Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Strategic Use of Telescopic Retainers and Semi-rigid Precision Attachments in a Geriatric Patient: A Case Report

  • Clinical Report
  • Published:
The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society

Abstract

The rehabilitation of medically compromised elderly patients with long span partially edentulous arches has been a tremendous challenge for dentists. Proper dental management requires a commitment to provide the best treatment despite the compromised oral conditions. The aim of this paper is to describe the prosthetic rehabilitation of an elderly patient who presented with chief complaints of gagging sensation while using upper denture, loose upper and lower dentures and difficulty in eating food. Patient was rehabilitated using removable partial denture with semi-rigid attachments in the maxillary arch and telescopic prosthesis in the mandibular arch. Use of semi precision attachments helped in increasing the retentive ability of the maxillary prosthesis, even in the presence of only few abutments. Fabrication of a telescopic denture is a technique sensitive procedure but it offers advantages like bilateral splinting effect in long span partially edentulous arches, reduced effective crown–root ratio, maintenance of proprioception and transfer of forces along the long axis of the abutments. Although the management was complex but it improved patient’s esthetics, oral function and social confidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Eichner K (1984) Recent knowledge gained from long-term observations in the field of prosthodontics. Int Dent J 34:35–40

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ante IH (1928) The fundamental principles, design and construction of crown and bridge prosthesis. Dent Items Interest 1:215–232

    Google Scholar 

  3. Misch CE (2005) Dental implant prosthetics, 2nd edn. Elsevier Mosby, St Louis, p 207

    Google Scholar 

  4. Breitman JB, Nakamura S, Freedman AL, Yalisove IL (2012) Telescopic retainer: an old or new solution? A second chance to have a normal dental function. J Prosthodont 21:79–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Swoope CC (1969) Prosthetic considerations in tooth removal. Dent Clin North Am 13:857–870

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Atwood DA (1962) Some clinical factors related to rate of resorption of the residual ridges. J Prosthet Dent 12:446–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gershkoff A (1970) The subperiosteal unilateral implant as a distal abutment and as a support to the periodontally involved teeth. Dent Clin North Am 14:95–102

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Preiskel HW (1979) Precision attachments in dentistry, 3rd edn. CV Mosby Co, St Louis, p 171

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wang CH, Lee HE, Du JK, Igarashi Y (2005) Connecting rigidities of various precision attachments compared with a conical crown retained telescope. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 21:22–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Phoneix RD, Cagna, Defreest CF (2008) Stewart’s clinical removable partial prosthodontics, 4th edn. Quintessence publishing Co Inc, Hanover Park, USA, pp 501–508

  11. The glossary of prosthodontics terms (2005) J Prosthet Dent 94:10-92

    Google Scholar 

  12. Langer A (1980) Telescope retainers and their clinical application. J Prosthet Dent 44:516–522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Berman H, Lusting P (1960) Primary substructure and removable telescope superstructure in denture reconstruction. J Prosthet Dent 10:724–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Schweitzer JM, Schweitzer RD, Schweitzer J (1971) The telescoped complete denture. A research report at the clinical level. J Prosthet Dent 26:357–372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Miller PA (1958) Complete dentures supported by natural teeth. J Prosthet Dent 8:924–928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Weaver JD (1989) Telescopic copings in restorative dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 61:429–433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Perel ML (1973) Telescope denture. J Prosthet Dent 29:151–156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Isaacson GO (1969) Telescope crown retainer for removable partial denture. J Prosthet Dent 22:436–448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yalisove IL, Dietz JR (1977) Telescopic prosthetic therapy. George F Stickley Co, Philadelphia, p 11

    Google Scholar 

  20. DeFranco RL (2000) Overdentures. In: Winkler S (ed) Essentials of complete denture prosthodontics, 2nd edn. Ishiyaku EuroAmerica Inc., St. Louis, USA, pp 384–385

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pezzoli M, Rossetto M, Calderale PM (1986) Evaluation of load transmission of distal-extension removal partial dentures using reflection photoelasticity. J Prosthet Dent 56:325–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Weigl P, Hahn L, Lauer HC (2000) Advanced biomaterials used for a new telescopic retainer for removable dentures. J Biomed Mater Res 53:320–336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Financial support

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Veena Jain.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wadhwa, B., Jain, V. & Pruthi, G. Strategic Use of Telescopic Retainers and Semi-rigid Precision Attachments in a Geriatric Patient: A Case Report. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 14 (Suppl 1), 232–237 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-013-0302-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-013-0302-6

Keywords

Navigation