Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of Sexual Objectification on Conspicuous Consumption and Materialism

  • Published:
Sexuality Research and Social Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Few studies have examined the effect of sexual objectification on consumption and materialism. We addressed this gap in the literature by examining whether sexual objectification is related to conspicuous consumption and materialism. More specifically, we attempt to answer the following questions: “What are some of the major antecedents of conspicuous consumption and materialism?” and “Is there any relationship between conspicuous consumption and materialism?” Using a quantitative approach, a multistage and cluster sampling method, and self-report questionnaires, we gathered responses from 362 young females living in Iran, as a developing country governed by Islamic codes. Participants completed self-report measures of the following variables: interpersonal sexual objectification scale (ISOS), body surveillance, body shame, conspicuous consumption, and materialism. Results showed that conspicuous consumption was significantly related to materialism. Regression analyses also indicate that body surveillance, as the main variable of self-objectification, had the highest impact on conspicuous consumption. Finally, according to our findings, conspicuous consumption was the main antecedent for materialism. The following study provides evidence for the negative effects of objectification on consumption and materialism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abercrombie, N., Hill, S., & Turner, B. S. (1994). Dictionary of sociology (3rd ed.). London: The Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnould, E. J., & Thompson, C. J. (2005). Consumer culture theory (CCT): twenty years of research. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(4), 868–882. doi:10.1086/426626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartky, S. L. (1990). Femininity and domination: studies in the phenomenon of oppression. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, J. (1998). The consumer society: myths and structures. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R. W. (1984). Three scales to measure constructs related to materialism: reliability, validity, and relationships to measures of happiness. In T. C. Kinnear (Ed.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 11, pp. 291–297). Provo: Association for Consumer Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calogero, R. M., Pina, A., Park, L. E., & Rahemtulla, Z. (2010). Objectification theory predicts college women’s attitudes toward cosmetic surgery. Sex Roles, 63, 32–41. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9759-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, C. (2000). Shopaholics, spendaholics and the question of gender. In A. Benson (Ed.), I shop, therefore I am: Compulsive buying and the search for self (pp. 57–75). New York: Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1981). Attention and self-regulation: a control theory approach to human behavior. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, E., & Fischer, E. (2001). When conspicuous consumption becomes inconspicuous: the case of the migrant Hong Kong consumers. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18, 474–488. doi:10.1108/07363760110404378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deflem, M. (2003). The sociology of the sociology of money Simmel and contemporary battle of the classics. Journal of Classical Sociology, 3(1), 67–96. doi:10.1177/1468795X03003001695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dittmair, H. (2008). Consumer culture, identity and well-being. Hove: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. (1997). Objectification theory: toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1951). Symbols of class status. British Journal of Sociology, 2, 294–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, R. E., & Clark, R. A. (2012). Materialism, status consumption, and consumer independence. The Journal of Social Psychology, 152(1), 43–60. doi:10.1080/00224545.2011.555434.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hatton, E., & Trautner, M. N. (2011). Equal opportunity objectification? The sexualization of men and women on the cover of rolling stone. Sexuality & Culture, 15, 256–278. doi:10.1007/s12119-011-9093-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson-King, D., & Brooks, K. D. (2009). Materialism, sociocultural appearance, messages and paternal attitudes predict college women’s attitude about cosmetic surgery. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33, 133–142. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.01480.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, M. (2009). Gender and everyday life. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasser, T. (2002). The high price of materialism. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasser, T., & Kanner, A. D. (Eds.). (2004). Psychology and consumer culture: the struggle for a good life in a materialistic world. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/pubs/books/4317024.aspx.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, L. H., William, O. B., & Richard, G. N. (2010). Handbook of marketing scales: multi-item measures for marketing and consumer. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khaje Noori, B., Mosavat, S. E., & Moazeni, M. (2012). Religion and consumption behavior. Quarterly Journal of Women and Society, 3(3), 79–105. ISSN: 2008-8566 (Persian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozee, H. B., & Tylka, T. L. (2006). A test of objectification theory with lesbian women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 348–357. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00310.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozee, H. B., Tylka, T. L., Augustus-Horvath, C. L., & Denchik, A. (2007). Development and psychometric evaluation of the interpersonal sexual objectification scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 176–189. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00351.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laumann, E. O., & House, J. S. (1970). Living room styles and social attributes. The patterning of material artefacts in a modern urban community. Sociology and Social Research, 45, 321–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, R. S. (1981). Conspicuous consumption: a study of exceptional consumer behavior. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinley, N. M., & Hyde, S. (1996). The objectified body consciousness scale: development and validation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 181–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. W. (2000). The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press (Original work published 1959).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moradi, B., Dirks, D., & Matteson, A. V. (2005). Roles of sexual objectification experiences and internalization of standards of beauty in eating disorder symptomatology: a test and extension of objectification theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 420–428. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.52.3.420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullins, P. R. (1999). Race and affluence: an archaeology of African American and consumer culture. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Cass, A., & McEwen, H. (2004). Exploring consumer status and conspicuous consumption. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 4, 25–39. doi:10.1002/cb.155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pishgamifard, Z., Abd, F., Motaghi, S., & Motaghi, A. (2012). Comparative investigation into personality characteristics between employed and non-employed women. Quarterly Journal of Women and Society, 3(2), 39–53. ISSN: 2008-8566(Persian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Podoshen, J. S., & Andrzejewski, S. (2012). An examination of the relationships between materialism, conspicuous consumption, impulse buying and brand loyalty. Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice, 20(3), 319–333. doi:10.2753/MTP1069-6679200306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podoshen, J. S., Li, L., & Zhang, J. (2011). Materialism and conspicuous consumption in China: a cross-cultural examination. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 35, 17–25. doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2010.00930.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richins, M. L. (1994). Valuing things: the public and private meanings of material possessions. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 504–521. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2489689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richins, M. L. (2004). The material values scale: measurement properties and development of a short form. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 209–219. doi:10.1086/383436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richins, M. L., & Dawson, S. (1992). A consumer values orientation for materialism and its measurement: scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 303–316. doi:10.1086/209304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segal, B., & Podoshen, J. S. (2012). An examination of materialism, conspicuous consumption and gender differences. International Journal of Consumer Studies. doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2012.01099.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shukla, P. (2008). Conspicuous consumption among middle age consumers: psychological and brand antecedents. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 17, 25–36. doi:10.1108/10610420810856495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sklair, L. (1998). The transnational capitalist class and global capitalism: the case of the tobacco industry. Political Power and Social Theory, 12, 3–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitzack, C. (1990). Confessing excess: women and the politics of body reduction. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigg, A. (2001). Veblen, Bourdieu and conspicuous consumption. Journal of Economic Issues, 35, 99–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underhill, P. (2004). Call of the mall. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, T. (1899). The theory of the leisure class. New York: McMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, N., Rindfleisch, A., & Burroughs, J. E. (2003). Do reverse-worded items confound measures of cross-cultural consumer research? The case of the material values scale. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 72–91. doi:10.1086/374697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zokaee, M. S. (2007). Youth, body and fit culture. Journal of Cultural Studies, 1, 117–141 (Persian).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Our special thanks go to Narmin BeheshtiZade, Mahshid Shahidi, Zahra Ramazani, and Samira Ebrahimpoor who, with their academic and empirical sophistication, greatly assisted us in conducting the present study. We should also thank all those professors and friends whose contributions to the current study were a great relief.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meysam Haddadi Barzoki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Haddadi Barzoki, M., Tavakol, M. & Vahidnia, A. Effects of Sexual Objectification on Conspicuous Consumption and Materialism. Sex Res Soc Policy 11, 153–162 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-014-0156-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-014-0156-7

Keywords

Navigation