Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Investigation of Climate Change Adaptation Impacts on Optimization of Water Allocation Using a Coupled SWAT-bi Level Programming Model

  • Wetlands and Global Change
  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One way to deal with the future effects of climatic changes on the water resources and to cope with water shortages in basins is to have a clear understanding of the future climate change trends. To this end, this study proposes an integrated hydrological-water transfer and supply (HWTS) framework including a coupled SWAT-Bi level programming model to investigate future optimal water supply between different sectors with regard to transaction right. Indeed, Soil & Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) is applied to project the rate of streamflow under Representative Concentration Pathway scenarios of RCP2.6&RCP4.5 and future periods (2020–2040 & 204(Abbas et al. 2015)2060). In addition, a case study of the Hamoun wetland in southeastern of Iran is considered for calibration and validation of real historical data (2000–2016) and then simulation of future streamflow patterns (2020–2060). Next, simulated streamflow data extracted by SWAT is entered as the input of market based bi-level optimization model so that upper-level manager seeks optimization of the available water level in the reservoirs while the lower-level decision maker tries to minimize the economic loss due to water shortage between different sectors regarding transaction right. However, after solving the model with the Improved Particle Swarm Optimization (IBPSO) technique, the final results show that although not much economic profit will be made, but considering specific management strategies such as demand reduction schemes to conserve more water, the imbalance between supply and demand can be significantly improved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Not applicable.

References

  • Abbas T et al (2015) Impacts of landuse changes on runoff generation in Simly watershed. Science International 27(4):4083–4089

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold JG et al (2012) SWAT: Model use, calibration, and validation. Transactions of the ASABE 55(4):1491–1508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbaspour KC, Rouholahnejad E, Vaghefi S, Srinivasan R, Yang H, Kløve B (2015) A continental-scale hydrology and water quality model for Europe: calibration and uncertainty of a high-resolution large-scale SWAT model. Journal of Hydrology 524:733–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asokan SM, Dutta D (2008) Analysis of water resources in the Mahanadi River basin, India under projected climate conditions. Hydrological Processes: An International Journal 22(18):3589–3603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnell NW, Gosling SN (2013) The impacts of climate change on river flow regimes at the global scale. Journal of Hydrology 486:351–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arora VK (2001) Streamflow simulations for continental–scale river basins in a global atmospheric general circulation model. Advances in Water Resources 24:775–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boretti A, Rosa L (2019) Reassessing the projections of the world water development report. Npj Clean Water 2(1):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betrie GD, Mohamed YA, van Griensven A, Srinivasan R (2011) Sediment management modelling in the Blue Nile Basin using SWAT model. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 15(3):807–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bard JF (1991) Some properties of the bi level linear programming. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 68(2):146–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., et al. (2015, December). A new model for long-term global water demand projection. In fall meeting of the American Geophysical Union, AGU 2015

  • Dehgan, A., et al. (2014). Water security and scarcity: potential destabilization in western Afghanistan and Iranian Sistan and Baluchestan due to transboundary water conflicts. Water and post-conflict peacebuilding, 305

  • Đorđević B, Dašić T (2011) Water storage reservoirs and their role in the development, utilization and protection of catchment. Spatium 24:9–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (2003), Water demand, Chapter 7: http://www.fao.org/3/a0994e/a0994e01.pdf

  • Field, C. B., et al. (2014). Summary for policymakers. In climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part a: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (pp. 1-32). Cambridge University press

  • Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (1995). The digital soil map of the world and derived soil properties, version 3.5 (CD-ROM), Rome

  • Fang SQ et al (2013) Bilevel multiobjective programming applied to water resources allocation. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2013:9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fereidoon M, Koch M (2018) SWAT-MODSIM-PSO optimization of multi-crop planning in the Karkheh River basin, Iran, under the impacts of climate change. Science of the Total Environment 630:502–516

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Forsythe, N., et al. (2019). A hydrological perspective on interpretation of available climate projections for the upper Indus Basin. In Indus River Basin (pp. 159-179). Elsevier

  • Faramarzi M, Abbaspour KC, Ashraf Vaghefi S, Farzaneh MR, Zehnder AJB, Srinivasan R, Yang H (2013) Modeling impacts of climate change on freshwater availability in Africa. Journal of Hydrology 480:85–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler HJ, Blenkinsop S, Tebaldi C (2007) Linking climate change modelling to impacts studies: recent advances in downscaling techniques for hydrological modeling. International Journal of Climatology 27:1547–1578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghaleno D et al (2017) Optimal utilization of the Chahnimeh water reservoirs in Sistan region of Iran using goal programming method. Ecopersia 5(1):1641–1654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grafton RQ, Chu HL, Stewardson M, Kompas T (2011) Optimal dynamic water allocation: irrigation extractions and environmental tradeoffs in the Murray River, Australia. Water Resources Research 47(12)

  • Gurung, P., & Bharati, L. (2012). Downstream impacts of the Melamchi Inter-Basin water transfer plan (MIWTP) under current and future climate change projections. Hydro Nepal: Journal of Water, Energy and Environment, 23–29

  • Guo X et al (2012) Bi level model for multi-reservoir operating policy in inter-basin water transfer-supply project. Journal of Hydrology 424:252–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosling SN, Arnell NW (2013). A global assessment of the impact of climate change on water scarcity. Climatic Change, 1–15

  • Ghaffari G, Keesstra S, Ghodousi J, Ahmadi H (2010) SWAT-simulated hydrological impact of land-use change in the Zanjanrood basin, Northwest Iran. Hydrological Processes: An International Journal 24(7):892–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu Z, Wei C, Yao L, Li C, Zeng Z (2016) Integrating equality and stability to resolve water allocation issues with a multiobjective bilevel programming model. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 142(7):04016013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kundu S, Khare D, Mondal A (2017) Individual and combined impacts of future climate and land use changes on the water balance. Ecological Engineering 105:42–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu B, Wang L, Jin YH, Tang F, Huang DX (2005) Improved particle swarm optimization combined with chaos. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 25(5):1261–1271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu D, Guo S, Shao Q, Liu P, Xiong L, Wang L, Hong X, Xu Y, Wang Z (2018) Assessing the effects of adaptation measures on optimal water resources allocation under varied water availability conditions. Journal of Hydrology 556:759–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moudi, M., et al. (2020). Dynamic optimization model for improving urban water supply system fragility with uncertain Streamflow. Water Resources Management, 1–13

  • Moriasi DN et al (2007) Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Transactions of the ASABE 50:885–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma W, Wang M, Zhu X (2014) Improved particle swarm optimization based approach for bilevel programming problem-an application on supply chain model. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics 5(2):281–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser SC (2010) Communicating climate change: history, challenges, process and future directions. Climatic Change 1(1):31–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Pichuka S, Maity R (2017) Spatio-temporal downscaling of projected precipitation in the 21st century: indication of a wetter monsoon over the upper Mahanadi Basin, India. Hydrological Sciences Journal 62(3):467–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter Schwartzstei. (2019). Drought climate change turn Iran Sistan and baluchestan into dust bowl. National geographic/environment: https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/2019/01/drought-climate-change-turn-iran-sistan-and-baluchestan-into-dust-bowl/

  • Refsgaard JC (1997) Parameterisation, calibration, and validation of distributed hydrological models. Journal of Hydrology 198(1):69–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon BR, Jolly I, Sophocleous M, Zhang L (2007) Global impacts of conversions from natural to agricultural ecosystems on water resources: quantity versus quality. Water Resources Research 43(3)

  • Song, W., et al. (2018). Optimal water allocation scheme in integrated water-ecosystem-economy system. River Basin management. Springer, 1-28

  • Schmalz B, Fohrer N (2009) Comparing model sensitivities of different landscapes using the ecohydrological SWAT model. Advances in Geosciences 21:91–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Themeßl MJ, Gobiet A, Heinrich G (2012) Empirical-statistical downscaling and error correction of regional climate models and its impact on the climate change signal. Climatic Change, 112(2):449–468

  • Tu, Y., et al. (2017). Bi-level water allocation model based on shortage control. In proceedings of the tenth international conference on management science and engineering management (pp. 647–657). Springer, Singapore

  • Thongwan T, Kangrang A, Prasanchum H (2019) Multi-objective future rule curves using conditional tabu search algorithm and conditional genetic algorithm for reservoir operation. Heliyon 5(9):e02401

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas V, Varzi MM (2015) A legal licence for an ecological disaster: the inadequacies of the 1973 Helmand/Hirmand water treaty for sustainable transboundary water resources development. International Journal of Water Resources Development 31(4):499–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vekerdy, Z., et al. (2006). History of environmental change in the Sistan Basin based on satellite image analysis: 1976–2005

  • Vaghefi SA et al (2015) Integration of hydrologic and water allocation models in basin-scale water resources management considering crop pattern and climate change: Karkheh River basin in Iran. Regional Environmental Change 15(3):475–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk AI et al (2013) The millennium drought in Southeast Australia (2001–2009): natural and human causes and implications for water resources, ecosystems, economy, and society. Water Resources Research 49(2):1040–1057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Hong Y, Gourley J, Adhikari P, Li L, Su F (2010) Quantitative assessment of climate change and human impacts on long-term hydrologic response: a case study in a sub-basin of the Yellow River, China. International Journal of Climatology 30(14):2130–2137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worku T et al (2017) Modeling runoff–sediment response to land use/land cover changes using integrated GIS and SWAT model in the Beressa watershed. Environmental Earth Sciences 76(16):1–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu et al (2016) Dynamic equilibrium strategy for drought emergency temporary water transfer and allocation management. Journal of Hydrology 539:700–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu et al (2020) Urban water supply system optimization and planning: bi-objective optimization and system dynamics methods. Computers & Industrial Engineering 142:106373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z, Yao L, Zhou X, Moudi M, Zhang L (2019) Optimal irrigation for sustainable development considering water rights transaction: a Stackelberg-Nash-Cournot equilibrium model. Journal of Hydrology 575:628–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yebdri D et al (2007) The water resources management study of the Wadi Tafna Basin (Algeria) using the SWAT model. African Water Journal 1(1):33–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao, L., et al. (2019). Optimal water allocation in Iran: a dynamic bi-level programming model. Water Science and Technology: Water Supply

  • Yang H (2001) Transport bilevel programming problems: recent methodological advances. Transportation research. Part B: methodological 35(1):1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang A, Zhang C, Fu G, Wang B, Bao Z, Zheng H (2012) Assessments of impacts of climate change and human activities on runoff with SWAT for the Huifa River basin, Northeast China. Water Resources Management 26(8):2199–2217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou J, He D, Xie Y, Liu Y, Yang Y, Sheng H, Guo H, Zhao L, Zou R (2015) Integrated SWAT model and statistical downscaling for estimating streamflow response to climate change in the Lake Dianchi watershed, China. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment 29(4):1193–1210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Zhang C, Shi W, Fu Y (2019) Quantitative evaluation and optimized utilization of water resources-water environment carrying capacity based on nature-based solutions. Journal of Hydrology 568:96–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Code Availability

This study used MATLAB software to solve the model and the relevant codes are attached to the paper.

Funding

This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71672013), Key Laboratory of Statistical information technology and data mining (Grant No. SDL201901), Statistical Science Research Program of Sichuan Provincial Statistics Bureau (Grant No: 2019SC15), MOE (Ministry of Education in China) Project of Humanities and Social Sciences (Grant No. 20YJC630165).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Moudi Mahdi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants for whom identifying information is included in this paper.

Competing Interests

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary materials

Supplementary materials

Stackelberg (Leader-Follower) framework

Stackelberg game (leader-follower) framework, involves a decision-making process with two decision-makers in view of a bi-level model with hierarchical structure (Guo et al. 2012; Yao et al. 2019), in which the leader of the upper level has the freedom to choose the best decision according to the reaction of the follower of the lower level, so he optimizes the objective function related to his level minF(X, Y) by considering the relevant level constraints U(X, Y) ≤ 0, and on the other hand, the follower according to the decision of the leader must optimize the objective function of his level minf(x, y) regarding lower-level constraints u(x, y) ≤ 0. The standard formulation for the bi-level model is as follows:

$$ {\displaystyle \begin{array}{c}\underset{x}{\min}\kern0.24em F\left(X,Y\right)\\ {}s.t.\kern0.6em U\left(X,Y\right)\le 0\\ {}\underset{y}{\min}\kern0.36em f\left(x,y\right)\\ {}s.t.\kern0.72em u\left(x,y\right)\le 0\end{array}} $$
(16)

Parameter Selection

Identification of the most sensitive parameters and their precisions for the basin is the first step in the calibration and validation process (Arnold et al. 2012). Parameterizing is a complex process due to the different characteristics of basins such as soil maps, etc. (Pichuka and Maity 2017). In this study, several sensitive parameters (Table 7) with different ranks of sensitivity in the entire basin have been considered in the SWAT-CUP. This is due to the difference in the slope of the region so that the parameters of groundwater and soil are the most sensitive in areas with lower slopes, while runoff parameters in areas with higher slopes are considered as the most sensitive parameters (Schmalz and Fohrer 2009). In fact, in areas with lower slopes, the amount of rain penetration is higher, which leads to an increase in base flow (Fereidoon and Koch 2018). Therefore, the groundwater parameters, GWQMN, ALPHA_BF, RCHRG_DP and SHALLST, followed by the soil parameter SOL_BD, were found to be more sensitive in lower elevations than in higher elevations. It must be mentioned that the CN2 (curve number in SCS method) is the most sensitive parameter for the whole basin.

Table 7 Initial and final parameter ranges for SWAT calibration and parameter significance

Information on the Percentage of each Land Cover in the Hamoun Wetland

Changes in land use classification such as decreasing forest cover, rising urban areas, increasing barren lands, etc., both in the short and long term, have a direct impact on the final output of the projected hydrological patterns in the basin (Worku et al. 2017; Abbas et al. 2015). In fact, in hydrological studies, analyzing the effect of land use change on the water balance of the basin is a priority because such a change affects the type of land cover, leads to changes in quantity, velocity, and intensity of surface flow, and then affects the hydrological process of the basin (Ghaffari et al. 2010; Worku et al. 2017). According to the above description, the land use classification utilized in SWAT for projecting climate change in Hamoun Wetland is as follows (Table 8):

Table 8 Land use classification for Hamoun Wetland
Table 9 Water demand in two states considering different periods (106m3)
Table 10 Parameters for water transfer in HWTS

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, Y., Mahdi, M., Huang, P. et al. Investigation of Climate Change Adaptation Impacts on Optimization of Water Allocation Using a Coupled SWAT-bi Level Programming Model. Wetlands 41, 36 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-021-01434-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-021-01434-5

Keywords

Navigation