Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The soil organic carbon stock and its influencing factors in a mountainous karst basin in P. R. China

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Carbonates and Evaporites Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Soil organic carbon represents a major carbon pool in terrestrial ecosystems. Currently, in karst areas, there is considerable uncertainty regarding the estimation of soil organic carbon pools due to limited profile numbers and heterogeneity. Using a grid-based sampling method, 2755 soil profiles consisting of 22,057 soil samples were analyzed to determine the spatial distribution and storage of soil organic carbon (SOC) in the Houzhai River Basin in the Guizhou Province in southwest China. The results suggest that the total SOC storages in the 0–20 and 0–100 cm soil horizons of the Houzhai River Basin are approximately 2.65 × 108 and 5.39 × 108 kg C, respectively. The differences in the soil bulk density between different soil types were considerable. The average soil bulk density of large mud field loam, which ranged from 1.25 to 1.52 g/cm3, was significantly higher than that of the other soil types. The differences in soil organic carbon content were obvious as well. As soil depth increased, the organic carbon content gradually decreased. At a depth of 0–50 cm, the soil organic carbon content significantly decreased. In contrast, soil organic carbon content decreased slowly from 50 to 100 cm, indicating that a depth of 50 cm is the turning point for organic carbon content. The different degrees of soil organic carbon storage in different soil types were mainly caused by differences in organic carbon density. In karst regions, the soil parent material limits the spatial distribution of soil organic carbon, and soluble rock is the base development material. Soil thickness, slope gradient, and rock exposure are the primary factors leading to differences in SOC storage in different soil types. In addition, this study also suggests that increased attention should be paid to rock exposure in the assessment of SOC stocks in karst mountainous areas, such as the Houzhai River Basin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adak T, Singha A, Kumar K, Shukla SK, Singh A, Singhkumar V (2014) Soil organic carbon, dehydrogenase activity, nutrient availability and leaf nutrient content as affected by organic and inorganic source of nutrient in mango orchard soil. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 14:394–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Akpa SIC, Odeh IOA, Bishop TFA, Hartemink AE, Amapu IY (2016) Total soil organic carbon and carbon sequestration potential in Nigeria. Geoderma 271:202–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohn HL (1982) Estimate of organic carbon in world soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 46:1118–1119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen XB, Zheng H, Zhang W, He XY, Li L, Wu JS, Huang DY, Su YR (2014) Effects of land cover on soil organic carbon stock in a karst landscape with discontinuous soil distribution. J Mt Sci 11:774–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang F, Hu YK, Gong YM, Tang HP (2015) Soil organic carbon of different decomposition rate and its relation to microbial activity in saline-alkali desert ecosystem. Pol J Ecol 63:102–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fontaine S, Barot S, Barre P (2007) Stability of organic carbon in deep soil layers controlled by fresh carbon supply. Nature 450:277–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox DM, Bryan RB (1999) The relationship of soil loss by in terrill erosion to slope gradient. CATENA 38:211–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu G, Zhang XZ, Zhou YT, Yu CQ, Shen ZX (2014) Partitioning sources of ecosystem and soil respiration in an alpine meadow of Tibet Plateau using regression method. Pol J Ecol 62:17–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong YM, Hu YK, Fang F, Liu YY, Li KH, Zhang GM (2012) Carbon storage and vertical distribution in three shrubland communities in Gurbantunggut Desert, Uygur Autonomous Region of Xinjiang, Northwest China. Chin Geogra 22:541–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grüneberg E, Schning I, Hessenmller D, Schulze ED, Weisser WW (2013) Organic layer and clay content control soil organic carbon stocks in density fractions of differently managed German beech forests. Forest Ecol Manag 303:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juan A, Roque O, Noelia GF, Antonio RN, Maria A, Javier GP, Maria MM (2013) Land use and climate change impacts on soil organic carbon stocks in semi-arid Spain. J Soils Sedim 13:265–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey-Henderson AE, Wilkinson SN (2013) Evaluating Shuttle radar and interpolated DEMs for slope gradient and soil erosion estimation in low relief terrain. Environ Modell Softw 40:128–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koulouri M, Giourga C (2007) Land abandonment and slope gradient as key factors of soil erosion in Mediterranean terraced lands. CATENA 69:274–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (2002) Soil carbon sequestration in china through agricultural intensification and restoration of degraded and desertified ecosystems. Land Degrad Dev 13:469–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson DW, Sommers LE (1982) Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds) Methods of soil analysis, agronomy, part 2, 2nd edn. ASA and SSSA, Madison, pp 539–577

    Google Scholar 

  • Niu X, Gao P, Li Y, Li X (2015) Impact of different afforestation systems on soil organic carbon distribution characteristics of limestone mountains. Pol J Environ Stud 24:2543–2552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parrasalcántara L, Lozanogarcía B, Brevik EC, Cerdà A (2015) Soil organic carbon stocks assessment in Mediterranean natural areas: a comparison of entire soil profiles and soil control sections. J Environ Manag 155:219–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pouyat RV, Groffman PM, Yesilonis ID, Hernandez L (2002) Soil carbon pools and fluxes in urban ecosystems. Environ Pollut 116:107–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger WH (1982) Carbon storage in the caliche of arid soils a case study from arizona. Soil Sci 133:247–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang YG, Li Y, Ye XH, Chu Y, Wang XP (2010) Profile storage of organic/inorganic carbon in soil: from forest to desert. Sci Total Environ 408:1925–1931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.01.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weissert LF, Salmond JA, Schwendenmann L (2016) Variability of soil organic carbon stocks and soil CO2 efflux across urban land use and soil cover types. Geoderma 271:80–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu M, Liu SJ, Ye YY, Zhang W, Wang KL, Chen HS (2015) Spatial heterogeneity and storage assessment method of surface soil organic carbon in high bulk-rock ratio slopes of Karst Regions. Chin J Eco Agric 6:676–685 (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu XF, Thornton PE, Post WM (2013) A global analysis of soil microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in terrestrial ecosystems. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 22:737–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ying B, Xiao SZ, Xiong KN, Cheng QW, Luo JS (2012) Comparative studies of the distribution characteristics of rocky desertification and land use/land cover classes in typical areas of Guizhou province, China. Environ Earth Sci 71:631–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang ZM, Zhou YC, Wang SJ, Huang XF (2017) Estimation of soil organic carbon storage and its fractions in a small karst watershed. Acta Geochim 1:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng T, Wu XQ, Dai EF, Zhao D (2016) SOC storage and potential of grasslands from 2000 to 2012 in central and eastern Inner Mongolia, China. J Arid Land 8:364–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou YC, Wang SJ, Lu HM, Xie L, Xiao D (2010) Forest soil heterogeneity and soil sampling protocols on limestone outctops: example from SW China. Acta Carsol 39:115–122

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the National Key Basic Research Development Program (Grant No. 2013CB956702), the Great Basic Research Fund of Guizhou Province (Grant No. QKH-JZ-2014-200203), the 100 High Level Innovating Project (Grant No. QKHRC-2015-4022) and Regional fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41561075).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Forest Resource and Environment Research Center of Guizhou Province, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, China

    Zhenming Zhang, Yunchao Zhou & Xianfei Huang

  2. College of Forestry, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, China

    Zhenming Zhang, Yunchao Zhou & Xianfei Huang

  3. Puding Karst Ecosystem Research Station of Guizhou Province, Puding, 562100, China

    Yunchao Zhou & Shijie Wang

  4. State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guiyang, 550002, China

    Shijie Wang

Authors
  1. Zhenming Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yunchao Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shijie Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xianfei Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yunchao Zhou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Z., Zhou, Y., Wang, S. et al. The soil organic carbon stock and its influencing factors in a mountainous karst basin in P. R. China. Carbonates Evaporites 34, 1031–1043 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13146-018-0432-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13146-018-0432-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation