Abstract
The assessment of constructed treatment wetland success usually relies on abiotic measures, such as nutrient level reduction. Because constructed wetlands eventually function as whole ecosystems, and their biotic components play a role in water treatment, it is important to consider the development of associated flora and fauna when conducting site assessments. The goal of this two-year case study was to observe ecosystem establishment at a constructed stormwater treatment wetland adjacent to Lake George in the Adirondack Mountains of New York, with a focus on macroinvertebrate and vegetation community development. The first year of the study occurred during a period of natural succession. The second year occurred following the artificial introduction of 85 plant species. The vegetation community predictably improved in richness, evenness, and diversity. The macroinvertebrate community experienced substantial shifts in dominant taxa. Importantly, each pond in the wetland’s treatment train developed unique profiles over time as defined by their vegetation and macroinvertebrate communities, as well as by their water chemistry. While the specific biotic and abiotic drivers creating these unique ponds have not been identified, the disparate profiles and how they function together will determine stormwater treatment efficiency after further site maturation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adamus PR (1995) Bioindicators for assessing ecological integrity of prairie wetlands. EPA/600/R-96/082. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Research Laboratory, Corvallis
Adamus PR, Gonyaw A (2001) National database of wetland plant sensitivities to enrichment and hydrologic alteration. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, Oregon. Available = via http://www.epa.gov/owow/wetlands/bawwg/publicat.html. Accessed 30 Dec 2014
Anderson DR, Laake JL, Crain BR, Burnham KP (1979) Guidelines for line transect sampling of biological populations. Journal of Wildlife Management 43(1):70–78
Bailey RC, Norris RH, Reynoldson TB (2001) Taxonomic resolution of benthic macroinvertebrate communities in bioassessments. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 20(2):280–286
Balcombe CK, Anderson JT, Fortney RH, Kordek WS (2005a) Aquatic macroinvertebrate assemblages in mitigated and natural wetlands. Hydrobiologia 541(1):175–188
Balcombe CK, Anderson JT, Fortney RH, Rentch JS, Grafton WN, Kordek WS (2005b) A comparison of plant communities in mitigation and reference wetlands in the mid-Appalachians. Wetlands 25(1):130–142
Batzer DP (2013) The seemingly intractable ecological responses of invertebrates in North American wetlands: a review. Wetlands 33(1):1–15
Batzer DP, Rader RB, Wissinger SA (eds) (1999) Invertebrates in freshwater wetlands of North America: ecology and management. Wiley, New York
Boylen CW, Eichler LW, Swinton M, Sutherland JW, Bloomfield JA (2009) Characterization of stream flow and water quality in the Lake George Basin, a project to quantify the impacts of land use on baseflow and stormwater runoff, report to New York State Department of State. Darrin Fresh Water Institute, Town of Lake George
Bray JR, Curtis JT (1957) An ordination of upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecological Monographs 27(4):325–349
Chazen Companies (2010) West Brook Conservation Intitiative: south parcel stormwater wetlands and environmental park, prepared for New York State Department of State. Hudson Valley, New York
Chipps SR, Hubbard DE, Werlin KB, Haugerud NJ, Powell KA, Thompson J, Johnson T (2006) Association between wetland disturbance and biological attributes in floodplain wetlands. Wetlands 26(2):497–508
Clesceri LS, Greenberg AE, Trussell RR (1989) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 17th edn. American Public Health Association, New York
Crow GE, Hellquist CB (2000) Aquatic and Wetland Plants of Northeastern North America. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison
Culler LE, Smith RF, Lamp WO (2014) Weak relationships between environmental factors and invertebrate communities in constructed wetlands. Wetlands 34(2):351–361
Darnell RM (1976) Impacts of construction activities in wetlands of the United States. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Research and Development, Corvallis
Environmental Laboratory (1987) Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual, technical report Y-87-1. U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg
Environmental Protection Agency (2012) Sampling methods and analysis: vascular plants. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Available via http://water.epa.gov/type/wetlands/assessment/oh1plant.cfm. Accessed 12 Jul 2011
Erwin KL (2009) Wetlands and global climate change: the role of wetland restoration in a changing world. Wetlands Ecology and Management 17(1):71–84
Google Inc. (2013) Google Earth 7.1.2.2041. Google Inc., Mountain View, California. Accessed 11 Sept 2014
Gottschall N, Boutin C, Crolla A, Kinsley C, Champagne P (2007) The role of plants in the removal of nutrients at a constructed wetland treating agricultural (dairy) wastewater, Ontario, Canada. Ecological Engineering 29(2):154–163
Hadad HR, Maine MA, Bonetto CA (2006) Macrophyte growth in a pilot-scale constructed wetland for industrial wastewater treatment. Chemosphere 63(10):1744–1753
Hammer DA (ed) (1989) Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: municipal, industrial, agricultural. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Hunt WF, Lord WG (2006) Maintenance of stormwater wetlands and wet ponds. Fact Sheet AGW-588-07. North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service, Urban Water Ways Series, North Carolina
IBM Corp (2013) IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0. IBM Corp, Armonk
Imfeld G, Braeckevelt M, Kuschk P, Richnow HH (2009) Monitoring and assessing process of organic chemicals removal in constructed wetlands. Chemosphere 74(3):349–362
Kadlec RH, Wallace SD (2008) Treatment wetlands, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Knight RL (1992) Ancillary benefits and potential problems with the use of wetlands for nonpoint source pollution control. Ecological Engineering 1(1–2):97–113
Landers DH (1982) Effects of naturally senescing aquatic macrophytes on nutrient chemistry and chlorophyll a of surrounding waters. Limnology and Oceanography 27(3):428–439
Lenat DR (1988) Water quality assessment of streams using a qualitative collection method for benthic macroinvertebrates. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 7(3):222–233
Merriman LS, Hunt WF III (2014) Maintenance versus maturation: constructed storm-water wetland’s fifth-year water quality and hydrologic assessment. Journal of Environmental Engineering. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000861
Microsoft® Corporation (2010) Microsoft® Excel 14.0.7128.5000. Microsoft® Corporation, Redmond
Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (2000) Wetlands, 3rd edn. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York
Mitsch WJ, Wilson RF (1996) Improving the success of wetland creation and restoration with know-how, time, and self-design. Ecological Applications 6(1):77–83
Mitsch WJ, Zhang L, Stefanik KC, Nahlik AM, Anderson CJ, Bernal B, Hernandez M, Song K (2012) Creating wetlands: primary succession, water quality changes, and self-design over 15 years. BioScience 62(3):237–250
Neill WE (1981) Impact of Chaoborus predation upon the structure and dynamics of a crustacean zooplankton community. Oecologia 48(2):164–177
Nelson SM, Thullen JS (2008) Aquatic macroinvertebrates associated with Schoenoplectus litter in a constructed wetland in California (USA). Ecological Engineering 33(2):91–101
Oberts GL (1994) Influence of snowmelt dynamics on stormwater runoff quality. Watershed Protection Techniques 1(2):55–61
Peckarsky BL, Fraissinet PR, Penton MA, Conklin DJ Jr (1990) Freshwater macroinvertebrates of Northeastern North America. Comstock, Ithaca
Persson J, Somes NLG, Wong THF (1999) Hydraulics efficiency of constructed wetlands and ponds. Water Science and Technology 40(3):291–300
Peterson RT, McKenny M (1968) A field guide to wildflowers: northeastern and north-central North America. Houghton Mifflin Company, New York
Pinder LCV (1986) Biology of freshwater chironomidae. Annual Review of Entomology 31:1–23
Rehage JS, Trexler JC (2006) Assessing the net effect of anthropogenic disturbance on aquatic communities in wetlands: community structure relative to distance from canals. Hydrobiologia 569(1):359–373
Rosenberg DM, Davis IJ, Cobb DG, Wiens AP (2001) Protocols for measuring biodiversity: benthic macroinvertebrates in fresh waters. Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Winnipeg
Schilling EG, Loftin CS, Huryn AD (2009) Macroinvertebrates as indicators of fish absence in naturally fishless lakes. Freshwater Biology 54(1):181–202
Scholz M, Hedmark A (2010) Constructed wetlands treating runoff contaminated with nutrients. Water Air Soil Pollution 205(1–4):323–332
Schueler TR (1992) Design of stormwater wetland systems: guidelines for creating diverse and effective stormwater wetland systems in the mid-Atlantic region. Metropolitan Council of Governments, Washington, D.C
Shannon CE, Weaver W (1949) The mathematical theory of communication. The University of Illinois Press, Urbana
Shelton LR (1994) Field guide for collection and processing stream-water samples for the National Water-Quality Assessment Program, Report 94–455. United States Geological Survey, Sacramento
Spieles DJ (2005) Vegetation development in created, restored, and enhanced mitigation wetland banks of the United States. Wetlands 25(1):51–63
Spieles DJ, Mitsch WJ (2000) Macroinvertebrate community structure in high- and low-nutrient constructed wetlands. Wetlands 20(4):716–729
Spieles DJ, Mitsch WJ (2003) A model of macroinvertebrate trophic structure and oxygen demand in freshwater wetlands. Ecological Modeling 161(3):183–194
Stewart TW, Downing JA (2008) Macroinvertebrate communities and environmental conditions in recently constructed wetlands. Wetlands 28(1):141–150
Streever B, Zedler J (2000) Letter: to plant or not to plant. BioScience 50(3):188
Sutherland JW, Bloomfield JA, Swart JM (1983) Lake George urban runoff study, nationwide urban runoff program, report. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Bureau of Water Research, Albany
Systat Software, Inc (2008) SigmaPlot version 11.0. Systat Software, Inc, San Jose
Szalay FA, Resh VH (1997) Responses of wetland invertebrates and plants important in waterfowl diets to burning and mowing of emergent vegetation. Wetlands 17(1):149–156
Tenenbaum DJ (2004) Constructed wetlands: borrowing a concept from nature. Environmental Health Perspectives 112(1):A44–A48
Thorp JH, Covich AP (eds) (2010) Ecology and classification of North American freshwater invertebrates. Elsevier, Burlington
Trebitz AS, Brazner JC, Cotter AM, Knuth ML, Morrice JA, Peterson GS, Sierszen ME, Thompson JA, Kelly JR (2007) Water quality in Great Lakes coastal wetlands: basin-wide patterns and responses to an anthropogenic disturbance gradient. Journal of Great Lakes Research 22(3):67–85
U.S. Geological Survey (2006) National field manual for the collection of water-quality data. U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations. Available via http://pubs.water.usgs.gov/twri9A. Accessed 10 Sep 2014
Watson JT, Hobson JA (1989) Hydraulic design considerations and control structures for constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. In: Hammer DA (ed) Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, pp 379–391
Weis JS, Weis P (2004) Metal uptake, transport and release by wetland plants: implications for phytoremediation and restoration. Environment International 30(5):685–700
Wood A (1995) Constructed wetlands in water pollution control: fundamentals to their understanding. Water Science and Technology 32(3):21–29
Worman A, Kronnas V (2004) Effect of pond shape and vegetation heterogeneity on flow and treatment performance of constructed wetlands. Journal of Hydrology 301(1–4):123–138
Zedler J (1996) Ecological issues in wetland mitigation: an introduction to the forum. Ecological Applications 6(1):33–37
Zedler J (2000) Progress in wetland restoration ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15(10):402–407
Acknowledgments
The majority of this study was funded by the Helen V. Froehlich Foundation with additional contributions from the Northeast Aquatic Plant Management Society. We would like to thank Dr. Toby Michelena for statistical assistance and Dr. Jeremy Farrell for macroinvertebrate trapping design and field work assistance. Additionally, we are very grateful for field work assistance provided by Brett D’Arco, Alex Pezzuoli, Shannon Collins, and Bethany Wickham.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pier, B.M., Dresser, B.R., Lee, J.J. et al. Ecological Analysis Before and After Planting in a Constructed Wetland in the Adirondacks. Wetlands 35, 611–624 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-015-0652-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-015-0652-4