Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Feasibility of Axillary Reverse Mapping and Clinicopathological Features Predicting ARM Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer—a Pilot Study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The axillary reverse mapping (ARM) technique has been described as an attempt to map and preserve the upper extremity lymphatic drainage during axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and/or SLNB. This technique is based on the hypothesis that the lymphatic pathway from the upper extremity is not involved by metastasis from primary breast cancer. The ARM node/s however, has been found, in various studies, to be involved with metastatic foci in patients with extensive axillary lymph node metastases. Therefore, the oncological safety of this procedure has not yet been determined. In this pilot study, we assessed the ARM node intraoperatively for various parameters and compared it to final HPR, to try and determine the oncologic safety of preserving the ARM node. Seventy-two breast cancer patients were screened for this prospective pilot study which was planned to recruit 20 patients. The study was initiated on May 2014, 20 patients were recruited till July 2015. Eligibility criterion was as follows: patients requiring primary axillary lymph node dissection based on a clinically positive axilla. Forty-five patients were ineligible because they had either received neoadjuvant chemotherapy or underwent previous axillary surgery or axillary radiation (exclusion criteria). Seven patients refused to give consent. ARM node identification rate was 75%. The most common location of the ARM node was lateral to the latissimus dorsi pedicle (42.10%), none of them being malignant. None of the oval or firm nodes were malignant. Tumor deposits were identified in 13%. Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) had 100% specificity, 94.4% negative predictive value, 100% positive predictive value, and 50% sensitivity. ARM is feasible using blue dye alone, with an acceptable identification rate. Location, consistency, and intraoperative FNAC of the ARM node, put together, may be reliable parameters to predict involvement of the ARM node with metastasis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Noguchi M, Miwa K, Michigishi T, Yokoyama K, Nishijima H, Takanaka T, Kawashima H, Nakamura S, Nonomura A (1997) The role of axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer management. Breast Cancer 4(3):143–153 ISSN 1340-6868

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Blanchard DK, Donohue JH, Reynolds C, Grant CS (2003) Relapse and morbidity in patients undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy alone or with axillary dissection for breast cancer. Arch Surg 138(5):482–488 ISSN 0344-8444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Leidenius M, Leivonen M, Vironen J, von Smitten K (2005) The consequences of long-time arm morbidity in node-negative breast cancer patients with sentinel node biopsy or axillary clearance. J Surg Oncol 92(1):23–31 ISSN 0022-4790

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Haid A, Koberle-Wuhrer R, Knauer M, Burtscher J, Fritzsche H, Peschina W, Jasarevic Z, Ammann M, Hergan K, Sturn H, Zimmermann G (2002) Morbidity of breast cancer patients following complete axillary dissection or sentinel node biopsy only: a comparative evaluation. Breast Cancer Res Treat 73(1):31–36 ISSN 0167-6806

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mansel RE, Fallowfield L, Kissin M, Goyal A, Newcombe RG, Dixon JM, Yiangou C, Horgan K, Bundred N, Monypenny I, England D, Sibbering M, Abdullah TI, Barr L, Chetty U, Sinnett DH, Fleissig A, Clarke D, Ell PJ (2006) Randomized multicenter trial of sentinel node biopsy versus standard axillary treatment in operable breast cancer: the ALMANAC Trial. JNCI 98(9):599–609 ISSN 0027-8874

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sakorafas GH, Peros G, Cataliotti L, Vlastos G (2006) Lymphedema following axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer. Surg Oncol 15(3):153–165 ISSN 0960-7404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wilke LG, McCall LM, Posther KE, Whitworth PW, Reintgen DS, Leitch AM, Gabram SG, Lucci A, Cox CE, Hunt KK, Herndon JE II, Giuliano AE (2006) Surgical complications associated with sentinel lymph node biopsy: results from a prospective international cooperative group trial. Ann Surg Oncol 13(4):491–500 ISSN 1068-9265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nos C, Lesieur B, Clough KB, Lecuru F (2007) Blue dye injection in the arm in order to conserve the lymphatic drainage of the arm in breast cancer patients requiring an axillary dissection. Ann Surg Oncol 14(9):2490–2496

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Thompson M, Korourian S, Henry-Tillman R, Adkins L, Mumford S, Westbrook KC et al (2007) Axillary reverse mapping (ARM): a new concept to identify and enhance lymphatic preservation. Ann Surg Oncol 14(6):1890–1895

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bedrosian I, Babiera GV, Mittendorf EA, Kuerer HM, Pantoja L, Hunt KK, Krishnamurthy S, Meric-Bernstam FM (2010) A phase I study to assess the feasibility and oncologic safety of axillary reverse mapping in breast cancer patients. Cancer 116(11):2543–2548 ISSN 0008-543X

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Kang SH, Choi JE, Jeon YS, Lee SJ, Bae YK (2009) Preservation of lymphatic drainage from arm in breast cancer surgery: is it safe? Cancer Res 69(Suppl 2):87s ISSN 0576-6656

    Google Scholar 

  12. Noguchi M, Yokoi M, Nakano Y (2010b) Axillary reverse mapping with indocyanine fluorescence imaging in patients with breast cancer. J Surg Oncol 101(3):217–221 ISSN 0022-4790

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nos C, Kaufmann G, Clough KB, Collignon M-A, Zerbib E, Cusumano P, Lecuru F (2008) Combined axillary mapping (ARM) technique for breast cancer patients requiring axillary dissection. Ann Surg Oncol 15(9):2550–2555 ISSN 1068-9265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ponzone R, Cont NT, Maggiorotto F, Cassina E, Mininanni P, Biglia N, Sismondi P (2009) Extensive nodal disease may impair axillary reverse mapping in patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 27(33):5547–5551 ISSN 0732-183X

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Boneti C, Korourian S, Diaz Z, Santiago C, Mumford S, Adkins L, Klimberg VS (2009) Scientific Impact Award: axillary reverse mapping (ARM) to identify and protect lymphatics draining the arm during axillary lymphadenectomy. Am J Surg 198(4):482–487 ISSN 0002-9610

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Britton TB, Solanki CK, Pinder SE, Mortimer PS, Peters AM, Purushotham AD (2009) Lymphatic drainage pathways of the breast and the upper limb. Nucl Med Comm 30(6):427–430 ISSN 0143-3636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Noguchi M (2009) Axillary reverse mapping for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 119:529–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ikeda K, Ogawa Y, Komatsu H, Mori Y, Ishikawa A, Nakajima T, Oohira G, Tokunaga S, Fukushima H, Inoue T (2012) Evaluation of the metastatic status of lymph nodes identified using axillary reverse mapping in breast cancer patients. World Journal of Surgical Oncology 10:233

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Shiva Kumar.

Ethics declarations

The study was approved by our Institutional Ethics Committee of and was funded by St. John’s Research Institute, a nonprofit funding body. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients that participated in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, K.S., Hemanth, G.N., Panjwani, P.K. et al. Feasibility of Axillary Reverse Mapping and Clinicopathological Features Predicting ARM Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer—a Pilot Study. Indian J Surg Oncol 8, 119–122 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-016-0578-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-016-0578-1

Keywords

Navigation