Skip to main content
Log in

Recent Advances in Wetland Delineation—Implications and impact of Regionalization

  • Article
  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Methodologies used to identify wetland boundaries continue to evolve and impact ecosystem management. Field testing conducted at 232 locations evaluated Regional Supplements to the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. These documents are used for wetland delineation by regulatory agencies and resource managers. Wetland delineations compared 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual guidance to Regional Supplement guidance. Supplement testing occurred in 37 States. This document examines changes in the wetland boundary, wetland delineation factors (vegetation, soils, and hydrology), problem situations, and comments provided by field teams. The wetland boundary did not change at 83% (192 sites) of locations. Where the boundary differed, wetland delineation based on Supplement guidance resulted in larger wetland in 12% (28 sites) of cases, while 1987 Manual guidance resulted in a larger wetland in 5% (12 sites) of cases. Changes in the boundary were reported at 25 locations and produced a mean increase of 5.8 m (median 4.6 m). Atypical or problem situations were reported at 22% (51 sites) of the sites examined. Supplement guidance was clear and easily applied at 84% (195 sites) of locations. Teams reported Supplement guidance as more defensible at 79% (183 sites) of locations compared to the 1987 Manual.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams DA, Buford MA, Dumond DM (1987) In search of the wetlandboundary. Wetlands 7:59–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinson MM (1993) A hydrogeomorphic classification for wetlands. Technical Report WRP-DE-4. U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinson MM (1995) Assessing wetland functions using HGM. National Wetlands Newsletter, January/February, Washington DC: Environmental Law Institute 1995:7–13

  • Brinson MM (1996) The hydrogeomorphic approach explained. National Wetlands Newsletter, November/December. Washington DC: Environmental Law Institute 1996:10–16

  • Claassen R, Heimlich RE, House RM, Wiebe KD (1998) Estimating the effects of relaxing agricultural land use restrictions: wetland delineation in the swampbuster program. Rev Agric Econ 20:390–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowardin LM, Carter V, Golet FC, La Roe TE (1979) Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Services. FWS/OBS-79/31. GPO, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Cubbage FW, Kirkman LK, Boring LR, Harris TG Jr, Deforest CE (1990) Federal legislation and wetlands protection in Georgia: legal foundations, classification schemes, and industry implications. For Ecol Manage 33/34:271–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Laboratory (1987) Corps of Engineers wetland delineation manual. Technical Report Y-87-1. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Janisch JE, Molstad NE (2004) Disturbance and the three parameters of wetland delineation. Wetlands 4:820–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michener MC (1983) Wetland site index for summarizing botanical studies. Wetlands 3:180–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1995) Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries. National Academy, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Newling CJ, Smith HK (1982) The corps of engineers wetlands research program. Wetlands 2:280–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segal DS, Latham PJ, Best GR (1987) Delineating a wetland boundary using vegetation, soil and hydrologic characteristics: a Florida dome example. Wetlands 7:51–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soil Survey Staff (2010) Web Soil Survey. Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Available via http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/. Accessed 13 December 2010

  • Stine JK (1983) Regulating wetlands in the 1970s: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Environmental Organizations. J For Hist 27:60–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiner RW (1993) The primary indicators method—a practical approach to wetland recognition and delineation in the United States. Wetlands 13:50–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiner RW (1996) Practical considerations for wetland identification and boundary delineation. In: Mulamoottil G, Warner BG, McBean EA (eds) Wetlands: Environmental gradients, boundaries, and buffer University of Waterloo. Wetlands Research Centre

  • Tzoumis KA (1998) Wetland policymaking in the U.S. Congress from 1789 to 1995. Wetlands 18:447–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resource Conservation Service (2010) Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States, Version 7.0. In: Vasilas LM, Hurt GW, Noble CV (eds) USDA, NRCS, in cooperation with the national technical committee for Hydric Soils

  • Wentworth TR, Johnson GP (1986) Use of vegetation in the designation of wetlands. Final report to the Fish and Wildlife Service. Revised draft, September 15, 1986. N.C, Agricultural Research Service and N.C. State University, School of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Raleigh

    Google Scholar 

  • Zedler JB, Cox GW (1985) Characterizing wetland boundaries: a pacific coast example. Wetlands 4:43–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacob F. Berkowitz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berkowitz, J.F. Recent Advances in Wetland Delineation—Implications and impact of Regionalization. Wetlands 31, 593–601 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-011-0167-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-011-0167-6

Keywords

Navigation