Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Causality Nexus between Economic Growth, Inflation and Innovation

  • Published:
Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper uses the panel vector error-correction model to explore the Granger-causality relationships between inflation, innovation and economic growth. This study covers 25 countries classified according to their firms’ extent of capacity for innovation between 1990 and 2014. The econometric analysis gave various images and very interesting results concerning the causality links between the variables in the short and long run, especially between the inflation and the two measures of innovation. Including two different innovation indicators offers a rich menu of possible causal patterns. We found that the innovation productivity is more responsive to the inflation in the most innovative countries. However, the innovation funding is more sensitive to the inflation in the less innovative countries. The originality of this study stems from three aspects: First, two measures of innovation are considered—innovation funding and innovation productivity. Second, the causality nature between the inflation and the innovation is not revealed yet in the literature. Third, using panel VEC model to discover the causality link between more than two variables in the short and long run and for two samples is an important contribution and a complicated method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1992). A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica. Econometric Society, 60(2), 323–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aghion, P. and P. Howitt. (1998). Endogenous growth theory, MIT Press.

  • Andres, J., & Hernando, I. (1997). Does inflation harm economic growth? Evidence for the OECD, NBER Working Paper no. 6062

  • Bai, J., & Ng, S. (2004). A panic attack on unit roots and cointegration. Econometrica, 72, 1127–1177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. J.. (1996a). Determinants of economic growth: a cross-country empirical study NBER Working Paper No 5698, National Bureau of Economic Reasarch 1050 Massachusetts, Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138.

  • Barro, R. (1996b). Determinants of economic growth: a cross-country empirical study. NBER Working Paper, 56(98), 22–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. (1996c). Inflation and growth. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 78, 153–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1995). Economic growth. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bravo-Ortega, C., & Martin, A. C. (2011). R&D and productivity: a two way avenue? World Development, 39(7), 1090–1107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breitung, J. (2000). The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. Advances in Econometrics, 15, 161–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange multiplier test and its application to model specifications in econometrics. Review of Economic Studies, 47, 239–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruno, M., & Easterly, W. (1998a). Inflation crises and long-run growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 41, 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruno, M., & Easterly, W. (1998b). Inflation crises and long-run growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 41, 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulent, G., & Baris Tekin, R. (2012). A panel causality analysis of the relationship among research and development, innovation, and economic growth in high-income OECD countries Eurasian. Econometric Reviews, 2(1), 32–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chimobi, O. (2010). Inflation and economic growth in Nigeria. Journal of Sustainable Development, 3(2), 44–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, I. (2001). Unit root tests for panel data. Journal of International Money and Finance, 20(2), 249–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costamagna, R (2015a). Inflation and R&D investment. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management 2015/2 (n°17)

  • Costamagna, R. (2015b). Inflation and R&D investment. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, n°, 17, 143–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czarnitzki, D & Toole, AA. (2007). Exploring the relationship between scientist human capital and firm performance: the case of biomedical academic entrepreneurs in the SBIR program, ZEW Discussion Papers 07–011.

  • Czarnitzki and Toole (2011). Patent protection, market uncertainty, and R&D investment. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(1), 147–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A. (1992a). Irreversible investment with uncertainty and scale economies. In LSE research online documents on economics 19372. London School of Economics and Political Science: LSE Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A. K. (1992b). Investment and hysteresis. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 6(No1), 107–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A. K., & Pindyck, R. S. (1994). Investment under uncertainty. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dornbusch, R., & Fischer, S. (1993). Moderate inflation. World Bank Economic Review, 7, 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, S. (1993). The role of macroeconomic factors in economic growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 32, 485–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granger, C. W. J. (1986). Developments in the study of co integrated economic variables. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 48(3), 213–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granger, C. W. J. (1988). Some recent developments in a concept of causality. Journal of Econometrics, 39(1–2), 199–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1991). Innovation and growth in the global economy. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 46, 49–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadri, K. (2000). Testing for stationarity in heterogeneous panel application. Economic Journal, 3, 148–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B. H. (2002). The financing of research and development. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18(1), 35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Himmelberg, C. P., & Petersen, B. C. (1994). R&D and internal finance: a panel study of small firms in high-tech industries. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 76, 38–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtz-Eakin, D., Newey, W., & Rosen, H. (1988). Estimating vector autoregressions with panel data. Econometrica, 56, 1371–1395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Im, K. S., Persaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115, 53–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey C (1995). "The Phillips curve is alive and well." New England Economic Review Mar.-Apr. 1995.

  • João and Margarida (2014). Does R&D matter for economic growth or vice versa? An application to Portugal and other European countries. Archives of Business Research, 2(3), 1–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S., Lim, H., & Park, D. (2013). Does productivity growth lower inflation in Korea? Applied Economics, 45(29), 2183–2190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, A., Lin, C., & Chu, C. J. (2002a). Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, A., Lin, C. F., & Chu, C. S. (2002b). Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, A., Lin, C. F., & Chu, C. (2002c). Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, R. (1997). Financial development and economic growth: views and agenda. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(2), 688–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G. S., & Wu, S. (1999a). A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61, 631–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G. S. and Wu, S. (1999b). A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test in this issue.

  • M Di Cintio and E Grassi. (2013). Uncertainty, flexible labour relations and R&D expenditure EERI research paper series. Economic and Econometrics Research Institute, No 13.

  • Moon, H. R., & Perron, B. (2004a). Testing for a unit root in panels with dynamic factors. Journal of Econometrics, 122, 81–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon, H. R., & Perron, B. (2004b). Testing for a unit root in panels with dynamic factors. Journal of Econometrics, 122, 81–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mubarik, A. (2005). Inflation and growth: an estimate of the threshold level of inflation in Pakistan. SBP- Research Bulletin, 1(1), 35–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, T. T., & Wang, K. (2010). Causality between housing returns, inflation and economic growth with endogenous breaks. Journal of Chinese Economics and Business Studies, 8(1), 95–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, S., Kearney, C., & Chowdhury, K. (1997). Inflation and economic growth: a multi-country empirical analysis. Applied Economics, 29(10), 1387–1401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedroni, P. (1997a). On the role of cross sectional dependency in dynamic panel unit root and panel cointegration exchange rate studies, Working Paper, Indiana University, November.

  • Pedroni, P. (1997b). Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests, with an application to the ppp hypothesis: new results, Working Paper, Indiana University, April.

  • Pedroni, P. (1999). Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61, 653–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedroni, P. (2000). Fully modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels. Advances in Econometrics, 15, 93–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedroni, P. (2004). Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis: new results. Econometric Theory, 20(3), 597–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22, 265–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck, R. S. (1991a). Irreversibility, uncertainty, and investment. Journal of Economic Literature, 29(3), 110–1148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck, R. S. (1991b). Irreversibility, uncertainty, and investment. Journal of Economic Literature, 29(3), 1110–1148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramzi, T. & Salah, A.B. (2015).The determinants of innovation capacity in the less innovative countries in the Euro-Mediterranean Region. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, pp 1–18. DOI :10.1007/s13132–015–0347-3.

  • Roberts, J. M. (1995). New Keynesian economics and the Phillips curve. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 27, 975–984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, PM..1990a. Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98, No. 5, pt. 2, University of Chicago.

  • Romer, P. M. (1990b). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98, S71–S102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudd, J., & Whelan, K. (2005a). New tests of the new Keynesian Phillips curve. Journal of Monetary Economics, 52, 1167–1181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, D. (2008). Patents, innovations and economic growth in Japan and South Korea: evidence from individual country and panel data. Applied Econometrics and International Development, 8(1), 181–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, J. (1965). Money and economic growth. Econometrica, 33, 671–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toole, A A. and Czarnitzki, Dirk. (2008). Patent protection, Market Uncertainty, and R&D Investment," ZEW Discussion Papers 06–056.

  • Vaona, A. (2012). Inflation and growth in the long run: a new Keynesian theory and further semiparametric evidence. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 16(1), 94–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zekeriya and Yildrim (2015). Relationships among labour productivity, real wages and inflation in Turkey. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 28(1), 85–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Professor Akri ben Salah, Professor Mohamed ben Mimoun, and Professor Hedi Zawchi for their valuable and helpful suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Trabelsi Ramzi.

Ethics declarations

Funding Information

The authors are the only source of funding for this paper.

Ethics

This article is original and contains unpublished materials. The corresponding author confirms that there are no ethical issues involved.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ramzi, T., Wiem, J. Causality Nexus between Economic Growth, Inflation and Innovation. J Knowl Econ 10, 35–58 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-016-0432-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-016-0432-2

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation