Abstract
Trips are used in moulded case circuit breaker (MCCB) to provide protection to low voltage distribution systems. Trip free can be achieved by using the fork biasing spring, that helps the fork to gets back to its intended trip position after the breaker gets tripped and helps avoiding intermediate position. Mechanical endurance testing of MCCBs mechanism for trip operation showed that fork biasing spring fails before the desired number of trip operation. In this study an improved design for fork biasing spring is proposed in order to increase the reliability of fork biasing spring. The springs are assembled in the MCCB mechanism and are subject to mechanical endurance test for trip operation. The results obtained from mechanical endurance test are used to determine the reliability of the springs using Weibull, Normal, Exponential, Lognormal, 3 Parameter Weibull, 3 Parameter Lognormal, 2 Parameter Exponential and 3 Parameter Loglogistic distribution for life data plots. The cause of the failure in present fork biasing spring is due to hook breakage in extension springs and the recommended torsion spring increases reliability.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Basak P, Basak I, Balakrishnan N (2009) Estimation for the three-parameter lognormal distribution based on progressively censored data. Comput Stat Data Anal 53(10):3580–3592
Chen C (2006) Tests of fit for the three-parameter lognormal distribution. Comput Stat Data Anal 50(6):1418–1440
Cohen AC Jr. (1951) Estimating parameters of logarithmic-normal distributions by maximum likelihood. J Am Stat Assoc 46(254):206–212
Das SK et al (2007) Failure analysis of a passenger car coil spring. Eng Fail Anal 14(1):158–163
Harter HL, Moore AH (1966) Local-maximum-likelihood estimation of the parameters of three-parameter lognormal populations from complete and censored samples. J Am Stat Assoc 61(315):842–851
Hill BM (1963) The three-parameter lognormal distribution and Bayesian analysis of a point-source epidemic. J Am Stat Assoc 58(301):72–84
Jiang R, Murthy DNP (2011) A study of Weibull shape parameter: properties and significance. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 96(12):1619–1626
Kim JS, Yum B-J (2008) Selection between Weibull and lognormal distributions: a comparative simulation study. Comput Stat Data Anal 53(2):477–485
Mahdi E, Hamouda AMS (2013) An experimental investigation into mechanical behavior of hybrid and nonhybrid composite semi-elliptical springs. Mater Des 52:504–513
Marković D, Jukić D (2010) On nonlinear weighted total least squares parameter estimation problem for the three-parameter Weibull density. Appl Math Model 34(7):1839–1848
Moeini A et al (2013) Fitting the three-parameter Weibull distribution with cross entropy. Appl Math Model 37(9):6354–6363
Munro AH, Wixley RAJ (1970) Estimators based on order statistics of small samples from a three-parameter lognormal distribution. J Am Stat Assoc 65(329):212–225
Nagatsuka H, Kamakura T, Balakrishnan N (2013) A consistent method of estimation for the three-parameter Weibull distribution. Comput Stat Data Anal 58:210–226
Rane SB, Narvel YAM (2016) Reliability assessment and improvement of air circuit breaker (ACB) mechanism by identifying and eliminating the root causes. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 7(1):305–321
Rukhin AL (1986) Improved estimation in lognormal models. J Am Stat Assoc 81(396):1046–1049
Stone R (2012) Fatigue life estimates using goodman diagrams. Retriev August 17:2012
Swingler J (2016) Reliability optimisation for the multi-contact connector system under fretting conditions. Electr Eng 99:1–8
Vera JF, Díaz-García JA (2008) A global simulated annealing heuristic for the three-parameter lognormal maximum likelihood estimation. Comput Stat Data Anal 52(12):5055–5065
Wu X, Zhou Z, Li Y (2003) Investigation of reliability and lifetime distribution of the gas sensors based on C2H5OH. Solid State Electron 47(1):107–110
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shirurkar, A., Patil, Y. & Jebaseelan, D.D. Reliability improvement of fork biasing spring in MCCB mechanism. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 10, 491–498 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-018-0732-y
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-018-0732-y