Abstract
The aim of this paper is to identify and develop the structural cause and effect relationship among the various quality enabled factors that affect the facility layout design stage of production system life cycle. In the paper, nine factors are identified from literature survey and experts’ opinion and then these are validated by questionnaire survey. Then, interpretive structural modelling approach is utilized to obtain the structural relationship among these factors of facility layout design stage. This developed structural model not only provides a complete structural relationship among the various factors but also provides the direction to the manufacturing managers for designing and implementing appropriate policies in order to have efficient facility layout design. Moreover, classification of factors has been carried out on the basis of dependence and driving power with the help of MICMAC analysis in order to find the key factors of facility layout design stage.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Attri R, Grover S (2015a) Production system life cycle: an inside story. Int J Ind Syst Eng 19(4):483–514
Attri R, Grover S (2015b) Analyzing the scheduling system stage of production system life cycle. Manag Sci Lett 5(5):431–442
Attri R, Grover S (2015c) Contextual relationship among the quality enabled factors of inventory control system stage. Int J Recent Adv Mech Eng 4(2):45–57
Attri R, Grover S, Dev N, Kumar D (2013a) An ISM approach for modelling the enablers in the implementation of Total Productive Maintenance (TPM). Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 4(4):313–326
Attri R, Grover S, Dev N, Kumar D (2013b) Analysis of barriers of Total Productive Maintenance (TPM). Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 4(4):365–377
Attri R, Dev N, Sharma V (2013c) Interpretive structural modelling (ISM) approach: an overview. Res J Manag Sci 2(2):3–8
Borade AB, Bansod SV (2011) Interpretive structural modelling-based framework for VMI adoption in Indian industries. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 58(9–12):1227–1242
Dubey R, Ali SS (2014) Identification of flexible manufacturing system dimensions and their interrelationship using total interpretive structural modelling and fuzzy MICMAC analysis. Global J Flex Syst Manag 15(2):131–143
Govindan K, Azevedo SG, Carvalho H, Cruz-Machado V (2013) Lean, green and resilient practices influence on supply chain performance: interpretive structural modeling approach. Int J Environ Sci Technol. doi:10.1007/s13762-013-0409-7
Hadi-Vencheh A, Mohamadghasemi A (2013) An integrated AHP–NLP methodology for facility layout design. J Manuf Syst 32:40–45
Jadhav JR, Mantha SS, Rane SB (2014a) Development of framework for sustainable Lean implementation: an ISM approach. J Ind Eng Int. doi:10.1007/s40092-014-0072-8
Jadhav JR, Mantha SS, Rane SB (2014b) Analysis of interactions among the barriers to JIT production: interpretive structural modelling approach. J Ind Eng Int. doi:10.1007/s40092-014-0092-4
Jadhav JR, Mantha SS, Rane SB (2014c) Roadmap for Lean implementation in Indian automotive component manufacturing industry: comparative study of UNIDO Model and ISM Model. J Ind Eng Int. doi:10.1007/s40092-014-0074-6
Jayalakshmi B, Pramod (2014) Total interpretive structural modeling (TISM) of the enablers of a flexible control system for industry. Global J Flex Syst Manag. doi:10.1007/s40171-014-0080-y
Kannan D, Diabat A, Shankar KM (2014) Analyzing the drivers of end-of-life tire management using interpretive structural modeling (ISM). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 72(9–12):1603–1614
Kumar S, Luthra S, Haleem A (2013) Customer involvement in greening the supply chain: an interpretive structural modeling methodology. J Ind Eng Int. doi:10.1186/2251-712X-9-6
Mandal A, Deshmukh SG (1994) Vendor selection using interpretive structural modeling (ISM). Int J Oper Prod Manag 14(6):52–59
Maniya KD, Bhatt MG (2011) An alternative multiple attribute decision making methodology for solving optimal facility layout design selection problems. Comput Ind Eng 61:542–549
Mathiyazhagan K, Haq AN (2013) Analysis of the influential pressures for green supply chain management adoption—an Indian perspective using interpretive structural modeling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 68(1–4):817–833
Pandey VC, Suresh G, Ravi S (2005) An interpretive structural modelimg of enabler variables for integration in supply chain management. Productivity 46(1):93–108
Raj T, Attri R (2011) Identification and modelling of barriers in the implementation of TQM. Int J Product Qual Manag 8(2):153–179
Raj T, Attri R, Jain V (2012) Modelling the factors affecting flexibility in FMS. Int J Ind Syst Eng 11(4):350–374
Rao RV, Singh D (2012) Weighted Euclidean distance based approach as a multiple attribute decision making method for plant or facility layout design selection. Int J Ind Eng Comput 3:365–382
Ravi V, Shankar R (2005) Analysis of interactions among the barriers of reverse logistics. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 72:1011–1029
Sage A (1977) Interpretive structural modeling: Methodology for largescale systems. McGraw-Hill, New York
Singh MD, Kant R (2008) Knowledge management barriers: an interpretive structural modelling approach. Int J Manag Sci Eng Manag 3(2):141–150
Singh RK, Garg SK, Deshmukh SG, Kumar M (2007) Modeling of critical success factors for implementation of AMTs. J Model Manag 2(3):232–250
Sivaprakasam R, Selladurai V, Sasikumar P (2014) Implementation of interpretive structural modelling methodology as a strategic decision making tool in a Green Supply Chain Context. Ann Oper Res. doi:10.1007/s10479-013-1516-z
Soti A, Shankar R, Kaushal OP (2010) Modeling the enablers of Six Sigma using interpreting structural modeling. J Model Manag 5(2):124–141
Sule DR (1994) Manufacturing facilities location, planning and design. PWS Publishing Company, Boston
Taghavi A, Murat A (2011) A heuristic procedure for the integrated facility layout design and flow assignment problem. Comput Ind Eng 61:55–63
Tompkins JA, White JA, Bozer YA, Frazelle EH, Tanchoco JM, Trevino J (1996) Facilities planning. Wiley, New York
Warfield JW (1974) Developing interconnected matrices in structural modelling. IEEE Transcr Syst Men Cybern 4(1):51–81
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Attri, R., Grover, S. Modelling the quality enabled factors of facility layout design stage of production system life cycle. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 8 (Suppl 1), 413–423 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-015-0386-y
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-015-0386-y