Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Estimating rates of wetland loss using power-law functions

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Estimates of rates of wetland loss are important for understanding whether wetland policies meet their objectives. In Alberta, a no-net-area loss interim wetland policy was introduced in 1993. We tested the effectiveness of this interim wetland policy. A historical wetland inventory was established by generating a wetland inventory using digital topographic analysis and calculating a wetland-area vs. wetland-frequency power-law function from these data. Permanent wetland loss (topographic depression no longer exists) was calculated as the deviation from the historical wetland-inventory power-law function (representing the pre-settlement wetland inventory) and was estimated at 32.8% in number and 2.10% in area, with uncertainty estimates well below 1%. Temporary wetland loss (topographic depression remains on the landscape) was calculated as the difference between the historical wetland inventory and a time series of contemporary wetland inventories mapped from aerial photographs. Results indicate that as of 1993, 49.4% of the number of wetlands were temporarily lost (56.6% of wetland area), which increased in 2011 to 56.8% (68.0% of wetland area), with uncertainty estimates well below 1%. From 1993 to 2011, we estimated a rate of loss of 0.63% in wetland area/year. Wetland loss continued despite the introduction of the no-net-area-loss policy in 1993.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adamus P (in press) WESP (Wetland Ecosystem Services Protocol): A Suite of RAMs Regionalized for Oregon, Alaska, Alberta, and the Atlantic Canada Provinces. In: Dorney J, Savage R, Tiner R, Adamus P (eds) Wetland and Stream Rapid Assessments: Development, Validation, and Application. Elsevier Publishing, Amsterdam

  • Alberta Water Resources Commission (1993) Wetland management in the settled area of Alberta. Alberta Water Resources Commission, Edmonton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ameli AA, Creed IF (2017) Quantifying hydrologic connectivity of wetlands to surface water systems. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 21:1791–1808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baatz M, Schäpe A (2000) Multiresolution Segmentation – an optimization approach for high quality multi-scale image segmentation. In: Strobl J et al (eds) Angewandte Geographische Informationsverarbeitung XII. Wichmann, Heidelberg, pp 12–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedford BL (1999) Cumulative Effects on Wetland Landscapes: Links to Wetland Restoration in the United States and Southern Canada. Wetlands 19:775–788. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03161784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell MS, Pilgrim ES (2011) Ecosystem services delivered by small-scale wetlands. Hydrological Sciences Journal 56:1467–1484. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2011.630317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown R, Zhang Z, Comeau LP, Bedard-Haughn A (2017) Effects of drainage duration on mineral wetland soils in a Prairie Pothole agroecosystem. Soil and Tillage Research 168:187–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.12.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clare S, Creed IF (2014) Tracking wetland loss to improve evidence-based wetland policy learning and decision making. Wetlands Ecology and Management 22:235–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-013-9326-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clare S, Krogman N, Foote L, Lemphers N (2011) Where is the avoidance in the implementation of wetland law and policy? Wetlands Ecology and Management 19:165–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-011-9209-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen MJ, Brown MT (2007) A model examining hierarchical wetland networks for watershed stormwater management. Ecological Modelling 201:179–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.09.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen MJ, Creed IF, Alexander L, Basu NB, Calhoun AJ, Craft C, D’Amico E, DeKeyser E, Fowler L, Golden HE, Jawitz JW (2016) Do geographically isolated wetlands influence landscape functions? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113:1978–1986. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1512650113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Conover WJ (1980) Practical Nonparametric Statistics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Creed IF, Beall FD (2009) Distributed topographic indicators for predicting nitrogen export from headwater catchments. Water Resources Research 45:W10407. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creed IF, Aldred DA, Serran JN et al (in press) Maintaining the portfolio of wetland functions on landscapes: a rapid evaluation tool for estimating wetland functions and values. In: Dorney J, Savage R, Tiner R, Adamus P (eds) Wetland and Stream Rapid Assessments: Development, Validation, and Application. Elsevier Publishing, Amsterdam

  • Davidson NC (2014) How much wetland has the world lost? Long-term and recent trends in global wetland area. Marine and Freshwater Research 65:934–941. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF14173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downing JA, Prairie YT, Cole JJ et al (2006) The global abundance and size distribution of lakes, ponds, and impoundments. Limnology and Oceanography 51:2388–2397. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2006.51.5.2388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ducks Unlimited Canada (2006) Canadian Wetland Inventory (geospatial data). Ducks Unlimited Canada, Stonewall

    Google Scholar 

  • Environment Canada (2010) Canadian Climate Normals (Dataset). Retrieved from: http://climate.weather.gc.ca/climate_normals/index_e.html

  • Government of Alberta (2013) Alberta Wetland Policy. ISBN: 978-1-4601-1287-8

  • Hamilton WN, Langenberg CW, Price MC, Chao DK (1998) Geologic Map of Alberta. Alberta Geological Society, Edmonton

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamon WR (1961) Estimating potential evapotranspiration, Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers. Journal of the Hydraulics Division 87:107–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay JB, Creed IF (2005) Sensitivity of digital landscapes to artifact depressions in remotely-sensed DEMs. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 71:1029–1036. 10.14358/PERS.71.9.1029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay JB, Creed IF, Beall FD (2004) Drainage basin morphometrics for depressional landscapes. Water Resources Research 40. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003322

  • Liu G, Schwartz FW (2011) An integrated observational and model-based analysis of the hydrologic response of prairie pothole systems to variability in climate. Water Resources Research 47. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009084

  • Marton JM, Creed IF, Lewis DB, Lane CR, Basu NB, Cohen MJ, Craft CB (2015) Geographically isolated wetlands are important biogeochemical reactors on the landscape. BioScience 65:408–418. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biv009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey FJ Jr (1951) The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for goodness of fit. Journal of the American Statistical Association 46:68–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MATLAB (2015) The MathWorks, Inc., Natick

  • McCauley LA, Anteau MJ, van der Burg MP, Wiltermuth MT (2015) Land use and wetland drainage affect water levels and dynamics of remaining wetlands. Ecosphere 6:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1890/ES14-00494.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller BA, Crumpton WG, van der Valk AG (2009) Spatial distribution of historical wetland classes on the Des Moines Lobe, Iowa. Wetlands 29:1146–1152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Mateos D, Power ME, Comín FA, Yockteng R (2012) Structural and functional loss in restored wetland ecosystems. PLoS Biology 10:e1001247. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001247

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mushet DM, Calhoun AJK, Alexander LC, Cohen MJ, DeKeyser ES, Fowler L, Lane CR, Lang MW, Rains MC, Walls SC (2015) Geographically isolated wetlands: rethinking a misnomer. Wetlands 35:423–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-015-0631-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Planchon O, Darboux F (2002) A fast, simple and versatile algorithm to fill the depressions of digital elevation models. Catena 46:159–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0341-8162(01)00164-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rains MC, Leibowitz SG, Cohen MJ, Creed IF, Golden HE, Jawitz JW, Kalla P, Lane CR, Lang MW, McLaughlin DL (2016) Geographically isolated wetlands are part of the hydrological landscape. Hydrological Processes 30:153–160. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sass GZ, Creed IF, Riddell J, Bayley S (2014) Regional-scale mapping of groundwater discharge zones using thermal satellite imagery. Hydrological Processes 28:5662–5673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seber GA, Lee AJ (2012) Linear Regression Analysis, vol 936. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Serran JN, Creed IF (2016) New mapping techniques to estimate the preferential loss of small wetlands on prairie landscapes. Hydrological Processes 30:396–409. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein R (1979) Hydrogeology of the Edmonton area (southeast segment), Alberta, Earth Sciences Report 79, Alberta Research Council, p 16

  • Van Meter KJ, Basu NB (2015) Signatures of human impact: size distributions and spatial organization of wetlands in the Prairie Pothole landscape. Ecological Applications 25:451–465. https://doi.org/10.1890/14-0662.1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watmough MD, Schmoll MJ (2007) Environment Canada’s Prairie and Northern Region Habitat Monitoring Program Phase II: Recent habitat trends in the Prairie Habitat Joint Venture (Technical Report Series No. 493). Environment Canada, Canadian Wildlife Service, Edmonton, Alberta

  • Waz A (2016) An Automated Framework to Identify Lost and Restorable Wetlands in the Prairie Pothole Region. Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. Paper 4190. http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/4190

  • Waz A, Creed IF (2017) Automated Techniques to Identify Lost and Restorable Wetlands in the Prairie Pothole Region. Wetlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-017-0942-0

  • Zedler JB (2003) Wetlands at your service: reducing impacts of agriculture at the watershed scale. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1:65–72. https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2003)001[0065:WAYSRI]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang B, Schwartz FW, Liu G (2009) Systematics in the size structure of prairie pothole lakes through drought and deluge. Water Resources Research 45. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR006878

Download references

Acknowledgements

The data used in this project can be obtained by contacting the authors. This research was supported by an Alberta Wetland Research Initiative Grant and a NSERC Discovery Grant to I.F. Creed and a NSERC CGS-M Award to J.N. Serran. We would like to thank Michael Watmough of Environment Canada for providing wetland loss data that were compared to our estimates.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irena F. Creed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Serran, J.N., Creed, I.F., Ameli, A.A. et al. Estimating rates of wetland loss using power-law functions. Wetlands 38, 109–120 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-017-0960-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-017-0960-y

Keywords

Navigation