Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Analysing the Characteristics of Open Government Data Sources in Greece

  • Published:
Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Open government data (OGD) initiatives have proliferated over the last years in many countries all over the world as the result of a long-standing movement towards the ‘open government’ paradigm. These initiatives have been launched and maintained by a variety of government organisations with different strategies and technical capacities and under different social, political and legal conditions. As a result, the OGD sources (defined as various types of portals enabling access to government datasets by the public through the Internet and providing various capabilities/functionalities in this direction) developed through these initiatives demonstrate a great diversity in both content, functionality and technology. However, limited research has been conducted on these OGD sources for understanding better their main characteristics from various perspectives and identifying their strengths and weaknesses. This paper contributes to filling this research gap, by presenting an analysis of the thematic, functional, semantic and technological characteristics of OGD sources in Greece. Sixty OGD sources have been analysed from these perspectives, and statistical analysis of relevant characteristics have been performed. Interesting conclusions have been drawn from this analysis, and based on them, recommendations have been formulated for government policy makers, in order to enhance OGD provision in Greece and increase the social and economic values that can be generated from them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/policy/psi/rules/eu/index_en.htm

  2. http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/digital-agenda/index_en.htm

  3. http://www.opengovpartnership.org/

  4. CKAN The Data hub, http://thedatahub.org/

  5. Open Government Data Initiative, http://ogdisdk.cloudapp.net/DataCatalog/DataSetList

  6. European Union Open Data portal, https://open-data.europa.eu/en/data/

  7. Freebase http://www.freebase.com

  8. http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/charter.html

  9. http://lab.linkeddata.deri.ie/2010/star-scheme-by-example/

  10. http://www.inspire.okxe.gr/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=30&Itemid=43

References

  • AGIMO (2010). Declaration of Open Government, retrieved February 25, 2011 from http://www.finance.gov.au/e-government/strategy-and-governance/gov2/declaration-of-open-government.html

  • Alexopoulos, C., Loukis, E., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2013). An evaluation framework for traditional and advanced open public data e-infrastructures. Como, Italy: Paper presented at the 13th European Conference on eGovernment – ECEG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexopoulos, C., Zuiderwijk, A., Charalabidis, Y., Loukis, E., Janssen, M. (2014). Designing a second generation of open data platforms: integrating open data and social media. In Electronic Government (pp. 230–241). Dublin, Ireland: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

  • Allan, R. (2009). The power of government information. In J. Gøtze & C. B. Pedersen (Eds.), State of the eUnion: government 2.0 and onwards. AuthorHouse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, F., & Kaltenböck, M. (2012). Linked open data: the essentials—a quick start guide for decision makers. Vienna, Austria: Monochrom Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertot, J. C., Gorham, U., Jaeger, P. T., Sarin, L. C., & Choi, H. (2014). Big data, open government and e-government: issues, policies and recommendations. Inf Polity, 19(1–2), 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, D. (2010). Letter to Government departments on opening up data, retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/news/letter-to-government-departments-on-opening-up-data

  • Chan, C. (2013). From Open Data to Open Innovation Strategies: Creating e-Services Using Open Government Data, 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

  • Chena, J. V., Jubiladoa, R. J. M., Capistrano, E. P. S., & Yen, D. C. (2015). Factors affecting online tax filing—an application of the IS Success Model and trust theory. Comput Hum Behav, 43, 251–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, S., Gharawi, M., & Burke, B. (2011). Knowledge and information sharing in transnational knowledge networks: a contextual perspective. In Proceedings of the 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLone, D. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Inf Syst Res, 3(1), 60–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLone, D. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. J Manag Inf Syst, 19(4), 9–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Digital Agenda Assembly (2011). Report from the workshop “Open Data and re-use of public sector information”, Brussels 16–17 June 2011 http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/events/cf/daa11/item-display.cfm?id=5963.

  • European Commission (2003). Directive 2003/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 November 2003 on the Re-use of Public Sector Information, available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2003:345:0090:0096:EN:PDF.

  • European Commission (2013). Directive 2013/37/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 amending Directive 2003/98/EC on the re-use of public sector information, available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?

  • European Commission (2014). Commission Notice – Guidelines on recommended standard licenses, datasets and charging for the reuse of documents of 24 July 2014, 2014/C 240/01, available at: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/news/commission-notice-guidelines-recommended-standard-licences-datasets-and-charging-re-use

  • Executive Office of the President (2009). Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies: Open Government Directive, Washington D. C., Memorandum No. M-10-06. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/open/documents/open-government-directive.

  • Executive Office of the President (2013). Open Data Policy - Managing Information as an Asset. Washington D. C., Memorandum No. M-13-13. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/memoranda/2013/m-13-13.pdf

  • Geiger, C. P., & v Luecke, J. (2012). Open government and (linked) (open) (government) (data). J e-Democracy Open Gov, 4(2), 265–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gharawi, M., & Dawes, S. (2010). Conceptualizing knowledge and information sharing in transnational knowledge networks. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (ICEGOV ‘10).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, T. M., Guerrero, S., Burke, G. B., Cook, M., Cresswell, A., Helbig, N., Hrdinova, J., & Pardo, T. (2012a). Open government and e-government: democratic challenges from a public value perspective. Inf Polity, 17(2), 83–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, T. M., Pardo, T. A., & Cook, M. (2012b). Creating open government ecosystems: a research and development agenda. Future Internet, 4, 900–928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huijboom, N., & Van Den Broek, T. (2011). Open data: an international comparison of strategies. Eur J Epractice, 12, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012). Benefits, adoption barriers, and myths of open data and open government. Inf Syst Manag, 29, 258–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jetzek, T., Avital, M., & Bjørn-Andersen, N. (2013a). The generative mechanisms of open government data. In Proceedings of ECIS (p. 156). Atlanta, GA: Association for Information Systems. AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), 2013.

  • Jetzek, T., Avital, M., & Bjørn-Andersen, N. (2013b). Generating value from open government data. In proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Information Systems. ICIS 2013. Atlanta, GA: Association for Information Systems. AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), 2013.

  • Kassen, M. (2013). A promising phenomenon of open data: a case study of the chicago open data Project. Gov Inf Q, 30, 508–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lathrop D., & Ruma L. (2010). Open government: collaboration, transparency, and participation in practice, 1st ed. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media, Inc.

  • Maier, U., & Huber, S. (2011). Open: the changing relation between citizens, public administration, and political authority. JeDEM, 3(2), 182–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manyika J, Chui M, Groves P, Farrell D, Van Kuiken S, and Almasi Doshi E (2013) Open data: Unlocking innovation and performance with liquid information. McKinsey Global Institute, McKinsey Center for Government and McKinsey Business Technology Office. Available at: http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/business_technology/open_data_unlocking_innovation_and_performance_with_liquid_information.

  • Maylor, H., & Blackmon, K. (2005). Researching business and management. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, P. (2010). Building open government. Gov Inf Q, 27(4), 401–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meijer, A., & Thaens, M. (2009). Public information strategies: making government information available to citizens. Inf Polity, 14(1–2), 31–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellouli, S., Luna-Reyes, L. F., & Zhang, J. (2014). Smart government, citizen participation and open data. Inf Polity, 19(1–2), 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obama, B. H. (2009). Transparency and open government. Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies. Available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-pressoffice/transparencyand-open-government.

  • Obama, B. (2010). Memo from President Obama on Transparency and Open Government. In D. Lathrop & L. Ruma (eds.), Open Government. http://www.whitehouse.gov/open/documents/open-government-directive. Accessed 18 April 2010.

  • Open Knowledge Foundation (OKF) (2012) “Open Data Handbook version 1.0.0” (revised November 14, 2012). Available at http://opendatahandbook.org/pdf/OpenDataHandbook.pdf

  • Parycek P, & Sachs M (2010) Open government – information flow in web 2.0. European Journal of ePractice, 9(1), 1–70.

  • Petychakis, M., Vasileiou, O., Georgis, C., Mouzakitis, S., & Psarras, J. (2014). A state-of-the-art analysis of the current public data landscape from a functional, semantic and technical perspective. J Theor Appl Electron Commer Res, 9(2), 34–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISA Programme (2011). Interoperability Solutions for European Public Administrations, “Towards Open Government Metadata”. https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/towards_open_government_metadata_0.pdf.

  • Ragin, C., & Amoroso, L. (2011). Constructing social research: the unity and diversity of method (2nd ed.). California: Pine Forge Press – Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rana, N., Dwivedi, Y., & Williams, M. (2013). Evaluating the validity of IS success models for e-government research: an empirical test and Integrated Model. Int J Electron Gov Res, 9(3), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, D. G., Yu, H., Zeller, W. P., & Felten, E. W. (2009). Government data and the invisible hand (Fall 2009). Yale J Law Technol, 11, 160. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1138083 .

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwegmann, C. (2012). Open data in developing countries. In European Public Sector Information Platform - Topic Report 2013/02.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2014) United Nations E-Government Survey 2014 - E-Government for the Future we Want, Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations, accessed from http://unpan3.un.org/egovkb/

  • Urbach, N., & Mueller, B. (2012). The updated DeLone and McLean Model of information systems success. In Y. Dwivedi, M. Wade, & S. Schneberger (Eds.), Information systems theory—explaining and predicting our digital society. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. S., & Liao, Y. W. (2008). Assessing eGovernment systems success: a validation of the DeLone and McLean model of information systems success. Gov Inf Q, 25, 717–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. (Ed.). (2011). Linking Government Data. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zijlstra T, and K Janssen (2013) The new PSI directive – as good as it seems? Open Knowledge Foundation Blog. [Online]. Available: http://blog.okfn.org/2013/04/19/the-new-psi-directive-as-good-as-it-seems/

  • Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., van den Braak, S., & Charalabidis, Y. (2012a). Linking open data: challenges and solutions. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (dg.o ‘12) (pp. 304–305). New York, USA: ACM.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zuiderwijk, A., Jeffery, K., & Janssen, M. (2012b). The potential of metadata for linked open data and its value for users and publishers. J e-Democracy Open Gov, 4(2), 222–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., Choenni, S., Meijer, R., & Alibaks, R. S. (2012c). Socio-technical impediments of open data. Electron J e-Government, 10(2), 156–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., & Parnia, A. (2013). The complementarity of open data infrastructures: an analysis of functionalities. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (dg.o ‘13) (pp. 166–171). Quebec City, Canada: ACM.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zuiderwijk, A., Helbig, N., Gil-García, R., & Janssen, M. (2014). Special Issue on Innovation through Open Data - A Review of the State-of-the-Art and an Emerging Research Agenda: Guest Editors’ Introduction. Special Issue on Innovation through Open Data - A Review of the State-of-the-Art and an Emerging Research Agenda: Guest Editors’ Introduction. J Theor Appl Electron Commer Res, 9(2), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper is related with the ENGAGE FP7 Infrastructure Project (An Infrastructure for Open, Linked Governmental Data Provision towards Research Communities and Citizens). The main goal of the ENGAGE project is the deployment and use of an advanced service infrastructure, incorporating distributed and diverse public sector information resources as well as data curation, semantic annotation and visualisation tools, capable of supporting scientific collaboration and governance-related research from multi-disciplinary scientific communities, while also empowering the deployment of open government data towards citizens. More information about this project can be found at www.engage-project.eu and www.engagedata.eu.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charalampos Alexopoulos.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 1 List of open government data sources in Greece

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alexopoulos, C., Loukis, E., Mouzakitis, S. et al. Analysing the Characteristics of Open Government Data Sources in Greece. J Knowl Econ 9, 721–753 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0298-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0298-8

Keywords

Navigation