Introduction

The availability of good quality water is an indispensable feature for preventing diseases and improving quality of life (Oluduro and Adewoye 2007). Natural water contains some types of impurities whose nature and amount vary with source of water (Drever 1988).

Water quality characteristic of aquatic environment arises from a multitude of physical, chemical and biological interactions (Deuzuane 1979). The water bodies, rivers, lakes, dams and estuaries are continuously subject to dynamic change with respect to the geological age, geochemical characteristics and anthropogenic influences.

This is demonstrated by continuous circulation, transformation and accumulation of energy and matter through the medium of living things and their activities. The dynamic balance in the aquatic ecosystem is upset by human activities, resulting in pollution which is manifested dramatically as fish kill, offensive taste, odor, color and unchecked aquatic weeds. The objective of the monitoring studies undertaken for water body is to assess variation in water quality.

The soundness or validity of the results in the inverse modeling depends on a valid conceptualization of the groundwater system, validity of the basic hydrochemical concepts and principles, accuracy of input data into the model, and level of understanding of the geochemical processes in the area (Güler and Thyne 2004).

Variation in groundwater chemistry is mainly a function of the interaction between the groundwater and the mineral composition of the aquifer materials through which it moves. Hydrochemical processes, including dissolution, precipitation, ion exchange, sorption, and desorption, together with the residence time occurring along the flow path, control the variation in chemical composition of groundwater (Apodaca et al. 2002). The zone of study covers: the great Oran sebkha basin (with an area of 1,878 km2); the sebkha itself (with an area of 298 km2) and the stretches (over 40 km long and 6–13 km wide). The zone is located in the Central Coastal Oran basin and is bounded by: the Djebel Murdjadjo (530 m) in the north, the Mount Tessala (1,061 m) in the south, the plain oued Tlelat in the east, and oued Mellah in the west (Fig. 1). The integrated geological study (sedimentology, geomorphology, tectonic, hydrogeology) permitted to determine factors which conditioned its setting up, since the lower-middle Miocene (Burdigalian–Langhian–Serravallian); emerged in the beginning of the Tortonian age, then it met and until the Pleistocene under a marine regime that evolved toward a continental regime since the superior Pleistocene. The southward swing of the northern area (Murdjadjo south side) at the Soltanian age would have been the main reason of the Sebkha of Oran endoreism and its subsequently closing (full) with the setting up of the wind accumulations.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Localization of sampling points in study area

Materials and methods

In order to characterize the groundwater quality in the dry season, a sampling network was chosen to allow the acquisition of representative data on the spatial and temporal variability (Fig. 1). This network covers the entire basin upstream to downstream and consists of a set of points of water wells, boreholes and springs.

Water withdrawals were made at low waters. The samples were collected during the period of 04–20 July 2011 where comprehensive analyses were performed. The parameters that have been measurement are: pH and electrical conductivity (EC) were measured in the field using a multi-parameter HANNA (pH meter HANNA instrument HI 9811). Subsequently, the samples were analyzed in the laboratory for their chemical constituents such as calcium, magnesium, sodium, potassium, chloride, bicarbonate and sulfate. This was achieved using standard methods as suggested by Rodier (1996). Ca+2, Mg+2, HCO3 and Cl were analyzed by volumetric titrations. Concentrations of Ca+2 and Mg+2 were estimated titrimetrically using 0.05 N EDTA and those of HCO3 and Cl by H2SO4 and AgNO3 titration, respectively. Concentrations of Na+ and K+ were measured using an Ionogram (Model: Ionogram Easy lyte Na/K/Cl, 800 ml, MEDICA 001384-001 R2 Analyser, 12160/12014-05) and that of sulfate by Spectrometer method (Model: Spectrometer UV Optizen 2120 UV). The results were tabled for interpretation.

In the literature, many different methodologies have been applied to study, evaluate and characterize the sources of variation in groundwater geochemistry. Among these methods is the inverse geochemical modeling in PHREEQC (Parkhurst and Appelo 1999) which is based on a geochemical mole-balance model and calculates the phase mole transfers (the moles of minerals and gases that must enter or leave a solution).

Results and discussion

The physico-chemical parameters obtained from analysis of water samples from Oran sebkha basin are presented in Table 1. The groundwater samples of the study area have pH values ranging from 5.1 to 7.6, which indicate that the groundwater is alkaline. The electrical conductivity (EC) values ranged from 720 to 15,820 μS cm−1 which is the characteristic of mixed water (Ca–Mg–Cl–HCO3). The gradual increase of conductivity denotes a significantly lateral input of wastewater with higher conductivity (Trinh 2003). The order of abundance of the major cations is Mg ≥ Na ≥ Ca ≥ K and all samples exceeded the desirable limit of Ca, Mg and Cl for drinking water, but the sulfate concentrations are all below health guidelines (WHO 2004) (Table 1).

Table 1 The physico-chemical parameters of water samples from Oran sebkha basin

In all water samples, a critical look at the results revealed that the values of these physico-chemical parameters are higher in the basin based on geological position; discharges of industrial wastewater and contamination of the groundwater by seawater were excluded as the source of high concentrations. The quantity of waste in different phases of a natural aquatic system is reflected by the level of hardness, alkalinity and other physico-chemical parameters. The higher values of all these physico-chemical parameters than those obtained could be a result of washing away of sulfate based fertilizers into the river (Ipinmoroti and Oshodi 1993; Vogel 1970).

Inferring the sources of solutes in groundwater using simple mass balance approaches does not provide unequivocal results, a reasonable way of constraining the processes that might influence the major ion chemistry. The controls on the hydrochemical evolution of groundwater largely depend on the chemistry of the recharging water, water aquifer matrix interaction (cation exchange), or both, as well as groundwater residence time within the aquifer (Garrels and MacKenzie 1971).

Three general processes that contribute to the generation of solutes in groundwater are: evaporate dissolution, carbonate dissolution, and silicate weathering (Garrels and MacKenzie 1971). The chemistry of the evolving water depends not only on the bulk chemistry of the matrix but also on the rate of weathering. Meybeck (1987) commented that weathering rates of evaporates and carbonates are up to 80 times and ~12 times, respectively, faster than silicate weathering rates. Hence, even relatively minor proportions of carbonates and evaporates can significantly influence water chemistry.

The study of the Ca2+ (mEq l−1)/Mg2+ (mEq l−1) ratio of groundwater from the area of study suggests the dissolution of dolomite present in the alluvium (Fig. 2). That is, if the ratio Ca2+/Mg2+ = 1, dissolution of dolomite should occur, whereas a higher ratio is indicative of greater calcite contribution (Maya and Loucks 1999). The points located below the line (Ca2+/Mg2+ = 1) indicate the dissolution of dolomite. The samples have a ratio between 0.03 and 0.72 indicating the dissolution of dolomite. Dissolved carbonates (calcite and dolomite) occur predominantly in the form of HCO3, due to the pH range. The solubility of calcite and dolomite is largely controlled by CO2 fugacity and pH, according to the reactions:

$$ {\text{CaCO}}_{ 3} \;{ + }\;{\text{CO}}_{ 2} \;\left( {\text{g}} \right)\;{ + }\;{\text{H}}_{ 2} {\text{O}}\;{ = }\;{\text{Ca}}^{{ 2 { + }}} \;{ + }\; 2 {\text{HCO}}_{ 3}^{\text{ - }} $$
(1)
$$ {\text{Ca1}} - x{\text{Mg}}x{\text{CO}}_{ 3} {\text{ + CO}}_{ 2} \left( {\text{g}} \right){\text{ + H}}_{ 2} {\text{O = }}\left( { 1 - x} \right){\text{Ca}}^{{ 2 { + }}} { + }x{\text{Mg}}^{{ 2 { + }}} + 2 {\text{{HCO}}_{ 3}}^{{ - }} $$
(2)

The plot of Ca2+ + Mg2+ versus SO −24  + HCO3 will be close to the 1:1 line if the dissolutions of calcite, dolomite, anhydrite and gypsum are the dominant reactions in a system (Maya and Loucks 1999). Ion exchange tends to shift the points to right due to an excess of SO −24  + HCO3 (Cerling et al. 1989; Fisher and Mulican 1997; McLean and Jankowski 2000). If reverse ion exchange is the process, it will shift the points to the left due to a large excess of (Ca2+ + Mg2+) over SO −24  + HCO3. The plot of Ca2+ + Mg2+ versus SO −24  + HCO3 shows that the all samples are located in the left side due to an excess of (Ca2+ + Mg2+) (Belkhiri et al. 2010) (Fig. 3).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Sample number versus Ca2+/Mg2+

Fig. 3
figure 3

Ca2+ + Mg2+ versus SO −24  + HCO3

An Na (méq L−1)-normalized Ca2+ (méq L−1) versus HCO3 (méq L−1) and plot Mg2+ (méq L−1) plot (Figs. 4, 5) (Gaillardet et al. 1999) shows that the samples range from being influenced by silicate weathering to carbonate dissolution. The relation between Na-normalized Ca2+, HCO3 and Mg2+ shows that although most of the Mg may have been derived from carbonate dissolution, some have a silicate source (Belkhiri et al. 2010).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Na-normalized Ca2+ and HCO3 (HCO3/Na) (mEq l−1/mEq l−1)

Fig. 5
figure 5

Na-normalized Ca2+ and Mg2+

The saturation indices (calculated by PHREEQC) of some of the common mineral phases are presented in Table 2, which clearly shows that the groundwater is generally supersaturated with respect to most of the carbonate phases and is most probably responsible for the composition of the groundwater (Belkhiri et al. 2010).

Table 2 Saturation indices of the water samples from Oran sebkha basin calculated by PHREEQC

The results of saturation calculations show that all the points are under saturated with anhydrite and gypsum, and halite mineral phases are minor or absent in the area, suggesting that their soluble components Na+, Cl, Ca2+ and SO −24 concentrations are not limited by mineral equilibrium. In contrast, aragonite, calcite and dolomite reach saturation as groundwater chemistry evolves along the groundwater flow paths. The groundwater in the studied area evolves from less saline Ca–Mg–HCO3 water to blended Mg–Ca–HCO3–Cl water to brackish Mg–Ca–Cl–HCO3 water along the topographic flow path. Inverse geochemical modeling along groundwater flow paths indicates the dissolution of evaporite minerals, precipitation of carbonate minerals and weathering reactions of silicate minerals (Table 1; Fig. 6) (Belkhiri et al. 2010).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Piper diagram showing groundwater classification (Piper 1994)

Conclusion

The results of this study show that analysis of hydrochemical data using statistical techniques such as inverse geochemical modeling of the statistical clusters can help to elucidate the geological factor controlling water chemistry.

The groundwater in the studied area evolves from less saline Ca–Mg–HCO3 water to blended Mg–Ca–HCO3–Cl water to brackish Mg–Ca–Cl–HCO3 water along the topographic flow path.

The analysis indicates that the water of Oran sebkha basin is characterized with moderate alkalinity in the investigated period. Mineral saturation indices calculated from both major ions indicate that the groundwater is generally supersaturated with respect to most of the carbonate and silicate phases and is most probably responsible for the composition of the groundwater.

Inverse geochemical modeling along groundwater flow paths indicates the dissolution of evaporite minerals, precipitation of carbonate minerals and weathering reactions of silicate minerals.