Abstract
The authors of the article discuss the formation and functioning of technology platforms as a tool for scientific and technological innovation development at the local and global levels of the economic space. In the context of the innovation triple helix concept, the authors of the article define a technology platform as a special type of business model and mechanism for organizing the innovation process, based on the system of innovations inherent in a specific, relatively stable network that unites representatives of the state, business, science, and education around a common vision of scientific and technical development and general approaches to the development of new innovative technologies. The article presents the organizational network structure of a technology platform, considers the processes of the dynamic development of a technology platform in the context of cyclical economic processes, reveals the relationship between the growth of intellectual and innovative potential with the change of technological structures, and proposes conceptual and formalized economic and mathematical models of the coordinated development of the technology platform and its sub-platforms.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akberdina, V. V., Tyulin, A. E., Chursin, A. A., & Yudin, A. V. (2020). Influence of cross-industry information innovations of the space industry on the economic growth of the Russian regions. Econoyemy of Region., 16(1), 228–241.
Alexander, M. (2002) The Kondratiev Cycle: A generational interpretation. iUniverse.
Baniak, A., & Dubina, I. (2012). Innovation analysis and game theory: A review. Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice, 14(2), 178–191.
Carayannis, E. and Campbell, D. (2009) Mode 3” and “Quadruple Helix”: Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem, International journal of technology management, 46(3-4): 201-234.
Carayannis, E., & Dubina. (2014). Thinking beyond the box: Game-theoretic and living lab approaches to innovation policy and practice improvement. Journal of the Knowledge Economy., 5(3), 427–439.
Carayannis, E. G., Barth, T. D., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2012). The quintuple helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1(2), 1–12.
Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Chesbrough, H., & Bogers, M. (2014). Explicating open innovation: Clarifying an emerging paradigm for understanding innovation. In H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke, & J. West (Eds.), New Frontiers in Open Innovation (pp. 3–28). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chursin, A.A., Shevchenko, V.V. (2017) About the possibilities of operational gaming scenario modeling activities of enterprises and corporations. Proceedings of 2017 10th International Conference Management of Large-Scale System Development, MLSD 2017. 8109609
Chursin, A., & Tyulin, A. (2018). Competence management and competitive product development: Concept and implications for practice. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Chursin, A., Vlasov, Y., & Makarov, Y. (2016). Innovation as a basis for competitiveness: Theory and practice. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
Dubina, I. N. (2011). Foreign investigations in the field of game-theoretic analysis of innovations. Automation and Remote Control., 72(8), 1753–1765.
Dubina, I. N. (2015). Game theory and business simulation game approaches to innovation ecosystem analysis. International Journal of Arts and Sciences, 08(04), 45–56.
Dubina, I. N., Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2012). Creativity economy and a crisis of the economy? Coevolution of knowledge, innovation, and creativity, and of the knowledge economy and knowledge society. Journal of the Knowledge Economy., 3(1), 1–24.
Dubina, I. N., Campbell, D. F. J., Carayannis, E. G., Chub, A. A., Grigoroudis, E., & Kozhevina, O. V. (2017). The balanced development of the spatial innovation and entrepreneurial ecosystem based on principles of the systems compromise: A conceptual framework. Journal of the Knowledge Economy., 8(2), 438–455.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The triple helix: University - industry - government relations a laboratory for knowledge based economic development. EASST Review, 14(1), 14–19.
Hahn, T. (2015) Cross-industry innovation processes: Strategic implications for telecommunication companies. Berlin: Springer\Gabler Verlag
Karash Yu. (2013) Will help the “second-order” space technologies to Russia? Voice of America. http://inosmi.ru/russia/20130203/205426700.html#ixzz3nIKkjet (retrieved 11.08.2020) (in Russian),
Khalturina, D. A., & Korotaev, A. V. (Eds.). (2009). System monitoring: Global and regional development. Moscow: URSS (in Russian).
Kondratieff, N. D. (2014). The long waves in economic life (2014 Reprint of 1935 English Translation). Martino Fine Books.
Kühnle, A. (2015) Cross industry innovation – A modern way to get innovations. Social Media Balloon. https://socialmediaballoon.de/cross-industry-innovation/6792 (retrieved 15.08.2020)
Park, H. W. (2014). Transition from the triple helix to N-tuple helices? An interview with Elias G. Carayannis and David F. J. Campbell. Scientometrics, 99, 203–207.
Ranga, M., & Etzkowitz, H. (2013). Triple helix systems: analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the Knowledge Society. Industry and Higher Education, 27(4), 237–262.
Tyulin, A., & Chursin, A. (2020). The new economy of the product life cycle: Innovation and design in the digital era. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
Tyulin, A.E., Chursin, A.A., Yudin, A.V., Grosheva, P.Y. (2019) Mathematical substantiation of the law on managing the company’s advanced development. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems. 11(11 Special Issue), p. 109-115
Vlasov, Y. V., & Chursin, A. A. (2016). Management of diversification system in aerospace industry. Economy of Region., 12(4), 1205–1217.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chursin, A.A., Dubina, I.N., Carayannis, E.G. et al. Technological Platforms as a Tool for Creating Radical Innovations. J Knowl Econ 13, 264–275 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-020-00715-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-020-00715-4