Abstract
Open government data (OGD) initiatives have proliferated over the last years in many countries all over the world as the result of a long-standing movement towards the ‘open government’ paradigm. These initiatives have been launched and maintained by a variety of government organisations with different strategies and technical capacities and under different social, political and legal conditions. As a result, the OGD sources (defined as various types of portals enabling access to government datasets by the public through the Internet and providing various capabilities/functionalities in this direction) developed through these initiatives demonstrate a great diversity in both content, functionality and technology. However, limited research has been conducted on these OGD sources for understanding better their main characteristics from various perspectives and identifying their strengths and weaknesses. This paper contributes to filling this research gap, by presenting an analysis of the thematic, functional, semantic and technological characteristics of OGD sources in Greece. Sixty OGD sources have been analysed from these perspectives, and statistical analysis of relevant characteristics have been performed. Interesting conclusions have been drawn from this analysis, and based on them, recommendations have been formulated for government policy makers, in order to enhance OGD provision in Greece and increase the social and economic values that can be generated from them.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
CKAN The Data hub, http://thedatahub.org/
Open Government Data Initiative, http://ogdisdk.cloudapp.net/DataCatalog/DataSetList
European Union Open Data portal, https://open-data.europa.eu/en/data/
Freebase http://www.freebase.com
References
AGIMO (2010). Declaration of Open Government, retrieved February 25, 2011 from http://www.finance.gov.au/e-government/strategy-and-governance/gov2/declaration-of-open-government.html
Alexopoulos, C., Loukis, E., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2013). An evaluation framework for traditional and advanced open public data e-infrastructures. Como, Italy: Paper presented at the 13th European Conference on eGovernment – ECEG.
Alexopoulos, C., Zuiderwijk, A., Charalabidis, Y., Loukis, E., Janssen, M. (2014). Designing a second generation of open data platforms: integrating open data and social media. In Electronic Government (pp. 230–241). Dublin, Ireland: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Allan, R. (2009). The power of government information. In J. Gøtze & C. B. Pedersen (Eds.), State of the eUnion: government 2.0 and onwards. AuthorHouse.
Bauer, F., & Kaltenböck, M. (2012). Linked open data: the essentials—a quick start guide for decision makers. Vienna, Austria: Monochrom Editions.
Bertot, J. C., Gorham, U., Jaeger, P. T., Sarin, L. C., & Choi, H. (2014). Big data, open government and e-government: issues, policies and recommendations. Inf Polity, 19(1–2), 5–16.
Cameron, D. (2010). Letter to Government departments on opening up data, retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/news/letter-to-government-departments-on-opening-up-data
Chan, C. (2013). From Open Data to Open Innovation Strategies: Creating e-Services Using Open Government Data, 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
Chena, J. V., Jubiladoa, R. J. M., Capistrano, E. P. S., & Yen, D. C. (2015). Factors affecting online tax filing—an application of the IS Success Model and trust theory. Comput Hum Behav, 43, 251–262.
Dawes, S., Gharawi, M., & Burke, B. (2011). Knowledge and information sharing in transnational knowledge networks: a contextual perspective. In Proceedings of the 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
DeLone, D. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Inf Syst Res, 3(1), 60–95.
DeLone, D. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. J Manag Inf Syst, 19(4), 9–30.
Digital Agenda Assembly (2011). Report from the workshop “Open Data and re-use of public sector information”, Brussels 16–17 June 2011 http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/events/cf/daa11/item-display.cfm?id=5963.
European Commission (2003). Directive 2003/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 November 2003 on the Re-use of Public Sector Information, available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2003:345:0090:0096:EN:PDF.
European Commission (2013). Directive 2013/37/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 amending Directive 2003/98/EC on the re-use of public sector information, available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?
European Commission (2014). Commission Notice – Guidelines on recommended standard licenses, datasets and charging for the reuse of documents of 24 July 2014, 2014/C 240/01, available at: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/news/commission-notice-guidelines-recommended-standard-licences-datasets-and-charging-re-use
Executive Office of the President (2009). Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies: Open Government Directive, Washington D. C., Memorandum No. M-10-06. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/open/documents/open-government-directive.
Executive Office of the President (2013). Open Data Policy - Managing Information as an Asset. Washington D. C., Memorandum No. M-13-13. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/memoranda/2013/m-13-13.pdf
Geiger, C. P., & v Luecke, J. (2012). Open government and (linked) (open) (government) (data). J e-Democracy Open Gov, 4(2), 265–278.
Gharawi, M., & Dawes, S. (2010). Conceptualizing knowledge and information sharing in transnational knowledge networks. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (ICEGOV ‘10).
Harrison, T. M., Guerrero, S., Burke, G. B., Cook, M., Cresswell, A., Helbig, N., Hrdinova, J., & Pardo, T. (2012a). Open government and e-government: democratic challenges from a public value perspective. Inf Polity, 17(2), 83–97.
Harrison, T. M., Pardo, T. A., & Cook, M. (2012b). Creating open government ecosystems: a research and development agenda. Future Internet, 4, 900–928.
Huijboom, N., & Van Den Broek, T. (2011). Open data: an international comparison of strategies. Eur J Epractice, 12, 1–13.
Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012). Benefits, adoption barriers, and myths of open data and open government. Inf Syst Manag, 29, 258–268.
Jetzek, T., Avital, M., & Bjørn-Andersen, N. (2013a). The generative mechanisms of open government data. In Proceedings of ECIS (p. 156). Atlanta, GA: Association for Information Systems. AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), 2013.
Jetzek, T., Avital, M., & Bjørn-Andersen, N. (2013b). Generating value from open government data. In proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Information Systems. ICIS 2013. Atlanta, GA: Association for Information Systems. AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), 2013.
Kassen, M. (2013). A promising phenomenon of open data: a case study of the chicago open data Project. Gov Inf Q, 30, 508–5.
Lathrop D., & Ruma L. (2010). Open government: collaboration, transparency, and participation in practice, 1st ed. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media, Inc.
Maier, U., & Huber, S. (2011). Open: the changing relation between citizens, public administration, and political authority. JeDEM, 3(2), 182–191.
Manyika J, Chui M, Groves P, Farrell D, Van Kuiken S, and Almasi Doshi E (2013) Open data: Unlocking innovation and performance with liquid information. McKinsey Global Institute, McKinsey Center for Government and McKinsey Business Technology Office. Available at: http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/business_technology/open_data_unlocking_innovation_and_performance_with_liquid_information.
Maylor, H., & Blackmon, K. (2005). Researching business and management. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
McDermott, P. (2010). Building open government. Gov Inf Q, 27(4), 401–413.
Meijer, A., & Thaens, M. (2009). Public information strategies: making government information available to citizens. Inf Polity, 14(1–2), 31–45.
Mellouli, S., Luna-Reyes, L. F., & Zhang, J. (2014). Smart government, citizen participation and open data. Inf Polity, 19(1–2), 1–4.
Obama, B. H. (2009). Transparency and open government. Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies. Available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-pressoffice/transparencyand-open-government.
Obama, B. (2010). Memo from President Obama on Transparency and Open Government. In D. Lathrop & L. Ruma (eds.), Open Government. http://www.whitehouse.gov/open/documents/open-government-directive. Accessed 18 April 2010.
Open Knowledge Foundation (OKF) (2012) “Open Data Handbook version 1.0.0” (revised November 14, 2012). Available at http://opendatahandbook.org/pdf/OpenDataHandbook.pdf
Parycek P, & Sachs M (2010) Open government – information flow in web 2.0. European Journal of ePractice, 9(1), 1–70.
Petychakis, M., Vasileiou, O., Georgis, C., Mouzakitis, S., & Psarras, J. (2014). A state-of-the-art analysis of the current public data landscape from a functional, semantic and technical perspective. J Theor Appl Electron Commer Res, 9(2), 34–47.
ISA Programme (2011). Interoperability Solutions for European Public Administrations, “Towards Open Government Metadata”. https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/towards_open_government_metadata_0.pdf.
Ragin, C., & Amoroso, L. (2011). Constructing social research: the unity and diversity of method (2nd ed.). California: Pine Forge Press – Sage Publications.
Rana, N., Dwivedi, Y., & Williams, M. (2013). Evaluating the validity of IS success models for e-government research: an empirical test and Integrated Model. Int J Electron Gov Res, 9(3), 1–22.
Robinson, D. G., Yu, H., Zeller, W. P., & Felten, E. W. (2009). Government data and the invisible hand (Fall 2009). Yale J Law Technol, 11, 160. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1138083 .
Schwegmann, C. (2012). Open data in developing countries. In European Public Sector Information Platform - Topic Report 2013/02.
United Nations (2014) United Nations E-Government Survey 2014 - E-Government for the Future we Want, Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations, accessed from http://unpan3.un.org/egovkb/
Urbach, N., & Mueller, B. (2012). The updated DeLone and McLean Model of information systems success. In Y. Dwivedi, M. Wade, & S. Schneberger (Eds.), Information systems theory—explaining and predicting our digital society. New York: Springer.
Wang, Y. S., & Liao, Y. W. (2008). Assessing eGovernment systems success: a validation of the DeLone and McLean model of information systems success. Gov Inf Q, 25, 717–733.
Wood, D. (Ed.). (2011). Linking Government Data. New York: Springer.
Zijlstra T, and K Janssen (2013) The new PSI directive – as good as it seems? Open Knowledge Foundation Blog. [Online]. Available: http://blog.okfn.org/2013/04/19/the-new-psi-directive-as-good-as-it-seems/
Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., van den Braak, S., & Charalabidis, Y. (2012a). Linking open data: challenges and solutions. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (dg.o ‘12) (pp. 304–305). New York, USA: ACM.
Zuiderwijk, A., Jeffery, K., & Janssen, M. (2012b). The potential of metadata for linked open data and its value for users and publishers. J e-Democracy Open Gov, 4(2), 222–244.
Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., Choenni, S., Meijer, R., & Alibaks, R. S. (2012c). Socio-technical impediments of open data. Electron J e-Government, 10(2), 156–172.
Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., & Parnia, A. (2013). The complementarity of open data infrastructures: an analysis of functionalities. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (dg.o ‘13) (pp. 166–171). Quebec City, Canada: ACM.
Zuiderwijk, A., Helbig, N., Gil-García, R., & Janssen, M. (2014). Special Issue on Innovation through Open Data - A Review of the State-of-the-Art and an Emerging Research Agenda: Guest Editors’ Introduction. Special Issue on Innovation through Open Data - A Review of the State-of-the-Art and an Emerging Research Agenda: Guest Editors’ Introduction. J Theor Appl Electron Commer Res, 9(2), 1–13.
Acknowledgments
This paper is related with the ENGAGE FP7 Infrastructure Project (An Infrastructure for Open, Linked Governmental Data Provision towards Research Communities and Citizens). The main goal of the ENGAGE project is the deployment and use of an advanced service infrastructure, incorporating distributed and diverse public sector information resources as well as data curation, semantic annotation and visualisation tools, capable of supporting scientific collaboration and governance-related research from multi-disciplinary scientific communities, while also empowering the deployment of open government data towards citizens. More information about this project can be found at www.engage-project.eu and www.engagedata.eu.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alexopoulos, C., Loukis, E., Mouzakitis, S. et al. Analysing the Characteristics of Open Government Data Sources in Greece. J Knowl Econ 9, 721–753 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0298-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0298-8