Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Brands and burlesque: toward a theory of spoof advertising

  • Published:
AMS Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Parody, or spoof advertising, is as old as advertising itself. However, the rise of consumer generated content and its rapid diffusion have created a veritable epidemic of spoof ads aimed at companies and their brands. Brands are increasingly becoming the targets of burlesque. Marketers, faced with a loss of control over their message, are left wondering why some brands are mercilessly ridiculed while others seem impervious and immune. In this paper we address the central question of “which brands are most at risk of being parodied, and why?” To this end we develop a theory of spoof advertising based on the literatures of burlesque, satire, and caricature. We then apply the theoretical model to a well-known spoof ad to illustrate the theory’s explanatory power. Finally, we discuss avenues for future research in this area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • “Burberry Ditches Chavs,” (2005). The Scotsman, downloaded from: http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/business.cfm?id=42952005, last updated 13th January 2005.

  • “Greenpeace targets Nestlé and Cadbury,” (2008). Asia’s Media & Marketing Newspaper, August 27th, 1.

  • “The other oil spill,” (2010) The Economist, June 26th, 395(8688), 71–73.

  • Alba, V. (1967). The Mexican Revolution and the Cartoon. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 9(1), 121–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allicke, M. D., Braun, J. C., Glor, J. E., Klotz, N. J., Nagee, J., Sederhold, R. H., et al. (1992). Complaining behavior in social interaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 286–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, D. G., & Hartman, L. P. (2003). Moral Imagination and the Future of Sweatshops. Business and Society Review, 108(4), 425–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Averill, J. R. (1983). Studies on anger and aggression: Implications for theories of emotion. American Psychologist, 38(11), 1145–1160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R. (1997). Anger, catharsis, and purchasing behavior following aggressive customer complaints. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 14(2), 156–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benoit, W. A., Klyukovski, A., McHale, J., & Airne. (2001). A Fantasy Theme Analysis of Political Cartoons on the Clinton-Lewinsky-Starr Affair. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 18(4), 377–394.

  • Berthon, P. R., Holbrook, M., Hulbert, J. M., & Pitt, L. F. (2007). Viewing Brands in Multiple Dimensions. Sloan Management Review, 48(2), 37–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berthon, P. R., Pitt, L. F., & Campbell, C. (2008). Ad Lib: When Customers Create the Ad. California Management Review, 50(4), 6–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettleheim, B. (1976). The uses of enchantment: The meaning and importance of fairy tales. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigi, A., Plangger, K., Bonera, M., & Campbell, C. L. (2011). When Satire is Serious: How Political Cartoons Impact a Country’s Brand. Journal of Public Affairs, 11(3), 148–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, C. (2012). The Nestlé Infant Formula Controversy and a Strange Web of Subsequent Business Scandals. Journal of Business Ethics, 106(3), 283–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braunsberger, K., & Buckler, B. (2011). What motivates consumers to participate in boycotts: Lessons from the ongoing Canadian seafood boycott. Journal of Business Research, 64(1), 96–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brocato, D., Peterson, R. A., & Crittenden, V. L. (2012). When Things go Wrong: Account Strategy following a Corporate Crisis Event. Corporate Reputation Review, 15(1), 35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinkman, D. (1968). Do Editorial Cartoons and Editorials Change Opinions? Journalism Quarterly, 45(4), 724–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burcak, E. (2010). “Consumer-Generated Advertising: Creators and Spectators,” Advances in Consumer Research - North American Conference Proceedings, 37, 284–287.

  • Campbell, C. L., Pitt, L. F., Parent, M., & Berthon, P. R. (2011). Understanding Consumer Conversations Around Ads in a Web 2.0 World. Journal of Advertising, 40(1), 87–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caswell, L. S. (2004). Drawing Swords: War in American Editorial Cartoons. American Journalism, 21(2), 13–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Champoux, V., Durgee, J., & McGlynn, L. (2012). Corporate Facebook pages: when ‘fans’ attack. Journal of Business Strategy, 33(2), 22–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, T. (2007). Starbucked: A Double Tall Tale of Caffeine, Commerce and Culture. New York: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, K. (2004). “British firm Lonsdale tries to lose Nazi image,” The Telegraph, October 2nd, 34.

  • Coupe, W. A. (1967). The German Cartoon and the Revolution of 1848. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 9(1), 137–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coupe, W. A. (1969). Observations on a Theory of Political Caricature. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 11(1), 79–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deighton, J. (2007). “Dove: Evolution of a Brand”, Harvard Business School Case Study 9–508–047. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deighton, J., Kornfeld, L. (2007). “Digital Interactivity: Unanticipated Consequences for Markets, Marketing, and Consumers,” Harvard Business School Working Paper, 08–017.

  • Dumenco, S. (2011). Could your brand benefit from the right boycott? We can help. Advertising Age, 82(36), 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. (1997). Political Cartoons in the 1988 Presidential Campaign: Image, Metaphor, and Language. New York: Garland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J., & Ware, L. (2005). Representing the Public in Campaign Media: A Political Cartoon Perspective. The American Behavioral Scientist, 49(3), 466–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fefer, M. D. (1999). “A Hill of Beans,” Seattle Weekly, March 31.

  • Freud, S. (1940/1989). An outline of psychoanalysis (J. Strachey, Trans.). New York: Norton.

  • Freud, S. (1993). Wit and Its Relation to the Unconscious. London: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J. H., Davis, R. W., & Herman, D. (1975). Escalation of aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(2), 162–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grégoire, Y., & Fisher, R. (2008). Customer betrayal and retaliation: when your best customers become your worst enemies. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(2), 247–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollenbeck, C. R., & Zinkhan, G. M. (2010). “Anti-brand communities, negotiation of brand meaning, and the learning process: The case of Wal-Mart”, Consumption, Markets & Culture, 13(3), 325–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, J., & Jaccard, J. J. (1981). The Sources, Meaning, and Validity of Consumer Complaint Behavior: A Psychological Analysis. Journal of Retailing, 57(3), 4–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. (2011). “Pepsi vs Coke: The Power of a Brand,” published on 24th March 2011 on Design Shack (http://designshack.net/articles/graphics/pepsi-vs-coke-the-power-of-a-brand/) downloaded on August 4th, 2012

  • King, B. G. (2008). A Political Mediation Model of Corporate Response to Social Movement Activism. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(3), 395–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P. (1982). Abusing Science: The Case Against Creationism (pp. 45–58). Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koku, P. S. (2012). On the effectiveness of consumer boycotts organized through the internet: the market model. Journal of Services Marketing, 26(1), 20–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S. (1972). Naming and Necessity. In D. Davidson & G. Harman (Eds.), Semantics of Natural Language (pp. 253–355). Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lacity, M. C., & Rudramuniyaiah, P. S. (2009). Funny Business: Public Opinion of Outsourcing and Offshoring as Reflected in U.S. and Indian Political Cartoons. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 24(13), 199–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, D. H. (1960). Lady Chatterley’s Lover. London: Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, K. (2007). Globalising justice within coffee supply chains? Fair Trade, Starbucks and the transformation of supply chain governance. Third World Quarterly, 28(4), 793–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGriff, J. A. (2012). A Conceptual Topic in Marketing Management: The Emerging Need for Protecting and Managing Brand Equity: The Case of Online Consumer Brand Boycotts. International Management Review, 8(1), 49–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHale, J. P., Zompetti, J. P., & Moffitt, M. (2007). A Hegemonic Model of Crisis Communication. Journal of Business Communication, 44(4), 374–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medhurst, M., & DeSousa, M. (1981). Political Cartoons as Rhetorical Form: A Taxonomy of Graphic Discourse. Communication Monographs, 48, 197–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milman, O. (2010). Social problems for brands. B&T Magazine, 60(2721), 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muñiz, A. M., Jr., & Schau, H. J. (2007). Vigilante Marketing and Consumer-Created Communications. Journal of Advertising, 36(3), 35–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OED. (1997). Oxford English Dictionary Addition Series. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olinick, S. (1989). A Critique of Empathy and sympathy. In J. Lichtenberg, M. Bornstein, & D. Silver (Eds.), Empathy (pp. 137–166). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oser, K. (2006). Chevy hands ad reins to consumers and gets Tahoe tangled in the Web. Automotive News, 80(6198), 64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ries, A., & Trout, J. (1982). Positioning: The Battle for Your Mind. New York: Warner Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. (1975). Empathetic: An unappreciated way of being. The Consulting Psychologist, 2, 2–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiller, F. (2004). Aesthetical Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, J. (1988). Consumer Complaint Intentions and Behavior: Definitional and Taxonomical Issues. Journal of Marketing, 52(1), 93–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streicher, L. H. (1967). On a Theory of Political Caricature. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 9(4), 427–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thibodeau, R. (1989). From Racism to Tokenism: The Changing Face of Blacks in New Yorker Cartoons. Public Opinion Quarterly, 53, 482–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C. J., & Arsel, Z. (2004). The Starbucks Brandscape and Consumers’ (Anticorporate) Experiences of Glocalization. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(3), 631–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Titchner, E. (1909). Elementary Psychology of the Thought Process. New York: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vitoux, P. (1974). Aldous Huxley and D. H. Lawrence: An Attempt at Intellectual Sympathy. The Modern Language Review, 69(3), 501–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, M., & Reed, S. (1975). Response to Before and After Watergate Caricatures. Journalism Quarterly, 52, 134–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiid, R., Pitt, L. F., & Engstrom, A. (2011). Not so Sexy: Public Opinion of Political Sex Scandals as Reflected in Political Cartoons. Journal of Public Affairs, 33(2), 137–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wispe, L. (1986). The Distinction Between Sympathy and Empathy: To Call Forth a Concept, A Word is Needed. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 314–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wollheim, R. (1974). Identification and imagination. In R. Wollheim (Ed.), Freud: A collection of critical essays (pp. 172–195). New York: Anchor/Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. McCallum Graduate School of Business, Bentley University, 175 Forest St, Waltham, MA, 02452, USA

    Pierre R. Berthon

  2. Beedie School of Business, Simon Fraser University, 500 Granville St, Vancouver, Canada, V6C 1W6

    Leyland F. Pitt

  3. Division of Industrial Marketing, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, Sweden

    Leyland F. Pitt

Authors
  1. Pierre R. Berthon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Leyland F. Pitt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leyland F. Pitt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berthon, P.R., Pitt, L.F. Brands and burlesque: toward a theory of spoof advertising. AMS Rev 2, 88–98 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-012-0027-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-012-0027-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation