Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Behavioral health referrals and treatment initiation rates in integrated primary care: a Collaborative Care Research Network study

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Translational Behavioral Medicine

ABSTRACT

Although the benefits of integrating behavioral health (BH) services into primary care are well established (World Health Organization and World Organization of Family Doctors, 2012; Chiles et al. in Clin Psychol–Sci Pr 6:204–220, 1999; Cummings 1997; O’Donohue et al. 2003; Olfson et al. in Health Aff 18:79–93, 1999; Katon et al. in Ann Intern Med 124:917–925, 2001; Simon et al. in Arch Gen Psychiatry 52:850–856, 1995; Anderson et al. in Diabetes Care 24:1069–1078, 2001; Ciechanowski et al. in Arch Intern Med 160:3278–3285, 2000; Egede et al. in Diabetes Care 25:464–470, 2002), research has focused primarily on describing the types of interventions behavioral health providers (BHPs) employ rather than on reasons for referral, treatment initiation rates, or the patient characteristics that may impact them. This study presents the results of a multisite card study organized by The Collaborative Care Research Network, a subnetwork of the American Academy of Family Physicians’ National Research Network devoted to conducting practice-based research focused on the provision of BH and health behavior services within primary care practices. The goals of the study included: (1) identifying the characteristics of patients referred for BH services; (2) codifying reasons for referral and whether patients were treated for the referral; (3) exploring any differences between patients who initiated BH contact and those who did not; and (4) assessing the types and frequency of BH services provided to patients who attended at least one appointment. Of the 200 patients referred to a BHP, 81 % had an initial contact, 71 % of which occurred on the same day. Men and women were equally likely to engage with a BHP although the time between appointments varied by gender. Depression and anxiety were the primary reasons for referral. Practice-based research is a viable strategy for advancing the knowledge about integrated primary care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig 1
Fig 2
Fig 3
Fig 4
Fig 5

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. World Health Organization and World Organization of Family Doctors. Integrating mental health into primary care: a global perspective. Geneva: World Health Organization. Available at http://www.who.int/mental_health/policy/Integratingmhintoprimarycare2008_lastversion.pdf. Accessed January 26, 2012

  2. Chiles JA, Lambert MJ, Hatch AL. The impact of psychological interventions on medical cost offset: a meta-analytic review. Clin Psychol–Sci Pr. 1999;6:204-220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cummings NA. Behavioral health in primary care: dollars and sense. In: Cummings NA, Johnston JN, Cummings J, eds. Behavioral Health in Primary Care: A Guide for Clinical Integration. Madison, CT: Psychosocial Press; 1997:3-21.

    Google Scholar 

  4. O’Donohue WT, Cummings NA, Ferguson KE. Clinical integration: the promise and the path. In: Cummings NA, O’Donohue WT, Ferguson KE, eds. Behavioral Health as Primary Care: Beyond Efficacy to Effectiveness. Reno, NV: Context; 2003:15-30.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Olfson M, Sing M, Slesinger HJ. Mental health/medical cost care offsets: opportunities for managed care. Health Aff. 1999;18:79-93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Katon WJ, Sullivan M, Walker E. Medical symptoms without identified pathology: relationship to psychiatric disorders, childhood and adult trauma, and personality traits. Ann Intern Med. 2001;124:917-925.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Simon GE, VonKorff M, Barlow W. Health care costs of primary care patients with recognized depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1995;52:850-856.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Anderson RJ, Freedland KE, Clouse RE, Lustman PJ. The prevalence of comorbid depression in adults with diabetes: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:1069-1078.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ciechanowski PS, Katon WJ, Russo JE. Depression and diabetes: impact of depressive symptoms on adherence, function, and costs. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:3278-3285.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Egede LE, Zheng D, Simpson K. Comorbid depression is associated with increased health care use and expenditures in individuals with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:464-470.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cwikel J, Zibler N, Feinson M, Lerner Y. Prevalence and risk factors of threshold and sub-threshold psychiatric disorders in primary care. Soc Psych Psych Epid. 2008;43(3):184-191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. VandenBos G, DeLeon P. The use of psychotherapy to improve physical health. Psychother Theor Res Pract Train. 1988;25(3):335-343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. McGinnis JM, Foege WH. Actual causes of death in the United States. J Am Med Assoc. 1993;270(18):2207-2212.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mokdad AH, Marks JS, Stroup DF, Gerberding JL. Actual causes of death in the United States. J Am Med Assoc. 2004;291:1238-1245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Blount A. Integrated primary care: organizing the evidence. Fam Syst Health. 2003;21:121-133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Doherty WJ, McDaniel SH, Baird MA. Five levels of primary care/behavioral healthcare collaboration. Behav Healthc Tomorrow. 1996;5:25-27.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. 2001. Available at http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=10027. Accessed January 26, 2012.

  18. Institute of Medicine. Improving the quality of health care for mental and substance-use conditions: quality chasm series. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. 2006. Available at http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11470#toc. Accessed January 26, 2012.

  19. Pincus HA. The future of behavioral health and primary care: drowning in the mainstream or left on the bank? Psychosomatics. 2003;44:1-11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Transforming mental health care in America: the federal action agenda: first steps. 2006. Available at http://www.samhsa.gov/Federalactionagenda/NFC_execsum.aspx. Accessed January 26, 2012.

  21. Beardsley RS, Gardocki GJ, Larson DB, Hidalgo J. Prescribing of psychotropic medication by primary care physicians and psychiatrists. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1988;45:1117-1119.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. deGruy FV. Mental health care in the primary care setting. In: Donaldson MS, Yordy KD, Lohr KN, Vanselow NA, eds. Primary Care: America’s Health in a New Era. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 1996:285-311.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fries JF, Koop CE, Beadle CE, Cooper PP, England MJ, Greaves RF, et al. Reducing health care costs by reducing the need and demand for medical services: the Health Project Consortium. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:321-325.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Goldman HH, Rye P, Sirovatka P. A report of the surgeon general. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Petterson SM, Phillips RL, Bazemore AW, Dodoo MS, Zhang X, Green LA. Why there must be room for mental health in the medical home. 2008. Available at www.aafp.org/afp. Accessed January 26, 2012.

  26. Regier D, Narrow W, Rae D, Manderscheid R, Locke B, Goodwin F. The de facto US mental and addictive services system: epidemiologic catchment area prospective 1-year prevalence rates of disorders and services. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1993;50:85-94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Robins LN, Regier DA, eds. Psychiatric Disorders in America: The Epidemiologic Catchment Area Study. New York, NY: The Free Press; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wang PS, Lane M, Olfson M, Pincus HA, Wells KB, Kessler RC. Twelve-month use of mental health services in the United States: results from the national comorbidity survey replication. Arch Gen Psych. 2005;62:629-640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang PS, Demler O, Olfson M, Pincus HA, Wells KB, Kessler RC. Changing profiles of service sectors used for mental health care in the United States. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163:1187-1198.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wagner EH, Austin BT, Davis C, Hindmarsh M, Schaefer J, Bonomi A. Improving chronic illness care: translating evidence into action. Health Aff. 2001;20(6):64-78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Pincus HA, Hough L, Houtsinger JK, Rollman BL, Frank RG. Emerging models of depression care; multi-level (6P) strategies. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2003;12:54-63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kessler R, Stafford D. Primary care is the de facto mental health system. In: Kessler R, Stafford D, eds. Collaborative Medicine Case Studies: Evidence in Practice. New York, NY: Springer; 2008:9-21.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Internal Aesculapius Medical Center document 2009.

  34. Cunningham PJ. Beyond parity: a primary care physicians’ perspectives on access to mental health care. Health Aff. 2009;28(3):w490-w501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Williams J, Palmes G, Kurt K, Pulley A, Meschan JF. Referral by pediatricians of children with behavioral health disorders. Clin Pediatr. 2005;44:343-349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Scholle SH, Haskett RF, Hanusa BH, Pincus HA, Kupfer DJ. Addressing depression in obstetrics/gynecology practice. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2003;25:83-90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kessler R. Mental health care treatment initiation when mental health services are incorporated into primary care practice. J Am Board Fam Med. 2012;25(2):255-259.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Auxier PhD.

Additional information

Implications

Practice: In order to maximize the chances of higher rates of behavioral health treatment initiation than what is commonly achieved through referrals to specialty mental health care, primary care practices should integrate on-site behavioral health services.

Policy: Resources should be directed toward the further development of policies that facilitate the provision of behavioral health services to patients in primary care.

Research: Card study methodology can be effectively implemented across different kinds of integrated primary care practices to assess patient variables associated with behavioral health treatment initiation.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

figure a

About this article

Cite this article

Auxier, A., Runyan, C., Mullin, D. et al. Behavioral health referrals and treatment initiation rates in integrated primary care: a Collaborative Care Research Network study. Behav. Med. Pract. Policy Res. 2, 337–344 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-012-0141-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-012-0141-8

KEYWORDS

Navigation