Skip to main content
Log in

Why should marketers be forced to ignore their moral awareness? A reply to Gaski

  • Commentary
  • Published:
AMS Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This commentary presents a reply to the Gaski paper that is published in this issue. Our stance is that he overstates his position and makes several 'leaps of faith' that are unwarranted. We focus on four major reservations about this work: (1) the dynamics of ethics and regulation are underrepresented; (2) simplistic assumptions are made about the uncertainty of ethical claims and theories; (3) responsibility is considered as an all or nothing proposition; and (4) empirical claims are offered that are not backed up with evidence and bad faith is displayed in presenting 'real world' examples. We conclude by stating that corporations have already institutionalized ethics and corporate social responsibility functions within their firms. We firmly believe that responsible marketers do have a conscience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jltnBOrCB7I

  2. https://pressroom.toyota.com/toyota-is-conducting-a-safety-recall-involving-certain-toyota-and-lexus-vehicles-6/

  3. See (in French) the text of the loi Garot here: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/jorf/id/JORFTEXT000032036289

  4. https://www.socialsciencespace.com/2013/01/philip-kotler-on-marketing-with-a-conscience/

  5. “I have no difficulty in practical moral judgments, which I find I make on a roughly hedonistic [i.e., utilitarian] basis, but, when it comes to the philosophy of moral judgments, I am impelled in two opposite directions and remain perplexed.” (Russell on Ethics, edited by Charles Pigden, London: Routledge, 1999, 165–6).

  6. Bernard Williams qualifies such radical relativism as “the most absurd view to have been advanced even in moral philosophy” (1972: 20). (Williams, B. Morality. An Introduction to Ethics. Cambridge University Press 1972).

  7. What’s Really Behind Corporate Promises on Climate Change? The New York Times 22 Feb 2021. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/22/business/energy-environment/corporations-climate-change.html

References

  • Bagha, J., & Laczniak, G. R. (2015). Seeking the real Adam Smith and Milton Friedman. Philosophy of Management, 14(3), 179–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowie, N. E. (2008). Kantian Ethics. In R. Kolb (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Business Ethics and Society (Vol. 3, pp. 1240–1244). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demuijnck, G., & Murphy, P. (2022). Retail practitioners’ views vs. ideal theoretical positions concerning ethical business practices with garment suppliers. Business & Professional Ethics Journal, 41(1), 50–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. (1994). Ties that bind. A social contracts approach to business ethics. Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, 32–33, 122–126.

  • Gaski, J. F. (1985). Dangerous territory: The societal marketing concept revisited. Business Horizons, 28(4), 42–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaski, J. F. (1999). Does marketing ethics have anything to say—A critical inventory of the literature. Journal of Business Ethics, 18, 315–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaski, J. F. (2013). To serve man: A marketing manifesto (and an article that should not have been necessary). Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 32(3), 6–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaski, J. F. (2015). The trouble with marketing ethics… in A. Nill (Ed.), Handbook on Ethics and Marketing. Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, 111–124.

  • Gaski, J. (2022). Toward social responsibility, not the social responsibility semblance: Marketing does not need a conscience. AMS Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-022-00227-1

  • Kotler, P. (2012). Marketing needs a conscience. Marketing News, 30.

  • Moore. G. E. (1903–1965). Principia Ethica. Cambridge: University Press.

  • Murphy, P. E., & Murphy, C. (2017). Sustainable living: Unilever. In E. O’Higgins & L. Zsolnai (Eds.), Progressive Business Models: Creating Sustainable and Pro-Social Enterprise (pp. 263–283). Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P. E., Öberseder, M., & Laczniak, G. R. (2013). Corporate societal responsibility in marketing: Normatively broadening the concept. AMS Review, 3, 86–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parfit, D. (2011). On what matters. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer, B. P. (2008). Shareholders and social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 297–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. C. (2001). Ethical guidelines for marketing practice: A reply to Gaski and some observations on the role of normative marketing ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 32, 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weller, A. (2017). Professional associations as communities of practice: Exploring the boundaries of ethics and compliance and corporate social responsibility. Business & Society Review, 122(3), 359–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. M. (2011). Responsibility for justice. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick E. Murphy.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Demuijnck, G., Murphy, P.E. Why should marketers be forced to ignore their moral awareness? A reply to Gaski. AMS Rev 12, 38–43 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-022-00226-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-022-00226-2

Keywords

Navigation