Skip to main content
Log in

Listening to Children: Exploring Intuitive Strategies and Interactive Methods in a Study of Children’s Special Places

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Early Childhood Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Stemming from the UNCRC, childhood researchers have proposed a variety of methodological strategies for upholding children’s rights and understanding their perspectives. This paper aims to advance the conversation on engaging children’s perspectives by presenting data collection methods used in a qualitative study exploring children’s special places. Place attachment and identity theories, as well as, contemporary sociological understandings, informed the study design, particularly, in viewing children as active agents continually constructing their own places in the world. Five interactive methods (book discussions, representational art, child-led place tours, informal interviews, and puppets) are presented in order to emphasize the importance of listening to children, building positive relationships, allowing children to take the lead, and fostering creative expression. While it may never be possible for the adult researcher to fully understand children’s perspectives, it is possible for researchers to implement intuitive strategies by reflectively adapting their methods to honor children’s diverse needs.

Résumé

S’appuyant sur la Convention relative aux droits de l’enfant des Nations Unies, des chercheurs sur l’enfance ont proposé une variété de stratégies méthodologiques, pour soutenir les droits des enfants et comprendre leurs perspectives. Cet article a pour but de faire avancer la discussion sur l’implication des perspectives des enfants en présentant les méthodes de cueillette de données utilisées dans une étude qualitative explorant des lieux spéciaux pour les enfants. Les théories de l’attachement et de l’identité à un lieu ainsi que des perspectives sociologiques contemporaines ont orienté le devis de l’étude, notamment la perception des enfants comme des agents actifs continuellement en train de construire leur propre place dans le monde. Cinq méthodes interactives : discussions sur des livres, art figuratif, visites de lieux guidées par les enfants, interviews informelles et marionnettes sont présentées pour souligner l’importance d’écouter les enfants, de construire des relations positives, de permettre aux enfants de prendre la direction, et de favoriser l’expression créatrice. Même s’il peut ne jamais être possible pour le chercheur adulte de comprendre totalement le point de vue des enfants, les chercheurs peuvent néanmoins établir des stratégies intuitives en adaptant de façon réflexive des méthodes qui respectent les différents besoins des enfants.

Resumen

Partiendo en la UNCRC, investigadores en el area de la educación infantil han propuesto una variedad de estrategias metodológicas, relacionadas con la defensa de los derechos de los niños y la comprensión de sus perspectivas. Este artículo busca avanzar en la conversación sobre el compromiso de las perspectivas de los niños, a través de la presentación de métodos de colección de información usados en un estudio cualitativo que explora los lugares especiales de los niños. La cercanía con un espacio y las teorías de identidad, así como perspectivas sociológicas contemporáneas fueron empleadas en el diseño de este estudio, particularmente, en la tarea de percibir a los niños como agentes activos que continuamente construyen sus propios espacios en el mundo. Cinco métodos interactivos (discusión de lecturas de libros, arte representativo, tours guiados por los niños, entrevistas informales y marionetas) se presentan para enfatizar la importancia que tiene el escuchar a los niños, el construir relaciones positivas, el permitir a los niños asumir roles de liderazgo y el promover expresiones creativas. Aunque probablemente nunca sea posible para los investigadores adultos el llegar a entender por completo las perspectivas de los niños, si es posible para los investigadores, el implementar estrategias intuitivas adaptando sus métodos en honor a las diversas necesidades de los niños.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Belohlawek, J., Keogh, B., & Naylor, S. (2010). The PUPPETS project hits WA. Teaching Science, 56(1), 36–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chawla, L. (1992). Childhood place attachments. In I. Altman & S. Low (Eds.), Place attachment (pp. 63–86). New York: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. (2005). Listening to and involving young children: A review of research and practice. Early Child Development and Care, 175(6), 489–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conroy, H., & Harcourt, D. (2009). Informed agreement to participate: Beginning the partnership with children in research. Early Child Development and Care, 179(2), 157–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corsaro, W. A. (2005). The sociology of childhood (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, S. (2005). Intention and meaning in young children’s drawing. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 24(2), 115–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeBruyn, M. (1975). Six special places. Chicago: Albert Whitman & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devine-Wright, P., & Clayton, S. (2010). Introduction of the special issue: Place, identity, and environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(3), 267–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einarsdóttir, J. (2007). Research with children: Methodological and ethical challenges. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 15(2), 197–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einarsdóttir, J., Dockett, S., & Perry, B. (2009). Making meaning: Children’s perspectives expressed through drawings. Early Childhood Development and Care, 179(2), 217–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, C. (2011). A place of my own: Exploring preschool children’s special places in the home environment. Children, Youth, and Environments, 21(2), 118–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, R. (1979). Children’s experience of place. New York: Irvington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, R. (1998). Sense of place in developmental context. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18(1), 5–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isenberg, J. P., & Jalongo, M. R. (2001). Creative expression and play in early childhood. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, A., & Prout, A. (Eds.). (1990). Constructing and re-constructing childhood: Contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood. Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, E., & White, E. J. (2011). Educational research with our youngest: Voices of infants and toddlers. London: Springer.

  • Keogh, B., & Naylor, S. (2009). Puppets Count. Mathematics Teaching, 213, 32–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkby, M. A. (1989). Nature as refuge in children’s environments. Children’s Environments Quarterly, 6(1), 7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjørholt, A. (2003). Creating a place to belong: Girls’ and boys’ hut-building as a site for understanding discourses on childhood and generational relations in a Norwegian community. Children’s Geographies, 1(1), 261–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kylin, M. (2003). Children’s dens. Children, Youth and Environments, 13(1). Retrieved from http://www.colorado.edu/journals/cye/13_1/Vol13_1Articles/CYE_CurrentIssue_Article_Dens_Kylin.htm.

  • Low, S. M., & Altman, I. (1992). Place attachment: A conceptual inquiry. In I. Altman & S. M. Low (Eds.), Place attachment (pp. 1–12). New York: Plenum Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lowry, P. (1993). Privacy in the preschool environment: Gender differences in reaction to crowding. Children’s Environments, 10(2), 46–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luckenbill, J. (2011). Circle time puppets: Teaching social skills. Teaching Young Children, 4(4), 8–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, L. E., Mitchell, M. R., & Evans, G. W. (2008). Effects of play equipment and loose parts in preschool children’s outdoor play behavior: An observational study and design intervention. Children, Youth, and Environments, 18(2), 36–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B. (2002). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, J. A. (1994). Acquisition of environmental subject knowledge in pre-school children: An international study. Children’s Environments, 11(30), 41–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson, D. D. (2001). Securing trustworthy data from an interview situation with young children: Six integrated interview strategies. Child Study Journal, 31(3), 137–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence. (M. Cook, Tran.). New York: International Universities Press. (Original work published 1936).

  • Proshansky, H. M., & Fabian, A. K. (1987). The development of place identity in the child. In C. S. Weinstein & T. G. David (Eds.), Spaces for children: The built environment and child development (pp. 21–40). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proshansky, H. M., Fabian, A. K., & Kaminoff, R. (1983). Place identity: Physical-world socialization of the self. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3, 57–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Punch, S. (2002). Research with children: The same or different from research with adults? Childhood, 9(3), 321–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qvortrup, J., Corsaro, W. A., & Honig, M. (2009). The palgrave handbook of childhood studies. United Kingdom: Palgrave Mcmillan.

  • Scannell, L., & Gifford, R. (2010). Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, S., Naylor, S., Keogh, B., Maloney, J., & Downing, B. (2008). Puppets promoting engagement and talk in science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(9), 1229–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skånfors, L., Löfdahl, A., & Hägglund, S. (2009). Hidden spaces and places in the preschool: Withdrawal strategies in preschool children’s peer cultures. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 7(1), 94–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, D. (2002). Children’s special places: Exploring the role of forts dens, and bush homes in middle childhood. Detroit: Wayne State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommer, D., Pramling Samuelsson, I., & Hundeide, K. (2010). Child perspectives and children’s perspectives in theory and practice. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, N. J., & Smith, A. B. (Eds.). (2009). Children as citizens? International voices. Dunedin, New Zealand: Otago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torr, J. (2007). The pleasure of recognition: Intertextuality in the talk of preschoolers during shared reading with mothers and teachers. Early years: Journal of International Research & Development, 27(1), 77–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (1989). Convention for the rights of the child. New York: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2005). Convention on the rights of the child: General Comment No. 7. Implementing child rights in early childhood. Geneva: Author.

  • Whiren, A. P. (1995). Planning a garden from a child’s perspective. Children’s Environments, 12(2), 111–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeegers, S. K., Readdick, C. A., & Hansen-Gandy, S. (1994). Daycare children’s establishment of territory to experience privacy. Children’s Environments, 11(4), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carie Green.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Green, C. Listening to Children: Exploring Intuitive Strategies and Interactive Methods in a Study of Children’s Special Places. IJEC 44, 269–285 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-012-0075-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-012-0075-9

Keywords

Navigation