Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Altered Plant-community Composition and Edaphic Features Associated with Plowing in Southern Wisconsin Fens

  • Article
  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The potential for land-use legacies to alter current wetland macrophyte communities and edaphic conditions are underexplored. Here we present results of a study describing associations among these factors in southern Wisconsin fens. Plant-community composition, hydrology, and nutrient availability data were recorded from 1) fens that had been plowed, 2) fens that have never been plowed, and 3) fens with plowed and never-plowed areas. Plowed fens had: 1) lower total species richness, 2) higher invasive species richness, 2) lower native graminoid richness, 3) lower shrub richness, 4) lower root-zone volumetric water content, and 5) higher available N and P then never-plowed fens. Most of these same relationships held when comparing plowed and never-plowed areas of the same fen. Non-metric Multidimensional Scaling revealed that the most important community gradient separates graminoid- and fen-specialist-rich communities from those dominated by invasive species. This gradient also separated plowed from never plowed plots. Accordingly, we believe that a history of plowing has fundamentally altered biotic and, potentially, abiotic conditions, with real consequences for wetland management and restoration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abu-Hamdeh N (2004) The effect of tillage treatments on soil water holding capacity and on soil physical properties. 13th International Soil Conservation Organization Conference – Brisbane, July 2004. Conserv Soil Water Soc: Shar Sol 669:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Amon J, Jacobson C, Shelley L (2005) Construction of fens with and without hydric soils. Ecol Eng 24:341–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amon J, Thompson C, Carpenter Q, Miner J (2002) Temperate zone fens of the glaciated Midwestern USA. Wetlands 22:301–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (1981) Dane County Natural Area Registry # 56: Deansville Fen. Inspection Sheet on File with Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources

  • Bailey A, Nichols T, Johnson C (1988) Soil stress state determination under wheel loads. Trans ASAE 31:1309–1314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bart D (2010) Using weed-control knowledge from declining agricultural communities in invasive species management. Hum Ecol 38:78–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bart D, Simon M, Carpenter Q, Graham S (2011) Historical land use and plant-community variability in a WI calcareous fen. Rhodora 113:160–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown C, Boutin C (2009) Linking past land use, recent disturbance, and dispersal mechanism to forest composition. Biol Conserv 142:1647–1656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budelsky R, Galatowitsch S (1999) Effects of Moisture, Temperature, and Time on Seed Germination of Five Wetland Carices: Implications for Restoration. Restor Ecol 7:86–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buisson E, Dutoit T (2004) Colonization by native species of abandoned farmland adjacent to a remnant patch of Mediterranean steppe. Plant Ecol 174:371–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter Q (1995) Toward a New Definition of Calcareous Fen for Wisconsin (USA). University of Wisconsin, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • Chai S, Tanner E (2011) 150 year legacy of land use on tree species composition in old secondary forests of Jamaica. J Ecol 99:113–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cione N, Padgett P, Allen E (2002) Restoration of a native shrubland impacted by exotic grasses, frequent fire, and nitrogen deposition in southern California. Restor Ecol 10:376–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czarapata E (2005) Invasive Plants of the Upper Midwest. The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggers S, Reed D (1997) Wetland Plants and Plant Communities of Minnesota and Wisconsin, 2nd edn. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul

    Google Scholar 

  • Flora of North America Editorial Committee eds (1993) Flora of North America North of Mexico. 16+ vols. New York, NY and Oxford, UK

  • Foster D, Swanson F, Aber J, Burke I, Brokaw N, Tilman D, Knapp A (2003) The Importance of Land-Use Legacies to Ecology and Conservation. Bioscience: 53-77

  • Freeze R, Cherry J (1979) Groundwater. Prentice Hall, Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Frolik A (1941) Vegetation on the Peat Lands of Dane County, Wisconsin. Ecol Monogr 11:117–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauch H (1982) Multivariate Analysis in Community Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grime J (1977) Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. American Naturalist: 1169-1194

  • Grootjans A, Hunneman H, Verkiel H, Van Andel J (2005) Long-term effects of drainage on species richness of a fen meadow at different spatial scales. Basic Appl Ecol 6:185–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guariguata M, Ostertag R (2001) Neotropical secondary forest succession: changes in structural and functional characteristics. Forest Ecol Manag 148:185–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Güsewell S, Buttler A, Klötzli F (1998) Short-term and long-term effects of mowing on the vegetation of two calcareous fens. J Veg Sci 9:861–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamre L, Halvorsen R, Edvardsen A, Rydgren K (2010) Plant species richness, composition and habitat specificity in a Norwegian agricultural landscape. Agric Ecosyst Environ 138:189–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinselman M (1970) Landscape evolution, peatland types, and the environment in the Lake Agassiz Peatlands Natural Area, Minnesota. Ecol Monogr 40:235–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill N, Keddy P (1992) Prediction of rarities from habitat variable; coastal plain plants on Nova Scotia Lakeshores. Ecology 73:1852–1859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hipp A (2008) Field Guide to Wisconsin Sedges: An Introduction to the Genus Carex (Cyperaceae). University of Wisconsin Press, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs R, Cramer V (2007) Old field dynamics: regional and local differences, and lessons for ecology and restoration. In: Cramer V and Hobbs R (eds) Old Fields: Dynamics and Restoration of Abandoned Farmland. Island Press, pp. 309–317

  • Holden J (2004) Artificial drainage in peatlands: hydrological and hydrochemical process and wetland restoration. Prog Phys Geogr 28:95–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacquemyn H, Butaye J, Hermy M (2003) Impacts of restored patch density and distance from natural forests on colonization success. Restor Ecol 11:417–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson A, Leopold D (1994) Vascular plant richness and rarity across a minerotrophic gradient in wetlands of St. Lawrence County, New York, USA. Biodivers Conserv 3:606–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klimkowska A, Van Diggelen R, Grootjans A, Kotowski R (2010) Prospects for fen meadow restoration on severely degraded fens. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 12:245–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kratz T, Winkler M, DeWitt C (1981) Hydrology and chronology of a peat mound in Dane County, southern Wisconsin. Trans Wis Acad Sci Arts Lett 69:37–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine J, D’Antonio C (1999) Elton revisited: a review of the evidence linking diversity and invasibility. Oikos 87:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCune B, Grace J (2002) Analysis of Ecological Communities. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach

    Google Scholar 

  • McLauchlan K (2006) The nature and longevity of agricultural impacts on soil carbon and nutrients: a review. Ecosystems 9:1364–1382

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Middleton B (2003) Soil seed banks and the potential restoration of forested wetlands after farming. J Appl Ecol 40:1025–1034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore D, Keddy P, Wisheu I (1989) Conservation of wetlands: do infertile wetlands deserve a higher priority? Biol Conserv 47:203–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motzkin G, Foster D, Allen A, Harrod J, Boone R (1996) Controlling site to evaluate history: vegetation patterns of a New England sand plain. Ecol Monogr 66:345–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed D (2002) Environmental Correlates of Vegetation Types in Southeastern Wisconsin Fens. University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee

    Google Scholar 

  • Romermann C, Dutoit T, Poschlod P, Buisson E (2005) Influence of former cultivation on the unique Mediterranean steppe of France and consequences for conservation management. Biol Conserv 121:21–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Standish R, Cramer V, Hobbs R, Kobryn H (2006) Legacy of land-use evident in soils of Western Australia’s wheatbelt. Plant Soil 280:189–207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (1997) Community invasibility, recruitment limitation, and grassland biodiversity. Ecology 78:81–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USDA (United States Department of Agriculture), NRCS (Natural Resource Conservation Service) (2012) The PLANTS Database. National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70874-4490 USA. URL http://plants.usda.gov (accessed 11 October 2012)

  • van der Valk A, Bremholm T, Gordon E (1999) The restoration of sedge meadows: seed viability, seed germination requirements, and seedling growth of Carex species. Wetlands 19:756–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verheyen K, Hermy M (2001) The relative importance of dispersal limitation of vascular plants in secondary forest succession in Muizen Forest, Belgium. J Ecol 89:829–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler B (1989) Species richness, species rarity, and conservation evaluation of rich-fen vegetation in lowland England and Wales. J Appl Ecol 25:331–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wijdeven S, Kuzee M (2000) Seed availability as a limiting factor in forest recovery processes in Costa Rica. Restor Ecol 8:414–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiser S, Allen R, Clinton P, Platt K (1998) Community structure and forest invasion by an exotic herb cover over 23 years. Ecology 79:2071–2081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WDNR (Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources) (2013) Natural Heritage Inventory: Calcareous Fens. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison, WI URL http://dnr.wi.gov/org/land/er/communities/index.asp?mode=detailandCode=CPHER064WI (accessed on 1 May 2013)

  • Zimmerman J, Pascarella J, Aide (2000) Barriers to forest regeneration in an abandoned pasture in Puerto Rico. Restor Ecol 8:350–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. C. Dewitt and several anonymous informants for providing historical information in this study. We thank Wings over Wisconsin, The Nature Conservancy, and Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources for site access and logistical support. Funding was provided to D. B. by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Bart.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davenport, T., Bart, D. & Carpenter, Q. Altered Plant-community Composition and Edaphic Features Associated with Plowing in Southern Wisconsin Fens. Wetlands 34, 449–457 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-013-0511-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-013-0511-0

Keywords

Navigation