Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Network analysis of RE-AIM framework: chronology of the field and the connectivity of its contributors

  • Systematic Reviews
  • Published:
Translational Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

The reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance (RE-AIM) framework has been widely used for translational research. We used social network analysis (SNA) to explore how innovative research frameworks, such as RE-AIM, have diffused over time in academic literature. A structured literature review was conducted on RE-AIM between 1999 and 2012. SNA indices of degree score, betweenness, centrality, and authorship ties were used to examine use of RE-AIM. Use of RE-AIM has grown since its inception and spread from a few research centers to use internationally. Investigation of co-authorship revealed many have published on RE-AIM, but a much smaller core of RE-AIM researchers have published together two or more times. SNA revealed how the RE-AIM framework has been used over time and identified areas to further expand use of the framework. SNA can be useful to understand how research frameworks diffuse over time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig 1
Fig 2
Fig 3
Fig 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gaglio B, Shoup JA, Glasgow RE. The RE-AIM framework: a systematic review of use over time. Am J Public Health. 2013; 103(6): e38-e46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dunton GF, Lagloire R, Robertson T. Using the RE-AIM framework to evaluate the statewide dissemination of a school-based physical activity and nutrition curriculum: “Exercise Your Options”. Am J Health Promot. 2009; 23(4): 229-232.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Farris RP, Will JC, Khavjou O, Finkelstein EA. Beyond effectiveness: evaluating the public health impact of the WISEWOMAN program. Am J Public Health. 2007; 97(4): 641-647.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Glasgow RE, Linnan LA. Evaluation of theory-based interventions. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K, eds. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. 4th ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2008: 487-508.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999; 89(9): 1322-1327.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gaglio B, Glasgow RE, Brownson RC, Colditz G, Procter E. Evaluation approaches for dissemination and implementation research. In: Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK, eds. Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012: 327-358.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zerhouni EA. Translational and clinical science—time for a new vision. N Engl J Med. 2005; 353(15): 1621-1623.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Woolf SH. The meaning of translational research and why it matters. JAMA. 2008; 299(2): 211-213.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Glasgow RE, Klesges LM, Dzewaltowski DA, Estabrooks PA, Vogt TM. Evaluating the impact of health promotion programs: using the RE-AIM framework to form summary measures for decision making involving complex issues. Health Educ Res. 2006; 21(5): 688-694.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jilcott S, Ammerman A, Sommers J, Glasgow R. Applying the RE-AIM framework to assess the public health impact of policy change. Ann Behav Med. 2007; 34(2): 105-114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Glasgow RE, Lichtenstein E, Marcus AC. Why don’t we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition. Am J Public Health. 2003; 93(8): 1261-1267.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kessler RS, Purcell EP, Glasgow RE, Klesges LM, Benkeser RM, Peek CJ. What does it mean to “employ” the RE-AIM model? Eval Health Prof. 2013; 36(1): 44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. King DK, Glasgow RE, Leeman-Castillo B. Reaiming RE-AIM: using the model to plan, implement, and evaluate the effects of environmental change approaches to enhancing population health. Am J Public Health. 2010; 100(11): 2076-2084.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Green LW, Ottoson J, Garcia C, Robert H. Diffusion theory and knowledge dissemination, utilization, and integration in public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2009; 30: 151.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kessler R, Glasgow RE. A proposal to speed translation of healthcare research into practice: dramatic change is needed. Am J Prev Med. 2011; 40(6): 637-644.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Crane D. Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tuire P, Erno L. Exploring invisible scientific communities: studying networking relations within an educational research community. A Finnish case. Higher Ed. 2001; 42(4): 493-513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Katz JS, Hicks D. How much is a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model. Scientometrics. 1997; 40(3): 541-554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Morris SA, Goldstein ML. Manifestation of research teams in journal literature: a growth model of papers, authors, collaboration, coauthorship, weak ties, and Lotka’s law. J Am Soc Inf Sci. 2007; 58(12): 1764-1782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Coile RC. Lotka’s frequency distribution of scientific productivity. J Am Soc Inf Sci. 1977; 28(6): 366-370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lotka A. The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. J Washington Acad Sci. 1926; 16(12): 317-323.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lee S, Bozeman B. The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Soc Stud Sci. 2005; 35(5): 673-702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Newman ME. The structure of scientific collaboration networks. PNAS. 2001; 98(2): 404-409.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ding WW, Levin SG, Stephan PE, Winkler AE. The impact of information technology on academic scientists’ productivity and collaboration patterns. Manag Sci. 2010; 56(9): 1439-1461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Abramo G, D’Angelo CA, Di Costa F. Research collaboration and productivity: is there correlation? Higher Ed. 2009; 57(2): 155-171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Thijs B, Glänzel W. A structural analysis of collaboration between European research institutes. Res Eval. 2010; 19(1): 55-65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee K, Brownstein JS, Mills RG, Kohane IS. Does collocation inform the impact of collaboration? PLoS One. 2010; 5(12): e14279.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 21.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corporation; Released 2012.

  29. Luke DA, Harris JK. Network analysis in public health: history, methods, and applications. Annu Rev Public Health. 2007; 28: 69-93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. LeCompte MD, Schensul JJ, Singer M, Trotter II, Robert T, Cromley EK. Mapping Social Networks, Spatial Data, & Hidden Populations. Lanham: Rowman Altamira; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Valente TW. Social Networks and Health. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. Christakis NA, Fowler JH. The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357(4): 370-379.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Christakis NA, Fowler JH. The collective dynamics of smoking in a large social network. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358(21): 2249-2258.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Fowler JH, Christakis NA. Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham Heart Study. BMJ. 2008; 337.

  35. Kamensky JM, Burlin TJ. Collaboration: Using Networks and Partnerships. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Powell WW, Koput KW, Smith-Doerr L. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology. Admin Sci Quart. 1996; 116–145.

  37. Varda D, Shoup JA, Miller S. A systematic review of collaboration and network research in the public affairs literature: implications for public health practice and research. Am J Pub Health. 2012; 102(3): 564-571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Norquist G, Miller L. Academic and public system collaborations: opportunities in a changing environment. Acad Psychiat. 2011; 35(2): 81-85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Bozeman B, Gaughan M. How do men and women differ in research collaborations? An analysis of the collaborative motives and strategies of academic researchers. Res Policy. 2011; 40(10): 1393-1402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Weintraub A. Social networks attempt to spark academic-university collaborations. Nature Biotech. 2012; 30(10): 901-903.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Bryson JM, Crosby BC, Stone MM. The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: propositions from the literature. Pub Admin Rev. 2006; 66(s1): 44-55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Scott J, Carrington PJ. The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wasserman S, Galaskiewicz J. Advances in Social Network Analysis: Research in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 1994.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  44. Uddin S, Hossain L, Rasmussen K. Network effects on scientific collaborations. PLoS One. 2013; 8(2): e57546.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kossinets G, Watts DJ. Empirical analysis of an evolving social network. Science. 2006; 311(5757): 88-90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Zhao S. Do internet users have more social ties? A call for differentiated analyses of Internet use. J Comp-Mediated Commun. 2006; 11(3): 844-862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Backstrom L, Huttenlocher D, Kleinberg J, Lan X. Group formation in large social networks: membership, growth, and evolution. Paper presented at Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining; 2006.

  48. Borgatti SP, Mehra A, Brass DJ, Labianca G. Network analysis in the social sciences. Science. 2009; 323(5916): 892-895.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Sosa ME. Where do creative interactions come from? The role of tie content and social networks. Org Sci. 2011; 22(1): 1-21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Fishman M, Cross R, Tadmor B. Better connected. Nature. 2013; 493(7434): 709-710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Freeman LC. UCINET for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  52. De Stefano D, Fuccella V, Vitale MP, Zaccarin S. The use of different data sources in the analysis of co-authorship networks and scientific performance. Soc Networks. 2013; 35(3): 370-381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Ding Y. Scientific collaboration and endorsement: network analysis of coauthorship and citation networks. J Inform. 2011; 5(1): 187-203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Doreian P, Stokman F. Evolution of Social Networks. 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Routledge; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Liao CH, Yen HR. Quantifying the degree of research collaboration: a comparative study of collaborative measures. J Informetrics. 2012; 6(1): 27-33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Noruzi A. Google scholar: the new generation of citation indexes. Libri. 2005; 55(4): 170-180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Garfield E. Citation indexes for science. a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Intl J Epi. 2006; 35(5): 1123-1127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Garfield E. The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA. 2006; 295(1): 90-93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Carrington PJ, Scott J, Wasserman S. Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 2005.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  60. Granovetter MS. The strength of weak ties. Am J Soc. 1973: 1360-1380.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This was an investigator-initiated study conducted without internal or external funding. All authors, external and internal, had full access to all of the data (including datasets, statistical reports, and tables) in the study and can take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Authors’ Statement of Conflict of Interest and Adherence to Ethical Standards

Jo Ann Shoup, Bridget Gaglio, Danielle Varda, and Russell Glasgow declare that they have no conflict of interest. There was no human subjects’ research conducted for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, 10065 East Harvard Avenue, Suite 300, Denver, CO, 80231, USA

    Jo Ann Shoup MSW, MS, MA

  2. School of Public Affairs, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, USA

    Jo Ann Shoup MSW, MS, MA & Danielle Varda PhD

  3. Communication and Dissemination Research, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), Washington, DC, USA

    Bridget Gaglio PhD

  4. School of Public Health, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, USA

    Danielle Varda PhD

  5. Colorado Health Outcomes Research Program, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, USA

    Russell E. Glasgow PhD

  6. School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, USA

    Russell E. Glasgow PhD

Authors
  1. Jo Ann Shoup MSW, MS, MA
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bridget Gaglio PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Danielle Varda PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Russell E. Glasgow PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jo Ann Shoup MSW, MS, MA.

Additional information

Implications

Practice: Social network analysis is an innovative methodology that can be used to visually demonstrate the spread of knowledge and dissemination of information in practice-based research networks.

Policy: Social network analysis, using the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance (RE-AIM) framework as the example, is an operative mechanism to translate effective interventions into practice and policy.

Research: Methods such as social network analysis are needed to address the gap between research-based interventions and their subsequent use in practice.

Appendices

Appendix A

Table 4 2012 and 5-year impact factor of journals abstracted for RE-AIM and SNA study
Full size table

Appendix B: references used in SNA

  1. 1.

    Glasgow RE. Outcomes of and for diabetes education research. The Diabetes Educator. Nov–Dec 1999;25(6 Suppl):74–88.

  2. 2.

    Eakin EG, Glasgow RE, Riley KM. Review of primary care-based physical activity intervention studies: effectiveness and implications for practice and future research. J Fam Pract. Feb 2000;49(2):158–168.

  3. 3.

    Feil EG, Glasgow RE, Boles S, McKay HG. Who participates in Internet-based self-management programs? A study among novice computer users in a primary care setting. Diabetes Educ. Sep–Oct 2000;26(5):806–811.

  4. 4.

    Glasgow RE, Toobert DJ. Brief, computer-assisted diabetes dietary self-management counseling: effects on behavior, physiologic outcomes, and quality of life. Med Care. Nov 2000;38(11):1062–1073.

  5. 5.

    Glasgow RE, Whitlock EP, Eakin EG, Lichtenstein E. A brief smoking cessation intervention for women in low-income planned parenthood clinics. Am J Public Health. May 2000;90(5):786–789.

  6. 6.

    Hampson SE, Skinner TC, Hart J, et al. Behavioral interventions for adolescents with type 1 diabetes: how effective are they? Diabetes Care. Sep 2000;23(9):1416–1422.

  7. 7.

    France EK, Glasgow RE, Marcus AC. Smoking cessation interventions among hospitalized patients: what have we learned? Prev Med. Apr 2001;32(4):376–388.

  8. 8.

    Glasgow RE, Bull S. Making a Difference With Interactive Technology: Considerations in Using and Evaluating Computerized Aids for Diabetes Self-Management Education. Diabetes Spectrum. 2001;14(2):99–106.

  9. 9.

    Glasgow RE, McKay HG, Piette JD, Reynolds KD. The RE-AIM framework for evaluating interventions: what can it tell us about approaches to chronic illness management? Patient Education and Counseling. 2001;44(2):119–127.

  10. 10.

    Lando HA, Valanis BG, Lichtenstein E, et al. Promoting smoking abstinence in pregnant and postpartum patients: a comparison of 2 approaches. Am J Manag Care. Jul 2001;7(7):685–693.

  11. 11.

    Eakin EG, Bull SS, Glasgow RE, Mason M. Reaching those most in need: a review of diabetes self-management interventions in disadvantaged populations. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. Jan-Feb 2002;18(1):26–35.

  12. 12.

    Earp JA, Eng E, O’Malley MS, et al. Increasing use of mammography among older, rural African American women: results from a community trial. American Journal of Public Health. 2002;92(4):646–654.

  13. 13.

    Glasgow RE, Bull SS, Gillette C, Klesges LM, Dzewaltowski DA. Behavior change intervention research in healthcare settings: a review of recent reports with emphasis on external validity. Am J Prev Med. Jul 2002;23(1):62–69.

  14. 14.

    Glasgow RE, Toobert DJ, Hampson SE, Strycker LA. Implementation, generalization and long-term results of the “choosing well” diabetes self-management intervention. Patient Educ Couns. Oct -Nov 2002;48(2):115–122.

  15. 15.

    Toobert DJ, Strycker LA, Glasgow RE, Bagdade JD. If you build it, will they come?. Reach and Adoption associated with a comprehensive lifestyle management program for women with type 2 diabetes. Patient Education and Counseling. Oct–Nov 2002;48(2):99–105.

  16. 16.

    Toobert DJ, Strycker LA, Glasgow RE, Barrera M, Bagdade JD. Enhancing support for health behavior change among women at risk for heart disease: the Mediterranean Lifestyle Trial. Health Educ Res. Oct 2002;17(5):574–585.

  17. 17.

    Bull SS, Gillette C, Glasgow RE, Estabrooks P. Work site health promotion research: to what extent can we generalize the results and what is needed to translate research to practice? Health Educ Behav. Oct 2003;30(5):537–549.

  18. 18.

    Glasgow RE, Boles SM, McKay HG, Feil EG, Barrera M, Jr. The D-Net diabetes self-management program: long-term implementation, outcomes, and generalization results. Preventive medicine. Apr 2003;36(4):410–419.

  19. 19.

    Dzewaltowski DA, Estabrooks PA, Klesges LM, Bull S, Glasgow RE. Behavior change intervention research in community settings: how generalizable are the results? Health Promot Int. Jun 2004;19(2):235–245.

  20. 20.

    Eakin EG, Brown WJ, Marshall AL, Mummery K, Larsen E. Physical activity promotion in primary care: bridging the gap between research and practice. Am J Prev Med. Nov 2004;27(4):297–303.

  21. 21.

    Glasgow RE, Boles SM, Lichtenstein E, Lee ME, Foster L. Adoption, reach, and implementation of a novel smoking control program: Analysis of a public utility–research organization partnership. Nicotine and Tobacco Research. 2004;6(2):269–274.

  22. 22.

    Glasgow RE, Nutting PA, King DK, et al. A practical randomized trial to improve diabetes care. J Gen Intern Med. Dec 2004;19(12):1167–1174.

  23. 23.

    Bodenheimer T, Young DM, MacGregor K, Holtrop JS. Practice-based research in primary care: facilitator of, or barrier to, practice improvement? Ann Fam Med. Jul-Aug 2005;3 Suppl 2:S28–32.

  24. 24.

    Bull SS, Gaglio B, Mckay HG, Glasgow RE. Harnessing the potential of the internet to promote chronic illness self-management: diabetes as an example of how well we are doing. Chronic Illness. 2005;1(2):143–155.

  25. 25.

    Eakin EG, Smith BJ, Bauman AE. Evaluating the population health impact of physical activity interventions in primary care—are we asking the right questions? Journal of Physical Activity and Health. 2005;2(2):197–215.

  26. 26.

    Gary TL, Hill-Briggs F, Batts-Turner M, Brancati FL. Translational research principles of an effectiveness trial for diabetes care in an urban African American population. Diabetes Educ. Nov–Dec 2005;31(6):880–889.

  27. 27.

    Glasgow RE, Nutting PA, King DK, et al. Randomized effectiveness trial of a computer-assisted intervention to improve diabetes care. Diabetes Care. Jan 2005;28(1):33–39.

  28. 28.

    Klesges LM, Estabrooks PA, Dzewaltowski DA, Bull SS, Glasgow RE. Beginning with the application in mind: designing and planning health behavior change interventions to enhance dissemination. Annals of Behavioral Medicine: a Publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine. Apr 2005;29 Suppl:66–75.

  29. 29.

    Toobert DJ, Strycker LA, Glasgow RE, Barrera Jr M, Angell K. Effects of the mediterranean lifestyle program on multiple risk behaviors and psychosocial outcomes among women at risk for heart disease. Ann Behav Med. Apr 2005;29(2):128–137.

  30. 30.

    Besculides M, Zaveri H, Farris R, Will J. Identifying best practices for WISEWOMAN programs using a mixed-methods evaluation. Prev Chronic Dis. Jan 2006;3(1):A07.

  31. 31.

    Chan CC, Chan K. Programs Effectiveness, Process Outcomes, and Sustainability of health promotion interventions in Hong Kong: Applying the RE-AIM framework. Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies. 2006;7(1):5–27.

  32. 32.

    Glasgow RE, Gaglio B, France EK, et al. Do behavioral smoking reduction approaches reach more or different smokers? Two studies; similar answers. Addictive Behaviors. 2006;31(3):509–518.

  33. 33.

    Glasgow RE, Nelson CC, Strycker LA, King DK. Using RE-AIM metrics to evaluate diabetes self-management support interventions. Am J Prev Med. Jan 2006;30(1):67–73.

  34. 34.

    Glasgow RE, Nutting PA, Toobert DJ, et al. Effects of a brief computer-assisted diabetes self-management intervention on dietary, biological and quality-of-life outcomes. Chronic Illn. Mar 2006;2(1):27–38.

  35. 35.

    Glasgow RE, Strycker LA, King DK, et al. Robustness of a computer-assisted diabetes self-management intervention across patient characteristics, healthcare settings, and intervention staff. Am J Manag Care. Mar 2006;12(3):137–145.

  36. 36.

    Gyurcsik NC, Brittain DR. Partial examination of the public health impact of the People with Arthritis Can Exercise (PACE) program: reach, adoption, and maintenance. Public Health Nurs. Nov–Dec 2006;23(6):516–522.

  37. 37.

    Marang-van de Mheen PJ, Stadlander MC, Kievit J. Adverse outcomes in surgical patients: implementation of a nationwide reporting system. Qual Saf Health Care. Oct 2006;15(5):320–324.

  38. 38.

    Aittasalo M, Miilunpalo S, Stahl T, Kukkonen-Harjula K. From innovation to practice: initiation, implementation and evaluation of a physician-based physical activity promotion programme in Finland. Health Promot Int. Mar 2007;22(1):19–27.

  39. 39.

    Bopp M, Wilcox S, Laken M, et al. Using the RE-AIM framework to evaluate a physical activity intervention in churches. Prev Chronic Dis. Oct 2007;4(4):A87.

  40. 40.

    Boratgis G, Broderick S, Callahan M, et al. Disseminating QI interventions. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. Dec 2007;33(12 Suppl):48–65.

  41. 41.

    Campbell MK, Resnicow K, Carr C, Wang T, Williams A. Process evaluation of an effective church-based diet intervention: Body & Soul. Health Educ Behav. Dec 2007;34(6):864–880.

  42. 42.

    Eakin EG, Bull SS, Riley KM, Reeves MM, McLaughlin P, Gutierrez S. Resources for health: a primary-care-based diet and physical activity intervention targeting urban Latinos with multiple chronic conditions. Health Psychol. Jul 2007;26(4):392–400.

  43. 43.

    Eakin EG, Lawler SP, Vandelanotte C, Owen N. Telephone interventions for physical activity and dietary behavior change: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. May 2007;32(5):419–434.

  44. 44.

    Farris RP, Will JC, Khavjou O, Finkelstein EA. Beyond effectiveness: evaluating the public health impact of the WISEWOMAN program. Am J Public Health. Apr 2007;97(4):641–647.

  45. 45.

    Fortier MS, Hogg W, O’Sullivan TL, et al. The physical activity counselling (PAC) randomized controlled trial: rationale, methods, and interventions. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. Dec 2007;32(6):1170–1185.

  46. 46.

    Glasgow RE, Nelson CC, Kearney KA, et al. Reach, engagement, and retention in an Internet-based weight loss program in a multi-site randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2007;9(2):e11.

  47. 47.

    Jilcott S, Ammerman A, Sommers J, Glasgow RE. Applying the RE-AIM framework to assess the public health impact of policy change. Ann Behav Med. Oct 2007;34(2):105–114.

  48. 48.

    McKenzie RA, Naccarella L, Thompson C. Well for life: Evaluation and policy implication of a health promotion initiative for frail older people in aged care settings. Australasian Journal on Ageing. 2007;26(3):135–140.

  49. 49.

    Toobert DJ, Glasgow RE, Strycker LA, Barrera M, Jr., Ritzwoller DP, Weidner G. Long-term effects of the Mediterranean lifestyle program: a randomized clinical trial for postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2007;4:1.

  50. 50.

    Cohen DJ, Crabtree BF, Etz RS, et al. Fidelity versus flexibility: translating evidence-based research into practice. Am J Prev Med. Nov 2008;35(5 Suppl):S381–389.

  51. 51.

    Coleman KJ, Geller KS, Rosenkranz RR, Dzewaltowski DA. Physical activity and healthy eating in the after-school environment. J Sch Health. Dec 2008;78(12):633–640.

  52. 52.

    Eakin EG, Reeves MM, Lawler SP, et al. The Logan Healthy Living Program: a cluster randomized trial of a telephone-delivered physical activity and dietary behavior intervention for primary care patients with type 2 diabetes or hypertension from a socially disadvantaged community—rationale, design and recruitment. Contemp Clin Trials. May 2008;29(3):439–454.

  53. 53.

    Eldridge S, Ashby D, Bennett C, Wakelin M, Feder G. Internal and external validity of cluster randomised trials: systematic review of recent trials. BMJ. Apr 19 2008;336(7649):876–880.

  54. 54.

    Estabrooks PA, Bradshaw M, Dzewaltowski DA, Smith-Ray RL. Determining the impact of Walk Kansas: applying a team-building approach to community physical activity promotion. Ann Behav Med. Aug 2008;36(1):1–12.

  55. 55.

    Estabrooks PA, Smith-Ray RL. Piloting a behavioral intervention delivered through interactive voice response telephone messages to promote weight loss in a pre-diabetic population. Patient Education and Counseling. 2008;72(1):34–41.

  56. 56.

    Glasgow RE. What types of evidence are most needed to advance behavioral medicine? Ann Behav Med. Feb 2008;35(1):19–25.

  57. 57.

    Glasgow RE, Estabrooks PA, Marcus AC, et al. Evaluating initial reach and robustness of a practical randomized trial of smoking reduction. Health Psychol. Nov 2008;27(6):780–788.

  58. 58.

    Holtrop JS, Dosh SA, Torres T, Thum YM. The community health educator referral liaison (CHERL): a primary care practice role for promoting healthy behaviors. Am J Prev Med. Nov 2008;35(5 Suppl):S365–372.

  59. 59.

    Klesges LM, Dzewaltowski DA, Glasgow RE. Review of external validity reporting in childhood obesity prevention research. Am J Prev Med. Mar 2008;34(3):216–223.

  60. 60.

    Levinson AH, Glasgow RE, Gaglio B, Smith TL, Cahoon J, Marcus AC. Tailored behavioral support for smoking reduction: Development and pilot results of an innovative intervention. Health Education Research. 2008;23(2):335–346.

  61. 61.

    Li F, Harmer P, Glasgow R, et al. Translation of an effective tai chi intervention into a community-based falls-prevention program. Am J Public Health. Jul 2008;98(7):1195–1198.

  62. 62.

    Maxwell AE, Jo AM, Chin SY, Lee KS, Bastani R. Impact of a print intervention to increase annual mammography screening among Korean American women enrolled in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program. Cancer Detect Prev. 2008;32(3):229–235.

  63. 63.

    Rosenkranz RR, Dzewaltowski DA. Model of the home food environment pertaining to childhood obesity. Nutrition Reviews. 2008;66(3):123–140.

  64. 64.

    Beck A, Bergman DA, Raham AK, Dearing JW, Glasgow RE. Using implementation and dissemination concepts to spread 21st-century well-child care at a health maintenance organization. The Permanente Journal. 2009;13(3):10–17.

  65. 65.

    Bernstein E, Topp D, Shaw E, et al. A preliminary report of knowledge translation: lessons from taking screening and brief intervention techniques from the research setting into regional systems of care. Acad Emerg Med. Nov 2009;16(11):1225–1233.

  66. 66.

    Buis LR, Poulton TA, Holleman RG, et al. Evaluating Active U: an Internet-mediated physical activity program. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:331.

  67. 67.

    Dunton GF, Lagloire R, Robertson T. Using the RE-AIM framework to evaluate the statewide dissemination of a school-based physical activity and nutrition curriculum: “Exercise Your Options”. Am J Health Promot. Mar–Apr 2009;23(4):229–232.

  68. 68.

    Dzewaltowski DA, Estabrooks PA, Welk G, et al. Healthy youth places: a randomized controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of facilitating adult and youth leaders to promote physical activity and fruit and vegetable consumption in middle schools. Health Educ Behav. Jun 2009;36(3):583–600.

  69. 69.

    Eakin E, Reeves M, Lawler S, et al. Telephone counseling for physical activity and diet in primary care patients. Am J Prev Med. Feb 2009;36(2):142–149.

  70. 70.

    Estabrooks PA, Shoup JA, Gattshall M, Dandamudi P, Shetterly S, Xu S. Automated telephone counseling for parents of overweight children: a randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2009;36(1):35–42. e32.

  71. 71.

    Feldstein AC, Perrin N, Rosales AG, et al. Effect of a multimodal reminder program on repeat mammogram screening. Am J Prev Med. Aug 2009;37(2):94–101.

  72. 72.

    Gabriele JM, Dubbert PM, Reeves RR. Efficacy of behavioural interventions in managing atypical antipsychotic weight gain. Obes Rev. Jul 2009;10(4):442–455.

  73. 73.

    Glasgow RE, Edwards LL, Whitesides H, Carroll N, Sanders TJ, McCray BL. Reach and effectiveness of DVD and in-person diabetes self-management education. Chronic Illn. Dec 2009;5(4):243–249.

  74. 74.

    Glasgow RE, Gaglio B, Estabrooks PA, et al. Long-term results of a smoking reduction program. Med Care. Jan 2009;47(1):115–120.

  75. 75.

    Mattila E, Leino K, Paavilainen E, Astedt-Kurki P. Nursing intervention studies on patients and family members: A systematic literature review. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences. 2009;23(3):611–622.

  76. 76.

    Plotnikoff RC, Todosijczuk I, Faulker G, et al. ParticipaACTION: Baseline assessment of the ‘new ParticipACTION’: A quantitative survey of Canadian organizational awareness and capacity. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2009;6:Article number 86.

  77. 77.

    Smith-Ray RL, Almeida FA, Bajaj J, et al. Translating efficacious behavioral principles for diabetes prevention into practice. Health Promotion Practice. 2009;10(1):58–66.

  78. 78.

    Volpp KG, Troxel AB, Pauly MV, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of financial incentives for smoking cessation. New England Journal of Medicine. 2009;360(7):699–709.

  79. 79.

    White SM, McAuley E, Estabrooks PA, Courneya KS. Translating physical activity interventions for breast cancer survivors into practice: an evaluation of randomized controlled trials. Ann Behav Med. Feb 2009;37(1):10–19.

  80. 80.

    Abildso CG, Zizzi SJ, Reger-Nash B. Evaluating an insurance-sponsored weight management program with the RE-AIM Model, West Virginia, 2004–2008. Prev Chronic Dis. May 2010;7(3):A46.

  81. 81.

    Belza B, Snyder S, Thompson M, LoGerfo J. From research to practice EnhanceFitness, an innovative community-based senior exercise program. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation. 2010;26(4):299–309.

  82. 82.

    Caperchione C, Coulson F. The WellingTONNE Challenge Toolkit: using the RE-AIM framework to evaluate a community resource promoting healthy lifestyle behaviours. Health Education Journal. 2010;69(1):126–134.

  83. 83.

    Clark D, Chrysler L, Perkins A, et al. Screening, referral, and participation in a weight management program implemented in five CHCs. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved. 2010;21(2):617–628.

  84. 84.

    Collard DC, Chinapaw MJ, Verhagen EA, van Mechelen W. Process evaluation of a school based physical activity related injury prevention programme using the RE-AIM framework. BMC Pediatr. 2010;10:86.

  85. 85.

    De Meij JS, Chinapaw MJ, Kremers SP, Van der Wal MF, Jurg ME, Van Mechelen W. Promoting physical activity in children: The stepwise development of the primary school-based JUMP-in intervention applying the RE-AIM evaluation framework. Br J Sports Med. Sep 2010;44(12):879–887.

  86. 86.

    Gitlin LN, Jacobs M, Earland TV. Translation of a dementia caregiver intervention for delivery in homecare as a reimbursable Medicare service: outcomes and lessons learned. Gerontologist. Dec 2010;50(6):847–854.

  87. 87.

    Glasgow RE, Kurz D, King D, et al. Outcomes of minimal and moderate support versions of an internet-based diabetes self-management support program. J Gen Intern Med. Dec 2010;25(12):1315–1322.

  88. 88.

    Glasgow RE, Strycker LA, Kurz D, et al. Recruitment for an internet-based diabetes self-management program: scientific and ethical implications. Ann Behav Med. Aug 2010;40(1):40–48.

  89. 89.

    Haas JS, Iyer A, Orav EJ, Schiff GD, Bates DW. Participation in an ambulatory e-pharmacovigilance system. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. Sep 2010;19(9):961–969.

  90. 90.

    McKee MD, Deen D, Maher S, Fletcher J, Fornari A, Blank AE. Implementation of a pilot primary care lifestyle change intervention for families of pre-school children: lessons learned. Patient Educ Couns. Jun 2010;79(3):299–305.

  91. 91.

    Reid RD, Mullen KA, Slovinec D’Angelo ME, et al. Smoking cessation for hospitalized smokers: an evaluation of the “Ottawa Model”. Nicotine Tob Res. Jan 2010;12(1):11–18.

  92. 92.

    Saunders N, Otago L, Romiti M, Donaldson A, White P, Finch C. Coaches’ perspectives on implementing an evidence-informed injury prevention programme in junior community netball. Br J Sports Med. Dec 2010;44(15):1128–1132.

  93. 93.

    van der Giesen FJ, van Lankveld W, Hopman-Rock M, et al. Exploring the public health impact of an intensive exercise program for patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a dissemination and implementation study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). Jun 2010;62(6):865–872.

  94. 94.

    Allen K, Zoellner J, Motley M, Estabrooks PA. Understanding the internal and external validity of health literacy interventions: A systematic literature review using the RE-AIM framework. Journal of Health Communication. 2011;16(sup3):55–72.

  95. 95.

    Ammentorp J, Kofoed PE. Research in communication skills training translated into practice in a large organization: a proactive use of the RE-AIM framework. Patient Education and Counseling. 2011;82(3):482–487.

  96. 96.

    Antikainen I, Ellis R. A RE-AIM evaluation of theory-based physical activity interventions. Journal of Sport Exercise and Psychology. 2011;33(2):198–214.

  97. 97.

    Austin G, Bell T, Caperchione C, Mummery WK. Translating research to practice: using the RE-AIM framework to examine an evidence-based physical activity intervention in primary school settings. Health Promotion Practice. 2011;12(6):932–941.

  98. 98.

    Bhardwaja B, Carroll NM, Raebel MA, et al. Improving prescribing safety in patients with renal insufficiency in the ambulatory setting: the Drug Renal Alert Pharmacy (DRAP) program. Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy. 2011;31(4):346–356.

  99. 99.

    Brug J, Tak NI, Te Velde SJ. Evaluation of nationwide health promotion campaigns in the Netherlands: an exploration of practices, wishes and opportunities. Health Promotion International. 2011;26(2):244–254.

  100. 100.

    Crutzen R, De Nooijer J. Intervening via chat: an opportunity for adolescents’ mental health promotion? Health Promotion International. 2011;26(2):238–243.

  101. 101.

    Day L, Finch CF, Hill KD, et al. A protocol for evidence-based targeting and evaluation of statewide strategies for preventing falls among community-dwelling older people in Victoria, Australia. Injury Prevention. 2011;17(2):1–8.

  102. 102.

    Finch CF, Gabbe BJ, Lloyd DG, et al. Towards a national sports safety strategy: addressing facilitators and barriers towards safety guideline uptake. Injury Prevention. 2011;17(3):1–10.

  103. 103.

    Finch CF, White P, Twomey D, Ullah S. Implementing an exercise-training programme to prevent lower-limb injuries: considerations for the development of a randomised controlled trial intervention delivery plan. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2011;45:791–796.

  104. 104.

    Glasgow RE, Dickinson P, Fisher L, et al. Use of RE-AIM to develop a multi-media facilitation tool for the patient-centered medical home. Implement Sci. 2011;6(10):118.

  105. 105.

    Kahwati LC, Lance TX, Jones KR, Kinsinger LS. RE-AIM evaluation of the Veterans Health Administration’s MOVE! weight management program. Translational Behavioral Medicine. 2011;1(4):551–560.

  106. 106.

    Noar SM. Computer technology-based interventions in HIV prevention: state of the evidence and future directions for research. AIDS Care. 2011;23(5):525–533.

  107. 107.

    Payne JM, France KE, Henley N, et al. RE-AIM evaluation of the Alcohol and Pregnancy Project: educational resources to inform health professionals about prenatal alcohol exposure and fetal alcohol spectrum disorder. Evaluation & the Health Professions. 2011;34(1):57–80.

  108. 108.

    Shubert TE, Altpeter M, Busby-Whitehead J. Using the RE-AIM Framework to translate a research-based falls prevention intervention into a community-based program: Lessons Learned. Journal of Safety Research. 2011;42(6):509–516.

  109. 109.

    Van Acker R, De Bourdeaudhuij I, De Cocker K, Klesges LM, Cardon G. The impact of disseminating the whole-community project’10,000 Steps’: a RE-AIM analysis. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(1):1–11.

  110. 110.

    Viswanathan M, Mansfield C, Smith LR, et al. Cross-Site Evaluation of a Comprehensive Pediatric Asthma Project The Merck Childhood Asthma Network, Inc.(MCAN). Health Promotion Practice. 2011;12(6 suppl 1):20S–33S.

  111. 111.

    Vuillemin A, Rostami C, Maes L, et al. Worksite physical activity interventions and obesity: a review of European studies (the HOPE project). Obesity Facts. 2011;4(6):479–488.

  112. 112.

    Weiss SM, Jones DL, Lopez M, Villar-Loubet O, Chitalu N. The many faces of translational research: a tale of two studies. Translational Behavioral Medicine. 2011;1(2):327–330.

  113. 113.

    Aittasalo M, Rinne M, Pasanen M, Kukkonen-Harjula K, Vasankari T. Promoting walking among office employees―evaluation of a randomized controlled intervention with pedometers and e-mail messages. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):403.

  114. 114.

    Anesetti-Rothermel A, Noerachmanto N, Horn K, Dino G. Beyond Reach and Effectiveness Evaluating the Not-On-Tobacco (NOT) Program in West Virginia From 2000 to 2005. Health Promotion Practice. 2012;13(4):506–514.

  115. 115.

    Carlfjord S, Andersson A, Bendtsen P, Nilsen P, Lindberg M. Applying the RE-AIM framework to evaluate two implementation strategies used to introduce a tool for lifestyle intervention in Swedish primary health care. Health Promotion International. 2012;27(2):167–176.

  116. 116.

    DerAnanian CA, Desai P, Smith-Ray R, Seymour RB, Hughes SL. Perceived versus actual factors associated with adoption and maintenance of an evidence-based physical activity program. Translational Behavioral Medicine. 2012;2(2):209–217.

  117. 117.

    Downey SM, Wages J, Jackson SF, Estabrooks PA. Adoption Decisions and Implementation of a Community-Based Physical Activity Program A Mixed Methods Study. Health Promotion Practice. 2012;13(2):175–182.

  118. 118.

    Estabrook B, Zapka J, Lemon SC. Evaluating the Implementation of a Hospital Work-Site Obesity Prevention Intervention Applying the RE-AIM Framework. Health Promotion Practice. 2012;13(2):190–197.

  119. 119.

    Fortney J, Enderle M, McDougall S, et al. Implementation outcomes of evidence-based quality improvement for depression in VA community based outpatient clinics. Implement Sci. 2012;7(1):30.

  120. 120.

    Goode AD, Owen N, Reeves MM, Eakin EG. Translation from research to practice: community dissemination of a telephone-delivered physical activity and dietary behavior change intervention. American Journal of Health Promotion. 2012;26(4):253–259.

  121. 121.

    Gordon P, Camhi E, Hesse R, et al. Processes and outcomes of developing a continuity of care document for use as a personal health record by people living with HIV/AIDS in New York City. International journal of Medical Informatics. 2012;81(10):e63–e73.

  122. 122.

    Graffy J, Goodhart C, Sennett K, Kamusiime G, Tukamushaba H. Young people’s perspectives on the adoption of preventive measures for HIV/AIDS, malaria and family planning in South-West Uganda: focus group study. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):1022.

  123. 123.

    Hanson LC, Armstrong TD, Green MA, et al. Circles of care development and initial evaluation of a peer support model for African Americans with advanced cancer. Health Education & Behavior. 2012:1090198112461252.

  124. 124.

    Jenkinson KA, Naughton G, Benson AC. The GLAMA (Girls! Lead! Achieve! Mentor! Activate!) physical activity and peer leadership intervention pilot project: a process evaluation using the RE-AIM framework. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):55.

  125. 125.

    Johnson JA, Al Sayah F, Wozniak L, et al. Controlled trial of a collaborative primary care team model for patients with diabetes and depression: rationale and design for a comprehensive evaluation. BMC Health Services Research. 2012;12(1):258.

  126. 126.

    Lakerveld J, Brug J, Bot S, et al. Sustainable prevention of obesity through integrated strategies: The SPOTLIGHT project’s conceptual framework and design. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):793.

  127. 127.

    Leveille SG, Walker J, Ralston JD, Ross SE, Elmore JG, Delbanco T. Evaluating the impact of patients’ online access to doctors’ visit notes: designing and executing the OpenNotes project. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2012;12(1):32.

  128. 128.

    Meyer C, Ulbricht S, Gross B, et al. Adoption, reach and effectiveness of computer-based, practitioner delivered and combined smoking interventions in general medical practices: a three-arm cluster randomized trial. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2012;121(1):124–132.

  129. 129.

    Mignogna J, A Cully J. Depression and anxiety in patients with COPD: a focus on psychological treatments in ambulatory care settings. Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews. 2012;8(2):137–144.

  130. 130.

    Nigg C, Geller K, Adams P, Hamada M, Hwang P, Chung R. Successful dissemination of Fun 5—a physical activity and nutrition program for children. Translational Behavioral Medicine. 2012;2(3):276–285.

  131. 131.

    Peels DA, van Stralen MM, Bolman C, et al. Development of Web-based computer-tailored advice to promote physical activity among people older than 50 years. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2012;14(2).

  132. 132.

    Poulos RG, Donaldson A. Is sports safety policy being translated into practice: what can be learnt from the Australian rugby union Mayday procedure? British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2012;46(8):585–590.

  133. 133.

    Rao J, Anderson L. Examining external validity in efficacy and secondary articles of home-based depression care management interventions for older adults. Preventing Chronic Disease. 2012;9:e172.

  134. 134.

    Samuel-Hodge CD, Garcia BA, Johnston LF, et al. Rationale, design, and sample characteristics of a practical randomized trial to assess a weight loss intervention for low-income women: the Weight-Wise II Program. Contemporary Clinical Trials. 2012;33(1):93–103.

  135. 135.

    Stevens AB, Smith ER, Trickett LR, McGhee R. Implementing an evidence-based caregiver intervention within an integrated healthcare system. Translational Behavioral Medicine. 2012;2(2):218–227.

  136. 136.

    Thomson HJ, Thomas S. External validity in healthy public policy: application of the RE-AIM tool to the field of housing improvement. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):633.

  137. 137.

    Toobert DJ, Glasgow RE, Strycker LA, Barrera Jr M, King DK. Adapting and RE-AIMing a heart disease prevention program for older women with diabetes. Translational Behavioral Medicine. 2012;2(2):180–187.

  138. 138.

    Wozniak L, Rees S, Soprovich A, et al. Applying the RE-AIM framework to the Alberta’s Caring for Diabetes Project: a protocol for a comprehensive evaluation of primary care quality improvement interventions. BMJ Open. 2012;2(5):e002099.

  139. 139.

    Young J, Gilwee J, Holman M, Messier R, Kelly M, Kessler R. Mental health, substance abuse, and health behavior intervention as part of the patient-centered medical home: a case study. Translational Behavioral Medicine. 2012;2(3):345–354.

  140. 140.

    Andrews JO, Cox MJ, Newman SD, et al. Training partnership dyads for community-based participatory research strategies and lessons learned from the community engaged scholars program. Health Promotion Practice. 2013;14(4):524–533.

  141. 141.

    Carlfjord S, Lindberg M, Andersson A. Sustained use of a tool for lifestyle intervention implemented in primary health care: a 2-year follow-up. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2013;19(2):327–334.

  142. 142.

    Cook PF, Richardson G, Wilson A. Motivational interviewing training to promote Head Start children’s adherence to oral health care recommendations: results of a program evaluation. Journal of Public Health Dentistry. 2013;73(2):147–150.

  143. 143.

    Kastirke N, John U, Goeze C, Sannemann J, Ulbricht S. Reaching families at their homes for an intervention to reduce tobacco smoke exposure among infants. Journal of Community Health. 2013;38(2):215–220.

  144. 144.

    Dunton GF, Liao Y, Grana R, et al. State-wide dissemination of a school-based nutrition education programme: a RE-AIM (reach, efficacy, adoption, implementation, maintenance) analysis. Public Health Nutrition. 2014;17(02):422–430.

Note: references 140–144 are of later or updated versions of publications available in 2012.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shoup, J.A., Gaglio, B., Varda, D. et al. Network analysis of RE-AIM framework: chronology of the field and the connectivity of its contributors. Behav. Med. Pract. Policy Res. 5, 216–232 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-014-0300-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-014-0300-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation