Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Development and refinement of a clinician intervention to facilitate primary care patient use of the PTSD Coach app

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Translational Behavioral Medicine

An Erratum to this article was published on 27 May 2016

Abstract

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is common and undertreated among Veterans Affairs (VA) primary care patients. A brief primary care intervention combining clinician support with a self-management mobile app (Clinician-Supported PTSD Coach, CS-PTSD Coach) may improve patient outcomes. This study developed and refined an intervention to provide clinician support to facilitate use of the PTSD Coach app and gathered VA provider and patient qualitative and quantitative feedback on CS-PTSD Coach to investigate preliminary acceptability and implementation barriers/facilitators. VA primary care providers and mental health leadership (N = 9) completed a survey and interview regarding implementation barriers and facilitators structured according to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Clinicians who delivered CS-PTSD Coach (N = 3) and patients (N = 9) who received it provided feedback on the intervention and implementation process. CS-PTSD Coach has high provider and patient acceptability. Important implementation factors included that CS-PTSD Coach be compatible with the clinics’ current practices, have low complexity to implement, be perceived to address patient needs, and have strong support from leadership. Diverse factors related to CS-PTSD Coach delivery facilitate implementation, provide an opportunity to problem-solve barriers, and improve integration of the intervention into primary care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Magruder KM, Frueh BC, Knapp RG, et al. Prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder in Veterans Affairs primary care clinics. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2005; 27(3): 169-179.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Stein MB, McQuaid JR, Pedrelli P, Lenox R, McCahill ME. Posttraumatic stress disorder in the primary care medical setting. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2000; 22(4): 261-269.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kessler RC, Chiu WT, Demler O, Merikangas KR, Walters EE. Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005; 62(6): 617-627.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Zlotnick C, Rodriguez BF, Weisberg RB, et al. Chronicity in posttraumatic stress disorder and predictors of the course of posttraumatic stress disorder among primary care patients. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2004; 192(2): 153-159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gillock KL, Zayfert C, Hegel MT, Ferguson RJ. Posttraumatic stress disorder in primary care: prevalence and relationships with physical symptoms and medical utilization. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2005; 27(6): 392-399.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rauch SA, Morales KH, Zubritsky C, Knott K, Oslin D. Posttraumatic stress, depression, and health among older adults in primary care. Am J of Geriatric Psychiatry. 2006; 14(4): 316-324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Karlin BE, Ruzek JI, Chard KM, et al. Dissemination of evidence-based psychological treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder in the Veterans Health Administration. J Trauma Stress. 2010; 23(6): 663-673.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Desai RA, Stefanovics EA, Rosenheck RA. The role of psychiatric diagnosis in satisfaction with primary care: data from the department of veterans affairs. Med Care. 2005; 43(12): 1208-1216.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Spoont MR, Nelson DB, Murdoch M, et al. Impact of treatment beliefs and social network encouragement on initiation of care by VA service users with PTSD. Psychiatr Serv. 2014; 65(5): 654-662.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Stecker T, Shiner B, Watts BV, Jones M, Conner KR. Treatment-seeking barriers for veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts who screen positive for PTSD. Psychiatr Serv. 2013; 64(3): 280-283.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sayer NA, Friedemann-Sanchez G, Spoont M, et al. A qualitative study of determinants of PTSD treatment initiation in veterans. Psychiatry. 2009; 72(3): 238-255.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Post EP, Metzger M, Dumas P, Lehmann L. Integrating mental health into primary care within the Veterans Health Administration. Fam Syst Health. 2010; 28(2): 83-90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Harmon AL, Goldstein ES, Shiner B, Watts BV. Preliminary findings for a brief posttraumatic stress intervention in primary mental health care. Psychol Serv. 2014; 11(3): 295-299.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cigrang JA, Rauch SA, Avila L, et al. Treatment of active-duty military with PTSD in primary care: early findings. Psychol Serv. 2011; 8(2): 104-113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Engel CC, Bray RM, Jaycox LH, et al. Implementing collaborative primary care for depression and posttraumatic stress disorder: design and sample for a randomized trial in the U.S. military health system. Contemp Clin Trials. 2014; 39(2): 310-319.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Possemato K. The current state of intervention research for posttraumatic stress disorder within the primary care setting. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2011; 18(3): 268-280.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Smith A. The smartphone difference. Pew Research Center. 2015; http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/01/us-smartphone-use-in-2015/.

  18. Bush NE, Wheeler WM. Personal technology use by U.S. military service members and veterans: an update. Telemed J E Health 2015.

  19. Lindhiem O, Bennett CB, Rosen D, Silk J. Mobile technology boosts the effectiveness of psychotherapy and behavioral interventions: a meta-analysis. Behav Modif 2015.

  20. Morland LA, Frueh C, Pierce K, Miyahira S. PTSD and telemental health: Updates and future directions. National Center for PTSD. Clin Quarterly. 2003; 12: 1-5.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Erbes CR, Stinson R, Kuhn E, et al. Access, utilization, and interest in mHealth applications among veterans receiving outpatient care for PTSD. Mil Med. 2014; 179(11): 1218-1222.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Price M, Yuen EK, Goetter EM, et al. mHealth: a mechanism to deliver more accessible, more effective mental health care. Clin Psychol Psychotherapy. 2014; 21(5): 427-436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hoffman JE, Wald L, Kuhn E, Greene C, Ruzek J, Weingardt K. PTSD Coach Version 1.0.1. [Mobile Application]. 2011; Available at: https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/ptsd-coach/id430646302?mt=8. Accessed Sep 1, 2015.

  24. Kuhn E, Greene C, Hoffman J, et al. Preliminary evaluation of PTSD Coach, a smartphone app for post-traumatic stress symptoms. Mil Med. 2014; 179(1): 12-18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Miner A, Kuhn E, Hoffman JE, Owe JE, Ruzek J, Taylor CB. Feasibility, acceptability, and potential efficacy of the PTSD Coach app in a community sample of trauma survivors. Psychol Trauma. In Press.

  26. Owen JE, Jaworski BK, Kuhn E, Makin-Byrd KN, Ramsey KM, Hoffman J. mHealth in the wild: using novel data to examine the reach, use, and impact of PTSD Coach. JMIR Mental Health. 2015; 2(1): e7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Pearson ML, Mattke S, Shaw R, Ridgely MS, Wiseman SH. (RAND Health, Santa Monica, CA). Patient self-management support programs: an evaluation. Final report. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US);2007 Nov. Report No.: 08-0011. Contract No.: 282-00-0005.

  28. Newman MG, Szkodny LE, Llera SJ, Przeworski A. A review of technology-assisted self-help and minimal contact therapies for anxiety and depression: is human contact necessary for therapeutic efficacy? Clin Psychol Rev. 2011; 31(1): 89-103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Proudfoot J, Parker G, Manicavasagar V, et al. Effects of adjunctive peer support on perceptions of illness control and understanding in an online psychoeducation program for bipolar disorder: a randomised controlled trial. J Affect Disord. 2012; 142(1-3): 98-105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q. 2004; 82(4): 581-629.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Kitson A, Harvey G, McCormack B. Enabling the implementation of evidence based practice: a conceptual framework. Qual Health Care. 1998; 7(3): 149-158.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Curran GM, Mukherjee S, Allee E, Owen RR. A process for developing an implementation intervention: QUERI Series. Implement Sci. 2008; 3: 17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations. 5th ed. New York, NY: Free Press; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Damschroder LJ, Lowery JC. Evaluation of a large-scale weight management program using the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR). Implement Sci. 2013; 8: 51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. English M, Nzinga J, Mbindyo P, Ayieko P, Irimu G, Mbaabu L. Explaining the effects of a multifaceted intervention to improve inpatient care in rural Kenyan hospitals—interpretation based on retrospective examination of data from participant observation, quantitative and qualitative studies. Implement Sci. 2011; 6: 124.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Connell LA, McMahon NE, Watkins CL, Eng JJ. Therapists’ use of the Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program (GRASP) intervention: a practice implementation survey study. Phys Ther. 2014; 94(5): 632-643.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009; 4: 50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Damschroder L, Aron D, Keith R, Kirsh S, Alexander J, Lowery J. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science. 2009;4(50).

  39. Possemato K, Kuhn E, Johnson E, et al. A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Clinician-Supported PTSD Coach: Impact on PTSD and Mental Health Treatment Utilization. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2016; 38: 94-98.

  40. Weathers FW, Ford J. Psychometric properties of the PTSD Checklist (PCL-C, PCL-S, PCL-M, PCL-PR). In: Stamm BH, ed. Measurement of Stress, Trauma, and Adaptation. Lutherville, MD: Sidran Press; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  41. National Center for PTSD. Using the PTSD Checklist for DSM-IV (PCL). U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. 2014; Available at: http://www.ptsd.va.gov/professional/pages/assessments/assessment-pdf/PCL-handout.pdf. Accessed Sep 1, 2015.

  42. Attkisson CC, Greenfield TK. The UCSF client satisfaction scales: I. The client satisfaction questionnaire-8. In: Mariush ME, ed. The use of psychological testing for treatment of planning and outcome assessment. Vol 3. 3rd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.; 2004:799-811.

  43. Thomas DR. A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. Am J Eval. 2006; 27(2): 237-246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This manuscript is based upon work supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Office of Research and Development, Mental Health Quality Enhancement Research Initiative and the Center for Integrated Healthcare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emily M. Johnson.

Ethics declarations

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States government.

Additional information

Implications

Practice: Consideration of implementation factors, specifically compatibility with the treatment setting, the ability of the intervention to address patient needs, leadership engagement, provider knowledge, and beliefs about the intervention, may facilitate implementation of behavioral health interventions.

Policy: Policymakers and administrators should foster environments that encourage implementation of novel approaches and support of interventions that combine clinician support with technology-based resources.

Research: Our results encourage further research on patient and implementation outcomes associated with CS-PTSD Coach and other technology facilitated interventions.

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13142-016-0415-7.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Possemato, K., Kuhn, E., Johnson, E.M. et al. Development and refinement of a clinician intervention to facilitate primary care patient use of the PTSD Coach app. Behav. Med. Pract. Policy Res. 7, 116–126 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-016-0393-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-016-0393-9

Keywords

Navigation