Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Identification of novel serum protein biomarkers in the context of 3P medicine for intravenous leiomyomatosis: a data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry-based proteomics study

  • Research
  • Published:
EPMA Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Intravenous leiomyomatosis (IVL) is a rare endocrine-associated tumor with unique characteristics of intravascular invasion. This study aimed to identify reliable biomarkers to supervise the development or recurrence of IVL in the context of predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine (PPPM/3PM).

Methods

A total of 60 cases were recruited to detect differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) in serum samples from IVL patients. These cases included those with recurrent IVL, non-recurrent IVL, uterine myoma, and healthy individuals without uterine myoma, with 15 cases in each category. Then, weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), lasso-penalized Cox regression analysis (Lasso), trend clustering, and a generalized linear regression model (GLM) were utilized to screen the hub proteins involved in IVL progression.

Results

First, 93 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) were determined from 2582 recognizable proteins, with 54 proteins augmented in the IVL group, and the remaining proteins declined. These proteins were enriched in the modulation of the immune environment, mainly by activating the function of B cells. After the integrated analyses mentioned above, a model based on four proteins (A0A5C2FUE5, A0A5C2GPQ1, A0A5C2GNC7, and A0A5C2GBR3) was developed to efficiently determine the potential of IVL lesions to progress. Among these featured proteins, our results demonstrated that the risk factor A0A5C2FUE5 was associated with IVL progression (OR = 2.64). Conversely, A0A5C2GPQ1, A0A5C2GNC7, and A0A5C2GBR3 might act in a protective manner and prevent disease development (OR = 0.32, 0.60, 0.53, respectively), which was further supported by the multi-class receiver operator characteristic curve analysis.

Conclusion

Four hub proteins were eventually identified based on the integrated bioinformatics analyses. This study potentiates the promising application of these novel biomarkers to predict the prognosis or progression of IVL by a 3PM approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated in this study have been involved in the manuscript or the supplementary files. The raw files of DIA proteomics have been uploaded to the public repository and can be retrieved from the iProX database (https://www.iprox.cn/page/project.html?id=IPX0003343000).

Abbreviations

IVL :

intravenous leiomyomatosis

CO :

control group

CO-no :

control subgroup without uterine myoma

CO-um :

control subgroup with uterine myoma

IVL-no :

IVL subgroup without recurrence

IVL-re :

IVL subgroup with recurrence

CTA :

computerized tomography angiography

LOH :

loss of heterozygosity

DIA :

data-independent acquisition

FASP :

filter-aided sample preparation

DDA :

data dependent acquisition

AGC :

automatic gain control

LC-MS/MS :

liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

FDR :

false discovery rate

DEPs :

differentially expressed proteins

FC :

fold change

OPLS-DA :

orthogonal partial least-squares discriminant analysis

GO :

gene ontology

KEGG :

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes

WGCNA :

weighted gene co-expression network analysis

TOM :

topological overlap matrix

PPI :

protein-protein interaction

FCM :

fuzzy c-means

Lasso :

lasso-penalized cox regression

GLM :

generalized linear regression model

ROC :

receiver operator characteristic curve

AUC :

area under the curve

LTBP2 :

latent-transforming growth factor β binding protein 2

OPN :

osteopontin

NK :

natural killer

Tfh :

follicular helper T

Treg :

regulatory T

GC :

germinal center

Cig :

carcinogenic immunoglobulin

PDAC :

pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

LMP1 :

latent membrane protein 1

NF-κB :

nuclear factor kappa B

AP-1 :

activating protein-1

References

  1. Ma G, Miao Q, Liu X, Zhang C, Liu J, Zheng Y, et al. Different surgical strategies of patients with intravenous leiomyomatosis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(37):e4902.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Matsuo K, Fleischman F, Ghattas CS, Gabrielyan AS, Ballard CA, Roman LD, et al. Successful extraction of cardiac-extending intravenous leiomyomatosis through gonadal vein. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(5):1341–5. e1

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Yu X, Fu J, Cao T, Huang L, Qie M, Ouyang Y. Clinicopathologic features and clinical outcomes of intravenous leiomyomatosis of the uterus: a case series. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021;100(1):e24228.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Aydin E, Kose O, Kocaaslan C, Aldag M, Bademci MS. Intravascular leiomyomatosis with extension into the pulmonary artery. J Card Surg. 2018;33(8):453–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Li B, Chen X, Chu YD, Li RY, Li WD, Ni YM. Intracardiac leiomyomatosis: a comprehensive analysis of 194 cases. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013;17(1):132–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Burke M, Opeskin K. Death due to intravenous leiomyomatosis extending to the right pulmonary artery. Pathology. 2004;36(2):202–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shi T, Shkrum MJ. A case report of sudden death from intracardiac leiomyomatosis. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2018;39(2):119–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kong LY, Chen LL, Xiang W, Liu F. Intravenous leiomyomatosis with paradoxical embolism: unusual presentation of uterine leiomyoma. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;13(1):e009930.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu J, Liang M, Ma G, Liu X, Cheng N, Cao D, et al. Surgical treatment for intravenous-cardiac leiomyomatosis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018;54(3):483–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Virzi G, Ragazzi S, Bussichella F, D'Agati P, Caputo S, Scaravilli F, et al. Intravenous leiomyomatosis extending from the inferior caval vein to the pulmonary artery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;133(3):831–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang Y, Clark LH, Sheng X, Zhou C. Successful en bloc venous resection with reconstruction and subsequent radiotherapy for 2 consecutive recurrences of intravenous leiomyoma--a case report. BMC Cancer. 2016;16:6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Su Q, Zhang X, Zhang H, Liu Y, Dong Z, Li G, et al. Intravenous leiomyomatosis of the uterus: a retrospective single-center study in 14 cases. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:9758302.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Guo X, Zhang C, Fang L, Guo L, Zhu W, Fang Q, et al. Echocardiographic characteristics of intravenous leiomyomatosis with intracardiac extension: a single-institution experience. Echocardiography. 2011;28(9):934–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gui T, Qian Q, Cao D, Yang J, Peng P, Shen K. Computerized tomography angiography in preoperative assessment of intravenous leiomyomatosis extending to inferior vena cava and heart. BMC Cancer. 2016;16:73.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang H, Nie P, Chen B, Hou F, Dong C, He F, et al. Contrast-enhanced CT findings of intravenous leiomyomatosis. Clin Radiol. 2018;73(5):503 e1–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yu X, Zhang G, Lang J, Liu B, Zhao D. Factors associated with recurrence after surgical resection in women with intravenous leiomyomatosis. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(5):1018–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang G, Feng F, Wang W, Zhu L. Rapamycin (sirolimus) in treatment of recurrent intravenous leiomyomatosis: a case report. BJOG. 2020;127(6):768–71.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Buza N, Xu F, Wu W, Carr RJ, Li P, Hui P. Recurrent chromosomal aberrations in intravenous leiomyomatosis of the uterus: high-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization study. Hum Pathol. 2014;45(9):1885–92.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lu B, Liu Q, Tang L, Ma Y, Shi H. Intravenous leiomyomatosis: molecular analysis of 17 cases. Pathology. 2020;52(2):213–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang W, Wang Y, Chen F, Zhang M, Jia R, Liu X, et al. Intravenous leiomyomatosis is inclined to a solid entity different from uterine leiomyoma based on RNA-seq analysis with RT-qPCR validation. Cancer Med. 2020;9(13):4581–92.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Miro A, Coppola Bottazzi E, Vanella S, Palma T, Noviello A, Apicella I, et al. Intravascular leiomyomatosis with intracardiac extension: a toraco-abdominal approach. J Surg Case Rep. 2021;2021(6):rjab249.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Aslam B, Basit M, Nisar MA, Khurshid M, Rasool MH. Proteomics: technologies and their applications. J Chromatogr Sci. 2017;55(2):182–96.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Chung L, Moore K, Phillips L, Boyle FM, Marsh DJ, Baxter RC. Novel serum protein biomarker panel revealed by mass spectrometry and its prognostic value in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2014;16(3):R63.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Wu J, Xie X, Liu Y, He J, Benitez R, Buckanovich RJ, et al. Identification and confirmation of differentially expressed fucosylated glycoproteins in the serum of ovarian cancer patients using a lectin array and LC-MS/MS. J Proteome Res. 2012;11(9):4541–52.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. da Costa AN, Plymoth A, Santos-Silva D, Ortiz-Cuaran S, Camey S, Guilloreau P, et al. Osteopontin and latent-TGF beta binding-protein 2 as potential diagnostic markers for HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(1):172–81.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Simon AJ, Parry-Smith WR, Redman CW, Kodampur M, Todd R, Satur C, et al. Intravascular leiomyomatosis: a case report and review of the literature. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;35(5):539–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Gloria-Bottini F, Pietropolli A, Ammendola M, Saccucci P, Bottini E. PTPN22 and uterine leiomyomas. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015;185:96–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Liu ZQ, Lu MY, Sun RL, Yin ZN, Liu B, Wu YZ. Characteristics of peripheral immune function in reproductive females with uterine leiomyoma. J Oncol. 2019;2019:5935640.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Ueno H, Banchereau J, Vinuesa CG. Pathophysiology of T follicular helper cells in humans and mice. Nat Immunol. 2015;16(2):142–52.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Gitlin AD, Mayer CT, Oliveira TY, Shulman Z, Jones MJ, Koren A, et al. HUMORAL IMMUNITY. T cell help controls the speed of the cell cycle in germinal center B cells. Science. 2015;349(6248):643–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Barwick BG, Scharer CD, Martinez RJ, Price MJ, Wein AN, Haines RR, et al. B cell activation and plasma cell differentiation are inhibited by de novo DNA methylation. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1900.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Dieu-Nosjean MC, Giraldo NA, Kaplon H, Germain C, Fridman WH, Sautes-Fridman C. Tertiary lymphoid structures, drivers of the anti-tumor responses in human cancers. Immunol Rev. 2016;271(1):260–75.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Fehres CM, van Uden NO, Yeremenko NG, Fernandez L, Franco Salinas G, van Duivenvoorde LM, et al. APRIL induces a novel subset of IgA(+) regulatory B cells that suppress inflammation via expression of IL-10 and PD-L1. Front Immunol. 2019;10:1368.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Ou Z, Wang Y, Liu L, Li L, Yeh S, Qi L, et al. Tumor microenvironment B cells increase bladder cancer metastasis via modulation of the IL-8/androgen receptor (AR)/MMPs signals. Oncotarget. 2015;6(28):26065–78.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Yang C, Lee H, Pal S, Jove V, Deng J, Zhang W, et al. B cells promote tumor progression via STAT3 regulated-angiogenesis. PLoS One. 2013;8(5):e64159.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Gu Y, Liu Y, Fu L, Zhai L, Zhu J, Han Y, et al. Tumor-educated B cells selectively promote breast cancer lymph node metastasis by HSPA4-targeting IgG. Nat Med. 2019;25(2):312–22.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Kang S, Maeng H, Kim BG, Qing GM, Choi YP, Kim HY, et al. In situ identification and localization of IGHA2 in the breast tumor microenvironment by mass spectrometry. J Proteome Res. 2012;11(9):4567–74.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Sheng Z, Liu Y, Qin C, Liu Z, Yuan Y, Hu F, et al. IgG is involved in the migration and invasion of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Pathol. 2016;69(6):497–504.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Geng ZH, Ye CX, Huang Y, Jiang HP, Ye YJ, Wang S, et al. Human colorectal cancer cells frequently express IgG and display unique Ig repertoire. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2019;11(3):195–207.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Cui M, You L, Zheng B, Huang X, Liu Q, Huang J, et al. High expression of cancer-derived glycosylated immunoglobulin G predicts poor prognosis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Cancer. 2020;11(8):2213–21.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Qin C, Sheng Z, Huang X, Tang J, Liu Y, Xu T, et al. Cancer-driven IgG promotes the development of prostate cancer though the SOX2-CIgG pathway. Prostate. 2020;80(13):1134–44.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Tang J, Zhang J, Liu Y, Liao Q, Huang J, Geng Z, et al. Lung squamous cell carcinoma cells express non-canonically glycosylated IgG that activates integrin-FAK signaling. Cancer Lett. 2018;430:148–59.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Qiu X, Zhu X, Zhang L, Mao Y, Zhang J, Hao P, et al. Human epithelial cancers secrete immunoglobulin g with unidentified specificity to promote growth and survival of tumor cells. Cancer Res. 2003;63(19):6488–95.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Kaplan B, Livneh A, Sela BA. Immunoglobulin free light chain dimers in human diseases. Sci World J. 2011;11:726–35.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Kang SY, Suh JT, Lee HJ, Yoon HJ, Lee WI. Clinical usefulness of free light chain concentration as a tumor marker in multiple myeloma. Ann Hematol. 2005;84(9):588–93.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Li M, Feng DY, Ren W, Zheng L, Zheng H, Tang M, et al. Expression of immunoglobulin kappa light chain constant region in abnormal human cervical epithelial cells. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2004;36(11):2250–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Liu H, Zheng H, Duan Z, Hu D, Li M, Liu S, et al. LMP1-augmented kappa intron enhancer activity contributes to upregulation expression of Ig kappa light chain via NF-kappaB and AP-1 pathways in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Mol Cancer. 2009;8:92.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Ma J, Jiang D, Gong X, Shao W, Zhu Z, Xu W, et al. Free immunoglobulin light chain (FLC) promotes murine colitis and colitis-associated colon carcinogenesis by activating the inflammasome. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):5165.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Groot Kormelink T, Powe DG, Kuijpers SA, Abudukelimu A, Fens MH, Pieters EH, et al. Immunoglobulin free light chains are biomarkers of poor prognosis in basal-like breast cancer and are potential targets in tumor-associated inflammation. Oncotarget. 2014;5(10):3159–67.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Qiu X, Sun X, He Z, Huang J, Hu F, Chen L, et al. Immunoglobulin gamma heavy chain gene with somatic hypermutation is frequently expressed in acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2013;27(1):92–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Adamovic T, McAllister D, Guryev V, Wang X, Andrae JW, Cuppen E, et al. Microalterations of inherently unstable genomic regions in rat mammary carcinomas as revealed by long oligonucleotide array-based comparative genomic hybridization. Cancer Res. 2009;69(12):5159–67.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Zheng H, Li M, Liu H, Ren W, Hu DS, Shi Y, et al. Immunoglobulin alpha heavy chain derived from human epithelial cancer cells promotes the access of S phase and growth of cancer cells. Cell Biol Int. 2007;31(1):82–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Chu J, Li Y, Deng Z, Zhang Z, Xie Q, Zhang H, et al. IGHG1 regulates prostate cancer growth via the MEK/ERK/c-Myc pathway. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:7201562.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank AJE (https://www.aje.cn/) for English-language editing.

Code availability

The custom codes performed for R analysis could be retrieved from the Bioconductor website (https://www.bioconductor.org/).

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the National High-Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding (2022-PUMCH-B-064, 2022-PUMCH-C-053, and 2022-PUMCH-B-123) and Natural Science Foundation of Beijing (grant number 7234411).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Software, data curation, formal analysis, and visualization: ZTG and PHF. Writing-original draft preparation and writing review or editing: ZTG, PHF, and ZJZ. Conceptualization or design, administration, and funding acquisition: JCL, RC, and ZYL.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhiyong Liang, Rong Chen or Jianchu Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The research procedure was carried out in conformity with the principle of the Helsinki Declaration and reviewed by the Ethics Committee of Peking Union Medical College Hospital.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent for publication was obtained from all participants.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

ESM 1

Supplementary Figure 1. Quality control analysis of the project. A. Quantitative fluctuation evaluation of samples. The abscissa represented different samples, and the ordinate represented the amount of protein expression. Different colors were on behalf of different groups. B. Peak capacity evaluation. The abscissa was the sequence of sample loading. The ordinate was the number of peaks; the green line represented the data of all peptides. A red line was displayed to illustrate iRT internal standard data. C. Protein FDR analysis. Cscore was equivalent to the protein reliability score. The black dotted line represented a 1% Q value (equivalent to 1% FDR) standard line. The higher the Csocre at the standard line, the better. (TIF 1960 kb) (PNG 229 kb)

High resolution image (TIF 1960 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ge, Z., Feng, P., Zhang, Z. et al. Identification of novel serum protein biomarkers in the context of 3P medicine for intravenous leiomyomatosis: a data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry-based proteomics study. EPMA Journal 14, 613–629 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13167-023-00338-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13167-023-00338-0

Keywords

Navigation