Abstract
Pump-and-treat (P&T) is a widely-adopted solution for the containment of solute plumes in contaminated aquifers. A cost-effective design of P&T systems requires optimizing (minimizing) the overall pumping rates (Q). This optimization is a stochastic process, as Q is a random variable linked to the randomness of the aquifer hydraulic conductivity (K). Previously presented stochastic approaches to minimize Q adopted two-dimensional (2D) Gaussian random spatial fields (r.s.f.) of log-transformed K. Recent studies based on geological entropy have demonstrated the limited ability of Gaussian r.s.f. to reproduce extreme K patterns, which mostly control transport in heterogeneous aquifers, when compared to non-Gaussian r.s.f. Moreover, 2D models generate different flow and transport connectivity than three-dimensional (3D) models. On these premises, this work aimed at extending previous works on P&T optimization in heterogeneous aquifers through Monte-Carlo groundwater simulations of 2D and 3D Gaussian and non-Gaussian r.s.f. The results indicated that the mean (\( \bar{Q}_{n} \)) and variance (\( \sigma_{Qn}^{2} \)) of the optimal Q distribution depend strictly on the chosen model dimensionality and r.s.f. generator. In particular, 2D models and models embedding indicator-based (i.e. non-Gaussian) r.s.f. tended to generate higher \( \bar{Q}_{n} \) and \( \sigma_{Qn}^{2} \) than 3D models with increasing number of model layers (KL) and Gaussian models. This behavior can be explained considering the spatial ordering of K clusters in the simulated aquifers, which is measured through metrics derived from the concept of geological entropy. It was found that 2D models and models embedding non-Gaussian r.s.f. displayed more spatially-persistent ordered K structures than 3D models and Gaussian models, resulting in higher \( \bar{Q}_{n} \) and \( \sigma_{Qn}^{2} \). This is attributed to the relative amount of heterogeneity sampled by the solute source and the increased likelihood of more ordered K clusters to generate preferential flow and solute transport channeling than more disordered and chaotic systems, which enhance solute mixing. Combining P&T with physical barriers (i.e. cut-off walls) was helpful to reduce both \( \bar{Q}_{n} \) and \( \sigma_{Qn}^{2} \) in all tested scenarios, corroborating previous findings. However, the relative efficacy of a specific physical barrier geometry to reduce \( \bar{Q}_{n} \) and \( \sigma_{Qn}^{2} \) also depends on the chosen model dimensionality and r.s.f. generator.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ballio, F., Guadagnini, A.: Convergence assessment of numerical Monte Carlo simulations in groundwater hydrology. Water Resour. Res. (2004). https://doi.org/10.1029/2003WR002876
Bayer, P., Finkel, M.: Conventional and combined pump-and-treat systems under nonuniform background flow. Groundwater 44(2), 234–243 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2005.00191.x
Bayer, P., Finkel, M., Teutsch, G.: combining pump-and-treat and physical barriers for contaminant plume control. Ground Water 42(6), 856–867 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2004.t01-4-.x
Bayer, P., Finkel, M., Teutsch, G.: Cost-optimal contaminant plume management with a combination of pump-and-treat and physical barrier systems. Groundw. Monit. Remediat. 25(2), 96–106 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6592.2005.0022.x
Beretta, G.P.: Some aspects of the state of the art of contaminated sites remediation in Italy. Acque Sotterr. Ital. J. Groundw. (2015). https://doi.org/10.7343/as-107-15-0134
Berkowitz, B., Balberg, I.: Percolation theory and its application to groundwater hydrology. Water Resour. Res. 29(4), 775–794 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1029/92WR02707
Bianchi, M., Kearsey, T., Kingdon, A.: Integrating deterministic lithostratigraphic models in stochastic realizations of subsurface heterogeneity. Impact on predictions of lithology, hydraulic heads and groundwater fluxes. J. Hydrol. 531, 557–573 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.10.072
Bianchi, M., Pedretti, D.: Geological entropy and solute transport in heterogeneous porous media. Water Resour. Res. 53(6), 4691–4708 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR020195
Bianchi, M., Pedretti, D.: An entrogram-based approach to describe spatial heterogeneity with applications to solute transport in porous media. Water Resour. Res. 54(7), 4432–4448 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR022827
Carle, S.F., Fogg, G.E.: Modeling spatial variability with one and multidimensional continuous-lag Markov chains. Math. Geol. 29(7), 891–918 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022303706942
Casasso, A., Tosco, T., Bianco, C., Bucci, A., Sethi, R.: How can we make pump and treat systems more energetically sustainable? Water 12(1), 67 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/w12010067
Chilès, J.-P.: Stochastic modeling of natural fractured media: a review. In: Leuangthong, O., Deutsch, C.V. (eds.) Geostatistics Banff 2004, pp. 285–294. Springer, Dordrecht (2005)
Dagan, G.: Flow and transport in porous formations (1989)
de Barros, F.P.J.: Evaluating the combined effects of source zone mass release rates and aquifer heterogeneity on solute discharge uncertainty. Adv. Water Resour. 117, 140–150 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2018.05.010
Deutsch, C., Journel, A.: GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library and User’s Guide, p. 340. Oxford University Press, New York (1998)
Dietrich, P. (ed.): Flow and Transport in Fractured Porous Media. Springer, Berlin (2005)
Dominijanni, A., Manassero, M., Boffa, G., Puma, S.: Intrinsic and state parameters governing the efficiency of bentonite barriers for contaminant control. In: Ferrari, A., Laloui, L. (eds.) Advances in Laboratory Testing and Modelling of Soils and Shales (ATMSS), pp. 45–56. Springer, Berlin (2017)
Emery, X.: Properties and limitations of sequential indicator simulation. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 18(6), 414–424 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-004-0213-5
EPA: Cost analyses for selected groundwater cleanup projects: pump and treat systems and permeable reactive barriers. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Technical report EPA 542-R-00-013 (2001). https://www.epa.gov/remedytech/cost-analyses-selected-groundwater-cleanup-projects-pump-and-treat-systems-and-permeable
EPA: Cost-effective design of pump and treat systems. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Technical report EPA 542-R-05-008 (2005). https://semspub.epa.gov/src/document/HQ/174138
Fernàndez-Garcia, D., Illangasekare, T.H., Rajaram, H.: Differences in the scale-dependence of dispersivity estimated from temporal and spatial moments in chemically and physically heterogeneous porous media. Adv. Water Resour. 28(7), 745–759 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2004.12.011
Fiori, A., Jankovic, I.: On preferential flow, channeling and connectivity in heterogeneous porous formations. Math. Geosci. 44(2), 133–145 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-011-9365-2
Freeze, R.A.: A stochastic-conceptual analysis of one-dimensional groundwater flow in nonuniform homogeneous media. Water Resour. Res. 11(5), 725–741 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1029/WR011i005p00725
Freeze, R.A.: The role of stochastic hydrogeological modeling in real-world engineering applications. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 18(4), 286–289 (2004)
Gómez-Hernandez, J.J., Wen, X.-H.: To be or not to be multi-Gaussian? A reflection on stochastic hydrogeology. Adv. Water Resour. 21(1), 47–61 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1708(96)00031-0
Harbaugh, A. W.: A computer program for calculating subregional water budgets using results from the US Geological Survey modular three-dimensional finite-difference ground-water flow model (1990)
Harbaugh, A.W., Banta, E.R., Hill, M.C., McDonald, M.G.: MODFLOW-2000, the U.S. Geological Survey modular ground-water model – User guide to modularization concepts and the Ground-Water Flow Process. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 00-92 (2000)
Hsieh, P.A., Freckleton, J.R.: Documentation of a computer program to simulate horizontal-flow barriers using the US Geological Survey’s modular three-dimensional finite-difference ground-water flow model. US Geological Survey (1993)
Huang, L., Ritzi, R.W., Ramanathan, R.: Conservative models: parametric entropy vs. temporal entropy in outcomes. Groundwater 50(2), 199–206 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2011.00832.x
Javandel, I., Tsang, C.-F.: Capture-zone type curves: a tool for aquifer cleanup. Groundwater 24(5), 616–625 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1986.tb03710.x
Journel, A.G., Deutsch, C.V.: Entropy and spatial disorder. Math. Geol. 25(3), 329–355 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00901422
Koltermann, C.E., Gorelick, S.: Heterogeneity in sedimentary deposits: a review of structure-imitating, process-imitating, and descriptive approaches. Water Resour. Res. 32(9), 2617–2658 (1996)
Kreitler, C.W.: Hydrogeology of sedimentary basins. J. Hydrol. 106(1–2), 29–53 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(89)90165-0
Kuppusamy, S., Palanisami, T., Megharaj, M., Venkateswarlu, K., Naidu, R.: In-situ remediation approaches for the management of contaminated sites: a comprehensive overview. In: de Voogt, P. (ed.) Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, vol. 236, pp. 1–115. Springer, Cham (2016)
Mackay, D.M., Cherry, J.A.: Groundwater contamination: pump-and-treat remediation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 23(6), 630–636 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1021/es00064a001
Mays, D.C., Faybishenko, B.A., Finsterle, S.: Information entropy to measure temporal and spatial complexity of unsaturated flow in heterogeneous media. Water Resources Research 38(12), 5 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1029/2001WR001185
McDonald, M.G., Harbaugh, A.W.: A modular three-dimensional finite-difference ground-water flow model. US Geological Survey (1988)
Pedretti, D., Bianchi, M.: Preliminary results from the use of entrograms to describe transport in fractured media. Acque Sotterr. Ital. J. Groundw. (2019). https://doi.org/10.7343/as-2019-421
Pedretti, D., Fernàndez-Garcia, D., Bolster, D., Sanchez-Vila, X.: On the formation of breakthrough curves tailing during convergent flow tracer tests in three-dimensional heterogeneous aquifers. Water Resour. Res. 49(7), 4157–4173 (2013a). https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20330
Pedretti, D., Masetti, M., Beretta, G.P., Vitiello, M.: A revised conceptual model to reproduce the distribution of chlorinated solvents in the Rho Aquifer (Italy). Groundw. Monit. Remediat. 33(3), 69–77 (2013b). https://doi.org/10.1111/gwmr.12017
Pedretti, D., Fernàndez-Garcia, D., Sanchez-Vila, X., Bolster, D., Benson, D.A.: Apparent directional mass-transfer capacity coefficients in three-dimensional anisotropic heterogeneous aquifers under radial convergent transport. Water Resour. Res. 50(2), 1205–1224 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014578
Pedretti, D., Russian, A., Sanchez-Vila, X., Dentz, M.: Scale dependence of the hydraulic properties of a fractured aquifer estimated using transfer functions. Water Resour. Res. 52(7), 5008–5024 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR018660
Pedretti, D., Masetti, M., Beretta, G.P.: Stochastic analysis of the efficiency of coupled hydraulic-physical barriers to contain solute plumes in highly heterogeneous aquifers. Journal of Hydrology 553(Supplement C), 805–815 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.08.051
Pedretti, D., Luoma, S., Ruskeeniemi, T., Backman, B.: A geologically-based approach to map arsenic risk in crystalline aquifers: analysis of the Tampere region, Finland. Geosci. Front. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2018.12.004
Pedretti, D., Mayer, U., Beckie, R.D.: Controls of uncertainty in acid rock drainage predictions from waste rock piles examined through Monte-Carlo multicomponent reactive transport. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-019-01756-1
Pham, T.D.: GeoEntropy: a measure of complexity and similarity. Pattern Recogn. 43(3), 887–896 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2009.08.015
Pham, T.D., Yan, H.: Spatial-dependence recurrence sample entropy. Phys. A 494, 581–590 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2017.12.015
Pollock, D. W.: User’s Guide for: MODPATH/MODPATH-PLOT, Version 3: A particle tracking post-processing package for MODFLOW, the U.S. Geological Survey finite-difference ground-water flow model, Documentation of MODPATH. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 94-464, 6 ch (1994)
Remy, N., Boucher, A., Wu, J.: Applied Geostatistics with SGeMS. A User’s Guide. Cambridge University Press, New York (2009)
Rolle, E., Beretta, G.P., Majone, M., Pedretti, D., Petrangeli Papini, M., Raffaelli, L.: Analisi delle alternative tecnologiche per il contenimento della contaminazione di acque sotterranee. In: Paper presented at the Reindustrializzazione di siti industriali inquinati e tecnologie di intervento sulle acque sotterranee e sui sedimenti. Ministry of Economic Development, Rome, Italy (2009)
Rubin, Y., Cushey, M.A., Bellin, A.: Modeling of transport in groundwater for environmental risk assessment. Stoch. Hydrol. Hydraul. 8(1), 57–77 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01581390
Sanchez-Vila, X., Guadagnini, A., Carrera, J.: Representative hydraulic conductivities in saturated groundwater flow. Rev. Geophys. (2006). https://doi.org/10.1029/2005RG000169
Sartore, L., Fabbri, P., Gaetan, C.: spMC: an R-package for 3D lithological reconstructions based on spatial Markov chains. Comput. Geosci. 94, 40–47 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2016.06.001
Scheibe, T.: Characterization of the spatial structuring of natural porous media and its impacts on subsurface flow and transport. Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford, US, Stanford University (1993)
Scheibe, T.D., Freyberg, D.L.: Use of sedimentological information for geometric simulation of natural porous media structure. Water Resour. Res. 31(12), 3259–3270 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1029/95WR02570
Shannon, C.E.: A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27(3), 379–423 (1948)
Silliman, S.E.: The importance of the third dimension on transport through saturated porous media: case study based on transport of particles. J. Hydrol. 179(1), 181–195 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(95)02838-2
Soares, A.: Sequential indicator simulation with correction for local probabilities. Math. Geol. 30(6), 761–765 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022451504120
Strebelle, S.: Conditional simulation of complex geological structures using multiple-point statistics. Math. Geol. 34(1), 1–21 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014009426274
Tartakovsky, D.M.: Assessment and management of risk in subsurface hydrology: a review and perspective. Adv. Water Resour. 51, 247–260 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.04.007
Truex, M.J., Johnson, C.D., Becker, D.J., Lee, M.H., Nimmons, M.J.: Performance assessment for pump-and-treat closure or transition. Document PNNL-24696. Pacific Northwest National Lab (PNNL), Richland, WA, USA (2015)
Wang, M., Zheng, C.: Optimal remediation policy selection under general conditions. Groundwater 35(5), 757–764 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1997.tb00144.x
Yang, Y.-L., Reddy, K.R., Zhang, W.-J., Fan, R.-D., Du, Y.-J.: SHMP-amended ca-bentonite/sand backfill barrier for containment of lead contamination in groundwater. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17(1), 370 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010370
Zinn, B., Harvey, C.F.: When good statistical models of aquifer heterogeneity go bad: a comparison of flow, dispersion, and mass transfer in connected and multivariate Gaussian hydraulic conductivity fields: flow, dispersion, and mass transfer. Water Resour. Res. (2003). https://doi.org/10.1029/2001WR001146
Acknowledgements
The author acknowledges two anonymous reviewers whose comments raised the quality of this paper, and Dr Marco Bianchi for the initial discussion on the manuscript content. All data generated from this work, including algorithms to run the stochastic fields and the MC simulations, can be requested to the author.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pedretti, D. Heterogeneity-controlled uncertain optimization of pump-and-treat systems explained through geological entropy. Int J Geomath 11, 22 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13137-020-00158-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13137-020-00158-8
Keywords
- Aquifer heterogeneity
- Solute plume containment
- Pump-and-treat
- Stochastic modeling
- Geological entropy
- Cost-effective analysis