Skip to main content
Log in

Temperature trends in the skin/surface, mid-troposphere and low stratosphere near Korea from satellite and ground measurements

  • Published:
Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Various types of satellite (AIRS/AMSU, MODIS) and ground measurements are used to analyze temperature trends in the four vertical layers (skin/surface, mid-troposphere, and low stratosphere) around the Korean Peninsula (123–132°E, 33–44°N) during the period from September 2002 to August 2010. The ground-based observations include 72 Surface Meteorological Stations (SMSs), 6 radiosonde stations (RAOBs), 457 Automatic Weather Stations (AWSs) over the land, and 5 buoy stations over the ocean. A strong warming (0.052 K yr−1) at the surface, and a weak warming (0.004∼0.010 K yr−1) in the mid-troposphere and low stratosphere have been found from satellite data, leading to an unstable atmospheric layer. The AIRS/AMSU warming trend over the ocean surface around the Korean Peninsula is about 2.5 times greater than that over the land surface. The ground measurements from both SMS and AWS over the land surface of South Korea also show a warming of 0.043∼0.082 K yr−1, consistent with the satellite observations. The correlation average (r = 0.80) between MODIS skin temperature and ground measurement is significant. The correlations between AMSU and RAOB are very high (0.91∼0.95) in the anomaly time series, calculated from the spatial averages of monthly mean temperature values. However, the warming found in the AMSU data is stronger than that from the RAOB at the surface. The opposite feature is present above the mid-troposphere, indicating that there is a systematic difference. Warming phenomena (0.012∼0.078 K yr−1) are observed from all three data sets (SMS, AWS, MODIS), which have been corroborated by the coincident measurements at five ground stations. However, it should also be noted that the observed trends are subject to large uncertainty as the corresponding 95% confidence intervals tend to be larger than the observed signals due to large thermal variability and the relatively short periods of the satellitebased temperature records. The EOF analysis of monthly mean temperature anomalies indicates that the tropospheric temperature variability near Korea is primarily linked to the Arctic Oscillation (AO), and secondarily to ENSO (El Niño and Southern Oscillation). However, the low stratospheric temperature variability is mainly associated with Southern Oscillation and then additionally with Quasi-Biennial Oscillation (QBO). Uncertainties from the different spatial resolutions between satellite data are discussed in the trends.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angell, J. K., 2003: Effect of exclusion of anomalous tropical stations on temperature trends from a 63-station radiosonde network, and comparison with other analyses. J. Climate, 16, 2288–2295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendat, J. S., and A. G. Piersol, 2010: Random Data, Analysis and Measurement Procedures. 4th Ed., Wiley, 604 pp.

  • Bond, N. A., and D. E. Harrison, 2006: ENSO’s effect on Alaska during opposite phases of the arctic oscillation. Int. J. Climatol., 26, 1821–1841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brazel, A. J., G. J. McCabe, Jr, and H. J. Verville, 1993: Incident solar radiation simulated by general circulation models for the southwestern United States. Climate Res., 2, 177–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cagnazzo, C., and E. Manzini, 2009: Impact of the stratosphere on the winter tropospheric teleconnections between ENSO and the North Atlantic and European region. J. Climate, 22, 1223–1238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chahine, M. T., H. Aumann, M. Goldberg, L. McMillin, P. Rosenkranz, D. Stealin, L. Strow, and J. Susskind, 2001: AIRS-team retrieval for core products and geophysical parameters. [Available online at http://eospso.gsfc.nasa.gov/eos_homepage/for_scientists/atbd/docs/AIRS/atbd-airs-L2.pdf]

  • Cohen, J., J. Foster, M. Barlow, K. Saito, and J. Jones, 2010: Winter 2009–2010: Case study of an extreme Arctic Oscillation event. Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L17707, doi:10.1029/2010GL044256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coll, C., Z. Wan, and J. M. Galve, 2009: Temperature-based and radiancebased of the V5 MODIS Land surface temperature product. J. Geophys. Res., 114, D20102, doi:10.1029/2009JD012038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, D. K., J. E. Box, K. A. Casey, S. J. Hook, C. A. Shuman, and K. Steffen, 2008: Comparison of satellite-derived and in-situ observations of ice and snow surface temperatures over Greenland. Remote Sens. Environ., 112, 3739–3749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A., 2007: AIRS Version 5.0 Released Files Description. JPL D-38429, 1–190. [Available online at http://disc.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/AIRS/documentation/v5_docs/AIRS_V5_Release_User_Docs/V5_Released_ProcFileDesc.pdf]

  • Horel, J. D., and J. M. Wallace, 1981: Planetary-scale atmospheric phenomena associated with the Southern Oscillation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 109, 813–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC, 2007: IPCC Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2007 (AR4). Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.: Cambridge University Press. http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/publications_and_data_reports.shtml.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jevrejeva, S., J. C. Moore, and A. Grinsted, 2003: Influence of the Arctic Oscillation and El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) on ice conditions in the Baltic Sea: The wavelet approach. J. Geophys. Res., 108, D21, 4677, doi:10.1029/2003JD003417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, M., R. E. Dickinson, and A. M. Vogelmann, 1997: A comparison of CCM2-BAT skin temperature and surface-air temperature with satellite and surface observations. J. Climate, 10, 1505–1524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutzbach, J. E., 1967: Empirical eigenvectors of sea-level pressure, surface temperature and precipitation complexes over North America. J. Appl. Meteorol., 6, 791–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karl, T. R., S. J. Hassol, C. D. Miller, and W. L. Murray (eds.), 2006: Temperature Trends in the Lower Atmosphere: Steps for Understanding and Reconciling Differences. A report by the Climate Change Science Program and Subcommittee on Global Change Research, Washington, DC, 180 pp., http://www.climatescience.gov/Library/sap/sap1-1/finalreport/default.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labitzke, K., and H. van Loon, 1988: Association between the 11-year solar cycle, the QBO, and the atmosphere, I, The troposphere and stratosphere on the northern hemisphere winter. J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 50, 197–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., and J. A. Curry, 2004: Recent Arctic Sea ice variability: Connections to the Arctic Oscillation and the ENSO. Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L09211, doi:10.1029/2004GL019858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luterbacher, J., D. Dietrich, E. Xoplaki, M. Grosjean, and H. Wanner, 2004: European seasonal and annual temperature variability, trends, and extremes since 1500. Science, 303, 1499–1503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mostovoy, G. V., R. King, K. R. Reddy, and V. G. Kakani, 2005: Using MODIS LST data for high resolution estimates of daily air temperature over Mississippi. Proc. of the 3rd international workshop on the analysis of multi-temporal remote sensing images, IEEE, CD Rom, 76–80.

  • NOAA, 2010a: AO index. [Available online at http://www.cpc.noaa.gov/products/precip/CWlink/daily_ao_index/monthly.ao.index.b50.current.ascii.table]

  • _____, 2010b: SO index. [Available online at http://www.cpc.noaa.gov/data/indices/soi]

  • _____, 2010c: QBO index. [Available online at http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/data/indices/qbo.u50.index]

  • Olsen, E., 2007a: AIRS/AMSU/HSB Version 5 Level 3 Quick Start. [Available online at http://airs.ipl.nasa.gov/AskAirs]

  • _____, 2007b: AIRS/AMSU/HSB Version 5 L2 Standard Pressure Levels. [Available online at http://disc.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/AIRS/documentation/v5_docs/AIRS_V5_Release_User_Docs/V5_L2_Standard_Pressure_Levels.pdf]

  • _____, and Coauthors, 2007a: AIRS version 5 release level 2 standard product quickstart. [Available online at http://disc.gsfc.nasa.gov/AIRS/documentation/v5_docs/AIRS_V5_Release_User_Docs/V5_L2_Standard_Product_QuickStart.pdf]

  • _____, and Coauthors, 2007b: AIRS/AMSU/HSB Version 5 Data Release User Guide, 1–68 [Available online at http:/disc.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/AIRS/.../v5.../AIRS_V5_Release_User.../V5_Data_Release_UG.pdf]

  • _____, E. Fishbein, S-Y Lee, and E. Manning, 2007c: AIRS/AMSU HSB version 5 level 2 product levels, layers and trapezoids. 1–11. [Available online at http://disc.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/AIRS/documentation/v5_docs/AIRS_V5_Release_User_Docs/V5_L2_Levels_Layers_Trapezoids.pdf]

  • Pagano, T. S., and Coauthors, 2006: Version 5 product improvements from the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS). Remote Sensing of the Atmosphere and Clouds, Proc. of SPIE, 6408, 640808.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randel, W. J., and F. Wu, 2006: Biases in stratospheric and tropospheric temperature trends derived from historical radiosonde data. J. Climate, 19, 2094–2104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salby, M., P. Callaghan, and D. Shea, 1997: Interdependence of the tropical and extratropical QBO: Relationship to the solar cycle versus a biennial oscillation in the stratosphere. J. Geophys. Res., 102, D25, 29789–29798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scaife, A., 2010: Stratosphere-troposphere coupling and climate prediction. [Available online at http://www.atmosp.physics.utoronto.ca/SPARC/DA2010/Tuesday/Scaife.pdf]

  • _____, and Coauthors, 2008: The CLIVAR C20C Project: Selected 20th century climate events. Climate Dyn., 31, doi: 10.1007/s00382-008-0451-1.

  • Susskind, J., 2007: Improved atmospheric soundings and error estimates from analysis of AIRS/AMSU data. Proc. of SPIE, 6684, 66840M.

  • _____, 2008: Weather and Climate Applications of AIRS/AMSU Sounding Data (ppt data).

  • _____, C. D. Barnet, and J. M. Blaisdell, 2003: Retrieval of atmospheric and surface parameters from AIRS/AMSU/HSB data in the presence of clouds. IEEE TRANS. Geosci. Remote Sens., 41, 390–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • _____, ______, ______, L. Iredell, F. Keita, L. Kouvaris, G. Molnar, and M. Chahine, 2006: Accuracy of geophysical parameters derived from Atmospheric Infrared Sounder/Advanced Microwave Sounding Unit as a function of fractional cloud cover. J. Geophys. Res., 111, D09S17, doi:10.1029/2005JD006272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • _____, and J. Blaisdell, 2008: Improved surface parameter retrievals using AIRS/AMSU Data. Proc. of SPIE, 6966, 696610.

  • Thompson, D. W. J., and J. M. Wallace, 1998: The Arctic Oscillation signature in the wintertime geopotential height and temperature fields. Geophys. Res. Lett., 25(9), 1297–1300, doi:10.1029/98GL00950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trenberth, K. E., and Coauthors, 2007: Observations: Surface and Atmospheric Climate Change. In: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K. B. Averyt, M. Tignor and H. L. Miller (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wan, Z., Y. Zhang, Q. Zhang, and Z.-L. Li, 2004: Quality assessment and validation of the MODIS global land surface temperature, Int. J. Remote Sensing, 25(1), 261–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • _____, 2005: Refinements of the MODIS Land-Surface Temperature Products. Technical Progress Report Submitted to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. NNG01HZ15C, 1–8.

  • _____, and Z.-L. Li, 2008: Radiance-based validation of the V5 MODIS land-surface temperature product, Int. J. Remote Sensing, 29(17), 5373–5395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • _____, 2009: Collection-5 MODIS Land Surface Temperature Products User’s Guide. 1–30.

  • Wang, W., S. Liang, and T. Meyers, 2008: Validating MODIS land surface temperature products using long-term nighttime ground measurements. Remote Sens. Environ., 112, 623–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weare, B. C., A. R. Navato, and R. E. Newell, 1976: Empirical orthogonal analysis of Pacific sea surface temperatures. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 6, 671–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilks, D. S., 1995: Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences. Academic Press, 467 pp.

  • Willmott, C. J., 1982: Some comments on the evaluation of model performance. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 63, 1309–1313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WMO, 2010: Assessment of the observed extreme conditions during the 2009/2010 boreal winter. WMO/TD-No. 1550, 1–8.

  • Yoo, J. -M., and J. A. Carton, 1988: Spatial dependence of the relationship between rainfall and outgoing longwave radiation in the tropical Atlantic. J. Climate, 1, 1047–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, D., and A. K. Savtchenko, 2003: Horizontal sea surface temperature gradients: MODIS satellite observations versus Reynolds analysis. Proc. of IGARSS 2003 meeting, 2003 IEEE, 954–956.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jung-Moon Yoo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yoo, JM., Won, YI., Cho, YJ. et al. Temperature trends in the skin/surface, mid-troposphere and low stratosphere near Korea from satellite and ground measurements. Asia-Pacific J Atmos Sci 47, 439–455 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13143-011-0029-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13143-011-0029-4

Key words

Navigation