Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Academic Entrepreneurship in Post-transition Country—Case Study of Croatia

  • Published:
Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Entering the European Union, Croatian universities have become a part of the big European market and society. Croatia as one of the newest EU members has been facing many challenges, and one of them has been the development of the higher education sector. In this paper, we aim to explore the possibilities for academic entrepreneurship in Croatia and investigate the barriers which hinder university-industry collaboration. The study adopted the qualitative case study approach, and it was conducted through in-depth interviews with respondents from the Technology Transfer Office (TTO) at the University of Split. Research results indicate that Croatia is only beginning to develop its academic entrepreneurship, having only a short history of entrepreneurship education at all levels of education. Furthermore, supporting institutions for university-industry collaboration, such as the surveyed TTO, were established only in the last decade and most of the potential partners from academia and industry are still not familiar with different possibilities of the collaboration. Our study also shows that specific contextual factors, such as high bureaucracy and administrative barriers, act as inhibiting factors to further development of academic entrepreneurship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Both of our respondents are full time employees of the Technology Transfer Office (TTO) at the University of Split, who performe some other roles at the same time.

References

  • Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (1991). Innovation and size at the firm level. South Econ J, 57(3), 739–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. E., & Fiol, C. M. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Acad Manag J, 19(4), 645–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D., & Thurik, R. (2001). What’s new about the new economy? Sources of growth in the managed and entrepreneurial economies. Ind Corp Chang, 10(1), 267–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D., Lehmann, E. E., & Paleari, S. (2014). Academic policy and entrepreneurship: a European perspective. J Technol Transfer, 40, 363–368. doi:10.1007/s10961-014-9359-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birly, S., & Norburn, D. (1988). The top management team and corporate performance. Strateg Manag J, 9, 225–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, R., & Kovalainen, A. (2009). Researching small firms and entrepreneurship: past, present and future. Int J Manag Rev, 11(2), 127–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruneel, J., D'Este, P., & Salter, A. (2010). Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university-industry collaboration. Res Policy, 39(7), 858–868. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, G., & Obloj, K. (2008). Entrepreneurship in emerging economies: where are we today and where should research go in future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. (1975). ‘Degree of freedom’ and the case study. Comparative Political Studies, 8(2), 178–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. (2010). Triple helix, quadruple helix and quintuple helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other? A proposed framework for a transdisciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 41–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A. C., & Dunkelburg, W. C. (1986). Entrepreneurship and paths to business ownership. Strategic Management Journal 7, 53–68.

  • D’Este, P., & Patel, P. (2007). University-industry linkages in the UK: what are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? Res Policy, 36(9), 1295–1313. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.05.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Este, P., & Perkmann, M. (2011). Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations. J Technol Transf, 36(3), 316–339. doi:10.1007/s10961-010-9153-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. F. (1985). The practice of entrepreneurship (pp. 141–188). Harper & Row, New York: Innovation and Entrepreneurship Practice and Principles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Acad Manag Rev, 14(4), 532–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H. (2001) The second academic revolution and the rise of entrepreneurial science. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, (Summer), 18–29.

  • Eurofound (2015). Youth entrepreneurship in Europe: values, attitudes, policies. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

  • Flick, U. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franicevic, V. (2003). Some considerations on post-socialist entrepreneurship. In D. Nuti & M. Uvalic (Eds.), Post-communist transition to a market economy: lessons and challenges (pp. 25–39). Roma: Longo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, W. A. (1995) Aspects of organizational emergence. BULL I., THOMAS

  • GEM (2006). Sto cini Hrvatsku poduzetnickom zemljom? Zagreb: CEPOR.

  • GEM (2015). 2014 global report. Massachusetts. Babson College.

  • Giuliani, E., Morrison, A., Pietrobelli, C., & Rabellotti, R. (2010). Who are the researchers that are collaborating with industry? An analysis of the wine sectors in Chile, South Africa and Italy. Res Policy, 39(6), 748–761. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimpe, C., & Fier, H. (2010). Informal university technology transfer: a comparison between United States and Germany. J Technol Transf, 35(6), 637–650. doi:10.1007/s10961-009-9140-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haider, S., Universidad, R., Juan C., Universidad R., and Juan C. (2012) D R&d c : I P F I+d:, 239–57.

  • Hall, B. H., Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2001). Barriers inhibiting industry from partnering with universities: evidence from the advanced technology program. J Technol Transf, 26(1), 87–98. doi:10.1023/a:1007888312792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiani Mavi, R. (2014). Indicators of entrepreneurial university: fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS approach. J Knowl Econ, 5(2), 370–387. doi:10.1007/s13132-014-0197-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klofsten, M., & Jones-Evans, D. (2000). Comparing academic entrepreneurship in Europe—the case of Sweden and Ireland. Small Bus Econ, 14(4), 299–309. doi:10.1023/A:1008184601282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornai, J. (2006). The great transformation of central and eastern Europe: success and disappointment. Economics of Transition, 14(2), 207–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwiek, M. (2012). Universities and knowledge production in central Europe. European Educational Research Journal, 11(1), 111–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lissoni, F., Llerena, P., McKelvey, M., & Sanditov, B. (2008). Academic patenting in Europe: new evidence from the KEINS database. Research Evaluation, 17(2), 87–102. doi:10.3152/095820208X287171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. (1979). Qualitative data as an attractive nuisance: the problem of analysis. Adm Sci Q, 24(4), 590–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M., and M. Huberman (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Muscio, A., & Pozzali, A. (2013). The effects of cognitive distance in university-industry collaborations: some evidence from Italian universities. J Technol Transf, 38(4), 486–508. doi:10.1007/s10961-012-9262-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norburn, D., & Birley, S. (1988). The top management team and corporate performance. Strateg Manag J, 9, 225–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OUI (Oxford University Innovation). (2014). How to set up a successful university startup incubator, no. October,1–5.

  • Perkmann, M., King, Z., & Pavelin, S. (2011). Engaging excellence? Effects of faculty quality on university engagement with industry. Research Policy Elsevier BV, 40(4), 539–552. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.01.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., Fini, R., et al. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: a review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy Elsevier BV, 42(2), 423–442. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, J. and Spencer, L. (1994) Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research by Jane Ritchie and Liz Spencer in A.Bryman and R. G. Burgess [eds.] “Analyzing qualitative data” pp. 173–194. London: Routledge.

  • Rohrbeck, R., & Heinrich, M. A. (2007). Findings in literature. ISPIM 2006 Conference - “Networks for Innovation”, 5470(5470), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohrbeck, R., & Arnold, H. M. (2009). Making university-industry collaboration work-a case study on the Deutsche Telekom Laboratories contrasted with findings in literature. Technische Universitat Berlin.

  • Sekulic, D., & Sporer, Z. (2000). Political transformation and elite transformation in Croatia. Eur Sociol Rev, 18(1), 85–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seppo, M., Rõigas, K., & Varblane, U. (2014). Governmental support measures for university-industry collaboration-comparative view of Europe. Journal of Knowledge Economy, 5(2), 388–408. doi:10.1007/s13132-014-0193-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2015). Academic entrepreneurship: time for a rethink? Br J Manag, 00(32), 1–14. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stojanov, D. (2004) Hungary and Bosnia and Herzegovina: a success and a failure of transition. Institute for World Economics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences

  • Storey, D. J. (1994) Understanding small business. Routledge, London

  • Urbano, D., & Guerrero, M. (2013). Entrepreneurial universities socioeconomic impacts of academic entrepreneurship in a European region. Economic Development Quarterly February, 27, 40–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dierdonck, V., & Debackere, K. (1988). Academic entrepreneurship at Belgian universities. R&D Manag, 18(4), 341–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, C. A. (2002). Qualitative interviewing. In J. Gubrium & J. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context and method, (pp. 83--101). Thousands Oaks, California: Sage.

  • Welter, F. (2011). Contextualizing entrepreneurship-conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 35(1), 165–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welter, F., & Smallbone, D. (2011). Institutional perspectives on entrepreneurial behavior in challenging environments. J Small Bus Manag, 49(1), 107–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, M. S. (2011). A process model of academic entrepreneurship. Business Horizons, 54(2), 153–161. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2010.11.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M. (2014). Academic entrepreneurship, technology transfer and society: where next? J Technol Transfer, 39(3), 322–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. (2007). Contextualizing theory building in entrepreneurship research. J Bus Ventur, 22(3), 443–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Economics, University of Split, Cvite Fiskovića 5, 21000, Split, Croatia

    Ivana Bilić

  2. Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, UK

    Vlatka Škokić

  3. Faculty of Economics, University of Split, Cvite Fiskovića 5, 21000, Split, Croatia

    Marina Lovrinčević

Authors
  1. Ivana Bilić
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vlatka Škokić
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marina Lovrinčević
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ivana Bilić.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bilić, I., Škokić, V. & Lovrinčević, M. Academic Entrepreneurship in Post-transition Country—Case Study of Croatia. J Knowl Econ 12, 41–55 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-017-0452-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-017-0452-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation