Skip to main content
Log in

How do cities and regions adapt to socio-economic crisis? Towards an institutionalist approach to urban and regional resilience

Wie reagieren Städte und Regionen auf sozio-ökonomische Krisen? Überlegungen zu einem von der neuen Institutionentheorie beeinflussten Verständnis von Resilienz

  • Wissenschaftlicher Beitrag
  • Published:
Raumforschung und Raumordnung

Abstract

This paper depicts resilience as a systemic ‘adaptive capacity’ to cope with social and economic crisis situations at the urban and regional level. It argues that the notion of resilience has to be conceptualised in such a way that processes of and (institutional) frameworks for decision making are recognized. Such an understanding suggests a new institutionalist approach to governance may be useful, one highlighting dominant norms, perceptions and paradigms leading to particular forms of action. Under the axiom of a socially constructed world the benefit of the notion of resilience as an analytical tool in urban and regional studies lies in a better understanding of change in complex systems of socio-spatial interdependencies. It thus has the potential to fill a gap in new institutional theory and contemporary governance research.

Zusammfassung

Der Beitrag begreift Resilienz als eine Art systemische Anpassungskapazität an sozioökonomische Krisensituationen auf städtischer und regionaler Ebene. Der Begriff der Resilienz sollte auf eine Art und Weise konzeptionalisiert werden, dass er Prozesse und (institutionelle) Rahmenbedingungen der Entscheidungsfindung berücksichtigt. Dieses Verständnis impliziert einen von der neuen Institutionentheorie beeinflussten Zugang zu Fragen der Governance, der dominante Normen, Sichtweisen und Paradigmen in ihrer Wirkung hinsichtlich bestimmter Handlungsweisen berücksichtigt. Der Beitrag der Resilienzforschung zu einer Stadt- und Raumforschung, die dem Grundverständnis einer sozial konstruierten Welt folgt, liegt in einem besseren Verständnis von Wandlungsprozessen in komplexen Systemen mit sozialräumlichen Wechselwirkungen. Ein solcher Zugang hat damit das Potenzial, eine Lücke in der neuen Institutionentheorie und der aktuellen Governanceforschung zu schließen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The author thanks three anonymous reviewers for useful comments that helped improve an earlier version of this paper.

References

  • Amin, A.; Thrift, N. (1994): Living in the global. In: Amin, A.; Thrift, N (eds.): Globalization, Institutions and Regional Development in Europe. Oxford, 1–22.

  • Beaverstock, J. V.; Smith, R. G.; Taylor, P. J. (1999): A Roster of World Cities. In: Cities 16, 6, 445–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosher, L.; Coaffee, N. (2008): Editorial: International perspectives on urban resilience. In: Urban Design and Planning 161, 4, 145–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bürkner, H.-J. (2010): Vulnerabilität und Resilienz—Forschungsstand und sozialwissenschaftliche Untersuchungsperspektiven. Erkner. = IRS Working Papers, Nr. 43.

  • Castells, M. (1996): The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture. Cambridge, Chichester.

  • Ernstson, H.; Van Der Leeuw, S.; Redman, C.; Meffert, D.; Davis, G.; Alfsen, C.; Elmqvist, T. (2010): Urban Transitions: On Urban Resilience and Human-Dominated Ecosystems. In: Ambio. A Journal of the Human Environment 39, 8, 531–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (2002): The Rise of the Creative Class. And how it’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. New York.

  • Gerst, J.; Doms, M.; Daly, M. C. (2009). Regional Growth and Resilience: Evidence from Urban IT Centers. In: Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (FRBSF). Economic Review 2009, 1–11.

  • Gorzelak, G.; Goh, C.-C. (eds.) (2010): Financial Crisis in Central and Eastern Europe: From Similarity to Diversity. Warsaw.

  • Grabher, G. (1993): The weakness of strong ties: the lock-in of regional development in the Ruhr area. In: Grabher, G. (ed.): The embedded firm: on the socioeconomics of industrial networks. London, 255–277.

  • GREMI (Groupe de recherche européen sur les milieux innovateurs) (1986): Milieux innovateurs en Europe. Paris.

  • Hassink, R. (2010): Regional resilience: a promising concept to explain differences in regional economic adaptability? In: Cambridge Journal of Regions. Economy and Society 3, 1, 45–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey, P. (2004): Creativity and Urban Governance. In: Policy Studies 25, 2, 87–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, E.; Wial, H.; Wolman H. (2008): Exploring Regional Economic Resilience. Berkeley. = BRR Working Paper, 2008–04.

  • Holling, C. S. (1973): Resilience and stability of ecological systems. In: Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S. (2001). Understanding the Complexity of Economic, Ecological, and Social Systems. In: Ecosystems 4, 5, 390–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, R. (2010): Resilient regions in an uncertain world: wishful thinking or a practical reality? In: Cambridge Journal of Regions. Economy and Society 3, 1, 11–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutter, G. (2011): Planning for Risk Reduction and Organizing for Resilience in the Context of Natural Hazards. In: Müller, B. (ed.): Urban Regional Resilience: How Do Cities and Regions Deal with Change? Berlin, Heidelberg, 101–111. = German Annual of Spatial Research and Policy 2010.

  • Jessop, B. (1998): The rise of governance and the risks of failure: the case of economic development. In: International Social Science Journal 50, 155, 29–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A.; Clark, J.; Cameron, A. (2010): The Global Economic Crisis and the Cohesion of Europe. In: Eurasian Geography and Economics 51, 1, 35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearns, A.; Paddison, R. (2000): New Challenges for Urban Governance. In: Urban Studies 37, 5–6, 845–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchhoff, T.; Brand, F.; Hoheisel, D.; Grimm, V. (2010): The One-Sidedness and Cultural Bias of the Resilience Approach. In: Gaia 19, 1, 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, T. (2009): Institutional perspectives of local development in Germany and England: a comparative study about regeneration in old industrial towns experiencing decline. Online: http://opus.kobv.de/ubp/volltexte/2009/3734/ (accessed 22.02.2012).

  • Lowndes, V. (2001): Rescuing Aunt Sally: Taking Institutional Theory Seriously in Urban Politics. In: Urban Studies 38, 11, 1953–1971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowndes, V. (2002): Institutionalism. In Marsh, D.; Stoker, G (eds.): Theory and Methods in Political Science. Houndmills, 90–108.

  • Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of Economics. London.

  • Medd, W.; Marvin, S. (2005): From the Politics of Urgency to the Governance of Preparedness: A Research Agenda on Urban Vulnerability. In: Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 13, 2, 44–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1990): Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge.

  • Peters, G. (1999): Institutional Theory in Political Science: The ‘New Institutionalism’. London, New York.

  • Pierson, P. (2000): Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics. In: American Political Science Review 94, 2, 251–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. (1998): The Competetive Advantage of Nations. New York.

  • Pyke, F.; Becattini, G.; Sengenberger, W. (1990): Industrial districts and inter-firm cooperation in Italy. Geneva.

  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997): Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Buckingham.

  • Savitch, H. V. (2008): Cities in a Time of Terror. Space, Territory, and Local Resilience. Armonk.

  • Simmie, J.; Martin, R. (2010): The economic resilience of regions: towards an evolutionary approach. In: Cambridge Journal of Regions. Economy and Society 3, 1, 27–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B. H.; Anderies, J. M.; Kinzig, A. P.; Ryan, P. (2006): Exploring Resilience in Social-Ecological Systems Through Comparative Studies and Theory Development: Introduction to the Special Issue. In: Ecology and Society 11, 1,12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welter-Enderlin, R. (2006): Einleitung: Resilienz aus der Sicht von Beratung und Therapie. In: Welter-Enderlin, R.; Hildebrand, B. (eds.): Resilienz. Gedeihen trotz widriger Umstände. Heidelberg, 7–19.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thilo Lang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lang, T. How do cities and regions adapt to socio-economic crisis? Towards an institutionalist approach to urban and regional resilience. Raumforsch Raumordn 70, 285–291 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13147-012-0170-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13147-012-0170-2

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation