in phytosanitation. The high organic content will tend to decrease the pH due to its carbonate chemistry. The pH from the study shows that the values are within the guidelines of the WHO and BIS. The result obtained is similar to the previous data reported from KLNP by Sharma et al. (2013). The DO values were found in the range of 3.19–9.18 mg/l. The lowest DO was observed in Thanga during the monsoon and the highest was recorded in Ithai during winter. The low DO suggest the poor quality of water indicating the slow rate of photosynthesis by phytoplankton present in the Loktak Lake. This made the water unsuitable for drinking purpose. The concentration of DO was recorded highest in all the location during winter as cold water can hold more dissolved oxygen than pre-monsoon. The DO values also depend on many factors like temperature, microbial population, pressure, and time of sampling.
Turbidity was found to vary between season and location of the sampling sites. Turbidity ranges from 0.23 to 2.84 NTU. The lowest were recorded in Ningthoukhong during winter and highest in Ithai during monsoon suggesting greater addition of particulate matters from the major rivers like Nambul and Nambol River to the Lake. The variation in the turbidity values in Ithai is due to the variation in the turbidity level in Loktak Lake. High deposition of sediments brought down by the rivers makes the lake turbid and deterioration of water quality. The presence of BOD in the water sample is from polluted rivers, including Nambul and Nambol River, and also from the domestic waste from the local areas of human settlement in and around the lake. The COD values range from 8 mg/l during monsoon in KLNP to 280 mg/l in Ningthoukhong during winter. The free carbon dioxide was present throughout the year in the Loktak Lake.
The EC values of the study site range from 136 to 298 μs/m. The lowest values were observed in Sendra during post-monsoon and highest in Thanga during monsoon. The higher value of EC is attributed to the high degree of anthropogenic activities like waste disposal, household waste, and chemicals runoff from agricultural and apiculture activities. The seasonal variation shows the increased in EC along the downstream. All the sites recorded higher EC as compare to the guidelines limit of WHO and BIS. The high concentration of EC implies the high level of pollution of the Loktak Lake. TDS values of the study area range from 46.52 to 168.9 mg/l. The high value of TDS was observed in Ithai during monsoon and lowest values KLNP during monsoon. The TDS proportionality enhanced the electrical conductivity in the water. The TDS of Loktak Lake originates from natural sources, sewage, urban, and agricultural runoff. The high TDS of Ithai was similar to the early reported study (Annual report 2011–2012). However, the TDS of Loktak is lower than the Yamuna and Ganga River (Prerna et al. 2014). Total hardness values range from 38 to 130 mg/l with KLNP recorded minimum in monsoon and maximum at Ithai and Thanga at monsoon. The total hardness value of Loktak Lake ranges from 38 mg/l in KLNP in pre-monsoon to 130 mg/l in Ithai during monsoon. On all the location, total hardness values are within the permissible limit of 300 mg/l (BIS 2012). BOD in the Loktak ranges from .99 to 4.19 mg/l. The lowest value was recorded in Sendra during post-monsoon and maximum during pre-monsoon in KLNP. The total organic carbon shows high variation among the study site with the highest reported in Sendra with 258.56 mg/l during monsoon and a minimum of 28.96 mg/l in Thanga during post-monsoon. This variation in the TOC is due to the seasonal changes in stream flow, soil wetness, and temperature (Kohler et al. 2008).
Determination of major ions
The major ions like Na+, K+, Ca+, \({\text{Mg}}_{2}^{ + }\), P+, Cl−, F−, \({\text{SO}}_{4}^{{2\text{ - }}}\), \({\text{PO}}_{4}^{{3\text{ - }}}\), \({\text{NO}}_{2}^{\text{ - }}\), and \({\text{NO}}_{3}^{\text{ - }}\) were measured, and the values are given in Table 5; Fig. 4. It was observed that the concentration of Na+, Ca+, and \({\text{Mg}}_{2}^{ + }\) remained dominant in the water during the post-monsoon. Maximum concentration of Na+ was at Ithai 14.5 mg/l during winter and minimum of 3.9 mg/l in Thanga during monsoon. K+ values range from 3.2 mg/l in Ningthoukhong during post-monsoon to 9.2 mg/l in Ithai during monsoon. Similarly, concentration of Ca+ ranges from 20 to 58 mg/l. The minimum concentration was observed in Sendra in Monsoon. The concentration of Ca+ showed an increasing trend towards the downstream due to agriculture runoff, precipitation, and weathering of soil. Concentration of \({\text{Mg}}_{2}^{ + }\) was recorded highest at Sendra 14.84 mg/l during post-monsoon and lowest at Ithai 3.24 mg/l during monsoon. The high rate of \({\text{Mg}}_{2}^{ + }\) in Sendra is due to the presence of magnesium containing rocks and minerals in the surrounding hills. P+ is found highest at Ithai 9.2 mg/l during the monsoon and the minimum at Ningthoukhong 3.2 mg/l during post-monsoon. The high concentration of P+ is due to the weathering of rocks which released P+. The concentration of the measured cations was found to be within the permissible limits.
The elemental anions Cl−, F−, \({\text{SO}}_{4}^{{2\text{ - }}}\), \({\text{PO}}_{4}^{{3\text{ - }}}\), \({\text{NO}}_{2}^{\text{ - }}\), and \({\text{NO}}_{3}^{\text{ - }}\) were measured. The concentration of Cl− shows the highest in KLNP 40 mg/l during post-monsoon and lowest at Ningthoukhong 14 mg/l during monsoon. Chloride concentration was found maximum during rainy season. This finding is similar to the previous report by Rai and Raleng (2012). F-concentration recorded a range of .18–26 mg/l. The concentration of F− is low in all the locations in all the seasons. Concentration of \({\text{SO}}_{4}^{{2\text{ - }}}\) ranges from 0.016 mg/l in Sendra during monsoon and highest of 1.17 mg/l in Ithai during pre-monsoon. \({\text{PO}}_{4}^{{3\text{ - }}}\) concentration shows the least among all the anions. The values range from .002 to .08 mg/l. The lowest was recorded in Ningthoukhong in pre-monsoon and highest in Ithai during Monsoon. The concentration of \({\text{NO}}_{2}^{\text{ - }}\) is higher than the permissible limit of ≤.1 according to WHO. All the locations recorded beyond the permissible limit in all the four seasons with maximum value of 4.12 mg/l in Thanga during winter and lowest of .11 mg/l in Sendra during monsoon. \({\text{NO}}_{3}^{\text{ - }}\) value shows a seasonal variation with the highest value of 35 mg/l recorded from Thanga during winter and minimum value of 6.3 mg/l in Ningthoukhong during pre-monsoon. The highest concentration of \({\text{NO}}_{3}^{\text{ - }}\) is mainly from agricultural activity including application of inorganic nitrogen fertilizers and manures in the aquaculture and agricultural farm in and around the location (WHO 2004). The spatial variations of the major ions are essential as it reflects the influence of various anthropogenic and lithology’s activities in the lake and river system (Chen et al. 2002).
Water quality index (WQI)
The values of the WQI of Loktak are given in Tables 6 and 7, and Fig. 5. It can be seen that the Loktak Lake has WQI ranges from 64 to 77 which reflects the poor status of the water quality. The result shows the different water quality at different locations. The WQI was classified accordingly following Yadav et al. (2010). These values indicate that the water quality was found unsuitable. Considering this observation, we reclassified the WQI values on the scale suggested by Ramakrishnaiah et al. (2009) and Mohanty (2004). From this classification, the water quality of the Loktak Lake falls under the poor. Thanga recorded that the highest and KLNP show lowest WQI values. Sendra, Ningthoukhong, and Ithai recorded a WQI of 66, 67 and 69. The high value of WQI in Thanga is due to domestic discharge from the Thanga Karang, an island located in the Loktak Lake. The low value in KLNP is due to the presence of Phumdis which acts as a sink for nutrients and plays an important role in phytosanitation. From this result, KLNP has better water quality follow by Sendra and Ningthoukhong. The WQI values gradually increased towards the downstream where it was recorded 70 in Ithai indicating the decreasing water quality. In all the sites, COD is well above the standard limit. The water is not fit for drinking purpose and pollution control should be enhanced and improved in areas where pollution is more. The present finding is similar to the earlier report by Rai and Raleng (2012).
The poor quality of the Loktak Lake is due to increase in concentration of physicochemical parameters bought by the two important rivers like Nambul and Nambol River which discharge the polluted water directly into the lake. The increase in agricultural and pisciculture activities in and around the Lake also increased the pollution due to use of fertilizers and chemicals including pesticides. These increases in pollution are a major concern for the local people living in and around the lake as they depend on the lake water for drinking and household activities.
Statistical analysis
The Pearson correlation matrix was carried out to study the correlation between the parameters (Table 8). It is seen that temperature is significantly positively correlate with turbidity, chlorine, and nitrate, and negatively correlated with BOD. Similarly, pH is significantly correlated with nitrite, EC with TDS and potassium, and negatively correlated with nitrate. Turbidity with nitrate and negatively correlated with BOD, TDS, and chloride. TDS is significantly correlated with potassium and negatively with nitrate. Total hardness is correlated with DO, magnesium is with phosphate, potassium with EC and TDS, chlorine is correlated with temperature and turbidity, and negatively with BOD, phosphate was significantly correlated with magnesium and nitrate, and finally, WQI is positively correlated with total carbon. Our study has found a significant correlation between the parameters and the highest correlation is with turbidity followed by TDS with significant correlation of 7 and 5 parameters, respectively. The correlation reflects both spatial and temporal variations.
Conclusion
The study of WQI reveals that the water quality of Loktak water is polluted and not fit for drinking purpose, even though the local people are drinking. The high WQI values were due to the high value of sub-indices of DO, EC, nitrite, and COD. The result revealed that the local people need to treat the water before usage. The study recommends the urgent need for continuous monitoring of the lake water and identifying the pollution sources to protect the largest fresh water lake from further contamination.
References
Abdul HM, Jawad A, Haider SA, Bahram KM (2010) Application of water quality index for assessment of Dokan Lake Ecosystem, Kurdistan region, Iraq. J Water Resour Prot 2:792–798
Abdulwahid SJ (2013) Water quality index of delizhiyan springs and Shawrawa river within Soran district, Erbil, Kurdistan region of Iraq. J Appl Environ Sci 3:40–48
Abrahao R, Carvalho M, da Silva Junior WR, Machado TTV, Gadelha CM, Hernandez MIM (2007) Use of index analysis to evaluate the water quality of a stream receiving industrial effluents. Water SA 33:459–465
Akbal F, Gurel L, Bahadir T (2011) Multivariate statistical techniques for the assessment of surface water quality at the mid-black sea coast of Turkey. Water Air Soil Pollut 216:21–37
Alam M, Pathak JK (2010) Rapid assessment of water quality index of Ramganga River, Western Uttar Pradesh (India) using a computer programme. Nat Sci 8:1–8
Altansukh O, Davaa G (2011) Application of index analysis to evaluate the water quality of the Tuul River in Mongolia. J Water Resour Prot 3:398–414
American Public Health Association (2005) Standard method for examination of water and wastewater, 21st edn. APHA, AWWA, WPCF, Washington
Annual report (2011–2012) Central Pollution Control Board. http://cpcb.nic.in/upload/AnnualReports/AnnualReport_43_AR_2011-12_English.pdf\. Accessed 11 Mar 2014
Bordalo AA, Nilsumranchit W, Chalermwat K (2001) Water quality and uses of the Bangpakong River (Eastern Thailand). Water Res 35:3635–3642
Boyacioglu H (2007) Development of a water quality index based on a European classification scheme. Water SA 33:101–106
Bureau of Indian Standards (2012) Specification for drinking water. IS:10500, New Delhi, India
Census India Report (2011). http://www.censusindia.gov.in/. Accessed 21 July 2014
Chaturvedi MK, Bassin JK (2010) Assessing the water quality index of water treatment plant and bore wells, in Delhi, India. Environ Monit Assess 163:449–453
Chauhan A, Singh S (2010) Evaluation of Ganga water for drinking purpose by water quality index at Rishikesh, Uttarakhand India. Rep Opin 2:53–61
Chen J, Wang F, Xia X, Zhang L (2002) Major element chemistry of the Changjiang (Yangtze River). Chem Geol 187:231–255
Chougule MB, Wasif AI, Naik VR (2009) In assessment of water quality index (WQI) for monitoring pollution of River Panchganga at Ichalkaranji, Proceedings of International Conference on energy and environment. pp 122–127
Chrysoula C, Gianmarco G, Eva P (2014) Assessment of ecological quality of coastal lagoons with a combination of phytobenthic and water quality indices. Marine Poll Bull 86:411–423
Costanza R, d’Arge R, De Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, Van Den BM (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–259
Das BK, Kar D (2015) Physico-chemical parameters and drainage types of River Siang in Arunachal Pradesh, India. In: Mishra GC (ed) Conceptual framework and innovations in agroecology and food sciences. Krishi Sanskriti Publications, New Delhi, pp 53–56
Das N, Das BK, Das S, Singh NR, Kar D (2015a) Preliminary studies on Icthyofauna diversity and physico-chemical parameters of River Bhogdoi during winter and pre-monsoon season in Assam. IOSR J Agric Vet Sci 8:35–41
Das S, Das T, Das BK, Kar D (2015b) Study of fish diversity and physico-chemical characteristics of River Singla. Int J Environ Sci 5:881–887
Dey SC, Kar D (1987) Physico-chemical complexes of water and soil in Sone, an ichthyologically potential tectonic lake of Assam. J Assam Sci Soc 30:1–11
Dey SC, Kar D (1989a) Aquatic macrophytes of Lake Sone in Assam. Environ Ecol 7:253–254
Dey SC, Kar D (1989b) Fishermen of Lake Sone in Assam: their socio-economic status. Sci Cult 55:395–398
Dutta B, Kar D (2014) Study on fish diversity and physico-chemical parameters in Toukak River at Shivasagar District in Assam and Nagaland. In: Kar D (ed) Research frontiers in wetlands, fishery & aquaculture. Dominant Publishers and Distributors Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, pp 175–182
Dwivedi SL, Pathak V (2007) A Preliminary assignment of water quality index to Mandakini River, Chitrakoot. Indian J Environ Prot 27:1036–1038
Gerald W, Bradley B, Rolf F, Shawna G (2015) Application of index number theory to the construction of a water quality index: aggregated nutrient loadings related to the areal extent of hypoxia in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Ecol Indic 49:162–168
Global Risks (2015) World Economic Forum. http://reports.weforum.org/global-risks-2015/part-1-global-risks-2015/introduction/. Accessed 10 May 2015
Gray TNE, Brook SM, McShea WJ, Mahood S, Ranjitsingh MK, Miyunt A, Hussain SA & Timmins R (2015) Rucervus eldii. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2015: e.T4265A22166803. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2015-2.RLTS.T4265A22166803.en. Accessed 11 Mar 2014
Guide Manual: Water and Waste Water, Central Pollution Control Board, New Delhi. http://www.cpcb.nic.in/upload/Latest/Latest_67_guidemanualw&wwanalysis.pdf. Accessed 12 Mar 2014
Hameed A, Alobaidy MJ, Abid HS, Mauloom BK (2010) Application of water quality index for assessment of Dokan lake ecosystem, Kurdistan region, Iraq. J Water Resourc Prot 2:792–798
Hector RA, Manuel CC, Rey MQ, Ruben AST, Adan PM (2012) An overall water quality index (WQI) for a man-made aquatic reservoir in Mexico. Int J Environ Res Public Health 9:1687–1698
Hefni E, Romanto YW (2015) Water quality status of Ciambulawung River, Banten Province, based on pollution index and NSF-WQI. Procedia Environ Sci 24:228–237
Horton R (1965) An index number system for rating water quality. J Water Pollut Control Fed 37:300–306
Jindal R, Thakur RK, Singh UB, Ahluwalia AS (2014) Phytoplankton dynamics and water quality of Prashar Lake, Himachal Pradesh, India. Sustain Water Qual Ecol 3–4:101–113
Joshi DM, Kumar A, Agrawal N (2009) Studies on physicochemical parameters to assess the water quality of river Ganga for drinking purpose in Haridwar district. Rasayan J Chem 2:195–203
Kalavathy S, Sharma TR, Sureshkumar P (2011) Water quality index of river Cauvery in Tiruchirappalli district, Tamilnadu. Arch Environ Sci 5:55–61
Kankal NC, Indurkar MM, Gudadhe SK, Wate SR (2012) Water quality index of surface water bodies of Gujarat, India. Asian J Exp Sci 26:39–48
Kannel PR, Lee S, Lee Y, Kanel SR, Khan SP (2007) Application of water quality indices and dissolved oxygen as indicators for river water classification and urban impact assessment. Environ Monit Assess 132:93–110
Kar D (1990) Limnology and fisheries of Lake Sone in the Cachar district of Assam (India). Matsya 15–16:209–213
Kar D (2007) Fundamentals of Limnology and aquaculture biotechnology. Daya Publishing House, New Delhi
Kar D (2010) Biodiversity conservation prioritisation. Swastik Publications, New Delhi
Kar D (2012) Wetlands, rivers, fish diversity, fish disease and aquaculture in North–East India. Fish Chimes 31:35–37
Kar D (2013) Wetlands and lakes of the world. Springer, London
Kar D (2014) Wetlands of Assam with special reference to sone beel, the biggest wetland in Assam and MoEF-listed wetland of wetland of national importance. In: Kar D (ed) Research frontiers in wetlands, fishery & aquaculture. Dominant Publishers and Distributors Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, pp 19–42
Kar D, Bharbhuiya AH, Saha B (2013) Panorama of wetland diversity in South Assam. Frontiers of wetlands, fishers & aquaculture research. In: Kar D (ed) Research frontiers in wetlands, fishery and aquaculture, dominant publishers and distributors Pvt. Dominant Publishers and Distributors Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, pp 187–210
Karakaya N, Evrendilek F (2009) Water quality time series for Big Melen Stream (Turkey): its decomposition analysis and comparison to upstream. Environ Monit Assess 165:125–136
Kazi TG, Arain MB, Jamali MK, Jalbani N, Afridi HI, Sarfraz RA, Baig JA, Shah AQ (2009) Assessment of water quality of polluted lake using multivariate statistical techniques: a case study. Ecotoxic Environ Saf 72:301–309
Kohler SJ, Buffam I, Laudon H, Bishop K (2008) Climate’s control of intra-annual and interannual variability of total organic carbon concentration and flux in two contrasting boreal landscape elements. J Geophys Res 113:G03012
Kosha AS, Geeta SJ (2015) Evaluation of water quality index for River Sabarmati, Gujarat, India. Appl Water Sci. doi:10.1007/s13201-015-0318-7
Krishna KS, Bharani R, Magesh NS, Prince SG, Chandrasekar N (2014) Hydrogeochemistry and groundwater quality appraisal of part of south Chennai coastal aquifers, Tamil Nadu, India using WQI and fuzzy logic method. Appl Water Sci 4:341–350
Krishna KS, Logeshkumaran A, Magesh NS, Prince SG, Chandrasekar N (2015) Hydro-geochemistry and application of water quality index (WQI) for groundwater quality assessment, Anna Nagar, part of Chennai City, Tamil Nadu, India. Appl Water Sci 5:335–343
Lobato TC, Hauser-Davis RA, Oliveira TF, Silveira AM, Silva HAN, Tavares MRM, Saraiva ACF (2015) Construction of a novel water quality index and quality indicator for reservoir water quality evaluation: a case study in the Amazon region. J Hydrol 522:674–683
Mehmet ATK, Huseyin S (2014) Parameters selection for water quality index in the assessment of the environmental impacts of land-based trout farms. Ecol Indic 36:672–681
Mehrnoosh A, Najmeh G, Kamyar Y, Mohammad R, Mahsa J, Alidad K, Reza S (2015) A modified drinking water quality index (DWQI) for assessing drinking source water quality in rural communities of Khuzestan Province, Iran. Ecol Indic 53:283–291
Mohamed EG, Ali MH, Ibrahim AAM, Ayman HF, Seliem ME (2014) Evaluation of surface water quality and heavy metal indices of Ismailia Canal, Nile River, Egypt. Egypt J Aquat Res 40:225–233
Mohanty SK (2004) Water quality index of four religious ponds and its seasonal variation in the temple city Bhuvaneshwar. In: Kumar A (ed) Water pollution. APH Publishing Corporation, New Delhi, pp 211–218
Mrunmayee M, Sahoo KCP, Khatua KK (2015) Inference of water quality index using ANFIA and PCA. Aquat Procedia 4:1099–1106
Nasirian M (2007) A new water quality index for environmental contamination contributed by mineral processing: a case study of Amang (Tin Tailing) processing activity. J Appl Sci 7:2977–2987
National Wetland Atlas: Manipur (2009) SAC/RESA/AFEG/NWIA/ATLAS/03/2009. Space Applications Centre (ISRO), Ahmedabad, p 96
Niemi GJ, Devore P, Detenbeck N, Taylor D, Lima A (1990) Overview of case studies on recovery of aquatic systems from disturbance. Environ Manag 14:571–587
Parmar K, Parma V (2010) Evaluation of water quality index for drinking purposes of river Subarnarekha in Singhbhum District. Int J Environ Sci 1:77–81
Pathak V, Banerjee AK (1992) Mine water pollution studies in Chapha Incline, Umaria Coalfield, Eastern Madhya Pradesh, India. Mine Water Environ 11:27–36
Pesce SF, Wunderlin DA (2000) Use of water quality indices to verify the impact of Córdoba City (Argentina) on Suquìa River. Water Res 34:2915–2926
Prerna S, Prabodha KM, Ajay K, Yogendra PG, Kaushala PM (2014) Changes in water quality index of Ganges river at different locations in Allahabad. Sustain Water Qual Ecol 3–4:67–76
Puinyabati H, Shomorendra M, Kar D (2013) Correlation of water’s physico-chemical characteristics and trematode parasites of Channa punctata (Bloch) in Awangsoi lake, Manipur, India. J Appl Nat Sci 5:190–193
Puinyabati H, Shomorendra M, Kar D (2014) Seasonal variation of some physico-chemical parameters of Awangsoi Lake, Bishnupur District, Manipur, India. In: Kar D (ed) Research frontiers in wetlands, fishery & aquaculture. Dominant Publishers and Distributors Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, pp 193–200
Rai SC, Raleng A (2012) The impacts of lan-use/cover change on Loktak Lake water quality in North-Eastern Region, India. Asian J Water Environ Pollut 9:13–23
Ramakrishnaiah CR, Sadashivaiah C, Ranganna G (2009) Assessment of water quality index for the Groundwater in Tumkur Taluk, Karnataka State India. J Chem 6:523–530
Ramsar report on Montreux Record. http://www.ramsar.org/cda/en/ramsar-documents-montreux/main/ramsar/1-31-118_4000_0__. Accessed 12 Mar 2014
Ravikumar P, Mehmood MA, Somashekar RK (2013) Water quality index to determine the surface water quality of Sankey tank and Mallathahalli lake, Bangalore urban district, Karnataka, India. Appl Water Sci 3:247–261
Rickwood CJ, Carr GM (2009) Development and sensitivity analysis of a global drinking water quality index. Environ Monit Assess 156:73–90
Salim AB, Ashok KP (2014) Surface water quality assessment of Wular Lake, a Ramsar site in Kashmir Himalaya, using discriminant analysis and WQI. J Ecosyst. doi:10.1155/2014/724728
Samantray P, Mishra BK, Panda CR, Rout SP (2009) Assessment of water quality index in Mahanadi and Atharabanki River and Taldanda Canal in Paradip Area. Indian J Human Eco 26:153–161
Sargaonkar A, Deshpande V (2003) Development of an overall index of pollution for surface water based on a general classification scheme in indian context. Environ Monit Assess 89:43–67
Sharma ASC, Gupta S, Singh NR (2013) Studies on the physico-chemical parameters in water of Keibul Lamjao National Park, Manipur, India. J Environ Biol 34:1019–1025
Shuchun Y, Bin X, Deyang K (2010) Chronology and nutrients change in recent sediment of Taihu Lake, Lower Changjiang river Basin, East China. Chinese Geogr Sci 20:202–208
Simeonov V, Einax JW, Stanimirova I, Kraft J (2002) Environmetric modeling and interpretation of river water monitoring data. Anal Bioanal Chem 374:898–905
Simoes FS, Moreira AB, Bisinoti MC, Gimenez SMN, Yabe MJS (2008) Water Quality index as a simple indicator of aquaculture effects on aquatic bodies. Ecol Indic 8:476–484
Singh NR, Shomorendra M, Kar D (2015) Role of certain physic-chemical properties of water on abundance of trematode parasites of Channa puctata (Bloch) in Sone Beel, Assam, India. Uttar Pradesh J Zool 35:105–112
Srinivas J, Purushotham AV, Murali Krishna KVSG (2013) Determination of water quality index in industrial areas of Kakinada, Andhra Pradesh, India. Int J Environ Sci 2:37–45
Trishal CL, Manihar T (2004) Atlas of Loktak Lake. Wetlands International and Loktak Development Authority, Manipur
United Nation World Water Day (2010) http://unwater-archive.stage.gsdh.org/WWD-2010//www.unwater.org/wwd10/faqs.html. Accessed 26 Jan 2015
Venkatesharaju K, Ravikumar P, Somashekar RK, Prakash KL (2010) Physicochemical and bacteriological investigation on the river Cauvery of Kollegal stretch in Karnataka. Kathmandu Univ J Sci Eng Technol 6:50–59
WHO (2011) Guidelines for drinking-water quality, 4th edn. World Health Organization, Geneva
Will MB, Richard PA, George E (2015) Host evaluating a great lakes scale landscape stressor index to assess water quality in the St. Louis River Area of Concern. J Great Lakes Res 41:99–110
World Health Organization (WHO) (2004) Guidelines for drinking water quality, 3rd edn. World Health Organization, Geneva
Yadav AK, Khan P, Sharma SK (2010) Water quality index assessment of groundwater in Todaraisingh Tehsil of Rajasthan State, India—a greener approach. J Chem 7:S428–S432
Acknowledgements
First author acknowledge Society of Wetland Scientists, USA and Ocean Park Conservation Foundation, Hong Kong for providing financial support for carrying out conservation work in Loktak Lake. The authors also thank anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and constructive suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Das Kangabam, R., Bhoominathan, S.D., Kanagaraj, S. et al. Development of a water quality index (WQI) for the Loktak Lake in India. Appl Water Sci 7, 2907–2918 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-017-0579-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-017-0579-4