ABSTRACT
Adherence to prescribed medications continues to be a problem in the treatment of chronic disease. Motivational interviewing (MI) has been shown to be successful for eliciting patients’ motivations to change their medication-taking behaviors. Due to the constraints of the US healthcare system, patients do not always have in-person access to providers. Because of this, there is increasing use of non-traditional healthcare delivery methods such as telephonic counseling. A systematic review was conducted among published studies of telephone-based MI interventions aimed at improving the health behavior change target of medication adherence. The goals of this review were to (1) examine and describe evidence and gaps in the literature for telephonically delivered MI interventions for medication adherence and (2) discuss the implications of the findings for research and practice. The MEDLINE, CINAHL, psycINFO, psycARTICLES, Academic Search Premier, Alt HealthWatch, Health Source: Consumer Edition, and Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition databases were searched for peer-reviewed research publications between 1991 and October 2012. A total of nine articles were retained for review. The quality of the studies and the interventions varied significantly, which precluded making definitive conclusions but findings among a majority of retained studies suggest that telephone-based MI may help improve medication adherence. The included studies provided promising results and justification for continued exploration in the provision of MI via telephone encounters. Future research is needed to address gaps in the current literature but the results suggest that MI may be an efficient option for healthcare professionals seeking an evidence-based method to reach remote or inaccessible patients to help them improve their medication adherence.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
World Health Organization, Sabaté E. Adherence to long-term therapies: Evidence for action. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003.
Braddock CH 3rd, Snyder L. The doctor will see you shortly. The ethical significance of time for the patient-physician relationship. J Gen Intern Med. 2005; 20(11): 1057-1062.
Dugdale DC, Epstein R, Pantilat SZ. Time and the patient-physician relationship. J Gen Intern Med. 1999; 14(Suppl 1): S34-S40.
Kavookjian J. Motivational interviewing. In: Richardson M, Chant C, Chessman KH, Finks SW, Hemstreet BA, Hume AL, eds. Pharmacotherapy self-assessment program, vol. 8. 7th ed. Lenexa, KS: American College of Clinical Pharmacy; 2011: 1-18.
Rollnick S, Miller WR, Butler C. Motivational interviewing in health care: Helping patients change behavior. New York: Guilford Press; 2008.
Hill S, Kavookjian J. Motivational interviewing as a behavioral intervention to increase HAART adherence in patients who are HIV+: a systematic review of the literature. AIDS Care. 2012; 24(5): 583-592.
Possidente CJ, Bucci KK, McClain WJ. Motivational interviewing: a tool to increase medication adherence. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2005; 62: 1311-1314.
Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing: Preparing people for change. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2002.
Britt E, Hudson SM, Blampied NM. Motivational interviewing in health settings: a review. Patient Educ Couns. 2004; 53(2): 147-155.
Reese RJ, Conoley CW, Brossart BF. Effectiveness of telephone counseling: a field-based investigation. J Couns Psychol. 2002; 49(2): 233-242.
Swartz SH, Cowan TM, Klayman JE, Welton MBT, Leonard BA. Use and effectiveness of tobacco telephone counseling and nicotine therapy in Maine. Am J Prev Med. 2005; 29: 288-294.
Zhu SH, Anderson CM, Tedeschi GJ, et al. Evidence of real-world effectiveness of a telephone quitline for smokers. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347(14): 1087-1093.
Stoddard AM, Fox SA, Costanza ME, et al. Effectiveness of telephone counseling for mammography: Results from five randomized trials. Prev Med. 2002; 34(1): 90-99.
Kolt GS, Schofield GM, Kerse N, Garrett N, Oliver M. Effect of telephone counseling on physical activity for low‐active older people in primary care: a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007; 55(7): 986-992.
Higgins JPT, Green S, Cochrane Collaboration. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Chichester, England; Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell; 2011.
Cook PF, Emiliozzi S, McCabe MM. Telephone counseling to improve osteoporosis treatment adherence: an effectiveness study in community practice settings. Am J Med Qual. 2007; 22(6): 445-456.
Cook PF, Emiliozzi S, Waters C, El Hajj D. Effects of telephone counseling on antipsychotic adherence and emergency department utilization. Am J Manage Care. 2008; 14(12): 841-846.
Cook PF, McCabe MM, Emiliozzi S, Pointer L. Telephone nurse counseling improves HIV medication adherence: an effectiveness study. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2009; 20(4): 316-325.
Cook PF, Emiliozzi S, El-Hajj D, McCabe MM. Telephone nurse counseling for medication adherence in ulcerative colitis: a preliminary study. Patient Educ Couns. 2010; 81(2): 182-186.
Berger BA, Liang H, Hudmon KS. Evaluation of software-based telephone counseling to enhance medication persistency among patients with multiple sclerosis. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2005; 45(4): 466-472.
Lawrence DB, Allison W, Chen JC, Demand M. Improving medication adherence with a targeted, technology-driven disease management intervention. Dis Manag. 2008; 11(3): 141-144.
Solomon DH, Iversen MD, Avorn J, et al. Osteoporosis telephonic intervention to improve medication regimen adherence: a large, pragmatic, randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 2012; 172(6): 477-483.
Williams A, Manias E, Walker R, Gorelik A. A multifactorial intervention to improve blood pressure control in co-existing diabetes and kidney disease: a feasibility randomized controlled trial. J Adv Nurs. 2012; 68(11): 2515-2525.
Konkle-Parker DJ, Erlen JA, Dubbert PM, May W. Pilot testing of an HIV medication adherence intervention in a public clinic in the Deep South. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2012; 24(8): 488-498.
Madson MB, Loignon AC, Lane C. Training in motivational interviewing: a systematic review. J Subst Abus Treat. 2009; 36(1): 101-109.
Lange I, Campos S, Urrutia M, et al. Effect of a tele-care model on self-management and metabolic control among patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care centers in Santiago, Chile. Rev Med Chil. 2010; 138(6): 729-737.
Conflict of Interest
All authors of this manuscript declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Implications
Practice: Motivational interviewing may be effective at increasing adherence to medication regimens when provided telephonically.
Policy: Research funding for interventions that have the ability to reach populations that do not have access to in-person providers is crucial to improve patient and public health.
Research: Future research should describe the motivational interviewing training that providers received, how treatment fidelity was evaluated throughout the study, and employ rigorous study designs that utilize health plan or pharmacy claims data to assess medication adherence among the chronically ill across specific diseases or conditions.
About this article
Cite this article
Teeter, B.S., Kavookjian, J. Telephone-based motivational interviewing for medication adherence: a systematic review. Behav. Med. Pract. Policy Res. 4, 372–381 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-014-0270-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-014-0270-3